Placement of Transvenous Pacemaker and ICD Leads Across Total Chronic Occlusions

Successful left ventricular lead placement by way of an azygos vein for a patient performing cardiac resynchronization therapy implantation with an occluded left subclavian vein: A case report

Central venous obstruction following pacemaker implantation is not uncommon and can prove challenging in the case of a system upgrade to a cardiac resynchronization therapy pacemaker (CRT-P). We describe the case of a patient who underwent a successful upgrading procedure of a pacemaker to a CRT-P in the presence of an occluded left subclavian vein and superior vena cava, using collateral veins that drained into right atrium.

Proposed strategies to overcome venous occlusion in the implantation of a cardiac implantable electronic device: A case report and literature review

This case report describes a successful balloon venoplasty to overcome a total occlusion from the brachiocephalic vein to the superior vena cava in a patient undergoing cardiac resynchronization therapy. It is crucial for implanting physicians to be familiar with strategies to overcome venous occlusion in lead implantation, especially balloon venoplasty, which is an effective and safe approach.

EHRA expert consensus statement and practical guide on optimal implantation technique for conventional pacemakers and implantable cardioverter-defibrillators: endorsed by the Heart Rhythm Society (HRS), the Asia Pacific Heart Rhythm Society (APHRS), and the Latin-American Heart Rhythm Society (LAHRS)

With the global increase in device implantations, there is a growing need to train physicians to implant pacemakers and implantable cardioverter-defibrillators. Although there are international recommendations for device indications and programming, there is no consensus to date regarding implantation technique. This document is founded on a systematic literature search and review, and on consensus from an international task force. It aims to fill the gap by setting standards for device implantation.

Unusual Venous Access for Device Implantation

Case series

Patient: Male, 80 • Female, 67 • Male, 48

Final Diagnosis: Management of difficult venous access for implantable cardiac devices

Symptoms: Heart failure

Medication: —

Clinical Procedure: —

Specialty: Cardiology

Hybrid venous recanalization and cardiac implantable electronic device lead revision procedures: A single-center retrospective analysis of 38 patients

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to describe the safety and efficacy of hybrid recanalization procedures in a series of patients with obstructed central veins requiring cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) revision.

METHODS

Between 2008 and 2016, 38 consecutive patients (24 M; age 60.5 ± 16.2 years; range 25-87 years) with central venous obstruction underwent 42 recanalization interventions performed in conjunction with CIED revision or extraction. Fifty percent of patients (19/38) presented with veno-occlusive symptoms, and 13% (5/38) of patients had CIED leads with an ipsilateral upper extremity dialysis conduit.

RESULTS

Ninety-one percent (38/42) of all procedures resulted in successful recanalization and CIED revision. Twenty-four percent (9/38) of all patients required secondary procedures due to recurrent stenosis, and 78% (7/9) of those requiring secondary procedures had indwelling dialysis conduits and/or clinical symptoms related to venous occlusion before the initial procedure. There were complications in 2 patients related to recanalization, and in 3 related to CIED revision.

CONCLUSIONS

Recanalization of central venous stenosis/occlusion in patients with CIED can be technically challenging but is successful in most patients. Symptomatic patients and those with dialysis conduits often require more aggressive revascularization interventions and may be at increased risk of complication or need for secondary interventions.

Venous Obstruction in Cardiac Rhythm Device Therapy

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

A variety of complex vascular pathologies arise following the implantation of electronic cardiac devices. Pacemaker and defibrillator lead insertion may cause proximal venous obstruction, resulting in symptomatic venous congestion and the compromise of potential future access sites for cardiac rhythm lead management.

RECENT FINDINGS

Various innovative techniques to recanalize the vein and establish alternate venous access have been pioneered over the past few years. A collaborative team of electrophysiologists and vascular specialists strategically integrate the patient's vascular disease into the planning of electrophysiology procedures. When vascular complications occur after device implantation, the same team effectively manages both the resulting vascular sequelae and related cardiac rhythm device challenges. This review will outline the various vascular challenges related to device therapy and offer an effective strategy for their management.

Venous System Interventions for Device Implantation

Subclavian obstruction is common after lead implantation and the need to add or replace a lead is increasing. Subclavian venoplasty (SV) is a safe and effective option for venous occlusion. Peripheral venography overestimates the severity of the obstruction. A wire can usually be advanced into the central circulation for SV. Compared with dilators, SV improves the quality of venous access, providing unrestricted catheter manipulation for His bundle pacing and left ventricular lead implantation. SV preserves venous access and reduces lead burden. SV can easily be added to the implanting physicians lead management options.

Cardiac Arrhythmias in Adults with Congenital Heart Disease: Pacemakers, Implantable Cardiac Defibrillators, and Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Devices

Implanting cardiac rhythm medical devices in adults with congenital heart disease requires training in congenital heart disease. The techniques and indications for device implantation are specific to the anatomic diagnosis and state of disease progression. It often requires a team of physicians and is best performed at a specialized adult congenital heart center.

Permanent pacing in patients without upper limb venous access: a review of current techniques

Permanent transvenous cardiac pacing is usually accomplished through the upper limb veins. When these are occluded, several other vascular access options exist which include the internal jugular, external jugular, femoral and iliac veins as well as more proximal access of the subclavian veins. Anterograde and retrograde techniques to restore subclavian venous patency has been described. A review of these approaches is undertaken, with a discussion of their pros and cons. Familiarity with these techniques will enable the implanter to perform transvenous pacing when faced with limited vascular access.

Balloon venoplasty of subclavian vein and brachiocephalic junction to enable left ventricular lead placement for cardiac resynchronisation therapy

This report describes the successful implantation of a LV lead using balloon venoplasty to overcome a very tight stenosis of the right subclavian vein / brachiocephalic junction for cardiac resynchronisation therapy (CRT-P) in a patient with a right sided CRT-P system and a failed epicardial LV lead. It is important for device implanters to be familiar with interventional equipments and techniques such as balloon venoplasty to overcome difficult venous access.

Complex biventricular pacing - a case series

It is established that cardiac resynchronisation therapy (CRT) reduces mortality and hospitalisation and improves functional class in patients with NYHA class 3-4 heart failure, an ejection fraction of ≤ 35% and a QRS duration of ≥ 120ms. Recent updates in the American guidelines have expanded the demographic of patients in whom CRT may be appropriate. Here we present two cases of complex CRT; one with a conventional indication but occluded central veins and the second with a novel indication for CRT post cardiac transplant.

Supraclavicular vein approach to overcoming ipsilateral chronic subclavian vein obstruction during pacemaker-ICD lead revision or upgrading

AIMS

We report our experience with the supraclavicular vein approach of subclavian vein puncture to overcome ipsilateral chronic obstruction when implanting pacemaker or implantable cardioverter defibrillator leads.

METHODS AND RESULTS

The subclavian vein obstruction was documented by venography. The skin was punctured with an 18-gauge needle, 1 cm lateral to the lateral head of the sternocleidomastoid muscle and 1 cm cranial to the clavicle. The needle was directed under and close to the clavicle pointing to the sternal notch. Once the vein was successfully punctured, medial to the obstruction, a 0.38 in. guidewire was inserted into the venous bed. A peel-away sheath was indwelled using the Seldinger technique. The leads were placed in the standard fashion; they were secured by suture to the subcutaneous tissue of the fossa supraclavicularis major using a protective sleeve. The proximal portion of the lead was tunnelled over the clavicle down to the device's prepectoral pocket. Lead insertion was performed in four patients (twice in one patient) with total left subclavian vein obstruction; the site of the obstruction was in the mid-segment of the left subclavian vein in two patients, in the axillary and distal segment of the subclavian vein in one patient, and in the distal segment of the subclavian vein in one patient. There were no complications with the surgical wound and the lead parameters remained stable.

CONCLUSION

The supraclavicular approach of the subclavian vein puncture to overcome ipsilateral total occlusion is feasible and safe.

Implant venoplasty: dilation of subclavian and coronary veins to facilitate device implantation: indications, frequency, methods, and complications

Subclavian vein (SV) obstruction occurs in 13-35% of patients with prior leads, resulting in use of proximal venous access, the other vein, laser lead extraction, or surgery. Surgery is required for optimal left ventricle lead placement in 10-15% of cardiac resynchronization therapy candidates because of small or stenotic veins. Published data describe the safe and successful balloon dilation of both subclavian and coronary veins (CV); however, implant venoplasty is rarely performed because many implanting physicians are not familiar with the use of balloons. This article outlines how we use venoplasty to facilitate implantation in our laboratory. The indications, frequency, observed and potential complications that have evolved with our experience are also discussed.

Upgrade of a pacemaker defibrillator to a biventricular device: the internal jugular vein approach in a case of bilateral subclavian veins occlusion

Cardiac resynchronization improves survival and functional class of patients with advanced chronic heart failure. Placement of a stimulation electrode in the coronary sinus via the left subclavian vein is not always possible and other alternatives are required, above all when it concerns upgrading a previous device. This paper presents the case of a patient with a pacemaker/defibrillator and occlusion of both subclavian veins who had a stimulation electrode successfully placed in the coronary sinus via the right internal jugular.

Recanalization of systemic venous baffles by radiofrequency perforation and stent implantation

Complete transposition of the great arteries has been historically managed by the Mustard (atrial switch) operation. This procedure is associated with longterm complications such as baffle occlusion, which also precludes the insertion of a permanent transvenous pacemaker. Transcatheter techniques have allowed the successful angioplasty and stenting of stenotic baffles but complete occlusions continue to pose a therapeutic challenge. We report the use of a novel technique, a radiofrequency perforation wire for the management of complete occlusion of systemic venous baffles post-Mustard operation.