Noncatheter-Based Delivery of a Single-Chamber Lumenless Pacing Lead in Small Children

Case series of late lead dislodgement of Medtronic SelectSecure 3830 pacing leads in growing paediatric patients

Background 

The SelectSecure lumenless 3830 pacing lead is often considered to be the pacing lead of choice for transvenous pacing in children because of its small diameter, lead strength, and reliable long-term sensing and pacing characteristics. One of the potential long-term pitfalls of a sturdy pacing lead is relative retraction with growth in children resulting in late lead dislodgement.

Case summary 

We report two cases of late SelectSecure 3830 lead dislodgement at 11.8 years (Case 1) and 8.8 years (Case 2), respectively, post the initial implantation. Case 1 was diagnosed with congenital complete heart block (CHB) at 9 months old when he presented with unconfirmed diphtheria infection. Case 2 was diagnosed with CHB at 14 weeks of age with positive maternal anti-Ro antibodies. Both patients underwent implantation of a transvenous permanent pacemaker implantation with Medtronic SelectSecure 3830 lead due to symptomatic bradycardia. Apart from a pulse generator change at 8.5 years (Case 1) and 7 years (Case 2), respectively, post-implant due to normal battery depletion, both patients are well in the interim.

Discussion 

As part of the pacemaker follow-up for rapidly growing children, we recommend more frequent surveillance of lead ‘tautness’ by chest radiography especially in children with CHB with no underlying heart rhythm.

Ten-Year Clinical Experience with the Lumenless, Catheter-Delivered, 4.1-Fr Diameter Pacing Lead in Patients with and without Congenital Heart

BACKGROUND

Patients with congenital heart defects (CHD) often present more challenges to pacing therapy due to anatomy than those without CHD. The lumenless, 4.1Fr diameter M3830 pacing lead (Medtronic, Inc., Minneapolis, MN, USA), approved for use in 2005, has, to date, reported to have excellent short-term (<6 years) lead performance. Unfortunately, very long-term performance is unknown, especially among CHD patients and with implants at alternate pacing (AP) sites. This study reports a 10-year clinical experience with the M3830 lead.

METHODS

Records of patients who received the M3830 lead were reviewed: patient demographics, implant techniques and locations, sensing and pacing characteristics, impedances (Imp), and any complications at implant and follow-up.

RESULTS

From 2005 to 2015, 141 patients (ages 2-50, mean 20.1 years, 57% males) received 212 leads: atrial 115; ventricle 97. CHD was present in 62% of patients. Leads were inserted at AP sites in 96% of patients. Postimplant follow-up was from 3 months to 10 years (mean 56.3 months). Comparative implant versus follow-up values (mean ± standard deviation) were available on 196 leads (92.5%), showing persistently low (<1 v @ 0.4-0.5 ms) pacing thresholds (P = 0.57). Sensing was also comparable (atrial leads, P = 0.41; ventricular leads, P = 0.9). Impedances differed (P < 0.05) but remained within the normal range. Two A leads became dislodged and one was repositioned while two other leads (1 A, 1 V) were extracted. There are no differences observed in the pacing characteristics between the CHD and non-CHD groups on follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

The 4.1Fr lumenless pacing lead shows ease of implant regardless of CHD or AP site, excellent very long-term (10 years) stability, and performance indices with a very low rate of complications.

Implantation of lumenless pacing leads at the inter-atrial septum and right ventricular outflow tract with deflectable catheter-sheath

Current permanent right ventricular and right atrial endocardial pacing leads are implanted utilizing a central lumen stylet. Right ventricular apex pacing initiates an abnormal asynchronous electrical activation pattern, which results in asynchronous ventricular contraction and relaxation. When pacing from right atrial appendage, the conduction time between two atria will be prolonged, which results in heterogeneity for both depolarization and repolarization. Six patients with Class I indication for permanent pacing were implanted with either single chamber or dual chamber pacemaker. The SelectSecure 3830 4-French (Fr) lumenless lead and the SelectSite C304 8.5-Fr steerable catheter-sheath (Medtronic Inc., USA) were used. Pre-selected pacing sites included inter-atrial septum and right ventricular outflow tract, which were defined by ECG and fluoroscopic criteria. All the implanting procedures were successful without complication. Testing results (mean atrial pacing threshold: 0.87 V; mean P wave amplitude: 2.28 mV; mean ventricular pacing threshold: 0.53V; mean R wave amplitude: 8.75 mV) were satisfactory. It is concluded that implantation of a 4-Fr lumenless pacing lead by using a streerable catheter-sheath to achieve inter-atrial septum or right ventricular outflow tract pacing is safe and feasible.