Impact of Different Pacing Modes on Left Ventricular Contractility Following Cardiopulmonary Bypass

Temporary biventricular pacing improves bypass graft flows in coronary artery bypass graft patients with permanent atrial fibrillation

OBJECTIVES

We have previously demonstrated the impact of univentricular pacing modalities on bypass graft flow (BGF) in the coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) patient with permanent atrial fibrillation (AF). The aim of the present study was to determine the mechanism of this improved coronary conduit and, in addition, to explore the possible benefits with biventricular pacing in patients with and without severe left ventricular dysfunction.

METHODS

In 43 CABG patients [mean age 69.5 ± 1.3 years; ejection fraction (EF) 49 ± 2%] with AF, we analysed coronary vascular resistances (CVRs) and the contemporary changes in the BGF obtained during right ventricular outflow tract (RVOT), right- (RV), left- (LV) and right-left ventricular pacing (biventricular pacing, BiVP) using the ultrasonic transit-time methodology.

RESULTS

BiVP resulted in the highest percentage decrease of CVR in the overall study group by 17.5 ± 3.0% (P < 0.001), followed by RVOT pacing with 13.9 ± 3.9%. Accordingly, the highest mean BGF was achieved during BiVP, resulting in a 21.6 ± 2.6% increase when compared with no pacing and 16 ± 3.7% when compared with RV pacing. Analysis of patients according to their preoperative LV function (EF ≥50%, n = 26; EF <50%, n = 17) showed significantly lower CVR (P < 0.037) and higher BGF during BiVP in patients with lower EF.

CONCLUSIONS

Placement of an additional LV pacing wire offered a significant improvement in BGF by minimizing CVR in patients with AF and poor EF.

Temporary epicardial left ventricular and biventricular pacing improves cardiac output after cardiopulmonary bypass

BACKGROUND

To evaluate, with different pacing modes, acute changes in left ventricular systolic function, obtained by continuous cardiac output thermodilution in various subsets of patients undergoing cardiopulmonary bypass surgery. Increments of mean arterial pressure and cardiac output were considered the end point.

METHODS

Fifty cases electively submitted to cardiac surgery were analyzed. Isolated valve surgery 62%, coronary revascularization 30% and 8% mixed disease. Left ventricular ejection fraction was preserved in 50%,36% had moderate depression,(EF 36%-50%) whereas 14% had severe depression (EF < 35%). Left bundle branch block occurred in 18%. Preoperatively 84% were in sinus rhythm and 16% in atrial fibrillation. The different subgroups were analyzed for comparisons. Right atrial-right ventricular and right atrial-left ventricular pacing were employed in sinus rhytm. Biventricular pacing was also used in atrial fibrillation.

RESULTS

Right atrium-right ventricular pacing, decreased significantly mean arterial pressure and cardiac output (2.3%) in the overall population and in the subgroups studied. Right atrium-left ventricle, increased mean arterial pressure and cardiac output in 79% of patients and yielded cardiac output increments of 7.5% (0.40 l/m) in the low ejection fraction subgroup and 7.3% (0.43 l/m) in the left bundle branch block subset. In atrial fibrillation patients, left ventricular and biventricular pacing produced a significant increase in cardiac output 8.5% (0.39 l/min) and 11.6% (0.53 l/min) respectively. The dP/dt max increased significantly with both modes (p = 0.021,p = 0.028).

CONCLUSION

Right atrial-right ventricular pacing generated adverse hemodynamic effects. Right atrium-left ventricular pacing produced significant CO improvement particularly in cases with depressed ventricular function and left bundle branch block. The greatest increments were observed with left ventricular or biventricular pacing in atrial fibrillation with depressed ejection fraction.

Selecting the best site for pacing leads after cardiac surgery by evaluating the asynchrony of myocardial deformation observed with different pacing sites

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES

After cardiac surgery, temporary pacing leads are routinely implanted in the right ventricle (RV). The objective was to investigate the effect of different ventricular pacing locations on cardiac synchrony (by evaluating myocardial deformation, or strain) and efficiency in patients undergoing cardiac surgery.

METHODS

Interventricular asynchrony (i.e. the difference in the time of onset of deformation between right and left ventricles; Tε-R/L) and intraventricular asynchrony (i.e. the standard deviation and maximum difference in the time of onset of deformation in six segments of the left ventricle [LV]; Tε-SD and Tε-MD, respectively) were assessed in 19 patients. Doppler echocardiography was used to evaluate these parameters and cardiac output after pacing in the RV and in three different LV segments.

RESULTS

Pacing in the RV resulted in the greatest increases in asynchrony parameters from baseline: Tε-R/L 59.8 ms (standard deviation [SD] 40.5 ms) vs. 28.23 ms (SD 56.9 ms), P=.002; Tε-SD 53.2 ms (SD 34.4 ms) vs. 36.6 ms (SD 34.9 ms), P=.007; and Tε-MD 135.3 ms (SD 82.9 ms) vs. 90.5 ms (SD 87.4 ms), P=.007. Pacing in the LV resulted in less asynchrony: for anterior LV pacing, Tε-R/L was 17.2 ms (SD 53.8 ms), Tε-SD was 35.8 ms (SD 17.9 ms), and Tε-MD was 91.3 ms (SD 45.2). The change from baseline was not significant. Cardiac output was lower after RV pacing than after anterior LV pacing: 4.36 (SD 1) vs. 4.70 (SD 1); P=.001.

CONCLUSIONS

Pacing in the LV produced less asynchrony than RV pacing. In addition, anterior LV pacing resulted in a higher cardiac output than RV pacing. These findings suggest that the location normally used for temporary leads after cardiac surgery should be changed.

Temporary epicardial ventricular stimulation in patients with atrial fibrillation: acute effects of ventricular pacing site on bypass graft flows

OBJECTIVE

Data on coronary artery bypass grafts flows in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) requiring epicardial ventricular pacing is lacking. This study aimed to evaluate the optimal epicardial ventricular pacing site in patients with AF following coronary artery bypass surgery (CABG).

METHODS

In 23 consecutive patients (mean age = 69.2 +/- 1.9 years, gender = 62% male, ejection fraction [EF]= 50.4 +/- 2.1%) monoventricular stimulations (VVI) were tested with a constant pacing rate of 100 bpm. The impact of ventricular pacing on bypass graft flow (transit-time flow probe) and pulsatility index (PI) were measured after lead placement on the mid paraseptal region of the right (RVPS) and the left (LVPS) ventricle, on the right inferior wall (RVIW), and on the right ventricular outflow tract (RVOT). In addition, hemodynamic parameters were measured. Patients served as their own control.

RESULTS

Comparison of all tested pacing locations revealed that RVOT stimulation provided the highest bypass grafts flows (59.9 +/- 6.1 mL/min) and PI (2.2 +/- 0.1) when compared with RVPS (51.3 +/- 4.7 mL/min, PI = 2.6 +/- 0.2), RVIW (54.0 +/- 5.1 mL/m; PI = 2.4 +/- 0.2), and LVPS (53.1 +/- 4.5 mL/min; PI = 2.3 +/- 0.1), respectively (p < 0.05). When analyzing patients according to their preoperative LV function (group I = EF > 50%; group II = EF < 50%), higher bypass graft flows were observed with RVOT pacing in patients with lower EF (p = n.s.).

CONCLUSIONS

Temporary RVOT pacing facilitates optimal bypass graft flows when compared with other ventricular pacing sites and should be the preferred method of temporary pacing in cardiac surgery patients with AF. Especially in patients with low EF following CABG, RVOT pacing may improve myocardial oxygen conditions for the ischemic myocardium and enhance graft patency in the early postoperative period.

Four-chamber pacing in patients with poor ejection fraction but normal QRS durations undergoing open heart surgery

BACKGROUND

Poor ejection fraction (EF) comprises a critical risk factor in cardiac bypass surgery (CABG). It has been unclear, whether biventricular or four-chamber pacing confers benefit upon patients with intact atrioventricular and interventricular conduction especially following surgery.

METHODS

Twenty-one consecutive patients with an EF <or= 35% underwent hemodynamic evaluation (continuous pressures and thermodilution) 3, 6, and 18 hours post-CABG and biatrial (AA), biatrial-right ventricular (AAV), and biatrial-biventricular (AAVV) pacing were compared.

RESULTS

Patients (65 +/- 9 years) presented with an average EF of 29.5% (15-35%). 514 measurements of cardiac index (CI) were taken. Nineteen patients (91%) showed highly significant increases in CI with AAVV as compared to AA pacing (P < 0,001) at all times post surgery. The increase in CI with pacing mode varied from 6% to 25% and decreased with time following surgery. No consistent difference in CI was seen between four-chamber (AAVV) and biventricular pacing (AVV). The QRS-widths prior to surgery never exceeded 120 ms; postoperatively QRS-complexes widened in all patients on average by 15.9 ms +/-6 and returned to starting values by 48 hours.

CONCLUSIONS

Biventricular pacing improves CI in patients with poor EF following cardiac surgery in the absence of preoperative atrioventricular- or interventricular conduction block. This benefit decreases with time after surgery as the QRS width returns to preoperative values. Four-chamber pacing did not confer additional benefit as compared to biventricular pacing in this series. Biventricular pacing should be considered as an adjunct in patients with critically low EF undergoing cardiac surgery.