Tilt Training: Does It Have a Role in Preventing Vasovagal Syncope?

Unmasking the hidden culprit: Recurrent syncope in a 62-year-old man linked to severe internal carotid artery stenosis

Syncope, a brief loss of consciousness, has many potential causes, with internal carotid artery (ICA) stenosis being a relatively uncommon but serious one. We present the case of a 62-year-old man from Dhaka, Bangladesh, who experienced recurrent syncope over 6 months, characterized by a brief loss of consciousness, occasional dizziness, and blurred vision. Despite a history of hypertension and hyperlipidemia, initial cardiac and neurogenic investigations were inconclusive. Magnetic resonance angiography revealed 90% stenosis of the right ICA, which was confirmed by digital subtraction angiography. The patient was treated with antiplatelet therapy, statins, and antihypertensives, and underwent carotid artery stenting. His postoperative recovery was uneventful, and he remained symptom-free during follow-up. This case underscores the importance of considering ICA stenosis in patients with recurrent syncope and comorbid vascular disease, particularly in resource-limited settings where timely diagnosis and intervention can prevent serious cerebrovascular complications.

The efficacy of non-pharmacological and non-pacing therapies in preventing vasovagal syncope: Tilt training, physical counter pressure maneuvers, and yoga - A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Vasovagal syncope (VVS) is a prevalent condition characterized by a sudden drop in blood pressure and heart rate, leading to a brief loss of consciousness and postural control. Recurrent episodes of VVS significantly impact the quality of life and are a common reason for emergency department visits. Non-pharmacological interventions, such as tilt training, physical counter pressure maneuvers, and yoga, have been proposed as potential treatments for VVS. However, their efficacy in preventing VVS remains uncertain.

METHODS

A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted following PRISMA guidelines. PubMed, Web of Science, and Embase were searched up to March 2023 for randomized controlled trials comparing non-pharmacological interventions with control in preventing VVS recurrence. The primary outcome was the recurrence rate of VVS episodes.

RESULTS

A total of 1130 participants from 18 studies were included in the meta-analysis. The overall mean effect size for non-pharmacological interventions versus control was 0.245 (95 % CI: 0.128-0.471, p-value <0.001). Subgroup analysis showed that yoga had the largest effect size (odds ratio 0.068, 95 % CI: 0.018-0.250), while tilt training had the lowest effect size (odds ratio 0.402, 95 % CI: 0.171-0.946) compared to control. Physical counter pressure maneuvers demonstrated an odds ratio of 0.294 (95 % CI: 0.165-0.524) compared to control.

CONCLUSION

Non-pharmacological interventions show promise in preventing recurrent VVS episodes. Yoga, physical counter pressure maneuvers, and tilt training can be considered as viable treatment options. Further research, including randomized studies comparing pharmacological and non-pharmacological approaches, is needed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of these interventions for VVS treatment.

Home Orthostatic Training in Elderly Patients with Vasovagal Syncope - A Prospective Randomised Controlled Trial

Aim: The aim of this study was to assess the effect of home orthostatic training (HOT) on autonomic reflexes in elderly patients with vasovagal syncope (VVS). Methods: Design and Setting: A single-blind randomised control trial was conducted at Eastbourne District General Hospital, East Sussex NHS Trust. Patients: Individuals with recurrent syncope underwent tilt-table testing between August 2007 and October 2009.Those with at least two syncopal episodes and tilt-test proven VVS were recruited. Participants were divided into those aged >65 years (O65) and those aged <65 years (U65). Interventions: Patients in the O65 group were randomised 1:1 to receive active HOT (O65+) or sham HOT (O65-). The U65 group received active HOT. Participants performed HOT/sham HOT and recorded their training and symptoms. Patients had a repeat tilt test at 3 months. Outcome Measures: Time to syncope at repeat tilt-table testing, low-frequency heart rate variability (LF-HRV), high-frequency heart rate variability (HF-HRV), mean upslope baroreflex sensitivity (BRS) and mean downslope BRS were assessed. Results: A total of 106 patients with recurrent syncope underwent tilt-table testing. Of these, 45 consecutive patients (30 in the O65 group and 15 in the U65 group) were recruited. Two, one and three patients withdrew or were lost-to-follow-up in the O65+, O65-, and U65 groups, respectively. Symptomatic benefit occurred in four (31 %) of the O65+, four (29 %) of the O65-, and six (50 %) of the U65. None of the autonomic measures changed significantly in any group. No difference was seen with HF-HRV, LF-HRV mean upslope BRS and mean downslope BRS. Fifty per-cent of the O65+ group stopped training because of back pain. Time constraint (25 %) was the most common reason for cessation in the U65 group. Conclusions: Despite good tilt training compliance, no improvement in autonomic measures in any group was shown. The most common reason for cessation of training was back pain in the elderly groups. This study does not support the use of HOT in elderly patients.

Therapy for Syncope

The diagnostic process in patients with syncope is not always easy and includes a detailed clinical history, physical examination and baseline electrocardiogram; according to the results of these initial approaches, some additional tests must be performed. Using this strategy, the cause of syncope is diagnosed in 60% to 80% of patients; in the remaining patients, risk stratification can be established to identify those patients at risk of having cardiac events or death at midterm follow-up. This article reviews the treatment of patients with syncope according to the different causes.

Overview of the contribution of recent clinical trials to advancement of syncope management

In this communication we review those trials that have contributed in recent years to improving our knowledge on the management (diagnosis and treatment) of syncope. In this regard, most recent trials focus on vasovagal syncope (VVS) and consequently these will be the focus of this manuscript. In essence, from a diagnostic perspective the ISSUE studies demonstrate the value of insertable loop recorders (ILR), while in terms of treatment, in the case of VVS current data strongly support use of non-pharmacologic treatment as a primary approach. There is no clear evidence supporting pharmacologic treatment with the possible exception of midodrine. Further, the most recent ISSUE trials suggest that in older very symptomatic patients with VVS in whom an asystole has been documented during spontaneous episode or possibly after ATP administration, implantation of a permanent pacemaker (PPM) can be effective. Which pacing or programming mode will be the more beneficial has not been completely clarified. Management of other forms of neurally-mediated syncope (e.g., carotid sinus syndrome) or other causes of syncope has not been addressed by clinical trials. In those cases, direction is provided by older evidence, the vast majority of which is based on observational reports or small non-randomized patient series.

[Tilt training increases vasoconstrictor reserve in patients with neurocardiogenic syncope]

Neurocardiogenic syncope (NCS) is a common clinical entity resulting from an excessive reflex autonomic response, particularly during orthostatism. Treatment options are controversial and of limited effectiveness. Tilt training (TT) is a promising option to treat these patients. However, its mechanism of action and clinical impact remain unclear.

OBJECTIVE

To characterize hemodynamic and autonomic responses during a TT program in patients with NCS refractory to conventional measures.

METHODS

We studied 28 patients (50% male, mean age 41±14 years) without structural heart disease, with NCS documented by tilt testing. The TT program included 9 tilt sessions (3 times a week, 30 min) (60° - 6 sessions, 70° - 3 sessions), under ECG and blood pressure monitoring combined with home orthostatic self-training and 10° head-up during sleep. Systolic volume, cardiac output, total peripheral resistance, baroreflex sensitivity and heart-rate variability were computed. Patients were reassessed at 1 month and every 6 months for a maximum of 36 months (24±12 months).

RESULTS

Over the course of the TT program there was a significant increase in total peripheral resistance (1485±225 vs. 1591±187 dyn·s·cm(-5), p<0.05), with a decrease in standard deviation (206±60 vs. 150±42, p<0.05). During follow-up, syncope recurred in five patients (19%), with a significant reduction in the number of episodes (4.0±3.2/patient in the 12 months before TT vs. 1.4±0.8/patient post-TT, p<0.05).

CONCLUSION

In refractory NCS, TT may be an effective therapeutic option, with long-term benefits. These results appear to be due to an increase in vasoconstrictor reserve combined with a reduction in its variance.

Are treatments for vasovagal syncope effective? A meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Therapies used to treat vaso-vagal syncope (VVS) recurrence have not been proven effective in single studies.

METHODS

Comprehensive search of PubMed, EMBASE and Cochrane Central databases of published trials was done. Randomized or non-randomized studies, comparing the intervention of interest to control group(s), with the endpoint of spontaneous recurrence or syncope on head-up tilt test, were included. Data were extracted on an intention-to-treat basis. Study heterogeneity was analyzed by Cochran's Q statistics. A random-effect analysis was used.

RESULTS

α-adrenergic agonists were found effective (n=400, OR 0.19, CI 0.06-0.62, p<0.05) in preventing VVS recurrence. β-blockers were not found to be effective when only randomized studies comparing β-blockers to non-pharmacologic agents were assessed (9 studies, n=583, OR 0.48, CI 0.22-1.04, p=0.06). Tilt-training had no effect when only randomized studies were considered (4 studies, n=298, OR 0.47, CI 0.21-1.05, p=0.07). Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors were found effective (n=131, OR 0.28, CI 0.10-0.74, p<0.05), though the analysis contained only 2 studies. Pacemakers were found effective in preventing syncope recurrence when all studies were analyzed (n=463, OR 0.13, CI 0.05-0.36, p<0.05). However, studies comparing active pacemaker to sensing mode only did not show benefit (3 studies, n=162, OR 0.45, CI 0.09-2.14, p=0.32).

CONCLUSIONS

This meta-analysis highlights the totality of evidence for commonly used medications used to treat VVS, and the requirement for larger, double-blind, placebo controlled trials with longer follow-up.

Syncope in adults: systematic review and proposal of a diagnostic and therapeutic algorithm

This review aims to provide a practical and up-to-date description on the relevance and classification of syncope in adults as well as a guidance on the optimal evaluation, management and treatment of this very common clinical and socioeconomic medical problem. We have summarized recent active research and emphasized the value for physicians to adhere current guidelines. A modern management of syncope should take into account 1) use of risk stratification algorithms and implementation of syncope management units to increase the diagnostic yield and reduce costs; 2) early implantable loop recorders rather than late in the evaluation of unexplained syncope; and 3) isometric physical counter-pressure maneuvers as first-line treatment for patients with neurally-mediated reflex syncope and prodromal symptoms.

Drugs and pacemakers for vasovagal, carotid sinus and situational syncope

BACKGROUND

Neurally mediated reflex syncope is the most common cause of transient loss of consciousness. In patients not responding to non-pharmacological treatment, pharmacological or pacemaker treatment might be considered.

OBJECTIVES

To examine the effects of pharmacological therapy and pacemaker implantation in patients with vasovagal syncope, carotid sinus syncope and situational syncope.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) on The Cochrane Library (Issue 1, 2008), PubMed (1950 until February 2008), EMBASE on OVID (1980 until February 2008) and CINAHL on EBSCOhost (1937 until February 2008). No language restrictions were applied.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included parallel randomized controlled trials and randomized cross-over trials of pharmacological treatment (beta-blockers, fludrocortisone, alpha-adrenergic agonists, selective serotonine reuptake inhibitors, ACE inhibitors, disopyramide, anticholinergic agents or salt tablets) or dual chamber pacemaker treatment. Studies were included if pharmacological or pacemaker treatment was compared with any form of standardised control treatment (standard treatment), placebo treatment, or (other) pharmacological or pacemaker treatment. We did not include non-randomized studies.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two reviewers independently assessed the risk of bias. Using a standardised data extraction form, they extracted characteristics and results of the various studies. In a consensus meeting they discussed any disagreements that had occurred during data extraction. If no agreement could be reached, a third reviewer was asked to make a decision. Summary estimates with 95% confidence intervals of treatment effect were calculated using relative risks, rate ratios or weighted means differences depending on the type of outcome reported.

MAIN RESULTS

We included 46 randomized studies, 40 on vasovagal syncope and six on carotid sinus syncope. No studies on situational syncope matched the criteria for inclusion in our review. Studies in general were small with a median sample size of 42. A wide range of control treatments were used with 22 studies using a placebo arm. Blinding of patients and treating physicians was applied in eight studies. Results varied considerably between studies and between types of outcomes.For vasovagal syncope, the occurrence of syncope upon provocational head-up tilt testing was lower upon treatment with beta-blockers, ACE-inhibitors and anticholinergic agents compared to standard treatment. For carotid sinus syncope, the occurrence of syncope upon carotid sinus massage was lower on midodrine treatment compared to placebo treatment in one study.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

There is insufficient evidence to support the use of any of the pharmacological or pacemaker treatments for vasovagal syncope and carotid sinus syncope. Larger studies using patient relevant outcomes are needed.

Home orthostatic training in chronic fatigue syndrome--a randomized, placebo-controlled feasibility study

BACKGROUND

Orthostatic (Tilt)-training is an effective treatment for neurally mediated hypotension (NMH). NMH is a frequent finding in chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS). We evaluated home orthostatic training (HOT) in CFS in a randomized placebo-controlled feasibility study.

METHODS

Thirty-eight patients with CFS (Fukuda Criteria) were randomly allocated to daily tilt training (n = 19) or sham training (n = 19) for 6 months. Haemodynamic responses to standing were performed in all subjects using continuous technology (Taskforce) at enrolment, week 1, 4 and 24. Symptom response and compliance were assessed using diaries.

RESULTS

Two patients (one from each arm) withdrew from the study. Fourteen patients in each group complied completely or partially, and patients found the training manageable and achievable. Compared to the sham group, blood pressure while standing dropped to 8.0 mmHg less in the HOT group at 4 weeks (95% CI: 1.0 to 15.0, P = 0.03). At 4 weeks, the HOT group had higher total peripheral resistance compared to the sham group; mean difference 70.2, 95% CI: -371.4 to 511.8. Changes were maintained at 6 months. There was no significant difference in fatigue between groups at 4 weeks (mean difference 1.4, 95% CI: -13.5 to 16.2), but there was a trend towards improvement in fatigue at 6 months. Compliers had lower fatigue compared to non-compliers.

CONCLUSIONS

A placebo-controlled study of HOT in CFS is feasible. HOT is well tolerated and generally complied with. A likely physiological rationale for HOT in CFS is related to reductions in orthostatic intolerance. An adequately powered study including strategies to enhance compliance is warranted.