Management of Infected Pacemaker Systems

The role of nuclear medicine in diagnosis of catheter-related infections

Infections represent a complication after transient or permanent implantation of medical devices (e.g. catheters or pacemaker systems), leading in many cases to therapeutic consequences such as the removal of the implanted system. Diagnosis of foreign body infections is difficult and mainly based on clinical findings rather than laboratory methods or modern morphological imaging tools. Two-dimensional echocardiography by transthoracic and transesophageal approach may be helpful in the detection of vegetations, but is not very sensitive for infections. Most methods in nuclear medicine, however, are based on function and not on form: some methods for the detection of an infection are unspecific like the use of labelled nanocolloids or Ga-67-citrate, or they need time-consuming and susceptible techniques for the labelling of autologous leukocytes. Monoclonal antibodies against epitopes on granulocytes, however, offer a fast and reliable in-vivo labelling technique. It has been demonstrated in a group of four patients that scintigraphic detection of pacemaker infections by immunoscintigraphy may represent a valuable diagnostic tool.

Complications associated with retained pacemaker leads

Retention of functionless pacemaker leads may occur following mechanical or infective problems (potentially or definitely infected) or after electrical failure of the lead. One hundred nineteen patients with a pacemaker lead (or leads) retained between 1970 and 1990 were reviewed retrospectively. Lead retention after an intervention dictated by potential or definite infection of the pacing system resulted in complications in 27 of 53 patients (51%), which in 22 patients (42%) were major (septicemia, superior vena cava syndrome, and further surgery under general anesthesia for recurrent "infective" problems) including three deaths. Complications were less likely if lead retention occurred after electrical failure with three minor and two major (surgery under general anesthesia, superior vena cava syndrome) complications in 66 patients (P less than 0.001). Bacteriology of swabs taken at the time of retention in the patients with potential or definite infection was unhelpful in predicting future complications: 8/18 patients (44%) whose swabs were negative had complications of which 5/18 (28%) were major. In our experience retention of functionless pacemaker leads after an intervention dictated by potential or definite infection of the pacing system, is associated with significant morbidity and mortality and should be avoided.

Extraction of implanted transvenous pacing leads: a review of a persistent clinical problem

Within a few months of implantation, permanent pacemaker leads become ensheathed in fibrocollagenous tissue. This tissue may anchor the lead so that it is difficult, dangerous, or impossible to remove it. Leads with bulbous or finned tips are particularly resistant to extraction. The risks of applying traction to an entrapped lead include induction of bradycardia or ventricular tachycardia and fibrillation, invagination of the right ventricle, avulsion of the right ventricular myocardium or tricuspid valve, hemopericardium, and cardiac tamponade. Forceful traction may result in uncoiling of the conductor, disruption of the insulation, or complete fracture, leaving an intravascular remnant that may embolize or be a source for thrombosis. Although fixation and abandonment of an inactive chronically implanted lead is frequently appropriate and is known to pose little long-term risk, the retained inactive lead may interact adversely with a new active lead and then increase the risk of venous thrombosis, serve as a potential nidus for infection, or produce spurious electrical sensing signals that may be sensed by the pulse generator. Absolute indications for lead removal are those in which there would be a life-threatening situation if the lead were to remain in situ. In the absence of an absolute indication, the decision to proceed with extraction must be made by weighing the potential for serious morbidity or mortality against risks of the extraction technique. Techniques for lead removal include traction and open cardiotomy operations. When a portion of the lead is intravascular, forceps, snares, baskets, countertraction, or lead-transection devices may be used to retrieve the fragment.

Pacemaker infection with Mycobacterium avium complex

A 21-year-old. HIV negative, malnourished, homeless woman with congenital heart block had a pacemaker implanted at 7 years of age and multiple procedures thereafter. The most recent of these procedures was replacement of a pulse generator in the right pectoral region. Four months later she had fever, pain, and swelling over the implant site resulting from infection with mixed flora and Mycobacterium avium complex. The pacemaker system was removed by thoracotomy via a median sternotomy and a new DDD pacemaker simultaneously implanted. She was treated with systemic antibiotics--isoniazid, rifampin, ethambutol--for 2 weeks. Six months later she was healthy, pacing well, and apparently free of infection, off all medications.

Prophylactic mezlocillin-netilmicin combination in permanent transvenous cardiac pacemaker implantation: a single-center, prospective, randomized study

A prospective, randomized study was carried out in order to assess the efficacy and safety of the mezlocillin-netilmicin combination in the prophylaxis of first permanent transvenous cardiac pacemaker implantation. Five hundred and fifty-two consecutive patients were randomly administered either 2 g mezlocillin and 200 mg netilmicin both as an i.v. bolus before implantation or 2g mezlocillin before and then 6 and 12 hours after surgery and 200 mg netilmicin before and then 12 hours after implantation. No adverse events were seen. Neither pocket nor electrode infections were observed in the 457 subjects still alive (mean follow-up: 29.2 months) or in patients who died after 1 year of follow-up (mean follow-up: 20.1 months) or before this time (mean follow-up: 4.7 months). The serum and pocket concentrations of mezlocillin and netilmicin at the end of surgery were found to be adequate to cover microorganisms that most often cause infections, including methicillin-resistant staphylococci.

Atrial pacing: who do we pace and what do we expect? Experiences with 100 atrial pacemakers

The records of 100 patients with permanent atrial pacemakers implanted over a 7-year period were reviewed to assess the role and results of this mode of pacing. Indications for pacing were sick sinus syndrome in 91, carotid sinus hypersensitivity in 3, and use of an antitachycardia device in 6 patients. The mean follow-up period was 32.9 months. Symptomatic relief was good. Lead dislodgment occurred in 11 patients (usually in the first week). Threshold rises not amenable to reprogramming occurred in three patients and loss of sensing occurred in seven patients but only one required intervention. Overall, 21 patients required reoperation. The type of lead did not influence the need for reoperation that appeared to be related to the experience of the operator. Complete atrioventricular block occurred in three patients, two of whom had carotid sinus hypersensitivity and one had sick sinus syndrome. Chronic atrial fibrillation occurred in five patients, none of whom required revision of the pacemaker system. Atrial pacing is a satisfactory pacing mode in patients with sick sinus syndrome. Provided satisfactory atrioventricular conduction has been shown by incremental atrial pacing to at least 120 beats/min and carotid hypersensitivity is absent, progression to complete atrioventricular block is uncommon. Greater implanting skills are required for good results.

Endocarditis due to six entrapped pacemaker leads and concomitant recurrent coronary arteriosclerosis

A case of endocarditis associated with six entrapped endocardial pacer leads is presented. Because of many failed attempts at removing them by conservative measures, cardiopulmonary bypass was needed; concomitant redo coronary bypass grafts were done. To our knowledge, this represents a unique case, the like of which has not been reported previously. Salient features of management are discussed.

Late purulent pacemaker pocket infection caused by staphylococcus epidermidis: serious complications of in situ management

The pathophysiology of late pacemaker pocket infection is poorly understood. We report three cases of late infection caused by Staphylococcus epidermidis. Despite initial local conservative management ultimate removal of the entire pacing system was required. In late pacemaker pocket infection we recommend initial removal of the entire pacing system and replacement on the contralateral side. When retrieval of the lead system requires open-heart surgery epicardial wires should be placed.