Comparison of atrial-His intervals during tachycardia and atrial pacing in patients with long RP tachycardia

Discrimination of atypical atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia from atrial tachycardia by the V-A-A-V response

INTRODUCTION

The electrophysiological discrimination between fast-slow (F/S-) atrioventricular (AV) nodal reentrant tachycardia (NRT) and atrial tachycardia (AT) originating from the interatrial septum remains challenging. While a V-A-A-V response may occur immediately after ventricular induction or entrainment of either tachycardia, the electrophysiological dissimilarities in that response between the two tachycardias remain unclear. The purpose of this study was to identify a diagnostic indicator discriminating F/S-AVNRT from AT by examining the difference in the V-A-A-V response between the two tachycardias.

METHODS

This retrospective study included 17 patients with F/S-AVNRT [7 with common-form F/S-AVNRT using a typical slow pathway (SP) and 10 with superior type F/S-AVNRT using a superior SP] and 10 patients with reentrant AT. All 27 patients presented with long RP supraventricular tachycardia and an initial V-A-A-V response upon ventricular induction or entrainment. The V-A-A-V response in patients with F/S-AVNRT was due to dual atrial responses. We measured the interval between the first (A1) and second atrial electrogram (A2) of V-A-A-V and calculated ΔAA by subtracting A1-A2 from the tachycardia cycle length.

RESULTS

V-A-A-V responses were observed most often upon ventricular induction of F/S-AVNRT (6±5 times) as well as AT (6±6 times; P = 0.87). The V-A-A-V response upon ventricular entrainment was observed in a single patient with F/S-AVNRT versus 10 all patients with AT (P<0.001). ΔAA ranged between -80 and 228 ms in F/S-AVNRT and between -184 and 26 ms in AT. A ΔAA >26 ms predicted a diagnosis of F/S-AVNRT with a 76% sensitivity and 100% specificity, while a ΔAA ←80 ms predicted a diagnosis of AT with a 50% sensitivity and 100% specificity.

CONCLUSIONS

ΔAA is a useful, confirmatory, diagnostic indicator of F/S-AVNRT versus AT associated with the V-A-A-V response. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

Distal type of nodo-ventricular pathway: Unique electrophysiological characteristics mimicking fasciculo-ventricular pathway

Fasciculo-ventricular and nodo-ventricular pathways (FVP and NVP) are rare preexcitation variants. Normally, NVP is electrophysiologically different from FVP. We describe a unique type of NVP emerging from the distal part of the slow pathway, designated as "distal type" NVP. The distal type NVP resembled FVP but was proven by unexpected elimination of the NVP during the slow pathway ablation. Also, NVP was distinguishable from FVP by a careful comparison of the HV intervals during conduction over the fast and slow pathways. Demonstration of this novel type NVP provides insights into how the insertion site of NVP affects its electrophysiologic behaviors. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

Electrophysiologic approach to diagnosis and ablation of patients with permanent junctional reciprocating tachycardia associated with complex anatomy and/or physiology

INTRODUCTION

Permanent junctional reciprocating tachycardia (PJRT) is a rare supraventricular tachycardia (SVT), typically involving a single decremental posteroseptal accessory pathway (AP).

METHODS

Four patients with long RP SVT underwent electrophysiology (EP) study and ablation. The cases were reviewed.

RESULTS

Case 1 recurred despite 3 prior ablations at the site of earliest retrograde atrial activation during orthodromic reciprocating tachycardia (ORT). Mapping during a repeat EP study demonstrated a prepotential in the coronary sinus (CS). Ablation over the earliest atrial activation in the CS resulted in dissociation of the potential from the atrium during sinus rhythm. The potential was traced back to the CS os and ablated. Case 2 underwent successful ablation at 6 o'clock on the mitral annulus (MA). ORT recurred and successful ablation was performed at 1 o'clock on the MA. Case 3 had tachycardia with variation in both V-A and A-H intervals which precluded the use of usual maneuvers so we used simultaneous atrial and ventricular pacing and introduced a premature atrial contraction with a closely coupled premature ventricular contraction. Case 4 had had two prior atrial fibrillation ablations with continued SVT over a decremental atrioventricular bypass tract that was successfully ablated at 5 o'clock on the tricuspid annulus. A second SVT consistent with a concealed nodoventricular pathway was successfully ablated at the right inferior extension of the AV nodal slow pathway.

CONCLUSION

We describe challenging cases of PJRT by virtue of complex anatomy, diagnostic features, and multiple arrhythmia mechanisms.

Superior-Type Fast-Slow Atrioventricular Nodal Reentrant Tachycardia Phenotype Mimicking the Slow-Fast Type

BACKGROUND

Superior-type fast-slow (sup-F/S-) atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT) is a rare AVNRT variant using a superior slow pathway (SP) as the retrograde limb. Its intracardiac appearance, characterized by a short atrio-His (AH) interval and the earliest site of atrial activation in the His-bundle, is an initial indicator for making a diagnosis.

METHODS

Among 22 consecutive patients with sup-F/S-AVNRT, 3 (age, 68-81 years) patients had an apparent slow-fast (S/F-) AVNRT characterized by a long AH interval and the earliest site of atrial activation in or superior to the His-bundle region (tachy-long-AH).

RESULTS

The diagnosis of sup-F/S-AVNRT was based on the standard criteria in 2 patients and on the occurrence of Wenckebach-type atrioventricular block during tachycardia, which was attributable to a block at the lower common pathway (LCP) below the circuit of the AVNRT, detected owing to the lower common pathway potentials, in one patient. As with the typical S/F-AVNRT, tachy-long-AH was induced after a jump in the AH interval. In contrast to typical S/F-AVNRT, fluctuation in the ventriculoatrial interval was observed during the tachy-long-AH. Ventricular overdrive pacing was unable to entrain or terminate the tachy-long-AH. Moreover, the tachy-long-AH reciprocally transited to/from sup-F/S-AVNRT spontaneously or was triggered by ventricular contractions while the atrial cycle length and earliest site of atrial activation remained unchanged. Both tachycardias were cured by ablation at a single site in the right-side para-Hisian region of 2 patients and the noncoronary aortic cusp of one patient. Collectively, the essential circuit of both tachycardias was identical, and the tachy-long-AH was diagnosed as another phenotype of sup-F/S-AVNRT accompanied by sustained antegrade conduction via another bystander slow pathway breaking through the His-bundle owing to the repetitive antegrade block at the lower common pathway, thus representing a long AH interval during the ongoing sup-F/S-AVNRT.

CONCLUSIONS

An unknown sup-F/S-AVNRT phenotype exists that apparently mimics the typical S/F-AVNRT and is also an unknown subtype of apparent S/F-AVNRT.

Pathophysiology, Diagnosis, and Ablation of Atrioventricular Node-dependent Long-R-P Tachycardias

Atrioventricular (AV) node–dependent long-R–P tachycardias are a unique group of supraventricular tachycardias that include atypical AV nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT), atypical AVNRT with a concealed bystander nodofascicular (NF)/nodoventricular (NV) accessory pathway inserting into the slow pathway of the AV node, the permanent form of junctional reciprocating tachycardia, and orthodromic NF/NV reciprocating tachycardia. Here, we discuss the complex pathophysiology, diagnosis, and ablation of these intriguing arrhythmias.

Classification, Electrophysiological Features and Therapy of Atrioventricular Nodal Reentrant Tachycardia

Atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT) should be classified as typical or atypical. The term 'fast-slow AVNRT' is rather misleading. Retrograde atrial activation during tachycardia should not be relied upon as a diagnostic criterion. Both typical and atypical atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia are compatible with varying retrograde atrial activation patterns. Attempts at establishing the presence of a 'lower common pathway' are probably of no practical significance. When the diagnosis of AVNRT is established, ablation should be only directed towards the anatomic position of the slow pathway. If right septal attempts are unsuccessful, the left septal side should be tried. Ablation targeting earliest atrial activation sites during typical atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia or the fast pathway in general for any kind of typical or atypical atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia, are not justified. In this review we discuss current concepts about the tachycardia circuit, electrophysiologic diagnosis, and ablation of this arrhythmia.

New Criteria During Right Ventricular Pacing to Determine the Mechanism of Supraventricular Tachycardia

Background—

Right ventricular pacing (RVP) during supraventricular tachycardia produces progressive QRS fusion before the QRS morphology becomes stable. This transition zone (TZ) may provide useful information for differentiating orthodromic reciprocating tachycardia (ORT) from atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia and atrial tachycardia independent of entrainment success.

Methods and Results—

We studied the effect of properly timed RVP on atrial timing during the TZ in 92 patients with supraventricular tachycardia who had RVP within 40 ms of the tachycardia cycle length. The TZ during RVP includes progressively fused QRS complexes and the first paced complex with a stable QRS morphology based on analysis of the 12-lead ECG. We also measured the stimulus-atrial interval from the end of the TZ and with each QRS complex thereafter until pacing was terminated or ventriculo-atrial block occurred. A fixed stimulus-atrial interval was defined as variation <10 ms during RVP. Atrial preexcitation, postexcitation, or supraventricular tachycardia termination with abrupt ventriculo-atrial block was observed within the TZ in 32 of 34 patients with ORT. A fixed stimulus-atrial interval was established within the TZ in 33 of 34 patients with ORT. At least 1 of these 2 responses was observed in all patients with ORT. None of the patients with atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia or atrial tachycardia had atrial timing perturbed or a fixed stimulus-atrial interval established within the TZ.

Conclusions—

During RVP within 40 ms of the tachycardia cycle length, ORT is the likely mechanism when atrial timing is perturbed or a fixed stimulus-atrial interval is established within the TZ.

Introduction to Supraventricular Tachycardia

Paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia (PSVT) is a clinical syndrome characterized by a rapid tachycardia with an abrupt onset and termination cardiomyopathy. The three most common causes of PSVT are atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia (50%-60%), atrioventricular reentrant tachycardia in patients with Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome (25%-30%), and atrial tachycardia (10%). Rare causes of PSVT include focal junctional tachycardia, atriofascicular tachycardia, permanent reciprocating junctional tachycardia, and nodoventricular/nodofascicular tachycardia. This article, based on challenging PSVT cases, is a guide for clinicians dealing with diagnostic or therapeutic dilemmas in the electrophysiology laboratory.

Classification and differential diagnosis of atrioventricular nodal re-entrant tachycardia

Recent evidence on atrioventricular nodal re-entrant tachycardia has identified several types of this common arrhythmia, with potential therapeutic implications. This article reviews the relevant new information, discusses the differential diagnosis of atrioventricular nodal re-entrant tachycardia, and summarizes the electrophysiological criteria for classification of the various forms of the arrhythmia.

Differential Diagnosis of Slow/Slow Atrioventricular Nodal Reentrant Tachycardia from Atrioventricular Reentrant Tachycardia Using Concealed Posteroseptal Accessory Pathway by 12-Lead Electrocardiography

Slow pathways are used as both antegrade and retrograde conduction pathway in slow/slow atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia (SS-AVNRT), and patients with SS-AVNRT have tachycardia ECGs mimicking atrioventricular reentrant tachycardia using concealed posteroseptal accessory pathway (PS-AVRT). Therefore, SS-AVNRT can be misdiagnosed as PS-AVRT, and the differential diagnosis is clinically important. Standard 12-lead ECGs during tachycardia were analyzed in patients with SS-AVNRT (n = 10) and PS-AVRT (n = 10). All these patients were diagnosed by electrophysiological study and underwent successful catheter ablation. Differences of the RP' intervals (dRP') between V1 and the inferior leads were evaluated. SS-AVNRT had significantly longer RP' intervals measured in V1 (167 +/- 25.2 vs 137 +/- 26.8 ms, SS-AVNRT vs PS-AVRT, respectively, P = 0.02), longer dRP' between V1 and II (dRP'[V1-II], 37 +/- 14 vs 17 +/- 6.7 ms, P = 0.0007), longer dRP'[V1-III] (39 +/- 14 vs 17 +/- 9.9 ms, P = 0.0011), and longer dRP'[V1-aVF] (39 +/- 13 vs 20 +/- 9.5 ms, P = 0.0008). The following criteria were suggested for differential diagnosis of SS-AVNRT from PS-AVRT: dRP'[V1-II] >25 ms (sensitivity and specificity: 80% and 100%, respectively), dRP'[V1-III] >23 ms (90% and 90%), dRP'[V1-aVF] >30 ms (90% and 90%). Differences of the RP' intervals between V1 and the inferior leads in the tachycardia ECGs were useful for differential diagnosis of SS-AVNRT from PS-AVRT.

Differentiation of atypical atrioventricular node re-entrant tachycardia from orthodromic reciprocating tachycardia using a septal accessory pathway by the response to ventricular pacing

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this study was to determine whether the response to ventricular pacing during tachycardia is useful for differentiating atypical atrioventricular node re-entrant tachycardia (AVNRT) from orthodromic reciprocating tachycardia (ORT) using a septal accessory pathway.

BACKGROUND

Although it is usually possible to differentiate atypical AVNRT from ORT using a septal accessory pathway, a definitive diagnosis is occasionally elusive.

METHODS

In 30 patients with atypical AVNRT and 44 patients with ORT using a septal accessory pathway, the right ventricle was paced at a cycle length 10 to 40 ms shorter than the tachycardia cycle length (TCL). The ventriculo-atrial (VA) interval and TCL were measured just before pacing. The interval between the last pacing stimulus and the last entrained atrial depolarization (stimulus-atrial [S-A] interval) and the post-pacing interval (PPI) at the right ventricular apex were measured on cessation of ventricular pacing.

RESULTS

All 30 patients with atypical AVNRT and none of the 44 patients with ORT using a septal accessory pathway had an S-A-VA interval >85 ms and PPI-TCL >115 ms.

CONCLUSIONS

The S-A-VA interval and PPI-TCL are useful in distinguishing atypical AVNRT from ORT using a septal accessory pathway.

Heterogeneity of anterograde fast-pathway and retrograde slow-pathway conduction patterns in patients with the fast-slow form of atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia: electrophysiologic and electrocardiographic considerations

OBJECTIVES

This study sought to define the electrophysiologic and electrocardiographic characteristics of fast-slow atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT).

BACKGROUND

In fast-slow AVNRT the retrograde slow pathway (SP) is located in the posterior septum, whereas the anterograde fast pathway (FP) is located in the anterior septum; however, exceptions may occur.

METHODS

Twelve patients with fast-slow AVNRT were studied. To determine the location of the retrograde SP, atrial activation during AVNRT was examined while recording the electrograms from the low septal right atrium (LSRA) on the His bundle electrogram and the orifice of the coronary sinus (CS). Further, to investigate the location of the anterograde FP, single extrastimuli were delivered during AVNRT both from the high right atrium and the CS.

RESULTS

The CS activation during AVNRT preceded the LSRA in six patients (posterior type); LSRA activation preceded the CS in three patients (anterior type), and in the remaining three both sites were activated simultaneously (middle type). In the anterior type, CS stimulation preexcited the His and the ventricle without capturing the LSRA electrogram (atrial dissociation between the CS and the LSRA), suggesting that the anterograde FP was located posterior to the retrograde SP. In the posterior and middle types, high right atrial stimulation demonstrated atrial dissociation, suggesting that the anterograde FP was located anterior to the SP. In the posterior and middle types, retrograde P waves in the inferior leads were deeply negative, whereas they were shallow in the anterior type.

CONCLUSIONS

Fast-slow AVNRT was able to be categorized into posterior, middle and anterior types according to the site of the retrograde SP. The anterior type AVNRT, where an anteriorly located SP is used in the retrograde direction and a posteriorly located FP in the anterograde direction, appears to represent an anatomical reversal of the posterior type which uses a posterior SP for retrograde and an anterior FP for anterograde conduction. Anterior type AVNRT should be considered in the differential diagnosis of long RP (RP > PR intervals) tachycardias with shallow negative P waves in the inferior leads.

Application of models of defibrillation to human defibrillation data: implications for optimizing implantable defibrillator capacitance

BACKGROUND

Theoretical models predict that optimal capacitance for implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs) is proportional to the time-dependent parameter of the strength-duration relationship. The hyperbolic model gives this relationship for average current in terms of the chronaxie (t(c)). The exponential model gives the relationship for leading-edge current in terms of the membrane time constant (tau(m)). We hypothesized that these models predict results of clinical studies of ICD capacitance if human time constants are used.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We studied 12 patients with epicardial ICDs and 15 patients with transvenous ICDs. Defibrillation threshold (DFT) was determined for 120-microF monophasic capacitive-discharge pulses at pulse widths of 1.5, 3.0, 7.5, and 15 ms. To compare the predictions of the average-current versus leading-edge-current methods, we derived a new exponential average-current model. We then calculated individual patient time parameters for each model. Model predictions were validated by retrospective comparison with clinical crossover studies of small-capacitor and standard-capacitor waveforms. All three models provided a good fit to the data (r2=.88 to .97, P<.001). Time constants were lower for transvenous pathways (53+/-7 omega) than epicardial pathways (36+/-6 omega) (t(c), P<.001; average-current tau(m), P=.002; leading-edge-current tau(m), P<.06). For epicardial pathways, optimal capacitance was greater for either average-current model than for the leading-edge-current model (P<.001). For transvenous pathways, optimal capacitance differed for all three models (P<.001). All models provided a good correlation with the effect of capacitance on DFT in previous clinical studies: r2=.75 to .84, P<.003. For 90-microF, 120-microF, and 150-microF capacitors, predicted stored-energy DFTs were 3% to 8%, 8% to 16%, and 14% to 26% above that for the optimal capacitance.

CONCLUSIONS

Model predictions based on measured human cardiac-muscle time parameter have a good correlation with clinical studies of ICD capacitance. Most of the predicted reduction in DFT can be achieved with approximately 90-microF capacitors.

Charge-burping theory correctly predicts optimal ratios of phase duration for biphasic defibrillation waveforms

BACKGROUND

For biphasic waveforms, it is accepted that the ratio of the duration of phase 2 to the duration of phase 1 (phase-duration ratio) should be < or = 1. The charge-burping theory postulates that the beneficial effects of phase 2 are maximal when it completely removes the charge delivered by phase 1. It predicts that the phase-duration ratio should be < 1 when the time constant of the defibrillation system (tau s) exceeds the time constant of the cell membrane (tau m) but > 1 when tau s < tau m. This study tested the hypothesis that the optimal phase-duration ratio depends on tau s (the product of the defibrillator capacitance and pathway resistance).

METHODS AND RESULTS

In a canine model of transvenous defibrillation (n = 8), we determined stored-energy defibrillation thresholds (DFTs) for biphasic waveforms from conventional capacitors (140 microF. tau s = 7.1 +/- 0.8 ms) and very small capacitors (40 microF. tau s = 2.0 +/- 0.2 ms). Each capacitance was tested with phase-duration ratios of 0.5, 1, 2, and 3. The duration of phase 1 approximated the optimal monophasic waveform, 6.3 +/- 0.7 ms for 140-microF waveforms and 2.8 +/- 0.2 ms for 40-microF waveforms. For 140-microF waveforms, the DFT was lower for phase-duration ratios < or = 1 than for phase-duration ratios > 1 (P = .0003). The reverse was true for 40-microF capacitors (P = .0008). There was a significant interaction between the effects of capacitance and phase-duration ratio on DFT (P = .0002). The lowest DFT for 40-microF waveforms was less than the lowest DFT for 140-microF waveforms (4.9 +/- 2.5 versus 6.4 +/- 2.4 J, P < .05).

CONCLUSIONS

The optimal phase-duration ratio is < or = 1 for conventional capacitors and > 1 for small capacitors. This supports the predictions of the charge-burping theory.