Induced termination of fibrillation

Electrophysiological properties of the fibrillating atrium: implications for therapy

1. Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most commonly occurring cardiac dysrhythmia and remains a challenge to medical therapy. Although the disorder has been recognized for over 100 years, surprisingly very little is understood about its pathophysiology. Over the past decade, a variety of experimental and animal models of AF have been developed and these have provided insights into the mechanism of AF. 2. The pathophysiology of AF is complex. Atrial fibrillation can be caused either by a single source of very rapid impulses or, in the majority of cases, by multiple random re-entering wavelets. The notion that AF may be initiated by a single rapid firing focus and the perpetuation of AF may be partly dependent on macro re-entry around the natural atrial orifices provides a new potential curative therapy for AF by radiofrequency ablation. 3. Shortening of atrial wavelength, either by slow atrial conduction velocities, short atrial refractory periods or both, seems to predispose to development of intra-atrial re-entry and, thus, AF. The functional mechanism by which anti-arrhythmic drugs terminate AF appears to be by prolonging the wavelength and decreasing the number of re-entry wavelets. These understandings are important for the future development of effective anti-arrhythmic agents against AF. 4. The presence of a short and variable excitable gap during AF may be potentially important for termination of AF by pacing. 5. New insights are being gained into the potential role and mechanism of electrical remodelling of the atrium due to AF. Repeated induction of AF by rapid atrial pacing leads to a shortening of atrial refractoriness with loss of rate adaptation, which favours the induction and maintenance of AF. These electrophysiological changes were assumed to occur during repeated AF and to facilitate the generation of multiple re-entrant wavelets. These data suggest that prompt restoration of sinus rhythm and new novel therapy that prevents or diminishes electrical remodelling may promote maintenance of sinus rhythm after successful cardioversion.

High-dose lidocaine does not affect defibrillation efficacy: implications for defibrillation mechanisms

This study assessed the effect of low (10 mg.kg-1.h-1) and very high (18 mg.kg-1.h-1) doses of lidocaine on defibrillation energy requirements (DER) to relate changes in indexes of sodium-channel blockade with changes in DER values using a dose-response study design. In group 1 (control; n = 6 pigs), DER values were determined at baseline and during treatment with 5% dextrose in water (D5W) and with D5W added to D5W. In group 2 (n = 7), DER values were determined at baseline and during treatment with low-dose lidocaine followed by high-dose lidocaine. In group 3 (n = 3), DER values were determined at baseline and high-dose lidocaine. Group 3 controlled for the order of lidocaine treatment with the addition of high-dose lidocaine after baseline. DER values in group 1 did not change during D5W. In group 2, low-dose lidocaine increased DER values by 51% (P = 0.01), whereas high-dose lidocaine added to low-dose lidocaine reduced DER values back to within 6% of baseline values (P = 0.02, low dose vs. high dose). DER values during high-dose lidocaine in group 3 also remained near baseline values (16.2 +/- 2.7 to 12.9 +/- 2.7 J), demonstrating that treatment order had no impact on group 2. Progressive sodium-channel blockade was evident as incremental reduction in ventricular conduction velocity as the lidocaine dose increased. Lidocaine also significantly increased ventricular fibrillation cycle length as the lidocaine dose increased. However, the greatest increase in DER occurred when ventricular fibrillation cycle length was minimally affected, demonstrating a negative correlation (P = 0.04). In summary, lidocaine has an inverted U-shaped DER dose-response curve. At very high lidocaine doses, DER values are similar to baseline and tend to decrease rather than increase. Increased refractoriness during ventricular fibrillation may be the electrophysiological mechanism by which high-dose lidocaine limits the adverse effects that low-dose lidocaine has on DER values. However, there is a possibility that an unidentified action of lidocaine is responsible for these effects.

Insights into mechanisms of antiarrhythmic drug action from experimental models of atrial fibrillation

Atrial fibrillation (AF) remains a challenge to medical therapy. Over the past several years, a variety of experimental models of AF have been developed. These have provided insights into mechanisms underlying AF and antiarrhythmic drug action against the arrhythmia. A variety of drugs effective against clinical AF, including flecainide, propafenone, procainamide, and sotalol, have been found to terminate experimental AF. All of these agents appear to act by prolonging the wavelength for atrial reentry at rapid rates, thereby increasing the size and decreasing the number of functional circuits maintaining the arrhythmia. While the ability to terminate AF is determined by refractoriness prolongation at rapid rates, refractoriness prolongation at slow rates (e.g., sinus rhythm) can prevent AF induction by premature beats. Thus, drugs with strong reverse use-dependence (like sotalol) may be much more effective in preventing than in terminating AF. Spacial heterogeneity in refractoriness is an important contributor to AF occurrence in some models, particularly vagal AF, and is reduced by some (but not all) drugs that terminate AF. New insights are being gained into mechanisms of electrical remodeling, which promotes AF maintenance when rapid atrial rates are maintained, such as during AF. This electrical remodeling may be an interesting novel target for therapy of AF. Insights into AF mechanisms obtained in experimental models of AF should help in the development of new and improved therapeutic approaches.