Junctional rhythm during slow pathway radiofrequency ablation in patients with atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia: beat-to-beat analysis and its prognostic value in relation to electrophysiologic and anatomic parameters

A prospective evaluation of the impact of individual RF applications for slow pathway ablation for AVNRT: Markers of acute success

BACKGROUND

Catheter ablation is highly effective for atrioventricular nodal re-entrant tachycardia (AVNRT). Generally junctional rhythm (JR) is an accepted requirement for successful ablation however there is a lack of detailed prospective studies to determine the characteristics of JR and the impact on slow pathway conduction.

METHODS

Multicentre prospective observational study evaluating the impact of individual radiofrequency (RF) applications in typical AVNRT (slow/fast). Characteristics of JR during ablation were documented and detailed testing was performed after every RF application to determine outcome. Procedural success was defined as ≤1 AV nodal echo.

RESULTS

Sixty-seven patients were included (mean age 53 ± 18years, 57% female and a history of SVT 2.9 ± 4.7 years). RF (50w, 60°) ablation for AVNRT was applied in 301 locations with JR in 178 (59%). Successful slow pathway modification was achieved in 66 (99%) patients with slow pathway block in 30 (46%). Success was associated with JR in all patients. Success was achieved in six patients with RF < 10 s. There was no significant difference in the CL of JR during RF between effective (587 ± 150 ms) versus ineffective (611 ± 193 ms, p = .4) applications. Inadvertent junctional beat-atrial (JA) block with immediate termination of RF was observed in 19 (28%) patients with AVNRT no longer inducible in 14 (74%). Freedom from SVT was achieved in 66 (99%) patients at a mean follow up of 15 ± 6 months.

CONCLUSION

In this prospective study, JR was required during RF for acute success in AVNRT. Cycle length of JR during RF was not predictive of success. Although unintended JA block during faster JR was associated with slow pathway block, this is a precursor to fast pathway block and should not be intentionally targeted.

Newly created animal model of human postoperative junctional ectopic tachycardia

OBJECTIVE

Junctional ectopic tachycardia complicates the postoperative recovery from open heart surgery in children. The reported risk factors include younger age, prolonged cardiopulmonary bypass times, and administration of inotropic agents. Junctional ectopic tachycardia occurs early after open heart surgery, in the setting of relative postoperative sinus node dysfunction, and exhibits QRS morphology consistent with an origin from the atrioventricular node or proximal conduction system. Our goal was to develop a reproducible animal model for postoperative junctional ectopic tachycardia.

METHODS

Eleven pigs, aged 2 to 4 months, underwent open heart surgery after induction of general anesthesia. Electrodes were sewn to the left atrium and right ventricle.

RESULTS

Sinus node dysfunction was created using clamp crushing without or with radiofrequency ablation (successful in 1 of 5 pigs) or sinus node removal (successful in 4 of 4). After prolonged cardiopulmonary bypass (>120 minutes) alone and with isoproterenol infusion, no spontaneous junctional ectopic tachycardia developed. Junctional ectopic tachycardia or fascicular tachycardia could be initiated after either slow atrioventricular nodal pathway ablation and/or digoxin administration. Junctional ectopic tachycardia occurred in 8 of 9 pigs (mean ventricular rate, 171 ± 32 bpm), and fascicular tachycardia occurred in 9 of 9 pigs (mean ventricular rate, 187 ± 39 bpm). His and right bundle recordings confirmed the conduction system origin.

CONCLUSIONS

Experimental junctional ectopic tachycardia or fascicular tachycardia can occur in the intraoperative setting of sinus node dysfunction, prolonged cardiopulmonary bypass, and enhanced conduction system automaticity. Conduction system automaticity occurred after either physical injury (ablation or tricuspid valve stretch) or measures to augment the transient inward current of the conduction system (isoproterenol and digoxin). This animal model can serve as the basis to assess new treatments of postoperative junctional ectopic tachycardia.

Can successful radiofrequency ablation of atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia be predicted by pattern of junctional ectopy?

BACKGROUND

Emergence of junctional rhythm (JR) during radiofrequency (RF) current delivery directed at the periatrioventricular nodal region has been shown to be a marker of success in atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT). Whereas the characteristics of JR during RF ablation of slow pathway have already been studied, the electrophysiologic features of different patterns of JR are yet to be evaluated. The aim of this study was to investigate in detail the characteristics of the JR that develops during the RF ablation of the slow pathway.

MATERIALS AND RESULTS

The study population consisted of 95 patients: 56 women and 33 men (mean age, 47.2 +/- 16.3 years) who underwent slow pathway ablation because of AVNRT. A combined anatomical and electrogram mapping approach was used, and AVNRT was successfully eliminated in all patients. This study identified 7 patterns for JR during the RF ablation of slow pathway: junction-junction-junction, sinus-junction-sinus, intermittent burst, sparse, no junction, sinus-junction-junction, and sinus-junction-block . The characteristics of JR, such as mean cycle length and total number, were gathered. The incidence of JR was significantly higher during effective applications of RF energy than during ineffective applications (P = .001). The mean number of junctional ectopy was 19.6 +/- 19. The total number of junctional ectopy was significantly higher during effective applications of RF energy than during ineffective applications (24.6 +/- 18.8 vs 8.4 +/- 13.2; P < .001). We found a significant difference between the effective and ineffective applications of RF energy in the mean cycle length of the junctional ectopy (464.6 +/- 167.5 vs 263.4 +/- 250.2; P < .01). The patterns of JR were compared between effective and ineffective applications. We managed to show a significant correlation between patterns of JR and successful ablation (P = .01). Logistic regression analysis revealed that the presence of sinus-junction-sinus, sinus-junction-junction, and sinus-junction-block patterns of JR was a predictor of a successful RF ablation (confidence interval [CI], 1.67-15.92 [P < .004]; CI, 1.02-85.62 [P = .048]; and CI, 1.06-32.02 [P = .042], respectively).

CONCLUSION

This study confirms that JR is often present during successful slow pathway ablation. The pattern of JR is useful as indicator of success.

Junctional rhythm quantity and duration during slow pathway radiofrequency ablation in patients with atrioventricular nodal re-entry supraventricular tachycardia

AIM

The occurrence of accelerated junctional rhythm during radiofrequency energy delivery at the region of the slow pathway is a well-recognized marker of successful treatment of atrioventricular nodal re-entry tachycardia (AVNRT). Our aim was to evaluate if the quantity and duration of accelerated junctional rhythm during radiofrequency ablation of the slow pathway is correlated with residual slow pathway conduction.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Forty consecutive patients with AVNRT undergoing radiofrequency ablation of slow pathway who developed accelerated junctional rhythm during ablation were included. We compared accelerated junctional rhythm quantity and duration between two groups: group A, without echo beats and group B, with echo beats on post-ablation electrophysiology study. The total amount of accelerated junctional rhythm was significantly greater in group A than in group B [75.0 (63.5-165.0) vs. 36.0 (24.0-65.0), P=0.006], as well as total duration of accelerated junctional rhythm [47.0(33.5-81.0) s vs. 23.0 (16.0-42.0) s, P=0.006]. The cycle length of accelerated junctional rhythm did not differ between the two groups [510.0 (445.0-545.0) ms vs. 500.0 (450.0-585.0) ms, P=0.5).

CONCLUSIONS

The amount and duration of accelerated junctional rhythm is correlated with the total abolishment abolition of slow pathway conduction. A higher amount and duration of accelerated junctional rhythm during radiofrequency applications may be an additional marker of successful ablation.

Atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia in children

The purpose of this study was to identify the clinical and electrophysiological characteristics of children with atrioventricular reentry tachycardia (AVNRT) and to define the prognosis and the treatment strategy. Sixty-two children (28 males and 34 females mean age, 10.2 +/- 3.2 years) with AVNRT ("slow-fast" type) were included in the study. Patients were divided into two groups: 47 patients with severe symptoms (group A) and 15 with mild symptoms (group B). The severity of the symptoms was not related to the electrophysiological parameters. Females were more symptomatic than males. Patients in group B did not receive any treatment (except 1 because of parents' choice) nor did they develop symptoms, and 5 patients had resolution of palpitations. Forty-one of 46 patients in group A were successfully treated with medical therapy as initial treatment. Thirty-one patients in group A underwent slow pathway ablation. There were late recurrences of AVNRT in 6 patients. Typical AVNRT in young patients does not appear to be life threatening. Patients with mild or no symptoms do well without therapy. Medical therapy and slow pathway ablation appear to be effective in the more symptomatic patients. Age and electrophysiological variables are not related to the symptoms or response to treatment. Females with AVNRT are more symptomatic and more likely to present with syncope.

Electrophysiological Characteristics of Junctional Rhythm During Ablation of the Slow Pathway in Different Types of Atrioventricular Nodal Reentrant Tachycardia

BACKGROUND

Junctional rhythm (JR) is commonly observed during radiofrequency (RF) ablation of the slow pathway for atrioventricular (AV) nodal reentrant tachycardia. However, the atrial activation pattern and conduction time from the His-bundle region to the atria recorded during JR in different types of AV nodal reentrant tachycardia have not been fully defined.

METHODS

Forty-five patients who underwent RF ablation of the slow pathway for AV nodal reentrant tachycardia were included; 27 patients with slow-fast, 11 patients with slow-intermediate, and 7 patients with fast-slow AV nodal reentrant tachycardia. The atrial activation pattern and HA interval (from the His-bundle potential to the atrial recording of the high right atrial catheter) during AV nodal reentrant tachycardia (HA(SVT)) and JR (HA(JR)) were analyzed.

RESULTS

In all patients with slow-fast AV nodal reentrant tachycardia, the atrial activation sequence recorded during JR was similar to that of the retrograde fast pathway, and transient retrograde conduction block during JR was found in 1 (4%) patient. The HA(JR) was significantly shorter than the HA(SVT) (57 +/- 24 vs 68 +/- 21 ms, P < 0.01). In patients with slow-intermediate AV nodal reentrant tachycardia, the atrial activation sequence of the JR was similar to that of the retrograde fast pathway in 5 (45%), and to that of the retrograde intermediate pathway in 6 (55%) patients. Transient retrograde conduction block during JR was noted in 1 (9%) patient. The HA(JR) was also significantly shorter than the HA(SVT) (145 +/- 27 vs 168 +/- 29 ms, P = 0.014). In patients with fast-slow AV nodal reentrant tachycardia, retrograde conduction with block during JR was noted in 7 (100%) patients. The incidence of retrograde conduction block during JR was higher in fast-slow AV nodal reentrant tachycardia than slow-fast (7/7 vs 1/11, P < 0.01) and slow-intermediate AV nodal reentrant tachycardia (7/7 vs 1/27, P < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with slow-fast and slow-intermediate AV nodal reentrant tachycardia, the JR during ablation of the slow pathway conducted to the atria through the fast or intermediate pathway. In patients with fast-slow AV nodal reentrant tachycardia, there was no retrograde conduction during JR. These findings suggested there were different characteristics of the JR during slow-pathway ablation of different types of AV nodal reentrant tachycardia.

Influence of isoproterenol on the accelerated junctional rhythm observed during radiofrequency catheter ablation of atrioventricular nodal slow pathway conduction

BACKGROUND

Accelerated junctional rhythm (AJR) has been considered as a sensitive but rather nonspecific marker of successful radiofrequency (RF) ablation of slow pathway in patients with atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT). However, AJR also occurs commonly during isoproterenol infusion. We therefore investigated the effect of isoproterenol on the significance of AJR while attempting slow pathway ablation.

METHODS

Forty patients with AVNRT underwent slow pathway ablation. Sixty-nine RF applications accompanied by AJR were observed and were separated into 2 groups: applications performed without (group I, n = 26) and with (group II, n = 43) isoproterenol infusion. The specificity of AJR for successful ablation for each group was calculated.

RESULTS

The specificity of AJR in groups I and II was 73% (19/26) and 49% (21/43), respectively (P <.05). There was no significant difference between the groups in the atrial electrogram width, atrial/ventricular electrogram amplitude ratio, the time from application onset to AJR emergence, or AJR cycle length. The catheter-tip temperature at AJR emergence was significantly lower (47 degrees C +/- 3 degrees C vs 52 degrees C +/- 3 degrees C, P <.001) and the ratio of junctional beats to total heart beats during RF application was significantly greater (46% +/- 24% vs 33% +/- 18%, P <.05) in group II compared with group I.

CONCLUSIONS

Isoproterenol lowers the threshold of AJR emergence during RF application and thereby lowers the specificity of AJR for successful ablation. Complete washout of isoproterenol may therefore improve the specificity of AJR during RF ablation in patients with AVNRT.