Preexisting Pulmonary Vein Stenosis in Patients Undergoing Atrial Fibrillation Ablation: A Report of Five Cases

Collateral Damage from Catheter Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation Lessons Learnt in the Past Decade

Catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation (AF) has been increasingly performed over the past decade. Regardless of technological advances and technique improvement, catheter ablation for AF remains a highly complex procedure and the risk of procedural complications is not negligible. This article discusses the management and the approach to avoid the serious complications of catheter AF ablation including pulmonary vein stenosis, atrioesophageal fistula, cardiac tamponade, stroke and collateral nervous damage. The management of periprocedural anticoagulation and the complications associated with epicardial AF ablation are also described.

Postradiofrequency ablation inflammatory pseudotumor associated with pulmonary venoocclusive disease: case report and review of the literature

Radiofrequency ablation of pulmonary veins is a common therapeutic intervention for atrial fibrillation. Pulmonary vein stenosis and venoocclusive disease are recognized complications, but the spectrum of pathologies postablation have not been previously reviewed. A recent case at our hospital showed a left hilar soft tissue mass in association with superior pulmonary vein stenosis in a patient 4 years postablation. On resection, this proved to be an inflammatory pseudotumor composed of myofibroblasts in an organizing pneumonia-type pattern with adjacent dendriform ossifications. Pulmonary venoocclusive change was a prominent feature. Literature on the histopathology of postradiofrequency ablation complications is limited. The severity of vascular pathology appears to increase with the postablation interval. Although pulmonary vascular changes are the most common late finding, fibroinflammatory changes including pulmonary pseudotumor formation, attributable to thermal injury, should be considered in the differential diagnosis of these cases.

[Cardiac computed tomography and ablation of atrial fibrillation]

Both cardiac computed tomography (CT) and interventional electrophysiology (EP) have evolved considerably in recent years. Technical improvements in CT have significantly reduced the radiation dose in cardiac applications. This imaging technology plays an important role in preprocedural planning and guidance of the procedures in many EP centers worldwide. Furthermore, CT is the imaging modality of choice to diagnose relevant complications in ablation of atrial fibrillation, e.g. pulmonary vein stenosis or atrioesophageal fistula. In anatomically driven ablation procedures, such as balloon-based procedures in atrial fibrillation, detailed analysis of the relevant cardiac structures is absolutely crucial not only to reduce radiation exposure and procedure times but also to improve ablation success and to reduce the occurrence of complications. Current software applications enable 3-dimensional reconstruction of cardiac images and the integration into electroanatomical navigation systems. This article reviews the available evidence in this field and highlights recent developments in image guidance for ablation of atrial fibrillation.

Prone position is essential for detection of pulmonary vein pseudostenosis by enhanced multidetector computed tomography in patients who undergo pulmonary vein isolation

BACKGROUND

Pulmonary vein (PV) stenosis is a major complication of PV isolation (PVI) by catheter ablation, so in the present study the optimal position for detecting PV stenosis on enhanced multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) image acquisition was determined.

METHODS AND RESULTS

The 64-slice enhanced MDCT was carried out before and after PVI in 116 consecutive patients with atrial fibrillation while they were in the prone position, as well as while supine. The supine position MDCT image showed >50% diameter stenosis of the PV in 11 (9%) patients before PVI (% diameter stenosis: mean 55+/-4%, range 51-65%). Greater than 50% diameter stenosis was seen in the left inferior PV in all 11 patients. The prone position attenuated the PV stenosis findings in the MDCT images in all 11 patients (mean 9+/-6%, range 2-18%). Stenosis visualized on images acquired in the supine position was, therefore, concluded to be pseudostenosis caused by descending aorta compression. At 3 months after PVI, no significant changes in PV diameter were observed in these 11 patients.

CONCLUSION

The present study demonstrated that the prone position is essential for eliminating PV pseudostenosis observed on supine-position enhanced MDCT images. The results also indicate that preexisting PV organic stenosis is rare.

Preablation assessment for the left atrium: comparison of ECG-gated cardiac CT with echocardiography

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES

Evaluate the role of two-dimensional echocardiography and electrocardiographically (ECG)-gated contrast-enhanced multislice computed tomographic (MSCT) cardiac imaging to assess cardiac anatomy, specifically pulmonary venous anatomy and left atrial thrombus, in a selected group of patients before catheter-based atrial fibrillation ablation.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Left atrial anatomy and associated findings in 34 consecutive patients scheduled for electrophysiologic testing who underwent both echocardiography and ECG-gated 16-slice MSCT cardiac imaging were retrospectively compared. Results from two-dimensional transthoracic echocardiography (TTE), cardiac MSCT, electrophysiologic study (EPS), and transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) (when performed) were taken from the official medical record without prior knowledge of this study when interpretation was rendered for clinical use. Electronic record review included: presence of left atrial thrombus (defined as constant filling defect on at least two echocardiographic views or filling defect on computed tomography) and location, pulmonary venous anatomy, and other cardiac, mediastinal, or pulmonary abnormalities.

RESULTS

Left atrial thrombus was identified by cardiac MSCT alone in five patients (15%). Pulmonary venous variants were identified with cardiac MSCT in two patients (6%). Both MSCT and echocardiography were normal in 17 subjects (79%). Echocardiography was better at identifying associated valvular abnormalities that were seen in 10 patients (29%). Cardiac MSCT angiography alone identified other cardiac and noncardiac abnormalities, including suspicious pulmonary malignancy, mediastinal adenopathy, and coronary stenosis in 15 patients (44%).

CONCLUSIONS

Echocardiography and cardiac MSCT angiography often provide complimentary findings during the preprocedural evaluation for patients with atrial fibrillation requiring ablation. Cardiac MSCT may provide significant additional information about the left atrium, mediastinum, coronary circulation, and visualized lung fields. Based on this study, we would advise that patients considered for radiofrequency ablation for uncontrolled right atrial fibrillation have both echocardiography and ECG-gated contrast-enhanced cardiac MSCT performed as part of the preprocedure evaluation.

Compression of the left atrium by the thoracic aorta in patients undergoing pulmonary vein isolation procedure for atrial fibrillation

INTRODUCTION

With the increasing use of pre-procedural imaging techniques such as magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and their integration with electroanatomic mapping systems in catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation (AF), atypical anatomy of the pulmonary veins (PV), left atrium (LA) and their relationship to the thoracic aorta is increasingly recognized.

OBJECTIVE

To characterize atypical LA-PV anatomies revealed by pre-procedural MRI and their impact on the safety and efficacy of AF ablation procedures.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We reported four patients who underwent AF ablation in our electrophysiology laboratory within the last year who had atypical LA-PV anatomy due to aorta compression recognized by pre-procedural three-dimensional (3D) MRI and anatomic segmentation. Twelve matched control cases without aorta compression were selected for comparison of LA-PV measurements.

RESULTS

All four patients in this study had a normal-sized descending thoracic aorta that compressed the left atrium, and all patients had evidence of left inferior PV narrowing secondary to external compression. Two patients also had anterior LA compression leading to posteriorly displaced interatrial septum. Isolation was not achieved in some PVs due to anatomic restraints, concern regarding risks of aortic injury and worsening pulmonary vein stenosis. There were no immediate or short-term complications.

CONCLUSIONS

Extrinsic compression by the descending aorta on the LA and PV leading to LA compression and/or preexisting PV stenosis is uncommon but has potentially important implications on the overall safety and efficacy of AF ablation procedures. Pre-procedural imaging plays an important role in assessing such anatomic variations and planning of the procedures in order to minimize the risk of PV stenosis and aortic injury.