Paradoxical Atrial Undersensing: Noise Rate Reversion or Amplifier Ringing?

Quiet timer blanking in a dog with sick sinus syndrome and a permanent transvenous pacemaker

A 14-year-old, 5.8 kg (12.7 lb) male castrated Jack Russell Terrier was referred for investigation of syncope and an arrhythmia. Electrocardiogram showed pronounced variation in the sinus rate including long periods of sinus arrest and an inconsistent escape rhythm. Sick sinus syndrome was the presumptive diagnosis. A single lead permanent transvenous pacemaker was implanted and was programmed to perform ventricular-demand pacing. Postoperative pacemaker interrogation revealed undersensing and asynchronous pacing during episodes of supraventricular tachycardia (SVT). This intermittent pacemaker malfunction was attributed to a specific pacemaker programming feature called quiet timer blanking. Adjustment of pacemaker parameters did not restore normal function. Treatment with sotalol (5 mg per os q 12 h) was used to medically treat the SVT, and asynchronous pacing was not observed during follow-up visits. To the authors' knowledge, this is the first documented case of quiet timer blanking causing paroxysmal undersensing and asynchronous pacing in a dog with a permanent pacemaker.

Atrial undersensing secondary to quiet timer blanking in pediatric and congenital heart disease patients

BACKGROUND

Atrial undersensing despite normal atrial lead parameters and high amplitude electrograms has been described in adult patients as a consequence of atrial amplifier saturation. Repetitive inputs cause amplifier ringing and undersensing occurs as a consequence of quiet timer blanking. High amplitude ventricular electrograms can also result in atrial blanking secondary to cross-chamber effect. This has not been described in pediatric patients or epicardial pacing systems and specific risk factors are not known. We describe five cases of atrial undersensing in pediatric and congenital heart disease patients with epicardial dual-chamber systems and high ventricular lead outputs.

METHODS

This was a retrospective cohort study of all patients with dual-chamber pacing systems cared for at the Heart Institute at Children's Hospital Colorado.

RESULTS

Five cases of atrial undersensing with normal atrial lead parameters were found. All were epicardial systems with acceptable lead parameters at implantation and Medtronic (Medtronic, Inc., Minneapolis, MN, USA) generators with unipolar leads. Ventricular pacing outputs were elevated at presentation, median 5.5 V (5-7.5). Presenting symptoms were exercise intolerance (four) and detection on routine monitoring (one). Successful interventions included reduction in ventricular lead pacing output (one), programming of rate response (two), and implantation of an alternative generator manufacturer (two).

CONCLUSION

Atrial undersensing secondary to amplifier ringing and quiet timer blanking is an uncommon presentation but may be clinically important in patients with unipolar epicardial atrial leads and high pacing outputs from ventricular leads.