"Sequential" Mapping Mimicking "Simultaneous" Mapping Using Magnetic Navigation During Catheter Ablation of Supraventricular Tachycardia: Results of the Single DX Study

Electrophysiology Catheter Detection and Reconstruction From Two Views in Fluoroscopic Images

Electrophysiology (EP) studies and catheter ablation have become important treatment options for several types of cardiac arrhythmias. We present a novel image-based approach for automatic detection and 3-D reconstruction of EP catheters where the physician marks the catheter to be reconstructed by a single click in each image. The result can be used to provide 3-D information for enhanced navigation throughout EP procedures. Our approach involves two X-ray projections acquired from different angles, and it is based on two steps: First, we detect the catheter in each view after manual initialization using a graph-search method. Then, the detection results are used to reconstruct a full 3-D model of the catheter based on automatically determined point pairs for triangulation. An evaluation on 176 different clinical fluoroscopic images yielded a detection rate of 83.4%. For measuring the error, we used the coupling distance which is a more accurate quality measure than the average point-wise distance to a reference. For successful outcomes, the 2-D detection error was 1.7 mm ±1.2 mm. Using successfully detected catheters for reconstruction, we obtained a reconstruction error of 1.8 mm ±1.1 mm on phantom data. On clinical data, our method yielded a reconstruction error of 2.2 mm ±2.2 mm.

Remote magnetic navigation for catheter ablation of atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Catheter ablation has become a well-established, first-line therapy for atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT), the most common reentry supraventricular tachycardia in humans. Robotic systems are becoming increasingly common in both complex and simple ablation procedures with presumed potential improvements in procedural efficacy and safety. The authors of this article conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis on the effectiveness and safety of the magnetic navigation system (MNS) in comparison with conventional catheter navigation for AVNRT ablation. An electronic search was performed using Cochrane Central database, Medline, Embase and Web of Knowledge between 2002 and 2012. References were searched manually. Outcomes of interest were: acute and long-term success, complications, total procedure, ablation and fluoroscopic times. Continuous variables were reported as standardized difference in means (SDM); odds ratios (OR) were reported for dichotomous variables. Thirteen studies (seven of which were nonrandomized controlled, four were case series and two were randomized controlled studies) involving 679 adult patients were identified. Twelve studies were based on a single center and one study was multicentral. MNS was deployed in 339 patients. The follow-up period ranged between 75 and 180 days. Acute success and long-term freedom from arrhythmia were not significantly different between MNS and control groups (98 vs 98%, OR: 0.94 [95% CI: 0.21-4.1] and 97 vs 96%, OR: 1.18 [95% CI: 0.35-4.0], respectively). A shorter fluoroscopic time was achieved with MNS; however, this did not reach statistical significance (15 vs 19 min, SDM: -0.26 [95% CI: -0.64-0.12]). Longer total procedure but similar ablation times were noted with MNS (160 vs 148 min, SDM: 3.48 [95% CI: 0.75-6.21] and 4 vs 6 min, SDM: -0.83 [95% CI: -2.19-0.53], respectively). The overall complication rate was similar between both groups (2.7 vs 1.0%, OR: 1.28 [95% CI: 0.33-4.96]). Our data suggest that the usage of MNS results in similar rates of success and complications when compared with conventional manual catheter ablation for AVNRT. MNS had a trend for reduced fluoroscopic time. Longer total procedure time was observed with MNS while the actual ablation time remained similar. Prospective randomized trials will be needed to better evaluate the relative role of MNS for catheter ablation of AVNRT.

[Magnetic navigation in invasive electrophysiological diagnostic and therapy]

Electrophysiological stimulation and ablation is currently performed with manually deflectable catheters of different lengths and curves. Disadvantages of conventional therapy are catheter stiffness, limited local stability, risk of dislocation or perforation, and reduced tissue contact in regions with difficult access. Fluoroscopy to control catheter movement and position may require substantial radiation times. Magnetic navigation was first applied for right heart catherization in congenital heart disease in 1991; the first electrophysiological application took place in 2003. Today, an ablation electrode with small magnets is aligned in the patient's heart by two external magnets positioned at both sides of the thorax. Antegrade and retrograde movement of the distal catheter tip are performed via an external device on the patient's thigh. Three-dimensional MRI scans acquired before intervention can be merged with electroanatomical reconstruction, leading to further reductions of radiation burden. During treatment of supraventricular tachyarrhythmias high local precision of magnetically guided catheters, good local stability, and a substantially reduced radiation time have been reported. First applications in ventricular tachyarrhythmias and complex congenital cardiac defects indicate a comparable effect. Limitations of this therapy are the application in left atrial procedures (open irrigated ablation catheters not yet available), difficult transaortic retrograde approach (high lead flexibility), and the considerable costs. Magnet-assisted navigation is feasible during percutaneous coronary interventions of tortuous coronary arteries and in positioning guidewires in coronary sinus side branches for resynchronisation therapy. Future applications will be complex left atrial procedures, magnetically guided cardiac stem cell therapy, local drug application, and extracardiac vessel therapy.