Efficacy of Medical Therapy for the Reduction of Heart Failure Events in Patients with Implanted Cardioverter Defibrillators

Heart failure treatment in patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices: Opportunity for improvement

BACKGROUND

Heart failure and reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) is the predominant indication for cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) and implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) implantation. The care gap and opportunity to optimize guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT) is unclear.

OBJECTIVE

We sought to define uptake, eligibility, dose, and adherence to GDMT in patients with CRT/ICD and HFrEF.

METHODS

MEDLINE was searched from 2000 to July 2021 for major randomized trials, registries, and cohort studies evaluating GDMT in this population. Thirty-eight studies focused on medical therapy in patients with CRT/ICD devices (CRT = 23, ICD = 11, and both = 4).

RESULTS

In the pivotal device trials, ACEI/ARB and beta-blocker use was high (mean 94%, range 41%-99%; and 83%, range 27%-97%, respectively), but mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists were modest (mean 45%, range 32%-61%), in keeping with guidelines of that era. Similar results were found in observational registries. CRT was associated with beta-blocker uptitration, while the effects on ACEI/ARB were less consistent. For beta blockers, 57%-68% of patients were uptitrated, increasing the mean percent of target dose achieved by 24% from baseline to follow-up. In one study, adherence increased, for ACEI/ARB from 37% to 55% and beta blockers 34% to 58%. Only 1 study assessed potential eligibility at implant for sacubitril-valsartan (72%) or ivabradine (28%), and no study examined sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors. Increased uptake, titration, and dose was associated with reduced mortality, hospitalization, and device therapies.

CONCLUSION

Patients with HFrEF and ICD/CRT are undertreated with respect to GDMT, and there is opportunity to optimize therapy to improve morbidity and mortality.

Atrial Fibrillation and Ventricular Tachyarrhythmias: Advancements for Better Outcomes

Cardiac arrhythmias are associated with several cardiac diseases and are prevalent in people with or without structural and valvular abnormalities. Ventricular arrhythmias (VA) can be life threating and their onset require immediate medical attention. Similarly, atrial fibrillation and flutter lead to stroke, heart failure and even death. Optimal treatment of VA is variable and depends on the medical condition associated with the rhythm disorder (which includes reversible causes such as myocardial ischemia or pro-arrhythmic drugs). While an implanted cardioverter defibrillator is often indicated in secondary prevention of VA. This review highlights the newest advancements in these techniques and management of ventricular and atrial tachyarrhythmias, along with pharmacological therapy.

Outcome after device implantation in chronic heart failure is dependent on concomitant medical treatment

BACKGROUND

Device implantation in chronic heart failure (CHF) for cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) with or without implantable cardioverter/defibrillator (ICD) is an established treatment option for symptomatic patients under medical baseline therapy. Although recommended, the need for optimization of medical therapy was never proven. As in 'the real world', medical therapy is not always up-titrated to the desirable dosages; this provides the opportunity to evaluate the impact of optimizing medical therapy in patients who had received a device therapy with proven effectiveness.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This observational cohort study retrospectively assessed the 'real life'-effect of CRT compared with that of CRT/ICD therapy and the impact of concomitant pharmacotherapy on outcome. Outcome of patients with guideline recommended renin-angiotensin system inhibitor and ss-blocker dosages was compared with that of patients who failed to reach the desired dosages. Mean follow-up for the 205 CHF (95 CRT and 110 CRT/ICD) patients was 16.8 + or - 12.4 months.

RESULTS

In the total study cohort, 83 (41%) reached the combined primary endpoint of all-cause death or cardiac hospitalization [CRT group: 25 (26%), CRT/ICD group: 58 (52.7%), P < 0.001]. Multiple cox regression analysis revealed non-optimized medical therapy at follow-up [HR = 2.080 (1.166-3.710), P = 0.013] and CRT/ICD vs. CRT [HR = 2.504 (1.550-4.045), P < 0.001] as significant predictors of the primary endpoint.

CONCLUSION

Our data stress the importance of professional monitoring and titration of pharmacotherapy not only in medically treated CHF patients but also in patients under device therapy by a heart failure unit or a specialized cardiologist.