Comparison of the Location of Slow Conduction Velocity in Cavotricuspid-Dependent Atrial Flutter in Patients With and Without Prior Atriotomy: Different Arrhythmogenic Basis and Clinical Implications for Placement of Atriotomy

The characteristics of pre-excitation syndrome concomitant with atrial tachyarrhythmia and the effect of radiofrequency ablation

BACKGROUND

Wolff-Parkinson-White (WPW) concomitant with atrial tachyarrhythmia (ATA) has not been systemically characterized.

METHODS

Detailed electroanatomical mapping of the right atrium (RA) and/or left atrium (LA) was performed using three-dimensional mapping and the accessory pathway (AP) was mapped.

RESULTS

WPW syndrome with ATA was diagnosed in 11 patients (median age 60 years). The characteristic of unidirectional anterograde conduction over the AP was displayed in nine patients, six of whom were intermittent. Sustained atrial tachycardia, that is, counterclockwise atrial flutter (AFL) with a median tachycardia cycle length (TCL) of 225 (220-275) ms, was mapped in eight patients; furthermore, "figure 8" right atrial reentry was mapped with TCL 250 ms in one patient with a surgical history of ventricular septal defect repair. The remaining two patients underwent mitral annulus-dependent AT after paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (PAF) ablation and LA micro-reentry AT, respectively. In four patients, the location of the APs was left posterior. Left-lateral APs were identified in four patients. The locations of the APs in the remaining three patients were the right posterior and middle septum. All ATAs and APs were successfully ablated. After a median follow-up of 37 (15-72) months, no anterograde conduction over the AP was recorded, new onset of PAF was recorded in three patients, and all of them underwent circumferential pulmonary vein isolation.

CONCLUSIONS

WPW with concomitant ATA frequently had continuous anterograde conduction over the AP with a rapid ventricular rate. Most WPWs displayed the characteristic of unidirectional anterograde conduction.

Characteristics and Ablation Outcomes of Atrial Tachycardia in Patients with Prior Cardiac Surgery vs. Spontaneous Scars: Where Are the Differences?

(1) Background: Atrial scars play an important role in atrial tachycardia (AT). They can not only be found in patients with prior cardiac surgery (PCS) but also in patients without PCS or significant structural heart disease, in which case the scar is called a spontaneous scar (SS). This study aims to compare the characteristics, mechanisms and ablation outcomes of AT in patients with PCS and SS. (2) Methods: We retrospectively reviewed electrophysiological and ablative characteristics of ATs in 46 patients with PCS and 18 patients with SS. (3) Results: There were averages of 1.52 and 2.33 ATs per patient in the PCS group and SS group, respectively (p < 0.01). Cavo-tricuspid isthmus dependent atrial flutter (CTI-AFL) was presented in most patients in both groups (93.50% vs. 77.80%, p = 0.17), whereas the SS group had a higher occurrence of scar-mediated reentrant AT (SMAT) and focal AT (FAT) compared with the PCS group (88.90% vs. 39.10%, p < 0.01; 22.2% vs. 2.2%, p < 0.05). There were no significant differences in acute success rate between the two groups, whereas patients with SS had lower long-term success rate (87.0% vs. 61.1%, p < 0.05) and higher occurrence of sinus node dysfunction (SND) (4.3% vs. 22.2%, p < 0.05). (4) Conclusions: CTI-AFL is common in both patients with PCS and SS, and routine CTI ablation is recommended. Compared with patients with PCS, patients with SS have more ATs, especially with higher occurrence of SMAT and FAT, and had a lower long-term success rate and higher incidence of SND.

Multi-electrode mapping of complex macroreentry atrial tachycardia

BACKGROUND

Multi-electrode mapping (MEM) is increasingly applied in ablation of complex atrial arrhythmias. This study aimed to evaluate MEM for analysis and treatment of complex macroreentry atrial tachycardia (MAT).

METHODS

Patients with MAT related to scarring, history of heart surgery or atrial linear ablation were studied. Patients were mapped with conventional activation mapping (CAM) or MEM. After characterizing the mechanism of atrial tachycardia (AT), the ablation was performed.

RESULTS

The study consisted of 114 eligible patients, 74 in the CAM and 40 in MEM. Compared with CAM, MEM had a shorter procedure duration (156.7 ± 59.1 ms vs. 127.3 ± 59.3 ms, P = 0.003) and mapping duration (62.6 ± 35.7 ms vs. 30.5 ± 15.3 ms, P < 0.001) and more mapping points (1364.9 ± 828.7 points vs. 148.3 ± 79.6 points, P < 0.001). There were no significant differences between CAM and MEM in acute ablation success rate, complication, postoperative AADs, and ablation duration. The mean disease-free survival time in CAM versus MEM was 20.8 (95% CI: 17.6-24.1) months versus 26.6 (95% CI: 22.7-30.4) months. The median disease-free survival time in the CAM versus MEM was 20.0 (95% CI: 13.9-26.1) months versus 30.0 (95% CI: 26.7-36.3) months. The AT recurrence risk of MEM was 0.522 times that of CAM (HR 95% CI: 0.282-0.968; P = 0.039).

CONCLUSION

MEM is strongly recommended in ablation of complex MAT.

Right atrial dual-loop reentrant tachycardia after cardiac surgery: Prevalence, electrophysiological characteristics, and ablation outcomes

BACKGROUND

Right atrial (RA) dual-loop reentrant tachycardia has been described in patients who have undergone open heart surgery. However, the prevalence, electrophysiological (EP) substrate, and ablation outcomes have been poorly characterized.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to investigate the prevalence, EP substrate, and ablation outcomes for RA dual-loop reentrant tachycardia after cardiac surgery.

METHODS

We identified all patients with atrial tachycardia (AT) after cardiac surgery. We compared EP findings and outcomes of those with RA dual-loop reentrant tachycardia to a control group of patients with RA macroreentrant arrhythmias in the setting of linear RA free-wall (FW) scar.

RESULTS

Of the 127 patients with 152 postsurgical ATs, 28 of the ATs (18.4%) had RA dual-loop reentry and 24 of 28 (85.7%) had tricuspid annular reentry combined with FW incisional reentry. An incision length >51.5 mm along the FW predicted the substrate for a second loop. In 22 of 23 patients (95.7%) with initial ablation in the cavotricuspid isthmus, a change in the interval between Halo_d to CS_p could be recorded, and 15 of 23 patients (65.2%) had coronary sinus activation pattern change. Complete success was achieved in 25 of 28 patients (89.3%) in the dual-loop reentry group and in 64 of 69 patients (92.8%) in the control group. After mean follow-up of 33.9 ± 24.2 months, 24 of 28 patients (85.7%) and 60 of 69 patients (86.95%) were free of arrhythmias after the initial procedure in the 2 groups, respectively.

CONCLUSION

The prevalence of RA dual-loop reentry is 18.4% of ATs with prior atriotomy scar. A long incision should alert physicians to the possibility of a second loop at the FW. Halo and coronary sinus activation patterns provide important clues to circuit transformation.

Substrate characteristics and ablation outcome of left atrial tachycardia in rheumatic mitral valve disease

BACKGROUND

Right atrial tachycardia (AT) is a common arrhythmia postsurgical valve replacement in patients with rheumatic heart disease (RHD). However, the substrate and the mechanism of left AT in such patients and the ablation efficacy is less known.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Twenty-seven RHD patients with AT were enrolled in this study; nine of them (33%) had left AT. Five and four patients had left AT during the first and second procedure, respectively. A spontaneous scar in the left posterior wall was identified in all patients, and obvious anterior scar in three patients. Dual-roof-dependent AT was found in three patients and macroreentry AT surrounding right pulmonary vein was identified in one patient, two of whom had left anterior scar. Three patients had AT circuit going around the mitral annulus, one of whom had left anterior scar. Entrainment pacing at different sites confirmed the mechanism of these macroreentries. Two patients had a focal origin, one was localized in posterior wall at the edge of the scar and the other one was originated from the left septum with normal voltage. After a mean follow-up of 27.4 ± 7.9 months, the left AT group had a similar recurrence rate compared with the right AT group alone (67% vs 56%, P = 0.58). In the left AT group, 11% of patients had AT recurrence and 56% of patients developed atrial fibrillation.

CONCLUSION

Left atrial AT can occur in RHD patients postmitral valve replacement. Catheter ablation is feasible with high acute success rate. The incidence of late development atrial fibrillation is considerable after successful ablation.

Very long-term outcome of catheter ablation of post-incisional atrial tachycardia: Role of incisional and non-incisional scar

BACKGROUND

The arrhythmogenicity of right atrial (RA) incisional scar after cardiac surgery could result in atrial tachycardia (AT). Radiofrequency catheter ablation is effective in the treatment of such tachycardia. However, data regarding long-term outcomes are limited.

METHODS AND RESULTS

A total of 105 patients with prior RA incision who underwent radiofrequency catheter ablation of AT were included. In the first procedure, electroanatomic mapping (EAM) revealed a total of 139 ATs in 105 patients, including 88 cavotricuspid isthmus dependent atrial flutters (IDAFs), 5 mitral annulus reentrant tachycardias (MARTs), 44 intra-atrial reentrant tachycardias (IARTs) and 2 focal ATs (FATs). AT was successfully eliminated in 101 (96.1%) patients. During a mean follow-up period of 90 ± 36 months, recurrent AT was observed in 23 patients and 21 underwent a second ablation. A total of 23 ATs were identified in redo procedures including 4 IDAFs, 2 MARTs, 12 IARTs and 5 FATs. The time to recurrence was significantly different among various AT types. Acute success was achieved in 20 of 23 redo procedures. Taking a total of 21 patients presenting atrial fibrillation during follow-up into account, 85 patients (81.9%) were in sinus rhythm. No complications except for a case of RA compartmentation occurred.

CONCLUSION

RA incisional scar played an essential role in promoting both IDAF and IART, while non-incisional scar contributed to a substantial rate of late recurrent AT in forms of both macroreentry and small reentry. Catheter ablation using EAM system resulted in a high success rate during long-term follow-up.