Physical Basis for the Mitral Velocity Curve in Assessing Mitral Valve Area and Left Ventricular Diastolic Function

[The effect of the duration of the cardiac cycles on determining mitral valve area by means of pressure half-time]

INTRODUCTION AND AIMS

To analyze the influence of variations in the length of cardiac cycle length of calculating mitral valve area by means of the pressure half time in patients with mitral valve stenosis and atrial fibrillation.

METHODS

Fifty-nine patients with pure mitral valve stenosis and atrial fibrillation were subjected to transmitral flow measurements by continuous Doppler monitoring from the apical window. In each patient the pressure half time was quantified, corresponding to a minimum of 30 consecutive cycles.

RESULTS

Considering all the measurements made in each patient, the correlation between pressure half time and cardiac cycle was significant in 20 cases (34%). The pressure half time variation coefficients were significantly greater when including the values corresponding to the shortest cycles. Thus, for cycle duration of > or = 800, 700, 600, 500 and 400 ms, the mean values were 0.096 +/- 0.041, 0.106 +/- 0.042 (NS), 0.128 +/- 0.032 (p < 0.05), 0.167 +/- 0.048 (p < 0.001) and 0.231 +/- 0.057 (p < 0.0001), respectively. Upon analyzing the relation between pressure half time and cardiac cycle with progressive exclusion of the longer cycles > or = 800, 700 and 600 ms the number of patients with significant correlation coefficients increased to 19/37 (51%), 12/23 (52%) and 4/6 (67%) on respectively excluding.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with mitral valve stenosis and atrial fibrillation show a variation in pressure half time that may complicate calculation of the mitral valve area. Variability is inherent to the measurement method, and is furthermore dependent upon cardiac cycle duration. This may be resolved by limiting determinations to cycles longer than 800 ms.

Old and new paradigms on diastolic function in acute myocardial infarction

Although left ventricular systolic function after myocardial infarction has been the subject of detailed studies, diastolic phenomena during and after acute myocardial infarction are less well understood. The reasons for this are that catheterization studies, which are the gold standard, are not practical for serial measurements, whereas Doppler echocardiographic evaluation of diastolic function is based on the assessment of left ventricular filling only rather than on the pressure-volume relation. This article reviews invasive and noninvasive studies of diastolic function after myocardial infarction and proposes an integrated approach to the assessment of systolic and diastolic function that are simultaneously but independently impaired after myocardial infarction.

Estimation of left ventricular end-diastolic pressure with the difference in pulmonary venous and mitral A durations is limited when mitral E and A waves are overlapped

Previous studies showed that difference in pulmonary venous and mitral A-wave durations can be used for the estimation of left ventricular end-diastolic pressure, which is based on the assumption that the pulmonary venous A wave and mitral A wave start with the beginning of left atrial contraction. It is also assumed that the mitral A wave ends with the end of left atrial contraction. These assumptions may not be correct if left atrial contraction occurs before the early left ventricular filling is completed. Adequate Doppler mitral inflow and pulmonary venous flow signals were obtained simultaneously with left ventricular pressures at the cardiac catheterization laboratory in 50 patients who showed separated E and A waves in mitral inflow. After heart rate was increased by right atrial pacing to make the mitral E and A waves overlap, Doppler and hemodynamic measurements were repeated. When E and A waves are separated, pulmonary A-wave duration exceeding mitral A-wave duration has a sensitivity of 67% and specificity of 85% in the prediction of elevated left ventricular end-diastolic pressure (>/=20 mm Hg), whereas the pulmonary A wave ending later than mitral A wave has a sensitivity of 83% and a specificity of 45%. When the mitral E and A waves are overlapped, the pulmonary A wave ending later than mitral A wave is better for the prediction of elevated left ventricular end-diastolic pressure (sensitivity 55%, specificity 75%) than pulmonary A-wave duration exceeding mitral A-wave duration (sensitivity 9%, specificity 96%). However, overall, both methods are limited for clinical use.

Doppler evaluation of left and right ventricular diastolic function: a technical guide for obtaining optimal flow velocity recordings

Doppler mitral flow velocities and related variables are used to assess left (LV) and right ventricular filling and, indirectly, ventricular diastolic function. Three abnormal ventricular filling patterns (impaired relaxation and pseudonormal and restrictive physiology) are recognized in patients with various heart diseases and have been related to alterations in LV diastolic properties and filling pressures. More recently, these variables have been used to assess the hemodynamic effects of drug therapy or heart surgery and prognosis in patients with restrictive and dilated cardiomyopathies. Despite these encouraging results, widespread clinical use of these Doppler techniques has been hampered by difficulties in obtaining accurate and reproducible measurements from Doppler flow velocity recordings. This is due, in part, to an underappreciation of factors such as cardiac filling mechanics, Doppler examination principles, and ultrasound machine settings, which can markedly affect the quality of the flow velocity recordings. The purpose of this article is to provide the technical information for performing a systematic and comprehensive Doppler evaluation of LV diastolic function that can be used on a routine basis. This information includes discussing the different flow velocity recordings required for a Doppler assessment of LV diastolic function, their proper recording technique, and the common technical pitfalls.

The noninvasive assessment of left ventricular diastolic function with two-dimensional and Doppler echocardiography

Left ventricular diastolic filling can be determined reliably by Doppler-derived mitral and pulmonary venous flow velocities. Diastolic filling abnormalities are broadly classified at their extremes to impaired relaxation and restrictive physiology with many patterns in between. An impaired relaxation pattern identifies patients with early stages of heart disease, and appropriate therapy may avert progression and functional disability. Pseudonormalization is a transitional phase between abnormal relaxation and restrictive physiology and signifies increased filling pressure and decreased compliance. In this phase, reducing preload, optimizing afterload, and treating the underlying disease are clinically helpful. A restrictive physiology pattern identifies advanced, usually symptomatic disease with a poor prognosis. Therapeutic intervention is directed toward normalizing loading conditions and improving the restrictive filling pattern, although this may not be feasible in certain heart diseases. Finally, many patients have left ventricular filling patterns that appear indeterminate or mixed. In these cases, clinical information, left atrial and left ventricular size, pulmonary venous flow velocity, and alteration of preload help assess diastolic function and estimate diastolic filling pressures.

Pulmonary venous flow as assessed by Doppler echocardiography: potential clinical applications

During the past few years Doppler assessment of pulmonary venous flow has gained increasing interest. The growing experience with the use of transesophageal echocardiography, the approach that nearly always yields registrations adequate for quantitative analysis, has markedly contributed in this respect. The Doppler-derived pulmonary venous flow pattern can be regarded as a measure of left atrial inflow and it augments the clinical significance of Doppler transmitral flow in the evaluation of diastolic left ventricular function. This article summarizes physiological background, possible applications, and limitations of Doppler echocardiography of pulmonary venous flow in clinical cardiology.

Estimation of left ventricular filling pressures using two-dimensional and Doppler echocardiography in adult patients with cardiac disease. Additional value of analyzing left atrial size, left atrial ejection fraction and the difference in duration of pulmonary venous and mitral flow velocity at atrial contraction

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this study was to determine whether left atrial size and ejection fraction are related to left ventricular filling pressures in patients with coronary artery disease.

BACKGROUND

In patients with coronary artery disease, left ventricular filling pressures can be estimated by using Doppler mitral and pulmonary venous flow velocity variables. However, because these flow velocities are age dependent, additional variables that indicate elevated left ventricular filling pressures are needed to increase diagnostic accuracy.

METHODS

Echocardiographic left atrial and Doppler mitral and pulmonary venous flow velocity variables were correlated with left ventricular filling pressures in 70 patients undergoing cardiac catheterization.

RESULTS

Left atrial size and volumes were larger and left atrial ejection fractions were lower in patients with elevated left ventricular filling pressures. Mean pulmonary wedge pressure was related to mitral E/A wave velocity ratio (r = 0.72), left atrial minimal volume (r = 0.70), left atrial ejection fraction (r = -0.66) and atrial filling fraction (r = -0.66). Left ventricular end-diastolic and A wave pressures were related to the difference in pulmonary venous and mitral A wave duration (both r = 0.77). By stepwise multilinear regression analysis, the ratio of mitral E to A wave velocity was the most important determinant of pulmonary wedge (r = 0.63) and left ventricular pre-A wave (r = 0.75) pressures, whereas the difference in pulmonary venous and mitral A wave duration was the most important variable for both left ventricular A wave (r = 0.75) and left ventricular end-diastolic (r = 0.80) pressures. The sensitivity of a left atrial minimal volume > 40 cm3 for identifying a mean pulmonary wedge pressure > 12 mm Hg was 82%, with a specificity of 98%.

CONCLUSIONS

Left atrial size, left atrial ejection fraction and the difference between mitral and pulmonary venous flow duration at atrial contraction are independent determinants of left ventricular filling pressures in patients with coronary artery disease. The additive value of left atrial size and Doppler variables in estimating filling pressures and the possibility that left atrial size may be less age dependent than other mitral and pulmonary venous flow velocity variables merit further investigation.