On-Line Myocardial Tissue Characterization with a New Commercially Produced Software

Comparison of Acoustic Densitometry and Dobutamine Echocardiography for an Assessment of Myocardial Viability

AIM

The aim of this study has been to compare acoustic densitometry and dobutamine echocardiography for an assessment of myocardial viability.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Thirty-four patients with coronary artery disease and dysfunctional myocardial segments, who were referred for myocardial revascularization, underwent a viability assessment using low-dose dobutamine echocardiography and acoustic densitometry. Results of the two techniques were compared to follow-up resting echocardiography. This follow-up examination was performed at a mean of 3 months after successful revascularization in order to assess the recovery of function in revascularized, initially dysfunctional segments. Echocardiography was performed in standard views using 16-segment model of the left ventricle. Viable myocardium was identified by the augmentation of systolic thickening of an abnormal segment by at least one grade during dobutamine infusion and by the value of the maximal amplitude of cyclic variation of integrated backscatter. Acoustic densitometry had the sensitivity and specificity to predict functional recovery 90% and 77%, respectively. Dobutamine echocardiography had the sensitivity and specificity to predict contractile reserve 83% and 81%, respectively. The results were statistically comparable. Concordance between these methods was 80%.

CONCLUSION

Acoustic densitometry and dobutamine echocardiography did not statistically differ in the prediction of functional recovery dysfunctional myocardial segments after revascularization.

Detection of residual tissue viability within the infarct zone in patients with acute myocardial infarction: ultrasonic integrated backscatter analysis versus dobutamine stress echocardiography

OBJECTIVES

The goals of this study were to analyze temporal changes in cardiac cyclic variation of integrated backscatter (CVIB) in acute myocardial infarction (AMI) and to investigate the predictive value of CVIB normalization compared with that of dobutamine stress echocardiography (DSE) in the assessment of functional recovery after revascularization.

BACKGROUND

The normal CVIB is blunted by ischemia and recovers early after reperfusion, faster than wall motion improvement. Analysis of CVIB has been widely investigated for its potential to detect viable myocardium in the early stage of infarction. No studies have compared CVIB analysis with other techniques for viability assessment in patients with acute ischemic.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Integrated backscatter images were obtained in 12 patients with AMI on days 1, 3, and 7 after admission and 1 month after revascularization. On day 7, DSE was performed in all patients. On admission, 22 of 144 segments were dyssynergic. On day 1, CVIB was abnormal in all 22 infarcted segments, on day 3, in 16, and on day 7, in only 10 infarcted segments. Eight of 10 segments nonviable by CVIB (CVIB-nonviable) were also nonrespondent by DSE; whereas 12 of 14 segments viable by DSE (DSE-viable) were also CVIB-viable. At follow-up, 10 CVIB-viable segments and 1 CVIB-nonviable segment showed functional recovery; whereas 10 of 14 DSE-viable segments showed functional recovery. Thus the positive predictive value of CVIB and DSE was 83% and 72%, respectively, with a diagnostic agreement between techniques in 77% of segments.

CONCLUSIONS

Our data suggest that the normalization in CVIB in the first week after AMI accurately predicts residual tissue viability within the infarct zone. We also observed that the initial pattern of cyclic variation may be predictive of functional recovery. Finally, we found a good correlation between the recovery of a normal CVIB in segments that were still dysfunctional and a more validated method to assess tissue viability, such as the dobutamine test.