Echocardiographic diagnosis of persistent fifth aortic arch

CHARGE syndrome and congenital heart diseases: systematic review of literature

CHARGE syndrome (CS) is a rare genetic disease that affects many areas of the body. The aim of the present systematic review was to evaluate the prevalence and types of congenital heart diseases (CHDs) in CS and their impact on clinical outcome. A systematic review from 1981 to September 2022 was conducted. Clinical studies that reported the association between CS and CHDs were identified, including a case report of a rare congenital anomaly of the aortic arch (AA) with persistent fifth aortic arch (PFAA). Demographic, clinical and outcome data were extracted and analyzed. Sixty-eight studies (44 case reports and 24 case series; n=943 CS patients) were included. The prevalence of CHDs was 76.6%, patent ductus arteriosus (PDA) 26%, ventricular (VSD) 21%, atrial septal defects (ASD) 18%, tetralogy of Fallot 11%, aortic abnormalities 24%. PFAA has not been previously reported in CS. Cardiac surgery was performed in more than half of CS patients (150/242, 62%). In-hospital mortality rate was about 9.5% (n=86/900) in case series studies and 12% (n=5/43) in case reports, including cardiovascular (CV) and non-CV causes. CHDs and feeding disorders associated with CS may have a substantial impact on prognosis. CHDs were usually associated with CS and represent important causes of morbidity and mortality. PFAA, although rare, may also be present. The prognosis is highly dependent on the presence of cardiac and non-cardiac developmental abnormalities. Further studies are needed to better identify the main causes of the long-term outcome of CS patients.

Persistent fifth aortic arch: a comprehensive literature review

Persistent fifth aortic arch (PFAA) is an extremely rare congenital cardiovascular anomaly resulting from the failure of the fifth aortic arch to degenerate during embryonic development; it is often associated with various other cardiovascular anomalies. Despite being first reported by Van Praagh in 1969, there have been only a few individual case reports. Owing to its rarity and lack of comprehensive understanding, PFAA is often misdiagnosed or missed diagnosed during clinical. Thus, this review aimed to summarise the embryonic development, pathological classification, imaging diagnosis, and clinical treatment of PFAA to improve its overall understanding, ultimately helping in accurate diagnosis and treatment.

Persistent fifth aortic arch: a single-center experience, case series

BACKGROUND

Persistent fifth aortic arch (PFAA) is an extremely rare congenital cardiovascular malformation and there is limited data in the literature. The objective of this study is to enhance our understanding and diagnosis of PFAA from echocardiography and computed tomography angiography (CTA) findings, and to evaluate the application of echocardiography in the diagnosis of PFAA.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed five cases of PFAA diagnosed from October 2016 to September 2019 at the Affiliated Children's Hospital of Capital Institute of Pediatrics. We described their diagnosis by echocardiography and CTA findings, and medical history.

RESULTS

Five cases of PFAA were identified in the study. Patients aged from 3 to 48 months and weighed from 4 to 12 kg presented different clinical symptoms upon clinical examination. All the patients completed a primary echocardiographic assessment; however, the first two patients were misdiagnosed by echocardiography and was confirmed by supplemental CTA while the other three patients were directly diagnosed by echocardiography. Surgery was necessary for three patients, two of whom accepted and one refused. The other two patients only needed a follow-up assessment, which showed good results.

CONCLUSIONS

The clinical manifestation of PFAA in our patient population was atypical, and their diagnosis depended on the use of echocardiography. In the case of uncertainty, the final diagnosis was confirmed by CTA. Although the nomenclature and embryonic origin of PFAA remains controversial, the accurate diagnosis of aortic arch abnormalities and associated malformations are imperative for time-sensitive treatments.

Assessment of persistent fifth aortic arch by echocardiography and computed tomography angiography

To evaluate the utility of echocardiography (echo) in the diagnosis of persistent fifth aortic arch (PFAA), a very rare congenital aortic arch anomaly, and to compare echo and computed tomography angiography (CTA) imaging findings to improve our understanding of this anomaly.Data on the clinical diagnosis, imaging findings, and clinical management of PFAA were retrospectively analyzed in 10 suspected cases of PFAA admitted to our hospital between January 2012 and February 2017. We compared echo as a first line examination modality, and CTA and surgery results as the gold standard. Weinberg's classification was used to classify the type of PFAA.All patients (100%) received echo examination, eight patients (80%) received CTA examination, and four patients (40%) received sternotomy surgery; all recovered well after surgery. According to Weinberg's classification, 2, 6, and 2 cases (20%, 60%, and 20%) were classified as Type A, B, and C, respectively. Echo was able to diagnose 5 cases of PFAA (1 Type A case and 4 Type B cases) in the first instance. The diagnostic conformance rate of echo was 62.5% after comparisons with CTA and surgery results.The clinical manifestation of PFAA was atypical, and its diagnosis depended primarily on medical imaging. Echo has a relatively high diagnostic accuracy for PFAA, which is very valuable for its early detection.

Persistent fifth aortic arch: the "great pretender" in clinical practice

Persistence of the embryonic "fifth aortic arch" in postnatal life is a rare, enigmatic - and at times controversial - condition, with variable anatomical forms and physiological consequences. First described in humans over 40 years ago by Van Praagh, the condition was labelled the "great pretender" by Gerlis 25 years later, because of its apparent propensity to mimic anatomically similar structures. Despite many subsequent case reports citing the condition, the true developmental origin of these structures remains unresolved, and has been the subject of debate among embryologists for more than a century. A persistent fifth aortic arch has been defined as an extrapericardial structure, arising from the ascending aorta opposite or proximal to the brachiocephalic artery, and terminating in the dorsal aorta or pulmonary arteries via a persistently patent arterial duct. This description may therefore encompass various anatomical forms, such as a unilateral double-lumen aortic arch, an unrestrictive aortopulmonary shunt, or a critical vascular channel for either the systemic or pulmonary circulation. The physiological properties of these vessels, such as their response to prostaglandins, may also be unpredictable. In this article, we demonstrate a number of cases that fulfil the contemporary definition of "persistent fifth aortic arch" while acknowledging the embryological controversies associated with this term. We also outline the key diagnostic features, particularly with respect to the use of new cross-sectional imaging techniques.

Persistent fifth arch anomalies - broadening the spectrum to include a variation of double aortic arch vascular ring

Fifth arch anomalies are rare and complex and frequently misdiagnosed or mistaken for other entities. We report a double arch vascular ring that is thought to consist of right fourth arch and left fifth arch components, a previously undescribed persistent fifth arch variant. The currently recognized spectrum and classification of fifth arch vascular anomalies are expanded along with illustrative images to justify the proposed changes. Reviewing and expanding the classification of fifth arch anomalies to include a double arch ring variant will promote recognition, correct diagnosis and appropriate management of these anomalies.

How frequent is the fifth arch artery?

Although usually shown in embryology textbooks, the presence of the fifth pair of pharyngeal arch arteries has long been controversial. To the best of our knowledge, six pairs of bilaterally symmetrical arteries developing within the pharyngeal arches are yet to be found in any mammalian or avian species. Collateral channels between the distal ends of the fourth and sixth arch arteries, in contrast, have been found in up to half of all developing mouse embryos. In only one human embryo, again to the best of our knowledge, has a channel been found that extends from the aortic sac to the dorsal aorta, and hence qualifies as an arch artery. Despite these confounding factors in terms of the developmental heritage of the fifth arch arteries, the purported channels are invoked with increasing frequency to describe various lesions discovered in the setting of the congenitally malformed heart. Persistence of the artery of the fifth arch was initially proposed to explain double-barrelled aorta. It was subsequently proposed to account for various systemic-to-pulmonary channels feeding the pulmonary circulation in the setting of pulmonary atresia. It has also been claimed to persist so as to explain abnormal branching of the brachiocephalic arteries from the aortic arch. In the light of the ongoing doubts concerning the existence of the arteries of the fifth arch themselves, we have reviewed the various descriptions of purported fifth arch arteries within the world literature. We have then sought to validate the descriptions on the basis of our own understanding of development, for this purpose providing images of the remoulding arch arteries in the mouse so as to substantiate our conclusions. While accepting that our own interpretations are speculative, we suggest that more convincing alternative explanations can be advanced to account for the majority of lesions currently interpreted on the basis of persistence of the arteries of the fifth arches. Although the interpretations do not necessarily change the therapeutic approaches to the channels, appropriate description is important in terms of their classification.

[Persistent fifth aortic arch with patent ductus arteriosus]

Persistent fifth aortic arch is a rare congenital vascular anomaly, with no clinical impact, so diagnosis is usually an incidental finding occasionally associated with other congenital heart defects. We report a case of persistent fifth aortic arch associated with patent ductus arteriosus.

Prenatal Diagnosis of a Persistent Fifth Aortic Arch, Pulmonary-to-Systemic type: An Unusual Association with Evolving Aortic Coarctation

Persistent fifth arch (PFA) is a rare anomaly that is often underdiagnosed and missed. Different PFA types that have been reported in the literature are systemic-to-systemic type (most common), systemic-to-pulmonary artery (PA), and PA-to-systemic types. The designations of systemic-to-PA or PA-to-systemic are based on if the PFA is a source of PA or systemic blood flow, respectively, in the setting of critical proximal obstruction (pulmonary atresia or aortic atresia). This case describes an unusual PFA, which connects the distal PA to distal ascending aorta; however, it is not associated with critical proximal obstruction, and while it appeared to be an incidental finding in early gestation, progressive serial distal obstruction of the left fourth arch was seen to develop. This case highlights that prenatal diagnosis of PFA is possible and that once a diagnosis is made, serial fetal echocardiograms should be performed to evaluate for evolving lesions.

Coarctation of persistent 5th aortic arch: first report of catheter-based intervention

Persistent 5th aortic arch, originally called double-lumen aortic arch, is a rarely reported cardiac developmental anomaly that results in systemic-to-systemic or systemic-to-pulmonary shunting. When this malformation occurs, other intracardiac defects are almost always present. We report the case of a 7-month-old girl who presented with a heart murmur; she was found to have an interrupted 4th aortic arch and coarctation of a persistent 5th aortic arch, with no other defects. To our knowledge, this is the 3rd report of a pediatric patient with this condition in isolation, and the first report of its diagnosis and treatment by means of cardiac catheterization and balloon angioplasty.

Persistent fifth aortic arch diagnosed by echocardiography and confirmed by angiography: Case report and literature review

Persistent fifth aortic arch is a rare congenital anomaly that can be discovered incidentally or at postmortem exam. It can be associated with major congenital heart malformations involving the systemic or the pulmonary circuits. It usually has no clinical significance but can be either, beneficial as in systemic outflow tract obstructions or cause hemodynamic compromise when associated with a significant left to right shunt. We report an infant with persistent fifth aortic arch associated with Shone's complex diagnosed accurately by transthoracic echocardiography and confirmed by cardiac catheterization and computed tomography.

Metric characterization of the aortic arch of early mouse fetuses and of a fetus featuring a double lumen aortic arch malformation

This study aimed at providing an objective metric characterization of the aortic arch of a mouse fetus featuring a double lumen aortic arch malformation. As a side effect it provides reference data defining the length and the diameters of the aortic arch segments of normally developed mouse fetuses at developmental stage 22 according to Theiler (TS22). We analyzed a total of 22 TS22 mouse fetuses of the Him:OF1 strain. We produced high-resolution three-dimensional (3D) computer models and measured the diameters and cross sectional areas of the aortic arch segments and of the ascending and descending aorta. In addition, we defined 3D skeletons of the arteries and measured the length of the aortic arch segments. We provide statistics on the measurements obtained from the normally developed TS22 fetuses and detailed characterizations of the double lumen aortic arch. Our data suggest that: firstly, in Him:OF1 fetuses of TS22, the formation of the aortic arch is not yet finished. The left subclavian artery still receives a significant amount of blood from the right ventricle. Secondly, persistence of the 5th pharyngeal arch artery does not affect remodeling of the arteries distal to the junction of 5th pharyngeal arch artery and dorsal aorta. Thirdly, hemodynamic forces define the dimensions of the aortic arch between the left common carotid and the left subclavian artery. Fourthly, the blood volume streaming through the 4th pharyngeal arch artery influences its enlargement between TS20 and TS22.

Multi-detector computed tomography demonstration of double-lumen aortic arch--persistent fifth arch--as an isolated anomaly in an adult

Persistent fifth - double-lumen - aortic arch is a rarely seen entity, which is usually associated with other cardiac anomalies; it has been previously reported only in children. We report a new case of double-lumen aortic arch with a systemic-to-systemic connection diagnosed incidentally during cardiac multi-detector computer tomography evaluation of coronary artery bypass grafts in an adult.

Persistent fifth aortic arch associated with coarctation of aorta: a case report

A 20-year-old man with persistent fifth aortic arch associated with coarctation of the aorta underwent catheterization and stenting of coarctation of the aorta.

[Complete vascular rings]

The complete vascular rings, embryological anomalies of the aortic arch and great vessels, are frequently incidental findings, although patients with significant anomalies can present with upper airway and oesophagus compression, resulting in non-cardiac morbidity. The diagnostic needs high clinical suspicion. We describe six cases, with a mean age of two and a half months at diagnosis. The objective of our review is to describe the type of complete vascular ring (double aortic arch, right circumflex aortic arch and right aortic arch with aberrant left subclavian artery and left ligamentum arteriosus), the most common symptoms (respiratory symptoms including constant high-pitched, aggravated crying) and invasive and non-invasive diagnostic procedures (esophagograms, CT, MRI).

Surgical Treatment of Persistent Fifth Aortic Arch Associated with Interrupted Aortic Arch

This study describes two cases of the rare congenital anomaly, persistent fifth aortic arch. Both cases involve boys (1 at 9 years of age and another at 7 months of age). To detect persistent fifth aortic arch with interrupted aortic arch, the following methods were used: echocardiogram, angiocardiography, and magnetic resonance imaging. In both cases the blood pressure between the upper and lower limbs differed. To relieve the obstruction of blood flow, each case was surgically repaired using patching or conduit interposition. Postoperative courses were uneventful. Two-year to 5-year follow-up examinations were positive showing that the anastomosis was unobstructed and the velocity of blood flow to the descending aorta was normal.