Serova M, Andreev D, Giverts I, Sazonova Y, Svet A, Kuklina M, Sedov V, Syrkin A, Saner H. A new algorithm for optimization of rate-adaptive pacing improves exercise tolerance in patients with HFpEF.
PACING AND CLINICAL ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY: PACE 2019;
43:223-233. [PMID:
31876292 DOI:
10.1111/pace.13857]
[Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/19/2019] [Revised: 12/03/2019] [Accepted: 12/05/2019] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
AIM
To develop an algorithm for optimization of rate-adaptive pacing settings in heart failure patients with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) and permanent cardiac pacing.
METHODS
This is a prospective randomized controlled study. A total of 54 patients with HFpEF, permanent atrial fibrillation (AF), and VVIR pacing were randomized to an intervention group with optimization of rate-adaptation parameters by using cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) and pacemaker stress echocardiography (PASE), and to a control group with conventional programming. CPET, 6-min walk test (6-mwt), echocardiography (echo), Duke Activity Status Index (DASI), and Minnesota questionnaire (MLHFQ) were performed at baseline and after 3 months. PASE was used to exclude exercise-induced ischemia and to determine safe upper sensor rate. Pacing parameters were corrected to achieve optimal heart rate increments of 3-6 bpm for 1 mL/min/kg of VO2 (oxygen uptake).
RESULTS
After 3 months, the intervention group demonstrated significant improvement of VO2 peak by 1.64 ± 1.6 mL/min/kg, anaerobic threshold by 1.33 ± 1.3 mL/min/kg, exercise time by 170 ± 98 s, 6-mwt distance by 75 ± 63 m (P < .0001 for all), DASI by 5.23 points (P = .009), MLHFQ-score (reduction by 9 points, P < .0001), and echo parameters (decrease in LA volume from 108 (84; 132) to 95 (85; 130) mL, P = .026; E/e' from 11.7 ± 3.2 to 10.4 ± 2.9, P = .025; systolic pulmonary artery pressure (SPAP) from 44 ± 14 to 39 ± 12 mm Hg, P = .001) compared to the control group.
CONCLUSION
An algorithm incorporating CPET and PASE for optimal programming of rate-adaptation parameters is a valuable tool to improve exercise capacity in HFpEF patients with permanent AF and VVIR pacing who remain exercise intolerant after conventional programming.
Collapse