Assessment of Coronary Flow Parameters by Transesophageal Echocardiography in Patients with Isolated Coronary Artery Ectasia: Effect of Intravenous Nitroglycerin

Effect of Diltiazem on Coronary Artery Flow and Myocardial Perfusion in Patients With Isolated Coronary Artery Ectasia and Either Stable Angina Pectoris or Positive Myocardial Ischemic Stress Test

Isolated coronary artery ectasia (CAE) may be associated with stable or unstable coronary events despite the absence of epicardial coronary stenosis. Impaired coronary flow dynamics and myocardial perfusion have been demonstrated in stable patients with ectatic coronary arteries. We aimed to assess whether epicardial flow and tissue-level perfusion would be improved by diltiazem in myocardial regions subtended by the ectatic coronary arteries in patients with isolated CAE. A total of 60 patients with isolated CAE were identified of 9,780 patients who underwent elective coronary angiography. Patients were randomized to 5 mg of intracoronary diltiazem or saline. Coronary blood flow of the microvascular network was assessed using myocardial blush grade (MBG) technique. The thrombolysis in myocardial infarction (TIMI) flow grade and TIMI frame count (TFC) were used to assess epicardial coronary flow. MBG (from 2.4 to 2.6, p = 0.02), TIMI flow grades (from 2.4 to 2.8, p <0.001), and TFC (from 35 to 26, p <0.001) were significantly improved after diltiazem, whereas no significant change was noticed after saline (from 2.4 to 2.4, p = 0.86 for MBG; from 2.3 to 2.3, p = 0.71 for TIMI flow grade; and from 35 to 33, p = 0.43 for TFC). Diltiazem provided amelioration of the altered coronary flow dynamics, which was suggested as the pathophysiological influence of CAE. In conclusion, the favorable effects of the diltiazem on myocardial perfusion were observed at both epicardial and tissue levels.

Nitroglycerin-induced heterogeneous subendocardial myocardial blood flow observed by cardioscopy in patients with coronary artery disease

It is controversial as to whether or not nitroglycerin (NTG) increases subendocardial myocardial blood flow (SMBF), and if it does, whether arterial or venous blood flow is increased in patients with coronary artery disease. This study was performed to examine NTG-induced changes in SMBF.Changes in SMBF induced by NTG (200 µg, i.v.) were examined by cardioscopy in 58 left ventricular wall segments of 58 patients with coronary artery disease. NTG-induced red and purple endocardial colors were defined as increased arterial and venous SMBF, respectively. Endocardial color before NTG administration was classified into brown, light brown, pale and white. Endomyocardial biopsy of the observed portion and (201)Tl scintigraphy were performed in 40 of these patients immediately after cardioscopy and several days after cardioscopy, respectively.Upon administration of NTG, SMBF increased in 48 of 58 wall segments; arterial SMBF in 34 and venous SMBF in 12 wall segments; arterial SMBF in all 24 brown to light brown segments; venous SMBF, arterial SMBF and no change in 12, 10 and 5 of pale segments, respectively; and no change in all 10 white wall segments. (201)Tl-scintigraphy and endomyocardial biopsy revealed that brown, light brown, pale and white endocardial color represented no ischemia, mild ischemia, severe ischemia and fibrosis, respectively.NTG caused an increase in either arterial or venous SMBF depending on control endocardial color, wall motion and severity of coronary stenosis.

Point of controversy: perioperative care of patients undergoing pheochromocytoma removal-time for a reappraisal?

Adrenalectomy for pheochromocytoma is reported with a mortality close to zero in recent studies. The dogma of preoperative fluid and hypotensive drug administrations is widely applied in patients scheduled for pheochromocytoma removal and is assumed to have a beneficial effect on operative outcomes. This paradigm is only based on historical studies of non-standardized practices and criteria for efficacy, with no control group. Pre- and intraoperative hypovolemia have never been demonstrated in patients scheduled for pheochromocytoma removal. Recent improvements in outcome of patients undergoing adrenalectomy for pheochromocytoma could also be the result of improvement in surgical techniques and refinement in anesthetic practices. Whether better knowledge of the disease, efficiency of available intravenous short-acting vasoactive drugs, and careful intraoperative handling of the tumor make it possible to omit preoperative preparation in most patients scheduled for pheochromocytoma removal is presently questionable. We reviewed available literature in this respect.