The treatment of aortic stenosis: is valvuloplasty ever an alternative to surgery?

Asymptomatic valvular disease: who benefits from surgery?

Routine physical examination and noninvasive imaging frequently lead to the diagnosis of valvular heart disease in asymptomatic patients. The decision to proceed to surgical repair or replacement is based on an informed evaluation of the risks of surgery versus those encountered with a nonoperative course. In determining whether symptoms are present, stress testing may be helpful, as many patients with significant valvular lesions have a tendency to limit their daily physical exertion to levels that do not provoke symptoms. The two most feared consequences of conservative management, sudden death and permanent myocardial damage, are rare in asymptomatic patients with severe aortic stenosis or regurgitation. Surgery for asymptomatic aortic stenosis is performed only for certain high-risk subsets of patients, including those with left ventricular dysfunction, ventricular arrhythmia, and critically small valves. Asymptomatic patients with aortic regurgitation and mitral regurgitation should undergo surgery if they have systolic dysfunction or marked ventricular enlargement.

Aortic valve disease: Current recommendations

Aortic stenosis is a common valvular abnormality. Surgical valve replacement is the standard of care for symptomatic patients with severe aortic stenosis and is appropriate for certain asymptomatic patients. Statin therapy may slow progression of the disease. Contrary to conventional wisdom, vasodilator therapy may in fact be safe and effective in certain instances of severe aortic stenosis. Chronic aortic regurgitation is commonly treated with vasodilator therapy, which is certainly indicated for the asymptomatic patient with hypertension. Surgery is recommended for left ventricular dilatation, diminished ventricular systolic function, or symptoms.

Effectiveness of balloon valvuloplasty in the young adult with congenital aortic stenosis

The objective of this study was to assess the effectiveness of balloon valvuloplasty in the young adult with congenital aortic stenosis and to compare its effectiveness with children. Percutaneous balloon valvuloplasty is effective in children with congenital aortic stenosis, but not in adults with acquired calcific aortic stenosis. Because effectiveness of balloon valvuloplasty in young adults with congenital aortic stenosis is not well defined, we evaluated the outcome in 15 patients aged 16-24 years (18 +/- 0.6; mean +/- SEM) who underwent balloon valvuloplasty from 1985 to 1993. The aortic valve annulus diameter ranged from 18.5 to 30 mm (24 +/- 0.9). The aortic valve was bicuspid in 12 and tricuspid in 3 patients, and calcification was present in one patient. Balloon valvuloplasty was performed using a double balloon technique in 12 patients and a single balloon technique in three patients. Three patients had inadequate relief of gradient with a residual peak systolic gradient > or = 70 mm Hg. Three patients required valve replacement-two patients for a residual gradient > or = 70 mg Hg, and one patient 4 years later for severe aortic valve regurgitation. Eight of the remaining 12 have undergone elective follow-up catheterization 1.2-2.5 years (1.5 +/- 0.1) later. The peak systolic aortic valve gradient decreased by 55% from 73 +/- 5.8 mm Hg to 35 +/- 5.4 mm Hg immediately postvalvuloplasty, and was 30 +/- 4.4 mm Hg at follow-up (P < 0.001). The left ventricular systolic pressure decreased from 179 +/- 7.5 to 147 +/- 6.5 mm Hg immediately postvalvuloplasty and was 147 +/- 4 mm Hg at follow-up. Aortic insufficiency was unchanged after valvuloplasty in 9, increased by 1+ in 4, and by 2+ in 2 patients. Balloon valvuloplasty was as effective in these young adults as in 70 children (age 6 +/- 0.7 years) with congenital aortic stenosis (peak systolic gradient pre- 79 +/- 3 mm Hg versus post- 34 +/- 2 mg Hg; at 1-2 years follow-up 34 +/- 4 mm Hg). Balloon valvuloplasty provides effective treatment in most young adults with congenital aortic stenosis, without early restenosis. Balloon valvuloplasty is as effective in young adults as in children, where it is currently the treatment of choice.

Balloon aortic valvuloplasty for aortic stenosis in neonates, children, and young adults

Balloon aortic valvuloplasty is a safe and effective treatment for aortic stenosis in neonates, children, and young adults. The indication for balloon valvuloplasty in children is a peak systolic gradient > 70 mmHg or > 50 mmHg in any patient with symptoms. Published results indicate that the procedure results in an acute reduction in gradient ranging from 49%-70%, and this reduction appears to persist through at least an intermediate follow-up. The percentage reduction in gradient is similar for neonates as well as older children. In neonates, it is imperative to evaluate the size of the left ventricle prior to balloon valvuloplasty since mortality is highest in those with variants of hypoplastic left heart syndrome. Though morbidity and mortality is higher in the neonatal age group, the results are similar to those following surgical intervention. In children older than 1 month of age, the major complication is the development of aortic regurgitation, although it usually appears to be well-tolerated. Previous surgical valvotomy is not a contraindication to balloon aortic valvuloplasty. In the current era, we believe that balloon aortic valvuloplasty should be considered as the first option in neonates, children and young adults with significant aortic valve obstruction.