Magnetocardiographically-guided catheter ablation

Clinical magnetocardiography: the unshielded bet-past, present, and future

Magnetocardiography (MCG), which is nowadays 60 years old, has not yet been fully accepted as a clinical tool. Nevertheless, a large body of research and several clinical trials have demonstrated its reliability in providing additional diagnostic electrophysiological information if compared with conventional non-invasive electrocardiographic methods. Since the beginning, one major objective difficulty has been the need to clean the weak cardiac magnetic signals from the much higher environmental noise, especially that of urban and hospital environments. The obvious solution to record the magnetocardiogram in highly performant magnetically shielded rooms has provided the ideal setup for decades of research demonstrating the diagnostic potential of this technology. However, only a few clinical institutions have had the resources to install and run routinely such highly expensive and technically demanding systems. Therefore, increasing attempts have been made to develop cheaper alternatives to improve the magnetic signal-to-noise ratio allowing MCG in unshielded hospital environments. In this article, the most relevant milestones in the MCG's journey are reviewed, addressing the possible reasons beyond the currently long-lasting difficulty to reach a clinical breakthrough and leveraging the authors' personal experience since the early 1980s attempting to finally bring MCG to the patient's bedside for many years thus far. Their nearly four decades of foundational experimental and clinical research between shielded and unshielded solutions are summarized and referenced, following the original vision that MCG had to be intended as an unrivaled method for contactless assessment of the cardiac electrophysiology and as an advanced method for non-invasive electroanatomical imaging, through multimodal integration with other non-fluoroscopic imaging techniques. Whereas all the above accounts for the past, with the available innovative sensors and more affordable active shielding technologies, the present demonstrates that several novel systems have been developed and tested in multicenter clinical trials adopting both shielded and unshielded MCG built-in hospital environments. The future of MCG will mostly be dependent on the results from the ongoing progress in novel sensor technology, which is relatively soon foreseen to provide multiple alternatives for the construction of more compact, affordable, portable, and even wearable devices for unshielded MCG inside hospital environments and perhaps also for ambulatory patients.

Clinical application of magnetocardiography

Magnetocardiography is a noninvasive contactless method to measure the magnetic field generated by the same ionic currents that create the electrocardiogram. The time course of magnetocardiographic and electrocardiographic signals are similar. However, compared with surface potential recordings, multichannel magnetocardiographic mapping (MMCG) is a faster and contactless method for 3D imaging and localization of cardiac electrophysiologic phenomena with higher spatial and temporal resolution. For more than a decade, MMCG has been mostly confined to magnetically shielded rooms and considered to be at most an interesting matter for research activity. Nevertheless, an increasing number of papers have documented that magnetocardiography can also be useful to improve diagnostic accuracy. Most recently, the development of standardized instrumentations for unshielded MMCG, and its ease of use and reliability even in emergency rooms has triggered a new interest from clinicians for magnetocardiography, leading to several new installations of unshielded systems worldwide. In this review, clinical applications of magnetocardiography are summarized, focusing on major milestones, recent results of multicenter clinical trials and indicators of future developments.

Nonfluoroscopic localization of an amagnetic stimulation catheter by multichannel magnetocardiography

This study was performed to: (1) evaluate the accuracy of noninvasive magnetocardiographic (MCG) localization of an amagnetic stimulation catheter; (2) validate the feasibility of this multipurpose catheter; and (3) study the characteristics of cardiac evoked fields. A stimulation catheter specially designed to produce no magnetic disturbances was inserted into the heart of five patients after routine electrophysiological studies. The catheter position was documented on biplane cine x-ray images. MCG signals were then recorded in a magnetically shielded room during cardiac pacing. Noninvasive localization of the catheter's tip and stimulated depolarization was computed from measured MCG data using a moving equivalent current-dipole source in patient-specific boundary element torso models. In all five patients, the MCG localizations were anatomically in good agreement with the catheter positions defined from the x-ray images. The mean distance between the position of the tip of the catheter defined from x-ray fluoroscopy and the MCG localization was 11 +/- 4 mm. The mean three-dimensional difference between the MCG localization at the peak stimulus and the MCG localization, during the ventricular evoked response about 3 ms later, was 4 +/- 1 mm calculated from signal-averaged data. The 95% confidence interval of beat-to-beat localization of the tip of the stimulation catheter from ten consecutive beats in the patients was 4 +/- 2 mm. The propagation velocity of the equivalent current dipole between 5 and 10 ms after the peak stimulus was 0.9 +/- 0.2 m/s. The results show that the use of the amagnetic catheter is technically feasible and reliable in clinical studies. The accurate three-dimensional localization of this multipurpose catheter by multichannel MCG suggests that the method could be developed toward a useful clinical tool during electrophysiological studies.

Localization of a ventricular tachycardia-focus with multichannel magnetocardiography and three-dimensional current density reconstruction

The objective of this case report is to determine the accurate localization of a malignant ventricular tachycardia (VT) focus by combining multichannel magnetocardiographic (MCG) information with morphologic data. The localization was obtained by calculating the three-dimensional current density distribution (3D-CDD) on the left ventricular surface. To estimate the accuracy of this localization technique, examinations of a healthy volunteer were additionally performed. The MCG-signals were recorded in a magnetically shielded room by a 49-channel magnetogradiometer. The corresponding morphologic information was recorded by magnetic resonance tomography (MRT). The coordinate systems were matched with the help of markers. The 3D-CDD was calculated by the Philips CURRY software package. The origin of a malignant VT determined by X-ray images of the ablation catheter position during the electrophysiological examination (EPE), was used as the gold standard. This was then compared with the localization results obtained by the 3D-CDD. It was found that the localization coordinates showed a difference of less than 10 mm.

Nonfluoroscopic localization of an amagnetic catheter in a realistic torso phantom by magnetocardiographic and body surface potential mapping

This study was performed to evaluate the accuracy of multichannel magnetocardiographic (MCG) and body surface potential mapping (BSPM) in localizing three-dimensionally the tip of an amagnetic catheter for electrophysiology without fluoroscopy. An amagnetic catheter (AC), specially designed to produce dipolar sources of different geometry without magnetic disturbances, was placed inside a physical thorax phantom at two different depths, 38 mm and 88 mm below the frontal surface of the phantom. Sixty-seven MCG and 123 BSPM signals generated by the 10 mA current stimuli fed into the catheter were then recorded in a magnetically shielded room. Non-invasive localization of the tip of the catheter was computed from measured MCG and BSPM data using an equivalent current dipole source in a phantom-specific boundary element torso model. The mean 3-dimensional error of the MCG localization at the closer level was 2 +/- 1 mm. The corresponding error calculated from the BSPM measurements was 4 +/- 1 mm. At the deeper level, the mean localization errors of MCG and BSPM were 7 +/- 4 mm and 10 +/- 2 mm, respectively. The results showed that MCG and BSPM localization of the tip of the AC is accurate and reproducible provided that the signal-to-noise ratio is sufficiently high. In our study, the MCG method was found to be more accurate than BSPM. This suggests that both methods could be developed towards a useful clinical tool for nonfluoroscopic 3-dimensional electroanatomical imaging during electrophysiological studies, thus minimizing radiation exposure to patients and operators.

Magnetocardiographic pacemapping for nonfluoroscopic localization of intracardiac electrophysiology catheters

The purpose of the study was to validate, in patients, the accuracy of magnetocardiography (MCG) for three-dimensional localization of an amagnetic catheter (AC) for multiple monophasic action potential (MAP) with a spatial resolution of 4 mm2. The AC was inserted in five patients after routine electrophysiological study. Four MAPs were simultaneously recorded to monitor the stability of endocardial contact of the AC during the MCG localization. MAP signals were band-pass filtered DC-500 Hz and digitized at 2 KHz. The position of the AC was also imaged by biplane fluoroscopy (XR), along with lead markers. MCG studies were performed with a multichannel SQUID system in the Helsinki BioMag shielded room. Current dipoles (5 mm; 10 mA), activated at the tip of the AC, were localized using the equivalent current dipole (ECD) model in patient-specific boundary element torso. The accuracy of the MCG localizations was evaluated by: (1) anatomic location of ECD in the MRI, (2) mismatch with XR. The AC was correctly localized in the right ventricle of all patients using MRI. The mean three-dimensional mismatch between XR and MCG localizations was 6 +/- 2 mm (beat-to-beat analysis). The co efficient of variation of three-dimensional localization of the AC was 1.37% and the coefficient of reproducibility was 2.6 mm. In patients, in the absence of arrhythmias, average local variation coefficients of right ventricular MAP duration at 50% and 90% of repolarization, were 7.4% and 3.1%, respectively. This study demonstrates that with adequate signal-to-noise ratio, MCG three-dimensional localizations are accurate and reproducible enough to provide nonfluoroscopy dependant multimodal imaging for high resolution endocardial mapping of monophasic action potentials.