The Use of Brachytherapy to Treat Renal Artery In‐Stent Restenosis

Treatment of atheromatous renal artery in-stent restenosis in 51 patients

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate our treatment of renal artery in-stent restenosis.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Monocentric retrospective study of 53 cases of restenosis and two occlusions in 51 patients detected via systematic follow-up with imaging (72.5%) and/or deterioration of kidney function (5.9%) and/or blood pressure failure (54.9%), 15.7 months (5-121) after implantation, giving rise to 49 recalibrations via a balloon and five additional stentings. Analysis of the technical results, the effects on blood pressure and kidney function after repeated revascularizations.

RESULTS

Secondary permeability of 38 arteries (63.2%) after 12.4 months (3-64) with 14 second restenoses; 33.3% after redilation with a balloon, 60% after renewed stenting, more common in smokers (P=0.02), in case of peripheral arterial disease (P=0.02), ostial location (P=0.049) and kidney function impairment at the time of diagnosis of the restenosis (P=0.012). After 12.7 months (3-64) post-revascularization, kidney function was improved in 30% of patients and stabilised in 50% of patients. Treatment of second restenoses: one failure (7.1%), nine dilations with a balloon, three cutting balloon, one second stent. Treatment of third restenoses: 71.4% treated with a balloon (2), cutting balloon (2) or coated stent (DES) (1); then permeability at a later point in time: 50%.

CONCLUSION

The treatment of repeated restenoses with conventional techniques is of imperfect efficacy, and currently remains un-codified.

Clopidogrel use before renal artery angioplasty with/without stent placement resulted in tertiary procedure risk reduction

OBJECTIVE

Contrary to coronary artery literature, the effect of preprocedural clopidogrel on renal artery restenosis (RAR) has not been characterized. This study was designed to evaluate the effect of preprocedural clopidogrel on target vessel revascularization (TVR), reintervention, and restenosis for patients who underwent recurrent renal artery angioplasty.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis of patients treated for RAR in a single tertiary center from January 1999 to December 2009 was conducted. Patients were divided into preadmission use of (1) clopidogrel or (2) aspirin only (acetylsalicylic acid [ASA]) for the initial procedure. TVR was defined as occurrence of a tertiary procedure for symptomatic RAR. Rate of freedom from event (ie, tertiary restenosis and TVR) was analyzed using Kaplan-Meier method.

RESULTS

Eighty-eight interventions were performed on 77 patients with RAR; 66% were females with average (mean ± SEM) age and body mass index of 68.8 ± 1.1 and 28.6 ± 0.8, respectively. Comorbidities included 96% chronic hypertension, 33% diabetes, 76% hyperlipidemia, 20% renal insufficiency, 39% tobacco use, 58% coronary artery disease, and 51% peripheral vascular disease. Clopidogrel use increased significantly during the index procedure from admission 35.2% to discharge 97.7% (P < .001, McNemar test). There was a trend toward risk reduction of a tertiary intervention (23%) for patients admitted on clopidogrel compared with ASA (P = .052). Likewise, there was a trend (P = .051) toward increased freedom from a tertiary intervention, with cumulative freedom at 8 years 93.5% for clopidogrel vs 61% for ASA. No differences were found for restenosis.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of preprocedural clopidogrel was associated with a possible risk reduction of TVR reintervention, but this finding needs to be validated in randomized clinical trial.

Percutaneous revascularization of persistent renal artery in-stent restenosis

Abstract

Percutaneous renal artery stenting is a common means of treating atherosclerotic renal artery stenosis. However, renal artery restenosis remains a frequent problem. The optimal treatment of restenosis has not been established and may involve percutaneous renal artery angioplasty or deployment of a second stent. Other modalities include cutting balloon angioplasty, repeat stenting with drug-eluting stents or endovascular brachytherapy. Most recently, use of polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE)-covered stents may offer a new and innovative way to treat recurrent renal artery stenosis. We describe a case in a patient who initially presented with renal insufficiency and multi-drug hypertension in the setting of severe bilateral renal artery stenosis. Her renal artery stenosis was initially successfully treated by percutaneous deployment of bilateral bare metal renal artery stents. After initial improvement of her hypertension and renal insufficiency, both parameters declined and follow-up duplex evaluation confirmed renal artery in-stent restenosis. Owing to other medical co-morbidities she was felt to be a poor surgical candidate and was subsequently treated first with bilateral cutting balloon angioplasty and second with drug-eluting stent deployment. Each procedure was associated with initial improvement of renal function and blood pressure control, which then later deteriorated with the development of further significant in-stent restenosis. It was then decided to treat the restenosis using PTFE-covered stents. At 12 months of follow-up, the blood pressure had remained stable and renal function had normalized. The covered stents remained free of any significant neointimal tissue or obstruction.

La radiothérapie des affections bénignes : quelles indications huit ans plus tard ?

The authors present an update version of the indications for radiotherapy in the management of benign diseases. This is based on available randomized trials and recent international meetings. Validated indications remain the prevention of resected heterotopic bone ossifications, keloïds scars and pterygium and also treatment of arteriovenous malformations; the place of radiotherapy for malignant exophtalmia is more and more restricted. Randomized trials have demonstrated the efficacy of endobrachytherapy in the prevention of restenosis after angioplasty but the use of embedded stent has replaced this indication. Macular degeneration is no more an indication of radiotherapy. Quality requirements for radiotherapy are identical for benign or malignant indications.