Embolic Protection Devices in Saphenous Vein Graft Interventions

Retrograde fractional flow reserve and recanalization of a chronic total occlusion of a saphenous venous graft

Chronic total occlusion (CTO) of the coronary artery represents a difficult group of lesions for percutaneous interventions. Conventionally, antegrade approach has been used to open these lesions, but recent literature provides evidence for the utility of retrograde approach in cases where initial antegrade approach is either not feasible or fails to recanalize the target vessel. This report illustrates retrograde CTO recanalization of saphenous vein graft (SVG) with fractional flow reserve utilization to determine ischemia in the territory of occluded SVG.

Risk factors for lower-extremity vein graft failure

Lower-extremity vein graft failure causes significant morbidity, increases health care costs, and negatively impacts patient quality of life. Identification of risk factors is essential for patient selection, risk factor modification, and identifying individuals who would benefit from more stringent surveillance protocols. Risk factors can be considered as either patient-related or technical. Here we discuss the patient-related risk factors for vein graft failure. Nontechnical factors related to the indication for operation include operation after a previously failed graft, or redo bypass, critical limb ischemia, and infection. Risk factors for vein graft failure are distinct from the risk factors for cardiovascular events. Young age and African American and Hispanic race are risk factors for lower-extremity vein graft failure. Hypercoaguable and inflammatory states also increase risk for vein graft failure. Therapy with statins is indicated in patients with peripheral atherosclerosis and may have beneficial effects on vein graft function, although further studies are needed in this area.

[Saphenous graft angioplasty]

In our daily practice the rate of saphenous graft angioplasty is less than 5%. This kind of angioplasty is more complex with a higher rate of complications in known fragile patients. Some technical trips and tricks are necessary to easily perform these angioplasties. Main difficulties are the extension of saphenous graft lesions, the risk of distal embolism, coronary slow or no flow and the high rate of restenosis. Pharmacological treatment is disappointing with no efficacy of the Gp IIb-IIa blockers. Otherwhise the use of protection devices is clearly effective and must be used when it is technically possible. With the use of bare metal stents in saphenous graft angioplasty the rate of restenosis is very high. There are some encouraging results with drug eluting stents. But we are still now not allowed to use them in this indication in our daily practice.