Diabetic retinopathy and coronary implantation of sirolimus-eluting stents

Association between obstructive coronary disease and diabetic retinopathy: Cross-sectional study of coronary angiotomography and multimodal retinal imaging

AIMS

To investigate the association between diabetic retinopathy (DR) and coronary artery disease (CAD) using coronary angiotomography (CCTA) and multimodal retinal imaging (MMRI) with ultra-widefield retinography and optical coherence tomography angiography and structural domain.

METHODS

Single-center, cross-sectional, single-blind. Patients with diabetes who had undergone CCTA underwent MMRI. Uni and multivariate analysis were used to assess the association between CAD and DR and to identify variables independently associated with DR.

RESULTS

We included 171 patients, 87 CAD and 84 non-CAD. Most CAD patients were males (74 % vs 38 %, P < 0.01), insulin users (52 % vs 38 %, p < 0.01) and revascularized (64 %). They had a higher prevalence of DR (48 % vs 22 %, p = 0.01), microaneurysms (25 % vs 13 %, p = 0.04), intraretinal cysts (22 % vs 8 %, p = 0.01) and areas of reduced capillary density (46 % vs 20 %, p < 0.01). CAD patients also had lower mean vascular density (MVD) (15.7 % vs 16.5,%, p = 0.049) and foveal avascular zone (FAZ) circularity (0.64 ± 0.1 vs 0.69 ± 0.1, p = 0.04). There were significant and negative correlations between Duke coronary score and MVD (r = -0.189; p = 0.03) and FAZ circularity (r = -0,206; p = 0.02). CAD, DM duration and insulin use independently associated with DR.

CONCLUSIONS

CAD patients had higher prevalence of DR and lower MVD. CAD, DM duration and insulin use were independently associated with DR.

ApoE isoforms, treatment of diabetes and the risk of coronary heart disease

AIM

To analyze the risk of coronary heart disease in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) receiving standard medical treatment.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective chart analysis of 269 middle-aged patients (age 45-64 years, mean age, 53.9 ± 5.5 years) with T2DM and without atherosclerotic cardiovascular events who underwent typing to determine their apolipoprotein E (apoE) isoforms. The apoE isoforms were determined using isoelectric focusing, followed by immunoblotting. We retrospectively evaluated the charts of the 269 patients, recorded between their first visit to the hospital (the study's start point, between 1987 and 1992) and the occurrence of an atherosclerotic cardiovascular event (the study's endpoint) or January 2004, whichever came first. The age-adjusted mean values and the prevalences of covariates were calculated to compare the laboratory data among the apoE phenotypes. To investigate the association of risk factors with the incidence of coronary heart disease during the follow-up period, monovariate and multivariate Cox regression models were used.

RESULTS

At enrollment, the mean serum low density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol levels were lowest (2.92 ± 0.89 mmol/L) among the subjects with apoE2 (apoE2/2 or apoE2/3) and highest (3.52 ± 0.77 mmol/L) among the subjects with apoE4 (apoE3/4 or apoE4/4). No significant differences in mean age or the percentage of smokers were observed among the three groups. Furthermore, no significant differences were observed in the systolic and diastolic blood pressures, body mass index, HbA1c level or serum triglyceride levels among the three groups. There were 47 cases of coronary heart disease over 3285 person-years of follow-up. An age-adjusted multivariate Cox proportional model identified diabetic retinopathy (hazard ratio, 2.38, 95% CI: 1.28-4.43, P = 0.006), a high systolic blood pressure (hazard ratio, 1.04, 95% CI: 1.02-1.06, P < 0.001) and high HbA1c values (hazard ratio, 1.19, 95% CI: 1.02-1.38, P = 0.0029), but not the LDL cholesterol value at enrollment (hazard ratio, 1.01, 95% CI: 0.97-1.05, P = 0.77) nor the specific apoE isoform, as significant predictors of coronary heart disease.

CONCLUSION

Under standard medical treatment of diabetes, including the control of LDL cholesterol levels, the apoE4 isoform was not associated with coronary heart disease among T2DM patients.

Detecting occult coronary artery disease followed by early coronary artery bypass surgery in patients with diabetic retinopathy: report from a diabetic retinocoronary clinic

OBJECTIVES

We hypothesized that a large number of patients with diabetic retinopathy who could benefit greatly from early coronary artery bypass grafting would not be identified.

METHODS

Patients with diabetic retinopathy receiving ophthalmologic care as outpatients in our hospital in whom coronary artery disease was not previously suspected were referred randomly to the diabetic retinocoronary clinic and were asked to participate in diagnostic tests, including an exercise treadmill test and exercise thallium scintigraphy or coronary computed tomography. Patients who had type 1 diabetes mellitus, required hemodialysis, or both were excluded from this study. A definitive diagnosis of coronary artery disease was confirmed by means of coronary angiography.

RESULTS

Of 214 patients with diabetic retinopathy, 55 (25.7%) were confirmed as having significant stenotic coronary artery disease. Patients with angiographically confirmed coronary disease were older than those with negative results on diagnostic tests (62.2 + or - 9.8 vs 57.9 + or - 10.3 years, P = .01). Fifteen had 1-vessel disease, 17 had 2-vessel disease, 14 had 3-vessel disease, 1 had left main trunk plus 1-vessel disease, 2 had left main trunk plus 2-vessel disease, and 5 had left main trunk plus 3-vessel disease. Eight patients had left main trunk disease, and 18 patients with non-left main trunk disease had proximal left anterior descending coronary artery (LAD) disease. Forty-two patients showed indications of coronary revascularization (coronary artery bypass grafting in 17 and percutaneous coronary intervention in 25). During the entire follow-up (287.6 + or - 183.2 days) of 39 patients undergoing coronary revascularization, all were alive without myocardial infarction, but 8 experienced vitreous hemorrhage.

CONCLUSIONS

Approximately 25% of patients with diabetic retinopathy receiving ophthalmologic care as outpatients have a significant stenotic coronary artery disease. Of the total diabetic population, a large number of patients with diabetic retinopathy who show strong indications for early coronary artery bypass grafting might well go unrecognized.

In early-stage diabetic retinopathy, risk of cardiac events after implantation of sirolimus-eluting stent is higher than after coronary artery bypass surgery

BACKGROUND

Patients with diabetic retinopathy (DR) have an increased risk of death from coronary heart disease and myocardial infarction. The purpose of this study was to compare the outcomes of revascularization strategies (sirolimus-eluting stent [SES] and coronary artery bypass surgery [CABG]) in patients with DR according to the stage of retinopathy: non-proliferative retinopathy (NPDR) and proliferative retinopathy (PDR).

METHODS

From April 2004 until February 2007, 627 patients including 51 NPDR and 62 PDR patients underwent SES implantation. For each retinopathy group, a historical comparison group at the same stages of retinopathy undergoing CABG was selected. Cardiac events were defined as a composite of cardiac death, myocardial infarction, and repeat revascularization.

RESULTS

The average follow-up from the time of the initial revascularization was 27.7 ± 8.5 months for NPDR-SES patients, 69.6 ± 36.6 months for NPDR-CABG patients, 26.4 ± 9.7 months for PDR-SES patients, and 68.3 ± 44.2 months for PDR-CABG patients; and Kaplan-Meier estimates of the percentages of events at 24 months were 47.0%, 22.8%, 28.5%, and 26.0%. Kaplan-Meier curves for cardiac events differed significantly between the SES group and the CABG group in NPDR patients (p = 0.04), whereas the curves did not differ significantly between the two groups of PDR patients. The adjusted hazard ratio of SES implantation for cardiac events in the entire group of DR patients was 1.75 (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.02-3.00, p = 0.04).

CONCLUSIONS

SES implantation is not a suitable method of revascularization in DR patients, especially in NPDR patients. CABG may become the first-choice revascularization technique for these patients.