Shortening of Median Door-to-Balloon Time in Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Singapore by Simple and Inexpensive Operational Measures: Clinical Practice Improvement Program

Relationship of Neighborhood Deprivation and Outcomes of a Comprehensive ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction Protocol

Background

We evaluated whether a comprehensive ST‐segment–elevation myocardial infarction protocol (CSP) focusing on guideline‐directed medical therapy, transradial percutaneous coronary intervention, and rapid door‐to‐balloon time improves process and outcome metrics in patients with moderate or high socioeconomic deprivation.

Methods and Results

A total of 1761 patients with ST‐segment–elevation myocardial infarction treated with percutaneous coronary intervention at a single hospital before (January 1, 2011–July 14, 2014) and after (July 15, 2014– July 15, 2019) CSP implementation were included in an observational cohort study. Neighborhood deprivation was assessed by the Area Deprivation Index and was categorized as low (≤50th percentile; 29.0%), moderate (51st –90th percentile; 40.8%), and high (>90th percentile; 30.2%). The primary process outcome was door‐to‐balloon time. Achievement of guideline‐recommend door‐to‐balloon time goals improved in all deprivation groups after CSP implementation (low, 67.8% before CSP versus 88.5% after CSP; moderate, 50.7% before CSP versus 77.6% after CSP; high, 65.5% before CSP versus 85.6% after CSP; all P<0.001). Median door‐to‐balloon time among emergency department/in‐hospital patients was significantly noninferior in higher versus lower deprivation groups after CSP (noninferiority limit=5 minutes; P_{noninferiority} high versus moderate = 0.002, high versus low <0.001, moderate versus low = 0.02). In‐hospital mortality, the primary clinical outcome, was significantly lower after CSP in patients with moderate/high deprivation in unadjusted (before CSP 7.0% versus after CSP 3.1%; odds ratio [OR], 0.42 [95% CI, 0.25–0.72]; P=0.002) and risk‐adjusted (OR, 0.42 [95% CI, 0.23–0.77]; P=0.005) models.

Conclusions

A CSP was associated with improved ST‐segment–elevation myocardial infarction care across all deprivation groups and reduced mortality in those from moderate or high deprivation neighborhoods. Standardized initiatives to reduce care variability may mitigate social determinants of health in time‐sensitive conditions such as ST‐segment–elevation myocardial infarction.

Implementation of temporal lobe contouring protocol in head and neck cancer radiotherapy planning: A quality improvement project

Temporal lobe necrosis as result of radiation for nasopharyngeal cancer (NPC) occurs up to 28% of NPC patients. The only effective mitigation is by strict adherence to temporal lobe dose tolerances during radiotherapy planning, which in turn hinges on accurate temporal lobe delineation. We aim to improve the accuracy and to standardize temporal lobe contouring for patients receiving head and neck radiotherapy for NPC in a tertiary teaching hospital in Singapore.The baseline data were obtained from 10 patients in the diagnostic phase and the effect of interventions were measured in 37 patients who underwent head and neck radiotherapy over a 6-month period.We conducted the project based on the Clinical Practice Improvement Program methodology. The baseline pooled mean percentage variation in temporal lobe contouring was 39.9% (0.8%-60.2%). There was a low level of temporal lobe contouring concordance and this provided the impetus for implementation of strategies to improve the accuracy and reproducibility of temporal lobe contouring. The interventions included supervision and training of radiation therapists and residents in temporal lobe contouring, and standardization of temporal lobe contouring with a protocol and contouring atlas.Thirty-seven patients were treated during the study period from June to November 2014. Following implementation of the first set of interventions, the pooled mean percentage variation in temporal lobe contouring decreased but was not sustained. The implementation of the second set of interventions resulted in a decrease from 39.9% (January to September 2014) to 17.3% (October to November 2014) where P = .004 using t test. Weekly variation was seen throughout the study period but the decrease was sustained after standardizing and providing a contouring atlas for temporal lobe contouring.Temporal lobe contouring can be standardized through effective implementation of a temporal lobe contouring protocol and atlas.

A hospital-wide system to ensure rapid treatment time across the entire spectrum of emergency percutaneous intervention

OBJECTIVES

This study's aim was to describe a hospital-wide system to deliver rapid door-to-balloon time across the entire spectrum of emergency percutaneous intervention.

BACKGROUND

Many patients needing emergency PCI are excluded from door-to-balloon public reporting metric; these groups do not achieve door-to-balloon times ≤90 min and have increased mortality rates.

METHODS

We prospectively implemented a protocol for patients with STEMI or other emergency indication for catheterization mandating (1) emergency department physician or cardiologist activation of the catheterization lab and (2) immediate patient transfer to an immediately available catheterization lab by an in-house nursing transfer team.

RESULTS

From September 1, 2005 to December 31, 2008, 526 consecutive patients underwent emergency PCI. Median door-to-balloon time was 68 min with 85.7% ≤90 min overall. Important subgroups included primary emergency department (62.5 min), cardiorespiratory arrest (71 min), cardiogenic shock (68 min), need for temporary pacemaker or balloon pump (67 min), initial ECG without ST-elevation (66.5 min), transfer from another ED (84 min), in-hospital (70 min), and activation indications other than STEMI (68 min). Patients presenting to primary ED and in transfer were compared to historical controls. Treatment ≤90 min increased (28%-85%, P < 0.0001). Mean infarct size decreased, as did hospital length-of-stay and admission total hospital costs. Acute myocardial infarction all-cause 30-day unadjusted mortality and risk-standardized mortality ratios were substantially lower than national averages.

CONCLUSION

A hospital-wide systems approach applied across the entire spectrum of emergency PCI leads to rapid door-to-balloon time, reduced infarct size and hospitals costs, and low myocardial infarction 30-day all-cause mortality. © 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Myocardial infarction in singapore: ethnic variation in evidence-based therapy and its association with socioeconomic status, social network size and perceived stress level

BACKGROUND

Singapore is a multiethnic Asian country comprising predominantly Chinese, Malays, and Indians. We sought to study the disparities in evidence-based therapy for people from these three ethnic groups who were admitted to hospital with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). We also examined its association with socioeconomic level and social network size and the influence on psychological stress level.

METHODS

In a prospective study, patients admitted with STEMI were recruited for a questionnaire survey. Relevant demographic and clinical data were collected.

RESULTS

A total of 364 patients were recruited and categorised based on ethnicity: Chinese (222 patients), Malays (72 patients), and Indians (70 patients). Malays and Indians were significantly younger than Chinese at the time of presentation with STEMI. Malays had significantly more children than the Chinese and Indians. Malays were in the lowest socioeconomic class, based on education level (P ≤ .02) and residential type (P ≤ .003). Most (87%) patients were treated with primary percutaneous coronary intervention. There were no significant differences between Chinese, Malays, and Indians in accessibility to primary percutaneous coronary intervention, symptom-to-balloon time, door-to-balloon time, and prescription of evidence-based medications. Malays had larger social networks for information support (P ≤ .05) and financial support (P ≤ .04) than Chinese and Indians. There were no significant differences between the three ethnic groups in satisfaction with social support. The perceived stress level was higher among Malays and Indians than Chinese.

CONCLUSIONS

Although Malays were underprivileged in the socioeconomic level, no significant difference in healthcare disparities were observed among the three ethnic groups. This may be a reflection of the advancement in Singapore's healthcare system. The lower socioeconomic level may also explain the higher perceived stress level in Malays.

Immigrant status and disparities in health care delivery in patients with myocardial infarction

BACKGROUND

We investigated the differences in socioeconomic status and quality health care between Singapore-born citizens and immigrants presenting with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI).

METHODS

In a prospective study, patients admitted with STEMI were recruited for a questionnaire survey. The recruited patients were categorized based on their immigration status into Singapore-born citizens (SBC), foreign-born citizens (FBC), permanent residents (PR) and non-residents (NR).

RESULTS

Among the 374 recruited patients, 286 (76.5%) patients were categorized as SBC, and the remaining 88 (23.5%) as immigrants. Further breakdown of the immigrants revealed that 33 were FBC (median duration of living in Singapore, 53 years), 22 were PR (18 years), and 33 were NR (11 years). Significant differences in socioeconomic status among SBC, FBC, PR and NR were detected. NR were in the lowest, while PR in the highest, socioeconomic class based on occupation (p=0.003), education level (p<0.001), and average monthly household income (p=0.020). There were no disparities in the proportion of patients treated with primary PCI (SBC 88%, FBC 82%, PR 91%, NR 79%, p=0.555). Median door-to-balloon times were similar among the four groups (56, 52, 60, 56min, p=0.614). Compared with SBC, PR was associated with longer symptom-to-balloon times (median difference 54.1 min; 95% CI 9.0 to 99.2).

CONCLUSION

There were major differences in the socioeconomic status among SBC, FBC, PR and NR who presented with STEMI. Although there were no major disparities in access to high quality health care to these patients with different immigration status, symptom-to-balloon time differed substantially among the different migrant classes.

Hospital-based strategies contributing to percutaneous coronary intervention time reduction in the patient with ST-segment elevation myocardiaI infarction: a review of the "system-of-care" approach

A myriad of hospital-wide initiatives have been implemented with the goal of decreasing door-to-balloon time. Much of the evidence behind the common strategies used is unknown; multiple strategies have been suggested in the reduction to the use of this important time-sensitive intervention. Among 8 primary strategies, 2 have substantial evidence to support their implementation in the attempt to reduce door-to-balloon time in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), including emergency physician activation of the cardiac catheterization laboratory and prehospital activation of the STEMI alert process. Two strategies have moderate evidence to support their use, including real-time data feedback to team members and team-based approach to STEMI management. The remaining 4 strategies have no quantitative evidence to support their use, including single call to a central paging system, expecting the cardiac catheterization laboratory personnel to arrive within 20 minutes of activation, attending cardiologist on site (within the hospital), and senior management commitment to the project. Although all the STEMI systems of care reviewed are associated with a decreased in time to treatment, only a few have sufficient quantitative evidence to support their implementation. To be effective, the movement to decrease time to treatment of STEMI at any hospital must be composed of an institutional response that includes multiple disciplines. Success also requires active participation from nurses, members of the catheterization team, and hospital leadership.

Management of Acute ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction: Reperfusion Options

Primary percutaneous coronary intervention and thrombolysis remain therapies of choice for patients presenting with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). Clinical outcome in the management of acute STEMI is dependent on myocardial reperfusion time and reperfusion strategies. Optimisation of these strategies should take into consideration logistical limitations of the local medical systems and the various patient profiles. We review the reperfusion strategies and its history in Singapore, comparing its clinical application with that in some developed Western countries. Key words: Acute Myocardial Infarction, Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention, ST segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction, Thrombolysis

Utilisation of emergency medical service among Singapore patients presenting with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: prevalence and impact on ischaemic time

BACKGROUND

Previous studies in Western countries found that the emergency medical service (EMS) was under-used in patients with myocardial infarction.

AIM

We sought to determine the prevalence of immediate EMS utilisation among Singapore patients presenting with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), and correlated the use of the EMS with the symptom-to-balloon and door-to-balloon times.

METHODS

We studied 252 patients admitted with STEMI to our institution from August 2008 to September 2009. Information regarding demographic characteristics, whether EMS was used, reperfusion procedural details and mortality rates were collected prospectively.

RESULTS

Among the recruited patients, 89 (35.3%) used the EMS (EMS group) and 163 (64.7%) did not use the EMS (non-EMS group). In the latter group, 98 (60.1%) arrived at our institution through their own transport, 56 (34.4%) first consulted general practitioners, and 9 (5.5%) initially consulted another hospital without acute medical services. Among the 245 (out of 252, 97.2%) patients who received percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), the EMS group was more likely to undergo primary PCI (P= 0.003) while the non-EMS group was more likely to undergo non-urgent PCI (P= 0.002). In patients who underwent primary PCI, the EMS group had a shorter symptom-to-balloon time (average difference 81.6 min, P= 0.002). The door-to-balloon time was similar for both groups.

CONCLUSION

Despite the availability of a centralised EMS, 64.7% of patients with STEMI did not contact EMS at presentation. These patients were less likely to receive primary PCI and had a significantly longer symptom-to-balloon time.