Extended follow-up after atrial repair for transposition of the great arteries: a younger age at surgery improves late survival

Predictors of Late Mortality in D-Transposition of the Great Arteries After Atrial Switch Repair: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Background

Existing data on predictors of late mortality and prevention of sudden cardiac death after atrial switch repair surgery for D‐transposition of the great arteries (D‐TGA) are heterogeneous and limited by statistical power.

Methods and Results

We conducted a systematic review and meta‐analysis of 29 observational studies, comprising 5035 patients, that reported mortality after atrial switch repair with a minimum follow‐up of 10 years. We also examined 4 additional studies comprising 105 patients who reported rates of implantable cardioverter‐defibrillator therapy in this population. Average survival dropped to 65% at 40 years after atrial switch repair, with sudden cardiac death accounting for 45% of all reported deaths. Mortality was significantly lower in cohorts that were more recent and operated on younger patients. Patient‐level risk factors for late mortality were history of supraventricular tachycardia (odds ratio [OR] 3.8, 95% CI 1.4–10.7), Mustard procedure compared with Senning (OR 2.9, 95% CI 1.9–4.5) and complex D‐TGA compared with simple D‐TGA (OR 4.4, 95% CI 2.2–8.8). Significant risk factors for sudden cardiac death were history of supraventricular tachycardia (OR 4.7, 95% CI 2.2–9.8), Mustard procedure (OR 2.2, 95% CI 1.1–4.1), and complex D‐TGA (OR 5.7, 95% CI 1.8–18.0). Out of a total 124 implantable cardioverter‐defibrillator discharges over 330 patient‐years in patients with implantable cardioverter‐defibrillators for primary prevention, only 8% were appropriate.

Conclusions

Patient‐level risk of both mortality and sudden cardiac death after atrial switch repair are significantly increased by history of supraventricular tachycardia, Mustard procedure, and complex D‐TGA. This knowledge may help refine current selection practices for primary prevention implantable cardioverter‐defibrillator implantation, given disproportionately high rates of inappropriate discharges.

Implantable cardiac defibrillator among adults with transposition of the great arteries and atrial switch operation: case series and review of literature

BACKGROUND

The experience with the implantable cardiac defibrillator (ICD) in patients with transposition of the great arteries (TGA) and history of atrial switch surgery remains limited.

METHODS

Retrospective evaluation aiming to assess characteristics and outcomes of consecutive TGA patients with history of atrial switch surgery implanted with an ICD between January 2005 and June 2012 in four French centers.

RESULTS

Of the 12 patients (median 34 years [28, 40]; 67% male), 4 patients (33%) were implanted for secondary prevention after symptomatic documented sustained ventricular tachycardia or sudden cardiac arrest. ICDs were implanted for primary prevention in 8 patients (67%), including cardiac resynchronization in 3 patients; severe systemic ventricle dysfunction was present in all cases (median ejection fraction 27% [20, 40]). Overall, one patient died during the ICD implantation secondary to refractory cardiac arrest after defibrillation testing. Over a median follow-up of 19 months [10, 106], 6 patients out of 11 (54%) experienced worsening of congestive heart failure, including 5 who were eventually transplanted. Overall, 3 patients (27%) experienced significant ICD-related complications, whereas only one patient (primary prevention indication) developed appropriate ICD therapy (successful anti-tachycardia pacing without shock). Half of the patients presented with at least one episode of sustained (≥ 5 min) atrial arrhythmia during follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings underline the key role of progressive heart failure in dictating outcomes among TGA patients with prior atrial switch repair. Our results also underline the need of better risk-stratification for sudden cardiac death in those patients.