Predictors of survival 1 hour after implantation of an intra-aortic balloon pump in cardiac surgery

Intensive Care Unit Stay of More than 14 Days after Cardiac Surgery is Associated with Non-cardiac Organ Failure

Some studies have shown an association between a prolonged intensive care unit (ICU) stay and risk factors such as mediastinal re-exploration, advanced age, low ejection fraction, lung disease and organ failure. The aim of this retrospective study was first to evaluate peri-operative risk factors ( n = 2683) and secondly to evaluate long-term survival ( n = 2563) in cardiac surgery patients with an ICU stay > 14 days. Long-term survival was assessed in an observational 3-year follow-up study. An ICU stay of > 14 days was associated independently with respiratory failure and dialysis-dependent acute renal failure, and with a significantly lower survival rate. Since an ICU stay is associated with a higher hospital and long-term mortality, measures should be taken throughout the entire hospital stay to identify and reduce the risk of organ failure.

Three-year survival after four major post–cardiac operative complications*

OBJECTIVE

After cardiac surgery, major morbidities known to be primary contributors to perioperative mortality are cardiac failure, respiratory failure, renal failure, and the need for mediastinal exploration. The first aim of this study was to ascertain long-term survival in cardiac surgery patients with and without the occurrence of major morbidities to investigate if long-term survival was comparable. The second aim of this study was to evaluate the prevalences and risk factors related to the four major morbidities in this patient population.

DESIGN

Retrospective observational outcome study.

SETTING

Cardiothoracic intensive care unit at a university hospital.

PATIENTS

We included 2,683 of 3,253 consecutive cardiac surgery patients cared for in a uniform fashion.

METHODS AND MAIN RESULTS

Perioperative mortality was significantly increased by the occurrence of major morbidity. In-hospital mortality was 0.7% in the absence of major morbidity compared with 72% when all major morbidities occurred. Three-year mortality for the entire study population was 15%, whereas the 3-yr long-term survival was significantly less for patients with morbidities compared with those without. Various independent perioperative risk factors were found for perioperative major morbidity and mortality.

CONCLUSIONS

Successful acute treatment and measures to identify and reduce the risk of major morbidities are necessary to improve outcome. In addition, long-term follow-up and management of morbidities are necessary to possibly improve long-term survival.

Prolonged Intensive Care Unit Stay in Cardiac Surgery: Risk Factors and Long-Term-Survival

BACKGROUND

Risk factors have been found for prolonged intensive care unit (ICU) stay in cardiac surgery patients in only a few studies; conflicting results have been described. The focus of this study was twofold: first, to evaluate preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative risk factors for ICU stay greater than 3 days in a cardiac surgery patient population; second, to evaluate long-term survival in cardiac surgery patients with prolonged ICU stay.

METHODS

Records from 2,683 cardiac surgery patients were retrospectively evaluated. Univariate and multivariate analyses for risk factors were performed for an ICU stay greater than 3 days. Thereafter, 2,563 patients were enrolled in a follow-up study for an observational time of 3 years after surgery.

RESULTS

Mortality was dependent on renal, respiratory, and heart failure, as well as age, elevated APACHE II scores, and reexploration. Long-term survival analyses demonstrated a significantly lower survival in patients with longer ICU stay. However, the 6-month to 3-year long-term survival was comparable with survival in patients without prolonged ICU stay.

CONCLUSIONS

Because of the increasing acuity of patients needing cardiac surgery, it is important to identify those at risk for a prolonged ICU course. It is therefore of paramount interest to implement measures throughout their entire hospital stay that would maximize organ function to improve survival and resource utilization.

The Impella Recover microaxial left ventricular assist device reduces mortality for postcardiotomy failure: a three-center experience

BACKGROUND

We evaluated patient outcomes and complications associated with the microaxial Impella Recover left ventricular assist device (Impella Cardiosystems AG, Aachen, Germany) for postcardiotomy low-output syndrome. This low-cost device is inserted across the aortic valve through a 10-mm vascular graft sewn to the ascending aorta.

METHODS

Impella patients were compared with 198 patients treated with an intraoperative intra-aortic balloon pump between January 2000 and December 2002. Three risk scores were used: the Hausmann score, the Texas Heart Institute score, and the Cleveland intensive care unit score. Between September 2001 and March 2003, 24 patients were treated with the Impella Recover for low-output syndrome. Before device insertion, 21 could not be separated from cardiopulmonary bypass, and 3 had postoperative hemodynamic instability despite high-dose catecholamines. Sixteen were treated with the Impella and intra-aortic balloon pump and 8 with the Impella alone (no intra-aortic balloon pump because of peripheral vascular disease or because deemed unnecessary).

RESULTS

No technical problems with device insertion occurred. Pump flow was 3.3 +/- 0.7 L/min at 28,000 +/- 4500 RPM. Support time was 61 +/- 56 hours (range, 7-228 hours). Four devices required repositioning. One device failed (leaking purge line) and was removed. Hemolysis was minimal (lactate dehydrogenase levels of 540 +/- 260 U/dL for Impella survivors). Mortality for Impella patients was 54% (13/24), similar to that for high-risk intra-aortic balloon pump patients (Hausmann score > or =2 [57%], intensive care unit score > or =2 [51%], Texas Heart Institute score > or =0.75 [55%], and cardiac index < or =2.3 [45%]). Cardiac output data were available in 19 Impella patients. Impella patients able to increase their cardiac output to 1 L/min or more above the pump flow of the Impella Recover had a 10% (1/10) mortality, versus 88% (8/9) in patients with a residual cardiac function of 1 L/min or less (P =.001). Comparison of high-risk intra-aortic balloon pump patients with Impella patients with residual cardiac function of 1 L/min or more showed a significant reduction in mortality, regardless of the high-risk definition used. Residual cardiac function was the strongest predictor of survival in Impella patients.

CONCLUSIONS

The Impella Recover device provides 3 to 4 L/min flow. It improves survival in patients with low-output syndrome if the heart is able to pump 1 L/min or more above device flow.

Patient selection for assist devices: bridge to transplant

Patients in severely progressed states of heart failure can be bridged to successful heart transplantation with mechanical assist devices. Experience has demonstrated that patient selection and timing of device implantation are crucial for obtaining acceptable results when using this expensive technology. The degree of irreversible secondary organ dysfunction before re-establishing adequate cardiac output determines the chance of reaching transplantation. Patients who recover during support from all sequelae of end stage heart failure have an excellent outcome after heart transplantation.

Outcome of cardiac surgery patients with complicated intensive care unit stay

Risk stratification has become an essential element in the practice of cardiac surgery. Several studies have identified preoperative risk factors for adverse outcome. However, outcome is mostly defined by 30-day mortality and morbidity. These data reflect poorly the benefit for the patient. Long-term survival, quality of life, and functional status should be included in a more global analysis of the outcome, particularly in patients with complicated ICU stay. By reviewing the recent data reported in the literature, we can identify a number of preoperative predictive factors for complicated ICU stay, including advanced age, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, preoperative low ejection fraction, previous myocardial infarction, reoperation, renal failure, combined surgery (coronary artery bypass grafting plus valve surgery), low hematocrit, and neurologic impairment. Short- and long-term outcomes are dependent on the type of postoperative complication. Unfortunately, data regarding the long-term outcome in these situations are very scarce.