Update on the total artificial heart

The Thoratec system implanted as a modified total artificial heart: the Bad Oeynhausen technique

The CardioWest™ total artificial heart (SynCardia Systems, Tuscon, AZ, USA) is the only FDA-approved total artificial heart determined as a bridge to human heart transplantation for patients dying of biventricular heart failure. Implantation provides immediate hemodynamic restoration and clinical stabilization, leading to end-organ recovery and thus eventually allowing cardiac transplantation. Occasionally, implantation of a total artificial heart is not feasible for anatomical reasons. For this patient group, we have developed an alternative technique using the paracorporeal Thoratec biventricular support system (Thoratec, Pleasanton, CA, USA) as a modified total artificial heart. A detailed description of the implantation technique is presented.

CardioWest temporary total artificial heart

BACKGROUND

The CardioWest temporary total artificial heart (TAH-t) replaces both native ventricles of the heart and is more beneficial for a select group of patients than most other typical ventricular assist devices (VADs). This review will expand on the current literature and highlight the chronology of this device. The CardioWest TAH-t has been implanted in over 715 patients at 30 multiple institutional centers worldwide as a bridge-to-transplant (BTT) since 1993. The mechanical flow dynamics of the device are manufactured and designed differently from other traditional VADs, allowing increased outputs and normal filling pressures, allowing for sufficient organ and tissue perfusion and dramatic recoveries, allowing patients to return to an almost normal quality of life.

RESULTS

There was a 79% survival to transplant achievement in the protocol group who received the TAH-t versus a 46% in the control group (P < 0.001). Furthermore, there was a 70% survival rate at one year in the protocol group versus 31% in the control group (P < 0.001). The one- and five-year survival rates after transplantation were 69% and 34%, respectively, in the control group and 86% and 64%, respectively, in the protocol group.

CONCLUSION

It is evident that the advancement of modern engineering and medicine has made way for a reliable and durable device that provides a promising future in the field of end-stage heart failure.

Total artificial heart-implantation technique using the CardioWest or the Thoratec system

Total artificial heart is a safe and efficient bridge for patients with terminal congestive heart failure awaiting cardiac transplantation. The implantation of the CardioWest total artificial heart has become an accepted therapeutic option in critically ill patients who have irreversible biventricular failure and are candidates for cardiac transplantation. Because of anatomical limitations in smaller patients (women, adolescents) implantation of the CardioWest system might be impossible. In these cases we have implanted the paracorporeal Thoratec device in a modified technique as a total artificial heart.

Rotary Blood Pumps for Cardiac Assistance: A "Must"?

Ventricular Assist Devices (VADs) were developed following the observation that most end-stage heart failure patients only required left heart support for survival. The trend toward left VAD implantation instead of a TAH has actually contributed to the development of nonpulsatile rotational devices. This article intends to evaluate the current and future technology of continuous flow pumps. Various issues pertaining to the long-term effects of continuous blood flow, biocompatibility of axial flow pumps, and the safety and reliability of such devices need to be addressed. Some of the advantages of rotary blood pumps include their small size, ease of implantation, and encouraging low infection rates. Certain issues such as automatic flow control, device components durability, and hemocompatibility remain unresolved. The quest for an ideal device combining optimal efficiency, ease of anatomical fit, and perfect bioacceptance, continues. Rotary blood pumps are not yet a "must."

Patient selection for assist devices: bridge to transplant

Patients in severely progressed states of heart failure can be bridged to successful heart transplantation with mechanical assist devices. Experience has demonstrated that patient selection and timing of device implantation are crucial for obtaining acceptable results when using this expensive technology. The degree of irreversible secondary organ dysfunction before re-establishing adequate cardiac output determines the chance of reaching transplantation. Patients who recover during support from all sequelae of end stage heart failure have an excellent outcome after heart transplantation.

Ventricular assist devices

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Recent advances in technology as well as new indications for implantation have appeared in the field of ventricular assist devices. Progress has also been made in the understanding of the underlying mechanisms of myocardial recovery after ventricular assist device support.

RECENT FINDINGS

Technological progress includes the development of fully implantable pulsatile and continuous flow pumps, either axial flow or centrifugal, for left ventricular and total heart assistance. Among the new indications for ventricular assist device support, the most important is the use of the device as permanent treatment for end-stage cardiac failure patients. Increased knowledge has been acquired regarding the effects of mechanical assistance and of unloading of the heart on haemodynamics, as well as on the cellular, molecular and electrophysiological characteristics of the failing heart. All these findings suggest that depressed myocardial function can sometimes recover with ventricular assist device therapy. Ventricular assist device support, however, still carries a high rate of complications: the device itself can fail, bleeding and thromboembolism are common, immunity is disturbed and the incidence of infection remains high.

SUMMARY

In patients with end-stage heart failure, ventricular assist devices can be used as a bridge to transplantation or to recovery, but they are now also considered as a long-term myocardial replacement therapy. Which device is the most appropriate for each indication, however, remains to be defined. Even if the underlying mechanisms of myocardial recovery are progressively clarified, the use of ventricular assist devices as a bridge to recovery still has limited clinical success. Clinical trials with the fully implantable devices are in their early stages, but these pumps appear promising in terms of efficacy, reliability and complication rate, as well as being easy to implant. Because more patients will benefit from ventricular assist device placement in the future, anaesthesiologists must be prepared to manage patients undergoing ventricular assist device placement or presenting for noncardiac surgery while under ventricular assist device support.