Early and late results of surgical treatment for ventricular septal rupture with and without use of the infarction exclusion technique--experience with two- and three-sheet modification

Early and Late Surgical Outcomes after Geometrical Infarct Exclusion for Post-Infarct Ventricular Septal Perforation

PURPOSE

Ventricular septal perforation (VSP) is a critical complication of acute myocardial infarction. Various surgical procedures for it have been developed; however, surgical outcomes remain unsatisfactory. In 2010, we introduced geometrical infarct exclusion (GIE) as a modification of the Komeda-David technique. This retrospective study compared the surgical outcomes of our geometric infarct exclusion technique to those of other surgical procedures.

METHODS

This study included 38 patients who underwent surgery for VSP. They were divided into patients who underwent GIE (GIE group; n = 17) and those who underwent other procedures (non-GIE group; n = 21). The clinical outcomes of the two groups were compared.

RESULTS

Operation, cardiopulmonary bypass, and cardiac arrest times in the GIE group were significantly longer than those in the non-GIE group (p <0.001). A residual shunt was observed in one patient (5.8%) in the GIE group and eight (38.0%) in the non-GIE group (p = 0.026). No patients in the GIE group required a reoperation for the residual shut, while two patients required it in the non-GIE group (p = 0.492). Operative mortality was insignificantly different between the two groups.

CONCLUSION

Geometric infarct exclusion has a longer procedural time than does other surgical procedures but can reduce the rates of residual shunts and reoperations.