Making a Business Case for Quality by Regional Information Sharing Involving Cardiothoracic Surgery

Amiodarone Protocol Provides Cost-Effective Reduction in Postoperative Atrial Fibrillation

BACKGROUND

Postoperative atrial fibrillation (POAF) after cardiac operations results in a significant increase in morbidity, mortality, and health care costs. Prophylactic amiodarone has been shown to reduce the incidence of POAF; however, the cost-effectiveness of a protocol-driven approach remains unknown.

METHODS

All patients with a Society of Thoracic Surgeons risk score enrolled in a prophylactic amiodarone protocol (n = 153) were propensity score matched 1:3 with patients before protocol implementation (n = 3,574). Multivariate logistic and linear regressions assessed the relative risks (POAF reduction and adverse medication effects) in the matched cohort of amiodarone therapy and costs, respectively. TreeAge cost-effectiveness software (TreeAge Software, Inc, Williamstown, MA) modeled the effects of prophylactic amiodarone costs, complication rates, and quality of life.

RESULTS

Of patients eligible for the prophylactic amiodarone protocol, 94.3% (281 of 298) were enrolled. Prophylactic amiodarone significantly reduced the rate of POAF (25.7% vs 16.8%, p < 0.0001). A total of 600 matched patients demonstrate no baseline differences in demographics, comorbidities, disease state, or operative factors, with a significant reduction in POAF without an increase in other associated complications. With the use these adjusted estimates, the prophylactic amiodarone protocol demonstrated a cost savings of $458 per patient. Sensitivity analysis confirmed the protocol is cost-effective for all protocol-related POAF risk reductions below an odds ratio of 0.726.

CONCLUSIONS

Implementation of a prophylactic amiodarone protocol significantly reduced risk-adjusted rates of POAF, with a cost savings of $458 per patient. This analysis demonstrates how rigorous quantitative analysis can evaluate the benefits of quality improvement projects.

Costs for surgical aortic valve replacement according to preoperative risk categories

BACKGROUND

The introduction of transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) led to more rigorous evaluation of surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) as a benchmark for TAVR. However, limited real-life cost data of SAVR are available. Therefore, the purpose of our study was to assess actual costs and resource utilization of SAVR in patients at different operating risk.

METHODS

Study data were drawn from a multi-institutional statewide database comprised of all cardiac surgical procedures in the Commonwealth of Virginia. The study included 2,530 elective, primary, isolated SAVRs performed from 2003 to 2012. Clinical data were matched with universal billing data. Patients were stratified into low-, intermediate- and high-risk categories according to the Society of Thoracic Surgeons- Predicted Risk of Mortality (STS-PROM) score: 0% to 4%, 4% to 8% , and greater than 8%, respectively. Clinical outcomes, resource use, and costs were compared between categories.

RESULTS

With increasing risk, there were higher rates of postoperative mortality (low 1.2% versus intermediate 2.7% versus high 6.2%, p < 0.001) and renal failure (2.7% vs 7.2% vs 10.6%; p < 0.001). The proportion of patients with any postoperative complication was higher with increasing risk (34% vs 48% vs 53%; p < 0.001). Length-of-stay increased from 6.8 days in the low-risk category to 10.2 and 11.3 days in the intermediate- and high-risk category, respectively (p < 0.001). There was an increase in mean total costs from the low- (n = 2,002) to intermediate- (n = 415) to high-risk (n = 113) category ($35,021 ± $22,642 vs $46,101 ± $42,460 vs $51,145 ± $31,655; p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Higher STS-PROM was significantly associated with higher postoperative mortality, complications, length-of-stay, and costs. The SAVR cost data provide a basis for the analysis of TAVR cost-effectiveness and its impact on payment systems.

The society of thoracic surgeons national database

AIMS

The Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS) National Database collects detailed clinical information on patients undergoing adult cardiac, paediatric and congenital cardiac, and general thoracic surgical operations. These data are used to support risk-adjusted, nationally benchmarked performance assessment and feedback; voluntary public reporting; quality improvement initiatives; guideline development; appropriateness determination; shared decision making; research using cross-sectional and longitudinal registry linkages; comparative effectiveness studies; government collaborations including postmarket surveillance; regulatory compliance and reimbursement strategies.

INTERVENTIONS

All database participants receive feedback reports which they may voluntarily share with their hospitals or payers, or publicly report. STS analyses are regularly used as the basis for local, regional and national quality improvement efforts.

POPULATION

More than 90% of adult cardiac programmes in the USA participate, as do the majority of paediatric cardiac programmes, and general thoracic participation continues to increase. Since the inception of the Database in 1989, more than 5 million patient records have been submitted.

BASELINE DATA

Each of the three subspecialty databases includes several hundred variables that characterise patient demographics, diagnosis, medical history, clinical risk factors and urgency of presentation, operative details and postoperative course including adverse outcomes.

DATA CAPTURE

Data are entered by trained data abstractors and by the care team, using detailed data specifications for each element.

DATA QUALITY

Quality and consistency checks assure accurate and complete data, missing data are rare, and audits are performed annually of selected participant sites.

ENDPOINTS

All major outcomes are reported including complications, status at discharge and mortality.

DATA ACCESS

Applications for STS Database participants to use aggregate national data for research are available at http://www.sts.org/quality-research-patient-safety/research/publications-and-research/access-data-sts-national-database.