Effect of Birth Ball Usage on Pain in the Active Phase of Labor: A Randomized Controlled Trial

The effect of using birth ball and squatting position during labor on pain, duration, and satisfaction: A randomized controlled trial

AIM

The aim of this study is to assess the effect of using a birth ball and squatting position during labor on labor pain, duration of labor, and satisfaction.

METHODS

This study is a randomized controlled experimental trial. It was conducted in the delivery unit of Başakşehir Çam and Sakura City Hospital. The study sample consisted of a total of 159 women, 53 in the birth ball application room, 53 in the squatting position group, and 53 in the control group. The "Information Form," "Visual Analog Scale," "Partograph," and "Maternal Satisfaction Assessment at Delivery Scale-Normal Birth" were used in the data collection. Data were analyzed using analysis of variance, Pearson's Chi-square test, Pillai's trace test.

RESULTS

The present study revealed that the pain perception level was lower in the birth ball and squatting position groups compared to the control group, and there was a statistically significant difference between them (p < .05). The duration of the first and second stages of labor and the total duration of labor decreased in the birth ball and squatting position groups (p < .05). The difference was statistically significant in comparing the level of satisfaction (p < .05). It was found that the highest satisfaction was in the birth ball group.

CONCLUSION

Using a birth ball and squatting position during labor are effective methods of reducing labor pain, shortening the duration of labor, and increasing the level of satisfaction. There is a need for more studies on the effects of the birth ball and squatting position.

CLINICALTRIALS

gov Identifier: NCT05360823.

Birthing balls to decrease labor pain and peanut balls to decrease length of labor: what is the evidence?

Birthing balls and peanut balls have been used for decades by nurses and midwives as a nonpharmacologic adjunct to labor management based on anecdotal evidence. This article aimed to review the evidence regarding their safety and efficacy based on randomized controlled trials. Birthing balls are round exercise balls that a laboring individual can use for sitting, rocking, and pelvic rotation. The use of the birthing balls has been thought to increase maternal comfort and mimic upright positioning to widen the pelvic outlet for those laboring without an epidural. A recent meta-analysis showed that the use of the birthing ball in labor significantly reduces maternal pain in labor by 1.7 points on a standard visual analog scale of 1 to 10 (mean difference, -1.70 points; 95% confidence interval, -2.20 to -1.20). The use of the birthing ball does not significantly affect the mode of delivery or the rate of other obstetrical complications. This suggests that its use is safe and can offer subjective improvement in maternal pain experienced during labor. The peanut ball is a peanut-shaped plastic ball placed between the knees of a person laboring in the lateral recumbent position, a position common in those laboring with an epidural. Traditionally, its use has been thought to allow for bent-knee positioning that can mimic a squatting position and facilitate frequent and optimal position changes during labor. Data regarding the effects of the peanut ball are mixed. A recent systematic review and meta-analysis found that the use of the peanut ball compared with no peanut ball is associated with a significantly decreased first stage of labor (mean difference, -87.42 minutes; 95% confidence interval, -94.49 to -80.34) and an 11% higher relative risk of vaginal delivery (relative risk, 1.11; 95% confidence interval, 1.02-1.22; n=669). The use of the peanut ball is not associated with increased incidences of obstetrical complications. As such, it is reasonable to offer to individuals in labor. There has been no reported risk of the use of either the birthing ball or the peanut ball. As such, both interventions can be offered to individuals in labor as an adjunct to labor management techniques based on moderate quality evidence.

The Effect of Birthing Ball Exercises on Labor Pain and Labor Outcome Among Primigraviade Parturient Mothers at a Tertiary Care Hospital

INTRODUCTION

Every woman has the right to respectful and empathetic care during childbirth that addresses her needs for pain management, and allows her the liberty to make it a memorable experience. This study aimed to assess the effect of birthing ball exercises on labor pain and labor outcome among primigravidae parturients at a tertiary care hospital.

METHOD

A quasi-experimental design was used. A total of 60 primigravidae with 30 each in the control and experiment groups were selected by consecutive sampling. Primigravidae in the experiment group underwent two sessions of 20 minutes of birthing ball exercises at a subsequent gap of one hour during their active phase of labor (>4 cm cervical dilation). Primigravidae in the control group received routine standard care that included continuous observation and monitoring of vital signs and progress of labor. The visual analog scale (VAS) score was assessed in the transition phase (cervical dilation 8 cm to 10cm) and labor outcomes were assessed after delivery in both groups.

RESULT

The experiment group had significantly better labor outcomes in terms of labor pain, cervical dilatation, and duration of labor compared to the primigravidae in the control group (p<0.05). In addition, the majority of mothers in the experiment group (86.7 %) underwent vaginal delivery with episiotomy compared to the control group (53.3%). Findings also revealed a statistically significant difference in the newborns of both groups regarding appearance, pulse, grimace, activity, and respiration (APGAR) score, crying immediately after birth, and admission to the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) at p<0.05.

CONCLUSION

There are a variety of discomforts that a woman experiences during labor. Reducing these discomforts is an important part of good nursing care. Non-pharmacologic methods like birthing ball exercises help decrease these discomforts by reducing labor pain and improving maternal and neonatal outcomes.

Effectiveness of the peanut ball use for women with epidural analgesia in labour: a systematic review and meta-analysis

This meta-analysis aimed to evaluate, using the best level of evidence, the possible benefits and advantages of using peanut ball (PB) in women with an epidural during labour on the maternal and neonatal outcomes. This research was conducted using MEDLINE/PubMed, Embase, LILACS, CINAHL, CENTRAL, PEDro, Web of Science and SCOPUS databases, with no period or language restrictions. The terms 'labor' and 'peanut ball' were used. Clinical trials (randomised and non-randomised) were included when comparing a group of parturients using PB with a control group under usual care. Randomised clinical trials (RCTs) or quasi-randomised were eligible for this systematic review. Two reviewers independently screened studies, extracted data and assessed the quality of evidence which was evaluated by the GRADE system. Quantitative analysis through meta-analysis was also applied whenever possible. In this updated review, we included four studies with a total of 818 women in labour after the use of pharmacological analgesia. Our GRADE ratings of evidence ranged from high to low quality. Overall, the included studies varied in their risk of bias, in which most were considered with some concerns. There is high evidence that the use of PB after epidural analgesia reduces the duration of the first period of labour by 87 minutes and moderate evidence that it increases the chance of vaginal delivery 11%. However, there is no evidence about other maternal and neonatal outcomes.Impact StatementWhat is already known on this subject? The peanut ball (PB) is used after the use of pharmacological analgesia, as it favours the opening of the pelvic canal and helps women to adopt more comfortable postures, but its real effects are not clear.What do the results of this study add? Our results suggest that using the PB reduces the duration of the first period of labour after an epidural and increases the chance of a vaginal birth.What are the implications of these findings for clinical practice and/or further research? These findings recommend the use of a PB after an epidural and further research with women without the use of pharmacological analgesia.

The Effect of Combination of Pelvic Rocking Exercise and Back Massage to Pain and Duration of Labor in Primigravidae

Background The combination of pelvic rocking exercise using a birth ball and back massage as non-pharmacological therapy needs to be investigated in relation to reducing pain and labor duration in primigravida mothers.   Aim This study aims to determine the effect of a combination of pelvic rocking exercise using a birth ball and back massage on pain and labor duration in primigravida mothers.    Methods The design of this study was quasy Experiment with the approach of non-equivalent control group 's. The research sample was 160 primigravida maternity mothers. The sample in the treatment group was given pelvic rocking intervention using a birth ball and back massage and the sample in the control group was given standard labor care such as touch, and taught labor positions that were in an upright position, providing encouragement and counseling. This research conducted in July–December 2020.    Results Provided evidence that pelvic rocking using a birth ball and back massage offers safe, non-invasive treatment for pain management and duration during labor.   Conclusion The results of this study provide an understanding that there is a significant effect of the combination of pelvic rocking exercise and back massage on pain and duration of labor in primigravida mothers.  

Effect of birth ball abdominal core training on pregnancy fatigue, waist pain and delivery outcomes

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the effect of birth ball abdominal core training on fatigue, waist pain, and delivery outcomes in middle and late pregnancy.

METHODS

A prospective study of 209 primipara in total with 24-27 weeks of gestation were recruited and divided into the training group (109 cases) and the control group (100 cases). The control group received routine prenatal exercise. On the basis of routine prenatal exercise, pregnant women in the training group were given birth ball exercises based on abdominal core training. The difference in pregnancy fatigue, waist discomfort, and delivery outcomes between the two groups were compared.

RESULTS

The waist pain and fatigue ratings of women were significantly lower and the vaginal delivery rate (74.3%) was significantly higher (62%) (P < 0.001) in the training group. There were no significant differences in the total stage of labor, postpartum hemorrhage, neonatal weight and 1-min neonatal Apgar score between the two groups. The rate of episiotomy in the training group (14.7%) was significantly lower than that in the control group (25.0%) (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Birth ball exercises can relieve fatigue and waist pain in middle and late 2021 pregnancy, reduce the rate of episiotomy, and promote spontaneous vaginal delivery.

Birthing ball for reducing labor pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

OBJECTIVE

Multiple factors are thought to affect a woman's sensation of pain during the process of labor. Birthing balls are round exercise balls upon which a woman sits during labor and performs different movements such as rocking back and forth and pelvic rotation. Midwives and nurses have been using birthing balls (also known as Swiss balls) to increase maternal comfort, widen the pelvic outlet, and facilitate progression of labor for women laboring without an epidural. Therefore, the aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials is to assess whether the use of the birthing ball in labor decreases maternal pain during labor.

DATA SOURCES

Research was conducted using PubMed, Scopus, ClinicalTrial.gov, OVID and Cochrane Library as electronic databases. Randomized controlled trials were identified using the following search strategy: "birthing ball" OR "birth ball" OR "swiss ball" OR "exercise ball" AND labor from the inception of each database to June 2019. No restrictions for language or geographic location were applied.

STUDY ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA

Selection criteria included randomized trials of pregnant women with a singleton, cephalic fetus who were randomized to either birthing ball or control group (i.e. no birthing ball) for use in labor.

STUDY APPRAISAL AND SYNTHESIS METHODS

Seven trials with 533 pregnant women were included. 287 (53.8%) were randomized to the intervention group (birthing ball) and 246 (46.2%) were randomized to the control group (no birthing ball). All analyses were done using an intention-to-treat approach, evaluating women according to the treatment group to which they were randomly allocated in the original trials. The primary outcome was labor pain in the first stage of labor. The summary measures were reported as summary relative risk (RR) or as summary mean difference (MD) with 95% of confidence interval (CI) using the random-effects model of DerSimonian and Laird.

RESULTS

Labor pain significantly decreased by 1.70 points in the birthing ball group compared to the control group (MD -1.70 points; 95% CI -2.20 to -1.20). Use of the birthing ball versus no birthing ball did not result in a significant difference in incidence of spontaneous vaginal delivery, operative vaginal delivery, cesarean delivery, or perineal lacerations.

CONCLUSION

The birthing ball is an effective method of pain reduction during labor for women laboring without an epidural.

Effect of upright and ambulant positions versus lying down during the active first stage of labor on birth outcomes among nulliparous women: randomized controlled clinical trial

Objective

To examine the effect of upright and ambulant positions versus lying down during the active first stage of labor on birth outcomes for nulliparous women.

Methods

This is a randomized controlled clinical trial conducted at the delivery department of Damanhour Educational Institute, El Behira Governorate, Egypt. The study sample involved 150 parturient women equally divided into intervention and control groups using randomization block technique. The researchers used four tools for data collection: Demographic data interview schedule, World Health Organization Partograph, Apgar's score, to evaluate neonatal outcomes, and visual analogue pain intensity scale. For the study group, the parturient women were encouraged to assume one of the upright positions or ambulating around the bed so as to maintain the pelvis in vertical plane as far as possible for 20–25 min for every 1 h. The control group received routine hospital care, which includes lying down in bed. IBM SPSS 23.0 was used to analyze the data.

Results

Significant differences (P < 0.05) were observed between the study and control groups in relation to cervical dilation, fetal head descent, uterine contractions interval, and frequency. The duration of the first stage of labor significantly reduced (P = 0.018) in the intervention group compared with control group. No significant differences (P > 0.05) were observed between both groups in term of emergency cesarean birth rates, oxytocin use, and neonatal outcomes.

Conclusions

This study proves that upright and ambulant positions significantly enhance uterine contractility, cervical dilatation, and fetal head descent and reduce the first stage duration.

Birth ball for pregnant women in labour research protocol: a multi-centre randomised controlled trial

Background

Birth ball is one of the non-pharmacologic pain relief methods to help mothers cope with the labouring process. A randomised controlled trial (RCT) is conducted to evaluate the effectiveness, safety and harm of birth ball use by pregnant women in labour compared to treatment as usual group.

Methods

A prospective multi-centre randomised controlled trial (RCT) will be conducted in Obstetrics and Gynaecological units of five public hospitals in Hong Kong, China. Data will be collected from March 2016 onward for 2 years. The target population is Chinese women with an uncomplicated singleton pregnancy at gestational age of 37 to 42 weeks. Participants are randomised based on parity (nulliparous and multiparous) and type of labour onset (spontaneous and induced). Women in the intervention group are actively offered and taught how to use a birth ball; those in the control group receive the usual midwifery care. The target sample size is 512. The primary outcome measures are maternal pain intensity, satisfaction with pain relief, sense of control in labour, assisted delivery and satisfaction with childbirth experience. Labour pain relief is measured by visual analogue scale (VAS). Other outcomes will be measured through four different validated questionnaires. To control for potential cluster effects, a linear mixed model will be used. An intention-to-treat analysis is adopted and performed by researchers unknown to subjects’ group allocation.

Discussion

Results will provide rigorous scientific evidence for policy development and practice. We are using stratified randomisation according to potential confounders of parity and type of labour onset to give four possible combinations. If the results are favourable, it will facilitate systematic implementation to promote birth ball use for women in labour.

Trial registration

Chinese Clinical Trial Register (ChiCTR), Registration number: ChiCTR-IIC-16008275, Date of registration 12 April 2016 (retrospectively registered), Date of enrolment of the first participant to the trial 1 March 2016.

Healthy Birth Practice #2: Walk, Move Around, and Change Positions Throughout Labor

Women who use upright positions and are mobile during labor have shorter labors, less intervention, fewer cesarean births, and report less severe pain, and describe more satisfaction with their childbirth experience than women in recumbent positions. The evidence for supporting physiologic childbearing for optimal birth fails to disrupt intervention intensive hospital practices that deny 60% of women mobility in labor despite calls by maternity care organizations to not restrict mobility for low risk women in spontaneous labor.

Birth ball use for women in labor: A systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate, with the best level of evidence, the possible benefits of using birth balls during labor in maternal and neonatal outcomes.

METHODS

This research was made using MEDLINE/PubMed, LILCAS, CINAHL, CENTRAL, and SCOPUS databases, with no period or language restrictions. The terms "labor" and "birth ball" were used. Clinical trials (randomized and non-randomized) were included when compared a group with parturients using birth ball with control group under usual care. The following primary outcomes were: maternal outcomes: pain intensity; length of first and second stage; perineal trauma and episiotomy. Neonatal outcomes: APGAR score, admission to neonatal intensive care unit and delivery room resuscitation. The quality of evidence was evaluated by the GRADE system. Quantitative analysis through meta-analysis was also applies whenever possible.

RESULTS

Seven studies were included. The pain outcome showed differences in the subgroups of 20/30 min on the birth ball (mean difference) -1,46; 95% Confidence Interval: 2,15 to -0,76, p < 0.0001), 60 min (mean difference -1,95; 95% Confidence Interval: 2,68 to -1,22; p < 0.00001) and 90 min (mean difference -1,72; 95% Confidence Interval: 2,44 to -1,00; p < 0.0001), based in a moderated quality of evidence. Other outcomes did not showed differences between groups after the interventions, with a low and very low level of evidence.

CONCLUSIONS

Use the birth ball reduced pain after 20-90 min of use and there was no difference in the other outcomes. The low quality of the studies included in this meta-analysis suggests that new trials with better methodology quality are necessary.

Relaxation techniques for pain management in labour

BACKGROUND

Many women would like to avoid pharmacological or invasive methods of pain management in labour and this may contribute to the popularity of complementary methods of pain management. This review examined currently available evidence on the use of relaxation therapies for pain management in labour. This is an update of a review first published in 2011.

OBJECTIVES

To examine the effects of mind-body relaxation techniques for pain management in labour on maternal and neonatal well-being during and after labour.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth's Trials Register (9 May 2017), the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (The Cochrane Library, Issue 5 2017), MEDLINE (1966 to 24 May 2017), CINAHL (1980 to 24 May 2017), the Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (18 May 2017), ClinicalTrials.gov (18 May 2017), the ISRCTN Register (18 May 2017), the WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (ICTRP) (18 May 2017), and reference lists of retrieved studies.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled trials (including quasi randomised and cluster trials) comparing relaxation methods with standard care, no treatment, other non-pharmacological forms of pain management in labour or placebo.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently assessed trials for inclusion and risk of bias, extracted data and checked them for accuracy. We attempted to contact study authors for additional information. We assessed evidence quality with GRADE methodology.

MAIN RESULTS

This review update includes 19 studies (2519 women), 15 of which (1731 women) contribute data. Interventions examined included relaxation, yoga, music and mindfulness. Approximately half of the studies had a low risk of bias for random sequence generation and attrition bias. The majority of studies had a high risk of bias for performance and detection bias, and unclear risk of bias for, allocation concealment, reporting bias and other bias. We assessed the evidence from these studies as ranging from low to very low quality, and therefore the effects below should be interpreted with caution.RelaxationWe found that relaxation compared to usual care provided lowered the intensity of pain (measured on a scale of 0 to 10 with low scores indicating less pain) during the latent phase of labour (mean difference (MD) -1.25, 95% confidence interval (CI) -1.97 to -0.53, one trial, 40 women). Four trials reported pain intensity in the active phase; there was high heterogeneity between trials and very low-quality evidence suggested that there was no strong evidence that the effects were any different between groups for this outcome (MD -1.08, 95% CI -2.57 to 0.41, four trials, 271 women, random-effects analysis). Very low-quality evidence showed that women receiving relaxation reported greater satisfaction with pain relief during labour (risk ratio (RR) 8.00, 95% CI 1.10 to 58.19, one trial, 40 women), and showed no clear benefit for satisfaction with childbirth experience (assessed using different scales) (standard mean difference (SMD) -0.03, 95% CI -0.37 to 0.31, three trials, 1176 women). For safety outcomes there was very low-quality evidence of no clear reduction in assisted vaginal birth (average RR 0.61, 95% CI 0.20 to 1.84, four trials, 1122 women) or in caesarean section rates (average RR 0.73, 95% CI 0.26 to 2.01, four trials, 1122 women). Sense of control in labour, and breastfeeding were not reported under this comparison.YogaWhen comparing yoga to control interventions there was low-quality evidence that yoga lowered pain intensity (measured on a scale of 0 to 10) with low scores indicating less pain) (MD -6.12, 95% CI -11.77 to -0.47, one trial, 66 women), greater satisfaction with pain relief (MD 7.88, 95% CI 1.51 to 14.25, one trial, 66 women) and greater satisfaction with childbirth experience (MD 6.34, 95% CI 0.26 to 12.42 one trial, 66 women (assessed using the Maternal Comfort Scale with higher score indicating greater comfort). Sense of control in labour, breastfeeding, assisted vaginal birth, and caesarean section were not reported under this comparison.MusicWhen comparing music to control interventions there was evidence of lower pain intensity in the latent phase for women receiving music (measured on a scale of 0 to 10 with low scores indicating less pain) (MD -0.73, 95% CI -1.01 to -0.45, random-effects analysis, two trials, 192 women) and very low-quality evidence of no clear benefit in the active phase (MD -0.51, 95% CI -1.10 to 0.07, three trials, 217 women). Very low-quality evidence suggested no clear benefit in terms of reducing assisted vaginal birth (RR 0.41, 95% CI 0.08 to 2.05, one trial, 156 women) or caesarean section rate (RR 0.78, 95% CI 0.36 to 1.70, two trials, 216 women). Satisfaction with pain relief, sense of control in labour, satisfaction with childbirth experience, and breastfeeding were not reported under this comparison.Audio analgesiaOne trial evaluating audio analgesia versus control only reported one outcome and showed no evidence of benefit in satisfaction with pain relief.MindfulnessOne trial evaluating mindfulness versus usual care found an increase in sense of control for the mindfulness group (using the Childbirth Self-Efficacy Inventory) (MD 31.30, 95% CI 1.61 to 60.99, 26 women). There is no strong evidence that the effects were any different between groups for satisfaction in childbirth, or for caesarean section rate, need for assisted vaginal delivery or need for pharmacological pain relief. No other outcomes were reported in this trial.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Relaxation, yoga and music may have a role with reducing pain, and increasing satisfaction with pain relief, although the quality of evidence varies between very low to low. There was insufficient evidence for the role of mindfulness and audio-analgesia. The majority of trials did not report on the safety of the interventions. Further randomised controlled trials of relaxation modalities for pain management in labour are needed. Trials should be adequately powered and include clinically relevant outcomes such as those described in this review.

The effect of Aloe vera gel and sweet almond oil on striae gravidarum in nulliparous women

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Striae are linear depressions of the skin and causes psychological and sexual problems in person. Different methods are used to prevent and treat them but there is no definitive method. We compared the effect of Aloe vera gel and sweet almond oil on striae gravidarum.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In this double-blind clinical trial, 160 nulliparous women were enrolled and randomly divided into three case groups and one control group. The four groups were given 700 g Aloe vera, sweet almond oil, and base cream to use topically on the abdominal skin and forth group don't receive any medication as control group in five steps, they were examined study's variables (itching, erythema, and spread of striae) using statistical tests in SPSS.

RESULT

The findings showed that Aloe vera and sweet almond oil creams are more effective than the base cream and the control group to decrease itching and erythema and to prevent the spread of striae on the surface of abdomen (p < .05); however, all three creams had a similar effect on the diameter and the number of striae (p > .05).

CONCLUSIONS

Aloe vera and sweet almond oil creams reduce the itching of striae and prevent their progression.

Outcomes of Exercise Training Following the Use of a Birthing Ball During Pregnancy and Delivery

Fournier, D, Feeney, G, and Mathieu, M-E. Outcomes of exercise training following the use of a birthing ball during pregnancy and delivery. J Strength Cond Res 31(7): 1941-1947, 2017- Using a birthing ball (BB) is an exercise form that is growing in popularity. Improved delivery outcomes have been recently reported with as little a 6-8 hours of training per week; however, little is known regarding lower and higher training levels. The aim of this study was to document whether more time spent training with a BB resulted in improved delivery outcomes for the mother and the newborn. This quasi-experimental study was conducted with a sample of women who participated in 1 to 28 supervised exercise classes during pregnancy according to the Ballon Forme program offered in nonclinical settings (http://ballonforme.com), with the option of completing the supervised BB exercises performed at home. Thirty women who gave birth naturally were included in the study. Mean BB training time was 22.3 hours (SD = 16.6 hours). A greater BB training time was significantly associated with shorter labor duration (r = -0.408; p = 0.031) and specific stages of labor (stage 1 [dilatation/active stage] [r = -0.372; p = 0.043] and stage 2 [expulsion] [r = -0.415; p = 0.028]). Increased participation in BB supervised classes was more closely associated with quicker deliveries than those of home based BB exercises. No associations between training time and adverse effects of labor parameters or the baby's health were noted. Greater involvement in BB training seems to lead to quicker deliveries than lower levels of involvement; it also has the benefit of supervised practice.

Factors Affecting Midwives’ Decision to Offer Complementary and Alternative Medicine/Nonpharmacological Pain Relief Methods for Labor and Birth

PURPOSE:This study examines how characteristics of birth settings influence midwives’ decision to offer complementary and alternate nonpharmacological pain relief in labor and childbirth.

METHOD:This is a nonexperimental design. A convenience sample of midwives (N= 520), members of the American College of Nurse-Midwives (ACNM), were surveyed using a 51-item Likert-type scale questionnaire. Midwives were assigned to 1 of 3 primary birth settings (hospital, birthing center, home birth) for data analysis to identify if certain characteristics (policies/protocols, use of technology, providers’ knowledge and beliefs, and midwives’ relationship with collaborating obstetricians) in the birth setting influence a midwife’s decision to offer nonpharmacological pain relief methods in labor and birth.

RESULTS:Findings indicate that knowledge and beliefs of health care providers most influenced midwives’ decisions. Although factors of the birth environment influence midwives’ decisions to offer nonpharmacological pain management in labor, they do not prevent midwives from using most of the nonpharmacological pain relief methods during labor and birth.

CONCLUSIONS:It would appear that the midwives’ philosophy of care more than the characteristics of the birth setting influence midwives’ decisions to offer nonpharmacological pain relief methods. Educating health care providers about nonpharmacological pain relief methods would further maximize midwives’ ability to use these strategies.

Hidroterapia e bola suíça no trabalho de parto: ensaio clínico randomizado

Resumo Objetivo Conhecer a influência do banho quente e exercício perineal com bola suíça, de forma isolada e combinada, sobre a progressão do trabalho de parto. Métodos Ensaio clínico randomizado e controlado, realizado em dois hospitais públicos, no período de 2013 a 2014 com 128 mulheres internadas para assistência ao parto. A randomização aleatória alocou 44 parturientes no Grupo Banho Quente, 45 no Grupo Bola Suíça e 39 no Grupo Banho Quente e Bola Suíça associados. Resultados A pesquisa mostrou aumento estatisticamente significante na frequência da contração uterina com uso isolado (p=0,025) e associado da bola suíça (p<0,001), um aumento também significante na frequência cardíaca fetal com uso isolado e associado do banho quente (p< 0,001). Conclusão Associação do banho quente e bola suíça foi mais efetiva para a progressão do trabalho de parto e desfecho para o parto normal quando comparado com o seu uso isolado.

Nonpharmacologic approaches for pain management during labor compared with usual care: a meta-analysis

OBJECTIVES

To assess the effects of nonpharmacologic approaches to pain relief during labor, according to their endogenous mechanism of action, on obstetric interventions, maternal, and neonatal outcomes.

DATA SOURCE

Cochrane library, Medline, Embase, CINAHL and the MRCT databases were used to screen studies from January 1990 to December 2012.

STUDY SELECTION

According to Cochrane criteria, we selected randomized controlled trials that compared nonpharmacologic approaches for pain relief during labor to usual care, using intention-to-treat method.

RESULTS

Nonpharmacologic approaches, based on Gate Control (water immersion, massage, ambulation, positions) and Diffuse Noxious Inhibitory Control (acupressure, acupuncture, electrical stimulation, water injections), are associated with a reduction in epidural analgesia and a higher maternal satisfaction with childbirth. When compared with nonpharmacologic approaches based on Central Nervous System Control (education, attention deviation, support), usual care is associated with increased odds of epidural OR 1.13 (95% CI 1.05-1.23), cesarean delivery OR 1.60 (95% CI 1.18-2.18), instrumental delivery OR 1.21 (95% CI 1.03-1.44), use of oxytocin OR 1.20 (95% CI 1.01-1.43), labor duration (29.7 min, 95% CI 4.5-54.8), and a lesser satisfaction with childbirth. Tailored nonpharmacologic approaches, based on continuous support, were the most effective for reducing obstetric interventions.

CONCLUSION

Nonpharmacologic approaches to relieve pain during labor, when used as a part of hospital pain relief strategies, provide significant benefits to women and their infants without causing additional harm.

Effect of dance labor on the management of active phase labor pain & clients' satisfaction: a randomized controlled trial study

BACKGROUND

There are a wide variety of non- pharmacologic pain relief techniques for labor which include pelvic movement, upright position, back massage and partner support during the first stage of labor. The effectiveness of dance labor- which is a combination of these techniques- has not been evaluated.

AIM

This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of dance labor in pain reduction and woman's satisfaction during the first stage of labor.

METHODS

60 primiparous women aged 18-35 years old were randomly assigned to dance labor and control groups. In the dance labor group, women were instructed to do standing upright with pelvic tilt and rock their hips back and forth or around in a circle while their partner massaged their back and sacrum for a minimum of 30 minutes. In the control group, the participants received usual care during physiologic labor. Pain and satisfaction scores were measured by Visual Analogue Scale. Data were analyzed by using the t. test and Chi-square.

FINDINGS

Mean pain score in the dance labor group was significantly lower than the control group (P < 0.05). The mean satisfaction score in the dance labor group was significantly higher than in the control group (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Dance labor which is a complementary treatment with low risk can reduce the intensity of pain and increase mothers, satisfaction with care during the active phase of labor.

Healthy birth practice #2: walk, move around, and change positions throughout labor

In the United States, obstetric care is intervention intensive, resulting in 1 in 3 women undergoing cesarean surgery wherein mobility is treated as an intervention rather than supporting the natural physiologic process for optimal birth. Women who use upright positions and are mobile during labor have shorter labors, receive less intervention, report less severe pain, and describe more satisfaction with their childbirth experience than women in recumbent positions. This article is an updated evidence-based review of the "Lamaze International Care Practices That Promote Normal Birth, Care Practice #2: Freedom of Movement Throughout Labor," published in The Journal of Perinatal Education, 16(3), 2007.

Maternal positions and mobility during first stage labour

BACKGROUND

It is more common for women in both high- and low-income countries giving birth in health facilities, to labour in bed. There is no evidence that this is associated with any advantage for women or babies, although it may be more convenient for staff. Observational studies have suggested that if women lie on their backs during labour this may have adverse effects on uterine contractions and impede progress in labour, and in some women reduce placental blood flow.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the effects of encouraging women to assume different upright positions (including walking, sitting, standing and kneeling) versus recumbent positions (supine, semi-recumbent and lateral) for women in the first stage of labour on duration of labour, type of birth and other important outcomes for mothers and babies.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth Group's Trials Register (31 January 2013).

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised and quasi-randomised trials comparing women randomised to upright versus recumbent positions in the first stage of labour.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

We used methods described in the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions for carrying out data collection, assessing study quality and analysing results. Two review authors independently evaluated methodological quality and extracted data for each study. We sought additional information from trial authors as required. We used random-effects analysis for comparisons in which high heterogeneity was present. We reported results using the average risk ratio (RR) for categorical data and mean difference (MD) for continuous data.

MAIN RESULTS

Results should be interpreted with caution as the methodological quality of the 25 included trials (5218 women) was variable.For Comparison 1: Upright and ambulant positions versus recumbent positions and bed care, the first stage of labour was approximately one hour and 22 minutes shorter for women randomised to upright as opposed to recumbent positions (average MD -1.36, 95% confidence interval (CI) -2.22 to -0.51; 15 studies, 2503 women; random-effects, T(2) = 2.39, Chi(2) = 203.55, df = 14, (P < 0.00001), I(2) = 93%). Women who were upright were also less likely to have caesarean section (RR 0.71, 95% CI 0.54 to 0.94; 14 studies, 2682 women) and less likely to have an epidural (RR 0.81, 95% CI 0.66 to 0.99, nine studies, 2107 women; random-effects, T(2) = 0.02, I(2) = 61%). Babies of mothers who were upright were less likely to be admitted to the neonatal intensive care unit, however this was based on one trial (RR 0.20, 95% CI 0.04 to 0.89, one study, 200 women). There were no significant differences between groups for other outcomes including duration of the second stage of labour, or other outcomes related to the well being of mothers and babies.For Comparison 2: Upright and ambulant positions versus recumbent positions and bed care (with epidural: all women), there were no significant differences between groups for outcomes including duration of the second stage of labour, or other outcomes related to the well being of mothers and babies.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

There is clear and important evidence that walking and upright positions in the first stage of labour reduces the duration of labour, the risk of caesarean birth, the need for epidural, and does not seem to be associated with increased intervention or negative effects on mothers' and babies' well being. Given the great heterogeneity and high performance bias of study situations, better quality trials are still required to confirm with any confidence the true risks and benefits of upright and mobile positions compared with recumbent positions for all women. Based on the current findings, we recommend that women in low-risk labour should be informed of the benefits of upright positions, and encouraged and assisted to assume whatever positions they choose.

Maternal positions and mobility during first stage labour

BACKGROUND

It is more common for women in both high- and low-income countries giving birth in health facilities, to labour in bed. There is no evidence that this is associated with any advantage for women or babies, although it may be more convenient for staff. Observational studies have suggested that if women lie on their backs during labour this may have adverse effects on uterine contractions and impede progress in labour, and in some women reduce placental blood flow.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the effects of encouraging women to assume different upright positions (including walking, sitting, standing and kneeling) versus recumbent positions (supine, semi-recumbent and lateral) for women in the first stage of labour on duration of labour, type of birth and other important outcomes for mothers and babies.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth Group's Trials Register (31 January 2013).

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised and quasi-randomised trials comparing women randomised to upright versus recumbent positions in the first stage of labour.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

We used methods described in the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions for carrying out data collection, assessing study quality and analysing results. Two review authors independently evaluated methodological quality and extracted data for each study. We sought additional information from trial authors as required. We used random-effects analysis for comparisons in which high heterogeneity was present. We reported results using the average risk ratio (RR) for categorical data and mean difference (MD) for continuous data.

MAIN RESULTS

Results should be interpreted with caution as the methodological quality of the 25 included trials (5218 women) was variable.For Comparison 1: Upright and recumbent positions versus recumbent positions and bed care, the first stage of labour was approximately one hour and 22 minutes shorter for women randomised to upright as opposed to recumbent positions (average MD -1.36, 95% confidence interval (CI) -2.22 to -0.51; 15 studies, 2503 women; random-effects, T(2) = 2.39, Chi(2) = 203.55, df = 14, (P < 0.00001), I(2) = 93%). Women who were upright were also less likely to have caesarean section (RR 0.71, 95% CI 0.54 to 0.94; 14 studies, 2682 women) and less likely to have an epidural (RR 0.81, 95% CI 0.66 to 0.99, nine studies, 2107 women; random-effects, T(2) = 0.02, I(2) = 61%). Babies of mothers who were upright were less likely to be admitted to the neonatal intensive care unit, however this was based on one trial (RR 0.20, 95% CI 0.04 to 0.89, one study, 200 women). There were no significant differences between groups for other outcomes including duration of the second stage of labour, or other outcomes related to the well being of mothers and babies.For Comparison 2: Upright and recumbent positions versus recumbent positions and bed care (with epidural: all women), there were no significant differences between groups for outcomes including duration of the second stage of labour, or other outcomes related to the well being of mothers and babies.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

There is clear and important evidence that walking and upright positions in the first stage of labour reduces the duration of labour, the risk of caesarean birth, the need for epidural, and does not seem to be associated with increased intervention or negative effects on mothers' and babies' well being. Given the great heterogeneity and high performance bias of study situations, better quality trials are still required to confirm with any confidence the true risks and benefits of upright and mobile positions compared with recumbent positions for all women. Based on the current findings, we recommend that women in low-risk labour should be informed of the benefits of upright positions, and encouraged and assisted to assume whatever positions they choose.

Effect of sacrum-perineum heat therapy on active phase labor pain and client satisfaction: a randomized, controlled trial study

AIM

Reduction of labor pain is one of the most important aspects of obstetric care. Heat therapy, typically applied to the woman's back, lower abdomen, groin, and/or perineum during last stage of labor, is an easy pain relief method that does not require highly skilled care. The effectiveness of heat therapy applied to the perineum during the first stage of labor has not been evaluated. This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of heat therapy for pain and woman's satisfaction during physiological labor.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS

Sixty primiparous women aged 18-35 years old were randomly assigned to heat therapy and control groups. Pain and satisfaction scores were measured by visual analog scale. The measurements of satisfaction were accomplished after birth. Data were analyzed by using the t-test and chi-square

RESULTS

Mean pain scores in the heat therapy group were significantly lower than the control group (P < 0.05). The mean satisfaction score in the heat therapy group was significantly higher than in the control group (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Heat therapy, an inexpensive complementary treatment with low risk, can reduce the intensity of pain and increase mothers' satisfaction with care during the active phase of labor.