Epidural Fever and Its Implications for Mothers and Neonates: Taking the Heat

Is peripartum maternal fever alone a reliable predictor of neonatal sepsis? A single-centre, retrospective cohort study

AIM

To determine the incidence rate of early-onset neonatal sepsis (EONS) among term neonates (gestation greater than 37 weeks) admitted to the neonatal intensive care unit for suspected sepsis and the association of EONS with maternal fever (temperature greater than 38°C).

METHODS

A single-centre retrospective cohort study of all term neonates (gestation >37 weeks) admitted to and treated in the neonatal unit at the Townsville University Hospital between March 2015 and March 2020. Neonatal sepsis was confirmed with positive neonatal blood culture. Data on neonatal birth/stay and maternal pregnancy were collected from the electronic medical records and neonatal database.

RESULTS

Data from 737 neonates who were admitted for treatment of EONS were analysed. Sixty % (426) reported maternal intrapartum fever, with 1.1% (5) of neonates developing blood culture-proven sepsis. Forty % did not report intrapartum fever (311), with 3% (9) of neonates developing sepsis. As such, the sensitivity and specificity of maternal fever are 1.14% and 97%, respectively. The positive predictive value was 35.7%, and the negative predictive value was 40.1%. Fourteen neonates developed EONS, and all of them were symptomatic. Seventy-eight % (334/426) of the women in the febrile group received epidural analgesia compared to 5% (16/311) in the afebrile group. Of the 95 neonates born to women with chorioamnionitis, one (1.0%) of the neonates born to women with chorioamnionitis developed sepsis.

CONCLUSIONS

Intrapartum maternal fever is an unreliable predictor for EONS and leads to unnecessary antibiotic treatment. Symptoms in the neonate are a more reliable indicator of an ill neonate with blood culture-proven sepsis.

Epidural analgesia during birth and adverse neonatal outcomes: A population-based cohort study

BACKGROUND

In general, epidural analgesia is considered a safe and efficient way to relieve pain during active labour and is increasingly used in childbirth. It is well documented that epidural analgesia during birth has benefits but also adverse effects. However, evidence is limited on how epidural analgesia influences neonatal outcome in a low-risk population of birthing women.

AIM

To examine low Apgar score, foetal hypoxia and admission to the neonatal intensive care unit in neonates of low-risk women receiving epidural analgesia during birth.

METHODS

A cohort study using registry data to investigate a population of 23,272 low-risk women giving birth at a university hospital.

RESULTS

Epidural analgesia was used in 21.6% of low-risk women during birth. Low Apgar score, foetal hypoxia, and admission to the neonatal intensive care unit were found in 0.6%, 0.6%, and 10.0%, respectively in neonates of mothers receiving epidural analgesia during birth compared to 0.3%, 0.6%, and 5.6%, respectively in the non-exposed group. Epidural analgesia was associated with low Apgar score, adjusted odds ratio 1.76 (95% CI 1.07-2.90) and admission to the neonatal intensive care unit, adjusted odds ratio 1.43 (95% CI 1.26-1.62). A mediation analysis indicates the impact of epidural analgesia on adverse neonatal outcomes was mediated by obstetric complications like maternal fever, labour augmentation, and foetal malpresentation.

CONCLUSION

This study found use of epidural analgesia during birth in low-risk pregnant women was associated with infant low Apgar score and admission to the neonatal intensive care unit.