A case management model to improve hemodialysis outpatient outcomes

Effects of Different Models of Dialysis Care on Patient-Important Outcomes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Ongoing payment reform in dialysis necessitates better patient outcomes and lower costs. Suggested improvements to processes of care for maintenance dialysis patients are abundant; however, their impact on patient-important outcomes is unclear. This systematic review included comparative randomized controlled trials or observational studies with no restriction on language, published from 2000 to 2014, involving at least 5 adult dialysis patients who received a minimum of 6 months of follow-up. The effect size was pooled and stratified by intervention strategy (multidisciplinary care [MDC], home dialysis, alternate dialysis settings, and electronic health record implementation). Heterogeneity (I²) was used to assess the variability in study effects related to study differences rather than chance. Of the 1988 articles screened, 25 international studies with 74,833 maintenance dialysis patients were included. Interventions with MDC or home dialysis were associated with a lower mortality (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.72, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.61, 0.84, I² = 41.6%; HR = 0.57, 95% CI 0.41, 0.81, I² = 89.0%; respectively) and hospitalizations (incidence rate ratio [IRR] = 0.68, 95% CI 0.51, 0.91, I² = NA; IRR = 0.88, 95% CI 0.64, 1.20, I² = 79.6%; respectively). Alternate dialysis settings also were associated with a reduction in hospitalizations (IRR = 0.41, 95% CI 0.25, 0.69, I² = 0.0%). This systematic review underscores the importance of multidisciplinary care, and also the value of telemedicine as a means to increase access to providers and enhance outcomes for those dialyzing at home or in alternate settings, including those with limited access to nephrology expertise because of travel distance.

A nurse-led case management program on home exercise training for hemodialysis patients: A randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Patients on maintenance hemodialysis suffer from diminished physical health. Directly supervised exercise programs have been shown to be effective at improving physical function and optimizing well-being. However, nurses seldom include an exercise intervention in the care plan for hemodialysis patients.

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this study was to examine the effects of a 12-week nurse-led case management program on home exercise training for hemodialysis patients.

DESIGN

The study was a randomized, two-parallel group trial.

SETTINGS

Hemodialysis units in two tertiary hospitals in Nanjing, mainland China.

PARTICIPANTS

One hundred and thirteen adult patients who have been in stable condition while on dialysis treatment for more than 3 months were recruited and randomly assigned to either the study group (n=57) or the control group (n=56).

METHODS

Both groups underwent a brief weekly in-center exercise training session before their dialysis sessions for the first 6 weeks. The study group received additional nurse case management weekly for the first 6 weeks and biweekly for the following 6 weeks. The intervention was to facilitate patients in performing regular exercise at home. Outcome measures, including gait speed, 10-repetition sit-to-stand performance, and quality of life were collected at baseline, and at 6 and 12 weeks into the program.

RESULTS

The results revealed that patients in the study group demonstrated greater increases in normal gait speed [F(1,111)=4.42, p=0.038] than the control group. For the study group, a mean increase of 12.02 (±3.03)centimeters/second from baseline to week 12 was found. With regard to the fast gait speed, there was a marginally significant between-group effect [F(1,111)=3.93, p=0.050]. The study group showed a mean improvement of 11.08 (±3.32)cm/s, from baseline to week 12. Patients from both groups showed improvements in their 10-repetition sit-to-stand performance. The between-group differences approached significance [F(1,111)=3.92, p=0.050], with the study group showed greater improvement than the control group. The time taken by the patients in the study group to complete the 10-STS test increased by 5.75 (±3.88)s from baseline to week 12. Significant improvements in quality of life across three time points were found only in the study group.

CONCLUSIONS

Home exercise using a nurse-led case management approach is practical and effective in improving the physical function and self-perceived health of stable hemodialysis patients.

Improving pediatric patient outcomes: comparing two case management models

PURPOSE OF THE STUDY

Case management (CM) is a growing and evolving profession. Outcomes-based research that identifies the role of CM is needed in health care today. Case management has been recognized as a way to help patients experience high-quality and cost-effective care. The purpose of this nonexperimental, retrospective research study was to examine two CM models and their effect on patient outcomes, including length of hospital stay and readmission to the hospital within 30 days of discharge with the same diagnosis.

PRIMARY PRACTICE SETTING

The study was completed at two acute care pediatric hospitals in separate geographical regions of the country.

METHODOLOGY AND SAMPLE

Two CM models were compared by conducting a retrospective patient chart review. Seven hundred pediatric patient charts were reviewed to determine whether the patient outcomes met patient outcomes of interest. All patients were diagnosed with asthma and were between the ages of 2 and 18 years.

RESULTS

Analysis of data indicated that the length of hospital stay at Hospital A was significantly shorter than the length of hospital stay for patients admitted to Hospital B. However, hospital readmission rates within 30 days of discharge at Hospital A versus Hospital B indicated no significant difference.

IMPLICATIONS FOR CASE MANAGEMENT PRACTICE

Further research that examines different CM models must account for variables such as complexity of disease process, age of patient on admission to the hospital, and relevance of discharge teaching.

Translating knowledge on best practice into improving quality of RRT care: a systematic review of implementation strategies

Recent studies showed wide variation in the extent to which guidelines and other types of best practice have been implemented as part of routine health care. This is also true for the delivery of renal replacement therapy (RRT) for ESRD patients. Increasing uptake of best practice within such complex care systems requires an understanding of implementation strategies and specific quality improvement (QI) techniques. Therefore, we systematically reviewed over 5000 titles published since 1990 and included papers describing planned attempts to accelerate uptake of best RRT practice into daily care. This resulted in a list of 93 QI initiatives, categorized in order to expedite shared learning. The majority of the initiatives were executed within the domains of vascular access, nutrition, and anemia management. Strategies oriented at patients were most common and many initiatives pre-defined an improvement target before starting implementation. Of the 93 initiatives, 22 were sufficiently robust methodologically to be analyzed in more detail. Our results tend to support previous findings that multifaceted strategies are more effective than single strategies. Improving our understanding of how to successfully implement best practice can inform system-level change and is the only way to close the gap between knowledge on what works and the actual care delivered to ESRD patients. Research into implementation, using specific QI techniques, should therefore be given priority in future.