1
|
Lidgerwood GE, Pitson SM, Bonder C, Pébay A. Roles of lysophosphatidic acid and sphingosine-1-phosphate in stem cell biology. Prog Lipid Res 2018; 72:42-54. [PMID: 30196008 DOI: 10.1016/j.plipres.2018.09.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/05/2018] [Revised: 08/15/2018] [Accepted: 09/05/2018] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
Stem cells are unique in their ability to self-renew and differentiate into various cell types. Because of these features, stem cells are key to the formation of organisms and play fundamental roles in tissue regeneration and repair. Mechanisms controlling their fate are thus fundamental to the development and homeostasis of tissues and organs. Lysophosphatidic acid (LPA) and sphingosine-1-phosphate (S1P) are bioactive phospholipids that play a wide range of roles in multiple cell types, during developmental and pathophysiological events. Considerable evidence now demonstrates the potent roles of LPA and S1P in the biology of pluripotent and adult stem cells, from maintenance to repair. Here we review their roles for each main category of stem cells and explore how those effects impact development and physiopathology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Grace E Lidgerwood
- Centre for Eye Research Australia, Royal Victorian Eye and Ear Hospital, East Melbourne, Australia; Ophthalmology, Department of Surgery, the University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Stuart M Pitson
- Centre for Cancer Biology, University of South Australia and SA Pathology, Adelaide, Australia
| | - Claudine Bonder
- Centre for Cancer Biology, University of South Australia and SA Pathology, Adelaide, Australia
| | - Alice Pébay
- Centre for Eye Research Australia, Royal Victorian Eye and Ear Hospital, East Melbourne, Australia; Ophthalmology, Department of Surgery, the University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Wang J, Lu L, Kok CH, Saunders VA, Goyne JM, Dang P, Leclercq TM, Hughes TP, White DL. Increased peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor γ activity reduces imatinib uptake and efficacy in chronic myeloid leukemia mononuclear cells. Haematologica 2017; 102:843-853. [PMID: 28154092 PMCID: PMC5477603 DOI: 10.3324/haematol.2016.153270] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/24/2016] [Accepted: 01/31/2017] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Imatinib is actively transported by organic cation transporter-1 (OCT-1) influx transporter, and low OCT-1 activity in diagnostic chronic myeloid leukemia blood mononuclear cells is significantly associated with poor molecular response to imatinib. Herein we report that, in diagnostic chronic myeloid leukemia mononuclear cells and BCR-ABL1+ cell lines, peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor γ agonists (GW1929, rosiglitazone, pioglitazone) significantly decrease OCT-1 activity; conversely, peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor γ antagonists (GW9662, T0070907) increase OCT-1 activity. Importantly, these effects can lead to corresponding changes in sensitivity to BCR-ABL kinase inhibition. Results were confirmed in peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor γ-transduced K562 cells. Furthermore, we identified a strong negative correlation between OCT-1 activity and peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor γ transcriptional activity in diagnostic chronic myeloid leukemia patients (n=84; P<0.0001), suggesting that peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor γ activation has a negative impact on the intracellular uptake of imatinib and consequent BCR-ABL kinase inhibition. The inter-patient variability of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor γ activation likely accounts for the heterogeneity observed in patient OCT-1 activity at diagnosis. Recently, the peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor γ agonist pioglitazone was reported to act synergistically with imatinib, targeting the residual chronic myeloid leukemia stem cell pool. Our findings suggest that peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor γ ligands have differential effects on circulating mononuclear cells compared to stem cells. Since the effect of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor γ activation on imatinib uptake in mononuclear cells may counteract the clinical benefit of this activation in stem cells, caution should be applied when combining these therapies, especially in patients with high peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor γ transcriptional activity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jueqiong Wang
- Cancer Theme, South Australian Health and Medical Research Institute (SAHMRI), Adelaide, Australia.,School of Medicine, University of Adelaide, Australia
| | - Liu Lu
- Cancer Theme, South Australian Health and Medical Research Institute (SAHMRI), Adelaide, Australia.,School of Medicine, University of Adelaide, Australia
| | - Chung H Kok
- Cancer Theme, South Australian Health and Medical Research Institute (SAHMRI), Adelaide, Australia.,School of Medicine, University of Adelaide, Australia
| | - Verity A Saunders
- Cancer Theme, South Australian Health and Medical Research Institute (SAHMRI), Adelaide, Australia
| | - Jarrad M Goyne
- Cancer Theme, South Australian Health and Medical Research Institute (SAHMRI), Adelaide, Australia
| | - Phuong Dang
- Cancer Theme, South Australian Health and Medical Research Institute (SAHMRI), Adelaide, Australia
| | - Tamara M Leclercq
- Cancer Theme, South Australian Health and Medical Research Institute (SAHMRI), Adelaide, Australia.,School of Medicine, University of Adelaide, Australia
| | - Timothy P Hughes
- Cancer Theme, South Australian Health and Medical Research Institute (SAHMRI), Adelaide, Australia.,School of Medicine, University of Adelaide, Australia.,Department of Haematology, SA Pathology, Adelaide, Australia.,Australasian Leukaemia and Lymphoma Group, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Deborah L White
- Cancer Theme, South Australian Health and Medical Research Institute (SAHMRI), Adelaide, Australia .,School of Medicine, University of Adelaide, Australia.,Australasian Leukaemia and Lymphoma Group, Melbourne, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Parham KA, Zebol JR, Tooley KL, Sun WY, Moldenhauer LM, Cockshell MP, Gliddon BL, Moretti PA, Tigyi G, Pitson SM, Bonder CS. Sphingosine 1-phosphate is a ligand for peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-γ that regulates neoangiogenesis. FASEB J 2015; 29:3638-53. [PMID: 25985799 DOI: 10.1096/fj.14-261289] [Citation(s) in RCA: 73] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/07/2014] [Accepted: 05/04/2015] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
Sphingosine 1-phosphate (S1P) is a bioactive lipid that can function both extracellularly and intracellularly to mediate a variety of cellular processes. Using lipid affinity matrices and a radiolabeled lipid binding assay, we reveal that S1P directly interacts with the transcription factor peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor (PPAR)γ. Herein, we show that S1P treatment of human endothelial cells (ECs) activated a luciferase-tagged PPARγ-specific gene reporter by ∼12-fold, independent of the S1P receptors. More specifically, in silico docking, gene reporter, and binding assays revealed that His323 of the PPARγ ligand binding domain is important for binding to S1P. PPARγ functions when associated with coregulatory proteins, and herein we identify that peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-γ coactivator 1 (PGC1)β binds to PPARγ in ECs and their progenitors (nonadherent endothelial forming cells) and that the formation of this PPARγ:PGC1β complex is increased in response to S1P. ECs treated with S1P selectively regulated known PPARγ target genes with PGC1β and plasminogen-activated inhibitor-1 being increased, no change to adipocyte fatty acid binding protein 2 and suppression of CD36. S1P-induced in vitro tube formation was significantly attenuated in the presence of the PPARγ antagonist GW9662, and in vivo application of GW9662 also reduced vascular development in Matrigel plugs. Interestingly, activation of PPARγ by the synthetic ligand troglitazone also reduced tube formation in vitro and in vivo. To support this, Sphk1(-/-)Sphk2(+/-) mice, with low circulating S1P levels, demonstrated a similar reduction in vascular development. Taken together, our data reveal that the transcription factor, PPARγ, is a bona fide intracellular target for S1P and thus suggest that the S1P:PPARγ:PGC1β complex may be a useful target to manipulate neovascularization.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kate A Parham
- *Centre for Cancer Biology, SA Pathology and University of South Australia, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia; School of Medicine, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia; Co-operative Research Centre for Biomarker Translation, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; and Department of Physiology, The University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, Tennessee, USA
| | - Julia R Zebol
- *Centre for Cancer Biology, SA Pathology and University of South Australia, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia; School of Medicine, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia; Co-operative Research Centre for Biomarker Translation, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; and Department of Physiology, The University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, Tennessee, USA
| | - Katie L Tooley
- *Centre for Cancer Biology, SA Pathology and University of South Australia, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia; School of Medicine, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia; Co-operative Research Centre for Biomarker Translation, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; and Department of Physiology, The University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, Tennessee, USA
| | - Wai Y Sun
- *Centre for Cancer Biology, SA Pathology and University of South Australia, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia; School of Medicine, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia; Co-operative Research Centre for Biomarker Translation, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; and Department of Physiology, The University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, Tennessee, USA
| | - Lachlan M Moldenhauer
- *Centre for Cancer Biology, SA Pathology and University of South Australia, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia; School of Medicine, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia; Co-operative Research Centre for Biomarker Translation, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; and Department of Physiology, The University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, Tennessee, USA
| | - Michaelia P Cockshell
- *Centre for Cancer Biology, SA Pathology and University of South Australia, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia; School of Medicine, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia; Co-operative Research Centre for Biomarker Translation, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; and Department of Physiology, The University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, Tennessee, USA
| | - Briony L Gliddon
- *Centre for Cancer Biology, SA Pathology and University of South Australia, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia; School of Medicine, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia; Co-operative Research Centre for Biomarker Translation, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; and Department of Physiology, The University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, Tennessee, USA
| | - Paul A Moretti
- *Centre for Cancer Biology, SA Pathology and University of South Australia, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia; School of Medicine, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia; Co-operative Research Centre for Biomarker Translation, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; and Department of Physiology, The University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, Tennessee, USA
| | - Gabor Tigyi
- *Centre for Cancer Biology, SA Pathology and University of South Australia, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia; School of Medicine, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia; Co-operative Research Centre for Biomarker Translation, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; and Department of Physiology, The University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, Tennessee, USA
| | - Stuart M Pitson
- *Centre for Cancer Biology, SA Pathology and University of South Australia, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia; School of Medicine, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia; Co-operative Research Centre for Biomarker Translation, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; and Department of Physiology, The University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, Tennessee, USA
| | - Claudine S Bonder
- *Centre for Cancer Biology, SA Pathology and University of South Australia, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia; School of Medicine, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia; Co-operative Research Centre for Biomarker Translation, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; and Department of Physiology, The University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, Tennessee, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Calvert JK, Helbig KJ, Dimasi D, Cockshell M, Beard MR, Pitson SM, Bonder CS, Carr JM. Dengue Virus Infection of Primary Endothelial Cells Induces Innate Immune Responses, Changes in Endothelial Cells Function and Is Restricted by Interferon-Stimulated Responses. J Interferon Cytokine Res 2015; 35:654-65. [PMID: 25902155 DOI: 10.1089/jir.2014.0195] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Although endothelial cell (EC) infection is not widespread during dengue virus (DENV) infection in vivo, the endothelium is the site of the pathogenic effects seen in severe DENV disease. In this study, we investigated DENV infection of primary EC and defined factors that influence infection in this cell type. Consistent with in vivo findings where EC infection is infrequent, only 3%-15% of EC became productively DENV-2-infected in vitro. This low level infection could not be attributed to inhibition by heparin, EC donor variation, heterogeneity, or biological source. DENV-infection of EC was associated with induction of innate immune responses, including increased STAT1 protein, STAT1- phosphorylation, interferon (IFN)-β, OAS-1, IFIT-1/ISG56, and viperin mRNA. Antibody blocking of IFN-β inhibited the induction of OAS1, IFIT1/ISG56, and viperin while shRNA knockdown of viperin enhanced DENV-infection in EC. DENV-infection of EC resulted in increased activity of sphingosine kinase 1, a factor important in maintaining vascular integrity, and altered basal and stimulated changes in barrier integrity of DENV-infected EC monolayers. Thus, DENV productively infects only a small percentage of primary EC but this has a major influence on induction of IFN-β driven innate immune responses that can restrict infection while the EC themselves are functionally altered. These changes may have important consequences for the endothelium and are reflective of pathogenic changes associated with vascular leakage, as seen in DENV disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Julie K Calvert
- 1 Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, School of Medicine, Flinders University , Adelaide, South Australia
| | - Karla J Helbig
- 2 School of Molecular and Biomedical Science, University of Adelaide , Adelaide, South Australia
| | - David Dimasi
- 3 Centre for Cancer Biology, University of South Australia and SA Pathology , Adelaide, South Australia
| | - Michaelia Cockshell
- 3 Centre for Cancer Biology, University of South Australia and SA Pathology , Adelaide, South Australia
| | - Michael R Beard
- 2 School of Molecular and Biomedical Science, University of Adelaide , Adelaide, South Australia.,3 Centre for Cancer Biology, University of South Australia and SA Pathology , Adelaide, South Australia
| | - Stuart M Pitson
- 3 Centre for Cancer Biology, University of South Australia and SA Pathology , Adelaide, South Australia
| | - Claudine S Bonder
- 3 Centre for Cancer Biology, University of South Australia and SA Pathology , Adelaide, South Australia
| | - Jillian M Carr
- 1 Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, School of Medicine, Flinders University , Adelaide, South Australia
| |
Collapse
|