Lidocaine in the treatment of status epilepticus

Study of the preparation, characterization, and solubility of lidocaine complexed with 5-sulfosalicylic acid dihydrate

OBJECTIVE

This study was to prepare solid dispersions of lidocaine (Lid) with 5-sulfosalicylic acid dihydrate (SSA) by freeze-drying (freeze-dried [FD] Lid/SSA = 1/1) and to evaluate their physical properties.

METHODS

Here, we evaluated the physicochemical properties and solubility of solid dispersions of Lid and SSA prepared by freeze-drying (freeze-dried [FD] Lid/SSA = 1/1).

RESULTS

Differential scanning calorimetry measurements showed that after freeze-drying, the endothermic peak due to Lid melting, the dehydration peak, and the endothermic peak due to SSA melting disappeared. Powder X-ray diffraction results showed that the characteristic Lid and SSA peaks disappeared after freeze-drying, indicating a halo pattern. The near-infrared spectroscopy results suggested that Lid-derived -NH and -CH groups and the Lid-derived -OH and -CH groups from the SSA peak shifted and broadened after freeze-drying, suggesting their involvement in complex formation through Lid/SSA intermolecular interactions. Nuclear Overhauser effect spectroscopy-nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) measurements showed a cross-peak due to the interaction between the Lid-derived -CH group and the SSA-derived -OH group, suggesting hydrogen bonding. Diffusion-ordered spectroscopy NMR measurements showed that the diffusion coefficients of Lid and SSA aggregated in FD Lid/SSA, suggesting a change in Lid dispersibility in the solvent owing to the formation of a complex with SSA. The solubility of FD Lid/SSA was approximately 88 mg/mL (∼20-fold higher than that of Lid).

CONCLUSIONS

These findings suggest that complex formation occurred in FD Lid/SSA; this enhanced the solubility of this dispersion.

Does Lidocaine Shorten Seizure Duration in Electroconvulsive Therapy?

BACKGROUND

Electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) is an effective short-term treatment for schizophrenia and depression, amongst other disorders. Lidocaine is typically added to reduce pain from intravenous propofol injection. However, depending on the dose used in the ECT setting, it can shorten seizure duration. The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of lidocaine dose on seizure duration.

METHODS

This retrospective, naturalistic cohort study included 169 patients treated with ECT. We examined 4714 ECT sessions with propofol or propofol plus lidocaine. Ictal quality was manually rated by visual inspection. The main outcome of this study was the relation of lidocaine with seizure duration after controlling for socio-demographic, ECT, and other anesthetic variables.

RESULTS

There was a significant negative association between lidocaine usage and seizure duration. Multivariate analyses showed that seizure duration was shortened by an average of 3.21 s in sessions with lidocaine. Moreover, in this subgroup, there was a significant negative dose-dependent association between lidocaine dose and seizure length. Complementarily, a significant positive association between preictal BIS and seizure length was found in the subgroup of sessions where preictal was used.

CONCLUSIONS

We provide additional evidence highlighting the importance of caution regarding lidocaine dosing due to the effect on seizure length in the ECT setting. It is advisable for clinicians to exercise caution when administering lidocaine regarding its dosing and seizure length in ECT settings. Future investigation is needed to assess causal relationships by studying certain vulnerable groups or employing other charge calculation techniques, such as the titration method.

Long-term Outcome of Intravenous Lidocaine in Pediatric Cluster Seizures: A Preliminary Study

BACKGROUND

Cluster seizures are life-threatening conditions. They may easily evolve into status epilepticus and are reported in up to 20% to 30% of patients with epilepsy. Sometimes cluster seizures become drug resistant, leading to the use of unconventional therapies. One of these unconventional approaches may be the use of lidocaine, which is a sodium-channel-blocking drug mostly known as a local anesthetic and antiarrhythmic agent.

METHODS

We describe the outcome of four children who were treated with continuous intravenous infusion of 2% lidocaine due to drug-resistant focal cluster seizures. Lidocaine was administered as an initial dose of 1 mg/kg/hour and, subsequently, was increased to 2 to 4 mg/kg/hour. The therapy was continued for five to 10 days. Patients remained under careful cardiological surveillance during the treatment.

RESULTS

Complete seizure remission was achieved in all four children. None of the patients experienced adverse events. Although seizures recurred in all patients within an average time of 2.4 months, they appeared with reduced frequency, and within the follow-up period (mean 7.5 months) no additional cluster seizures occurred.

CONCLUSIONS

Treatment with lidocaine in pediatric cluster seizures may be useful and may be considered as a therapeutic option. Our patients encountered no side effects and experienced prolonged seizure remission, possibly resulting from the effect of lidocaine on sodium channels or from its anti-inflammatory properties. However, more studies are required to confirm the safety and long-term effectiveness of this approach. Clinicians should be aware of possible adverse effects and necessity of sustained cardiological surveillance during the treatment.

Outside the box: Medications worth considering when traditional antiepileptic drugs have failed

PURPOSE

Review and discuss medications efficacious for seizure control, despite primary indications for other diseases, as treatment options in patients who have failed therapy with traditional antiepileptic drugs (AEDs).

METHODS

Literature searches were conducted utilizing PubMed and MEDLINE databases employing combinations of search terms including, but not limited to, "epilepsy", "refractory", "seizure", and the following medications: acetazolamide, amantadine, bumetanide, imipramine, lidocaine, verapamil, and various stimulants.

RESULTS

Data from relevant case studies, retrospective reviews, and available clinical trials were gathered, analyzed, and reported. Experience with acetazolamide, amantadine, bumetanide, imipramine, lidocaine, verapamil, and various stimulants show promise for cases of refractory epilepsy in both adults and children. Many medications lack large scale, randomized clinical trials, but the available data is informative when choosing treatment for patients that have failed traditional epilepsy therapies.

CONCLUSIONS

All neurologists have encountered a patient that failed nearly every AED, diet, and surgical option. For these patients, we often seek fortuitous discoveries within small series and case reports, hoping to find a treatment that might help the patient. In the present review, we describe medications for which antiepileptic effect has been ascribed after they were introduced for other indications.

Infantile Epileptic Encephalopathy Associated With SCN2A Mutation Responsive to Oral Mexiletine

BACKGROUND

Genetic alterations are significant causes of epilepsy syndromes; especially early-onset epileptic encephalopathies and voltage-gated sodium channelopathies are among the best described. Mutations in the SCN2A subunit of voltage-gated sodium channels have been associated with benign familial neonatal-infantile seizures, generalized epilepsy febrile seizures plus, and an early-onset infantile epileptic encephalopathy.

METHOD

We describe two infants with medically refractory seizures due to a de novo SCN2A mutation.

RESULTS

The first child responded to intravenous lidocaine with significant reduction in seizure frequency and was successfully transitioned to enteral mexiletine. Mexiletine was subsequently used in a second infant with reduction in seizure frequency.

CONCLUSION

Class 1b antiarrhythmic agents, lidocaine and mexiletine, may be useful in infants with medically refractory early infantile epileptic encephalopathy secondary to mutations in SCN2A.

Pharmacotherapy for Status Epilepticus

Status epilepticus (SE) represents the most severe form of epilepsy. It is one of the most common neurologic emergencies, with an incidence of up to 61 per 100,000 per year and an estimated mortality of 20 %. Clinically, tonic-clonic convulsive SE is divided into four subsequent stages: early, established, refractory, and super-refractory. Pharmacotherapy of status epilepticus, especially of its later stages, represents an "evidence-free zone," due to a lack of high-quality, controlled trials to inform clinical decisions. This comprehensive narrative review focuses on the pharmacotherapy of SE, presented according to the four-staged approach outlined above, and providing pharmacological properties and efficacy/safety data for each antiepileptic drug according to the strength of scientific evidence from the available literature. Data sources included MEDLINE and back-tracking of references in pertinent studies. Intravenous lorazepam or intramuscular midazolam effectively control early SE in approximately 63-73 % of patients. Despite a suboptimal safety profile, intravenous phenytoin or phenobarbital are widely used treatments for established SE; alternatives include valproate, levetiracetam, and lacosamide. Anesthetics are widely used in refractory and super-refractory SE, despite the current lack of trials in this field. Data on alternative treatments in the later stages are limited. Valproate and levetiracetam represent safe and effective alternatives to phenobarbital and phenytoin for treatment of established SE persisting despite first-line treatment with benzodiazepines. To date there are no class I data to support recommendations for most antiepileptic drugs for established, refractory, and super-refractory SE. Limiting the methodologic heterogeneity across studies is required and high-class randomized, controlled trials to inform clinicians about the best treatment in established and refractory status are needed.

Therapeutic choices in convulsive status epilepticus

INTRODUCTION

Convulsive status epilepticus (SE) is one of the most frequent and severe neurological emergencies in both adults and children. A timely administration of appropriate antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) can stop seizures early and markedly improve outcome.

AREAS COVERED

The main treatment strategies for SE are reviewed with an emphasis on initial treatments. The established first-line treatment consists of benzodiazepines, most frequently intravenous lorazepam. Benzodiazepines that do not require intravenous administration like intranasal midazolam or intramuscular midazolam are becoming more popular because of easier administration in the field. Other benzodiazepines may also be effective. After treatment with benzodiazepines, treatment with fosphenytoin and phenobarbital is usually recommended. Other intravenously available AEDs, such as valproate and levetiracetam, may be as effective and safe as fosphenytoin and phenobarbital, have a faster infusion time and better pharmacokinetic profile. The rationale behind the need for an early treatment of SE is discussed. The real-time delays of AED administration in clinical practice are described.

EXPERT OPINION

There is limited evidence to support what the best initial benzodiazepine or the best non-benzodiazepine AED is. Recent and developing multicenter trials are evaluating the best treatment options and will likely modify the recommended treatment choices in SE in the near future. Additionally, more research is needed to understand how different treatment options modify prognosis in SE. Timely implementation of care protocols to minimize treatment delays is crucial.

Management of refractory status epilepticus in adults: still more questions than answers

Refractory status epilepticus (RSE) is defined as status epilepticus that continues despite treatment with benzodiazepines and one antiepileptic drug. RSE should be treated promptly to prevent morbidity and mortality; however, scarce evidence is available to support the choice of specific treatments. Major independent outcome predictors are age (not modifiable) and cause (which should be actively targeted). Recent recommendations for adults suggest that the aggressiveness of treatment for RSE should be tailored to the clinical situation. To minimise intensive care unit-related complications, focal RSE without impairment of consciousness might initially be approached conservatively; conversely, early induction of pharmacological coma is advisable in generalised convulsive forms of the disorder. At this stage, midazolam, propofol, or barbiturates are the most commonly used drugs. Several other treatments, such as additional anaesthetics, other antiepileptic or immunomodulatory compounds, or non-pharmacological approaches (eg, electroconvulsive treatment or hypothermia), have been used in protracted RSE. Treatment lasting weeks or months can sometimes result in a good outcome, as in selected patients after encephalitis or autoimmune disorders. Well designed prospective studies of RSE are urgently needed.

Complications of the management of status epilepticus in the intensive care unit

Barbiturates and propofol are widely used to control status epilepticus. This review aims to discuss all possible adverse effects incurred by the administration of GABA-mediated anesthetic agents. Further on unconventional therapies such as ketamine, lidocaine, or anesthetic agents are discussed both with respect to efficacy and complications. The aim of this review is to raise awareness of complications incurred by therapeutic approaches to patients with status epilepticus in the intensive care unit.

Effect of topiramate, in combination with lidocaine, and phenobarbital, in acute encephalitis with refractory repetitive partial seizures

OBJECTIVE

Acute encephalitis with refractory repetitive partial seizure (AERRPS) is a peculiar type of post-encephalitic/encephalopathic epilepsy. Here we report an analysis of AERRPS in a series of children and propose an effective treatment option for seizure control in these children.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed cases of AERRPS treated in a pediatric intensive care unit, between February 2002 and June 2006. Clinical characteristics were systemically assessed. Burst suppression coma was induced by high-dose suppressive therapy; 24-h electroencephalogram (EEG) monitoring was performed on each patient. The goal of treatment was to achieve complete clinical seizure control or burst-suppression pattern on EEG, aiming for an interburst interval of >5s. Brain imaging was done for each patient.

RESULTS

There were nine patients (seven boys), aged 5-15 years. Clinical symptoms included fever (100%), upper respiratory symptoms (66.7%) and altered consciousness (66.7%). All patients received multiple high-dose suppressive drugs and were intubated with/without inotropic agents. Seizures in three patients were stopped after high-dose lidocaine infusion (6-8 mg/kg/h) in the acute stage and three patients were stopped after high dose phenobarbital (serum level 60-80 ug/mL) combined with high-dose oral topiramate (15-20 mg/kg/day). Follow-up for this study was 16-61 months. Two subjects died while seven developed epilepsy and/or neurologic deficits; none returned to baseline. All survivors were discharged and continued multiple antiepileptic medications.

CONCLUSIONS

Our data indicates that children with AERRPS have high mortality and morbidity rates. High-dose topiramate combined with high-dose lidocaine infusion or high-dose phenobarbital in the acute stage might be an effective treatment option for children with AERRPS.

Treatment of acute seizures and status epilepticus

Overt status epilepticus and persistent obtundation after a witnessed clinical seizure are neurologic emergencies. Early recognition and intervention in the electroclinical syndrome of status epilepticus reduces morbidity, although treatment of the underlying etiology is also critical. This review outlines key concepts related to status epilepticus, delineates an approach to the early management of status epilepticus, and highlights novel but practical approaches in the evaluation and treatment of refractory status epilepticus, emphasizing the use of a treatment algorithm. This review is written from the perspective of the intensive care unit clinician, and the approach and opinions expressed stem from clinical experience and review of the current literature. Particular attention is given to an overall approach to the management of convulsive status epilepticus in adults and older children as well as exploring novel approaches and diagnostic tools that may prove useful in difficult-to-control status epilepticus.

Lidocaine treatment in pediatric convulsive status epilepticus

BACKGROUND

Convulsive status epilepticus (CSE) may end fatally or leave serious sequelae. CSE treatment, invariably an emergency case, is based upon i.v. benzodiazepines as well as phenytoin, barbiturates or both. The present paper reports efficiency of lidocaine in CSE.

METHODS

The effects of lidocaine on patients with CSE due to infectious and non-infectious reasons were compared. Lidocaine was given in 29 episodes of CSE to 49 patients having failed to respond to first-line anticonvulsive drugs, such as diazepam, phenobarbital and phenytoin therapy. Lidocaine was given in doses of 2 mg/kg bolus i.v., and then in 4 mg/kg per h infusion.

RESULTS

Mean duration of lidocaine infusion was 14.6 +/- 7.8 h. Effectiveness of lidocaine in patients with CSE was found to be 44.4%. Also, 11 patients responded to a single dose of lidocaine (37.9%), while another two (6.9%) required another dose to suppress their seizures. Patients with seizures attributable to infections were observed to have responded favorably to lidocaine when compared to those with seizures due to epilepsy (37.9% vs 6.8%; P < 0.05). Subsequent epilepsy was found to occur more frequently in patients with a poor response to lidocaine than in patients with a good response (P < 0.05). Adverse reactions to lidocaine were observed in three patients (10.3%), two of them having ventricular arrhythmia. As for the other patient, the focal seizure developed into a generalized one.

CONCLUSIONS

Lidocaine seems to be useful for the management of CSE as a rapid-acting anticonvulsant, particularly in patients with CSE due to infections. But further studies with larger number of patients are needed.

Treatment of Status Epilepticus in Adults: Guidelines of the Italian League Against Epilepsy

Status epilepticus (SE) is a medical emergency which can lead to significant morbidity and mortality and requires prompt diagnosis and treatment. SE is differentiated into generalized or partial SE on the basis of its electro-clinical manifestations. The guidelines for the management of SE produced by the Italian League against Epilepsy also distinguish three different stages of SE (initial, established and refractory), based on time elapsed since the onset of the condition and responsiveness to previously administered drugs. Treatment should be started as soon as possible, particularly in generalized convulsive SE, and should include general support measures, drugs to suppress epileptic activity and, whenever possible, treatments aimed at relieving the underlying (causative) condition. Benzodiazepines are the first line antiepileptic agents, and i.v. lorazepam is generally preferred because it is associated with a lower risk of early relapses. If benzodiazepines fail to control seizures, i.v. phenytoin is usually indicated, though i.v. phenobarbital or i.v. valproate may also be considered. Refractory SE requires admission to an intensive care unit (ICU) to allow adequate monitoring and support of respiratory, metabolic and hemodynamic functions and cerebral electrical activity. In refractory SE, general anesthesia may be required. Propofol and thiopental represent first line agents in this setting, after careful assessment of potential risks and benefits.

[Refractory status epilepticus: diagnosis, therapy, course, and prognosis]

Status epilepticus (SE) is a frequent neurological emergency with an annual incidence of 10-20/100,000 individuals. The overall mortality is about 10-20%. Patients present with long-lasting fits or series of epileptic seizures or extended stupor and coma. Furthermore, patients with SE can suffer from a number of systemic complications possibly also due to side effects of the medical treatment. In the beginning, standardized treatment algorithms can successfully stop most SE. A minority of SE cases prove however to be refractory against the initial treatment and require intensified pharmacologic intervention with nonsedating anticonvulsive drugs or anesthetics. In some partial SE, nonpharmacological approaches (e.g., epilepsy surgery) have been used successfully. This paper reviews scientific evidence of the diagnostic approach, therapeutic options, and course of refractory SE, including nonpharmacological treatment.

Intravenous lidocaine for status epilepticus during childhood

The clinical efficacy of lidocaine for convulsive status epilepticus in 53 convulsive episodes was examined in 37 children (17 males, 20 females). Mean age of patients receiving lidocaine was 3 years 7 months (SD 3y 5mo). Lidocaine administration achieved control of status epilepticus in 19 of 53 convulsive episodes (35.8%). Seizures ceased within 5 minutes of lidocaine administration in all 19 patients who were responsive to the drug. Regarding aetiology of status epilepticus and types of seizures, there was no statistical difference in effectiveness. Mild decrease of oxygen saturation, monitored by pulse oximetry, was observed in one patient, which improved by oxygenation using a mask. Lidocaine is a useful anticonvulsive agent; however, the response rate to lidocaine appears to be quite low, as less than half of the seizures were effectively controlled by lidocaine. Favourable properties of the drug include prompt responses, less alteration of consciousness, and fewer adverse effects, including less respiratory depression.

Chemically Induced Seizures

Drug- and toxin-associated seizures (DTS) may result from exposure to a wide variety of agents. Most DTS can be managed with supportive care. First-line anticonvulsant therapy should include benzodiazepines, unless agents require a specific antidote. Phenytoin is generally not expected to be useful for DTS and in some instances may be harmful. In this article the authors discuss the pathophysiology of DTS, the potential differential diagnosis, and the clinical presentation. They also review selected agents that cause DTS and provide an overview of how the clinician should approach the management of patients who have DTS.

Drug- and toxin-associated seizures

Drug- and toxin-associated seizures may result from exposure to a wide variety of agents. Obtaining a comprehensive history behind the exposure is generally more helpful than diagnostic testing. Most DTS may be managed with supportive care, including benzodiazepines, except in the case of agents that require a specific intervention or antidote.

Porcine FAD-containing monooxygenase metabolizes lidocaine, bupivacaine and propranolol in vitro

Lidocaine, bupivacaine and propranolol are amines that can be expected to act as substrates for FAD-containing monooxygensae (FMO) (EC 1. 14. 13. 8). We found that FMO metabolizes lidocaine, bupivacaine and propranolol. The Km and Vmax values of lidocaine, bupivacaine and propranolol for FMO are 143, 408 and 210 microM, and 145, 119 and 135 nmol/min/mg FMO protein, respectively. The lipophilicity of the drugs decreased in the following order: lidocaine>propranolol>bupivacaine, under our experimental conditions. Furthermore, the metabolic products of FMO were separated by high-performance liquid chromatography and analyzed by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry, and were found to be the N-oxides and N-hydroxylamines of the respective drugs. These findings suggest that lidocaine, bupivacaine and propranolol are substrates for FMO, and the enzymatic toward lidocaine or bupivacaine may be inhibited exclusively and competitively by propranolol.

Status epilepticus: a review of different syndromes, their current evaluation, and treatment

BACKGROUND

Status epilepticus (SE) encompasses a wide range of seizure types with different clinical presentations, pathophysiologies, treatment imperatives, and outcomes. The most dramatic and life-threatening form, generalized convulsive status epilepticus, has been reviewed in all of these aspects, but other less common types of SE have been described less extensively.

REVIEW SUMMARY

Definitions of generalized convulsive SE and its pathophysiology are reviewed briefly. Defining SE by a specific duration of seizures is controversial and has implications for studies and for clinical management. Several types of SE are different in their causes, presentations, and outcomes. Many are underdiagnosed. This article focuses on the pharmacology and clinical studies of several anticonvulsant medications used to treat SE. A protocol approach is not detailed. Rather, the clinical evaluation begins with meticulous diagnosis of the type of SE. Establishing the SE syndrome diagnosis and use of anticonvulsants with demonstrated effectiveness facilitate an appropriate treatment plan for individual patients. Recent developments in the basic science of SE raise the possibility of better treatments in the future.

CONCLUSIONS

As there are many types of seizures, there are also many types of SE. Each has unique presentations and treatment considerations. Review of actual clinical data from SE treatment studies should be helpful in devising the best treatment for an individual patient.

Diagnosis and Treatment of Nonconvulsive Status Epilepticus in an Intensive Care Unit Setting

Nonconvulsive status epilepticus (NCSE) in adults is a heterogeneous epileptic emergency and includes absence status (AS), complex-partial status epilepticus (CPSE), and the status epilepticus of epileptic encephalopathy (SEEE). The latter seems to be strikingly frequent among patients in intensive care units (ICU). Diagnosis of NCSE is difficult, but has to be made quickly. It relies on clinical signs and a confirmation electroencephalography (EEG). According to the different etiologies and outcomes of AS, CPSE, and SEEE, treatment has to be individually adapted, but needs to follow some basic principles--treatment should take place in the ICU and be monitored by continuous EEG. With a few exceptions, the first drug is an intravenous benzodiazepine, mainly lorazepam. Intravenous fosphenytoin or phenytoin or valproate may follow next. If some forms of NCSE are resistant to first- and second-line treatments, single or combinations of anesthetics and enteral antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) may be added. This opinion is not evidence-based, and randomized controlled prospective trials to evaluate optimal treatment of NCSE are of first priority.

Progress in clinical neurosciences: Status epilepticus: a critical review of management options

Although generalized tonic-clonic status epilepticus (SE) is frequently seen, an evidence-based approach to management is limited by a lack of randomized clinical studies. Clinical practice, therefore, relies on a combination of expert recommendations, local hospital guidelines and dogma based on individual preference and past successes. This review explores selected and controversial aspects of SE in adults and provides a critical appraisal of currently recommended management strategies.

Evaluating the quality of systematic reviews in the emergency medicine literature

STUDY OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to examine the scientific quality of systematic reviews published in 5 leading emergency medicine journals.

METHODS

MEDLINE and EMBASE databases were electronically searched to identify published systematic reviews. Searches were only conducted in emergency medicine journals during the past 10 years; 4 of the journals were also hand searched. Potential reviews were assessed independently by 2 reviewers for inclusion. Data regarding methods were extracted from each review independently by 2 reviewers. All systematic reviews were retrieved and rated for quality by using the 10 questions from the overview quality assessment questionnaire.

RESULTS

Twenty-nine reviews were identified from more than 100 citations. The overall scientific quality of the systematic reviews was low (mean score, 2.7; 95% confidence interval 2.1 to 3.2; maximum possible score, 7.0). Selection and publication biases were rarely addressed in this collection of reviews. For example, the search strategies were only identified in 9 (31%) reviews, whereas independent study selection (6 [21%]) and quality assessment of included studies (9 [31%]) were infrequently performed. Overall, the majority of reviews had extensive flaws, and only 3 (10%) had minimal flaws.

CONCLUSION

The results of the study indicate that many of the systematic reviews published in the emergency medicine literature contain major flaws; reviews with poor methodology may limit the validity of reported results. Further efforts should be made to improve the design, reporting, and publication of systematic reviews in emergency medicine.

Effect of lidocaine on harmaline-induced tremors in the rat

The present study was undertaken to investigate the effect of lidocaine on harmaline-induced tremors in the rat. Four groups of Wistar rats weighing 45-50 g were injected with harmaline (50 mg/kg i.p.) for inducing experimental tremors. The rats in group 1 served as control, whereas the animals in groups 2, 3, and 4 were also given lidocaine i.p. at doses of 12.5, 25, and 50 mg/kg, respectively, 10 min after the onset of tremors (therapeutic study). In a separate four groups of animals intraperitoneal lidocaine injection was given 10 min before harmaline (prophylactic study) in the same dose regimen as mentioned above. The latency of onset, intensity, and duration of tremor and electromyographic responses were recorded. Lidocaine dose dependently attenuated harmaline-induced tremors in rats. The latency period was increased, and duration and intensity of harmaline-induced tremors was reduced by lidocaine. Our electromyography (EMG) study also revealed a decrease in the amplitude of harmaline-induced tremors in lidocaine-treated rats. In conclusion, the results of this study clearly suggest beneficial effects of lidocaine in harmaline-induced tremors.