Minor head trauma in anticoagulated patients

Minor head injury in anticoagulated patients: performance of biomarkers S100B, NSE, GFAP, UCH-L1 and Alinity TBI in the detection of intracranial injury. A prospective observational study

OBJECTIVES

Data in literature indicate that in patients suffering a minor head injury (MHI), biomarkers serum levels could be effective to predict the absence of intracranial injury (ICI) on head CT scan. Use of these biomarkers in case of patients taking oral anticoagulants who experience MHI is very limited. We investigated biomarkers as predictors of ICI in anticoagulated patients managed in an ED.

METHODS

We conducted a single-cohort, prospective, observational study in an ED. Our structured clinical pathway included a first head CT scan, 24 h observation and a second CT scan. The outcome was delayed ICI (dICI), defined as ICI on the second CT scan after a first negative CT scan. We assessed the sensitivity (SE), specificity (SP), negative predictive value (NNV) and positive predictive value (PPV) of the biomarkers S100B, NSE, GFAP, UCH-L1 and Alinity TBI in order to identify dICI.

RESULTS

Our study population was of 234 patients with a negative first CT scan who underwent a second CT scan. The rate of dICI was 4.7 %. The NPV for the detection of dICI were respectively (IC 95 %): S100B 92.7 % (86.0-96.8 %,); ubiquitin C-terminal hydrolase-L1 (UCH-L1) 91.8 % (83.8-96.6 %); glial fibrillary protein (GFP) 100 % (83.2-100 %); TBI 100 % (66.4-100 %). The AUC for the detection of dICI was 0.407 for S100B, 0.563 for neuron-specific enolase (NSE), 0.510 for UCH-L1 and 0.720 for glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The NPV of the analyzed biomarkers were high and they potentially could limit the number of head CT scan for detecting dICI in anticoagulated patients suffering MHI. GFAP and Alinity TBI seem to be effective to rule out a dCI, but future trials are needed.

Minor head injury in anticoagulated patients: Outcomes and analysis of clinical predictors. A prospective study

BACKGROUND

The optimal management of patients taking oral anticoagulants who experience minor head injury (MHI) is unclear. The availability of validated protocols and reliable predictors of prognosis would be of great benefit. We investigated clinical factors as predictors of clinical outcomes and intracranial injury (ICI).

METHODS

We conducted a single-cohort, prospective, observational study in an ED. Our structured clinical pathway included a first head CT scan, 24 h observation and a second CT scan. The primary outcome was the occurrence of MHI-related death or re-admission to ED at day +30. The secondary outcome was the rate of delayed ICI (dICI), defined as second positive CT scan after a first negative CT scan. We assessed some clinical predictors derived from guidelines and clinical prediction rules as potential risk factors for the outcomes.

RESULTS

450 patients with a negative first CT scan who underwent a second CT scan composed our 'study population'. The rate of the primary outcome was 4%. The rate of the secondary outcome was 4.7%. Upon univariate and multivariate analysis no statistically significant predictors for the outcomes were found.

CONCLUSIONS

Previous retrospective studies showed a lot of negative predictive factors for anticoagulated patients suffering a minor head injury. In our prospective study no clinical factors emerged as predictors of poor clinical outcomes and dICI. So, even if we confirmed a low rate of adverse outcomes, the best management of these patients in ED remains not so clear and future trials are needed.

Antithrombotic and risk of hemorrhagic complications in over-60-year-olds after mild-minimal traumatic brain injury

PRIMARY OBJECTIVE

to identify if antithombotics are risk factors for intracereral lesion in older adults with minimal-mild traumatic brain injury (m-mTBI).

RESEARCH DESING

prospective cohort study.

METHODS AND PROCEDURES

We included 2,303 patients over 60 years arriving at our Emergency Department within 24 hours of an mTBI with a Glasgow Coma Scale (GSC) of 14-15. Data were gathered on clinical history, cranial CT scans, blood analyses.

OUTCOMES AND RESULTS

91.1% had an admission GSC score of 15, and 23.6% developed intracranial complications. In bivariate analyses, statins were associated with a 1.28-fold lower risk of IC. Hemorrhagic progression was 29.76-fold higher in patients receiving anticoagulants, with no difference among anticoagulant types. Male sex, GSC of 14, alcohol consumption, and the presence of tumor were risk factors for IC. In multivariate analysis, GSC of 14, alcohol consumption, and malignancy emerged as risk factors for these complications, neurological disease and diabetes as protective factors. After exclusion of neurological disease and diabetes from the multivariate model, a GSC of 14 showed the highest predictive capacity.

CONCLUSIONS

Antithrombotics intake are not risks factor for intracranial injury in minimal-mild brain injury trauma. Further research is needed taking account of their fragility and comorbidities.

Multi-centric study for development and validation of a CT head rule for mild traumatic brain injury in direct oral anticoagulants: the HERO-M nomogram

BACKGROUND

Nomograms are easy-to-handle clinical tools which can help in estimating the risk of adverse outcome in certain population. This multi-center study aims to create and validate a simple and usable clinical prediction nomogram for individual risk of post-traumatic Intracranial Hemorrhage (ICH) after Mild Traumatic Brain Injury (MTBI) in patients treated with Direct Oral Anticoagulants (DOACs).

METHODS

From January 1, 2016 to December 31, 2019, all patients on DOACs evaluated for an MTBI in five Italian Emergency Departments were enrolled. A training set to develop the nomogram and a test set for validation were identified. The predictive ability of the nomogram was assessed using AUROC, calibration plot, and decision curve analysis.

RESULTS

Of the 1425 patients in DOACs in the study cohort, 934 (65.5%) were included in the training set and 491 (34.5%) in the test set. Overall, the rate of post-traumatic ICH was 6.9% (7.0% training and 6.9% test set). In a multivariate analysis, major trauma dynamic (OR: 2.73, p = 0.016), post-traumatic loss of consciousness (OR: 3.78, p = 0.001), post-traumatic amnesia (OR: 4.15, p < 0.001), GCS < 15 (OR: 3.00, p < 0.001), visible trauma above the clavicles (OR: 3. 44, p < 0.001), a post-traumatic headache (OR: 2.71, p = 0.032), a previous history of neurosurgery (OR: 7.40, p < 0.001), and post-traumatic vomiting (OR: 3.94, p = 0.008) were independent risk factors for ICH. The nomogram demonstrated a good ability to predict the risk of ICH (AUROC: 0.803; CI95% 0.721-0.884), and its clinical application showed a net clinical benefit always superior to performing CT on all patients.

CONCLUSION

The Hemorrhage Estimate Risk in Oral anticoagulation for Mild head trauma (HERO-M) nomogram was able to predict post-traumatic ICH and can be easily applied in the Emergency Department (ED).

Clinical Indications of Computed Tomography (CT) of the Head in Patients With Low-Energy Geriatric Hip Fractures: A Follow-Up Study at a Community Hospital

Introduction:

A seemingly large percentage of geriatric patients with isolated low-energy femur fractures undergo a head computed tomography (CT) scans during initial work up in the emergency department. This study aimed to evaluate the pertinent clinical variables that are associated with positive CT findings with the objective to decrease the number of unnecessary CT scans performed.

Methods:

A retrospective review performed at a level II trauma center including 713 patients over the age of 65 sustaining a femur fracture following a low-energy fall. The main outcome measure was pertinent clinical variables that are associated with CT scans that yielded positive findings.

Results:

A total of 713 patients over the age of 65 were included, with a low-energy fall, of which 76.2% (543/713) underwent a head CT scan as part of their evaluation. The most common presenting symptom reported was the patient hitting their head, 13% (93/713), and 1.8% (13/713) were unsure if they had hit their head. Of those evaluated with a head CT scan, only 3 (0.4%) had acute findings and none required acute neurosurgical intervention. All three patients with acute changes on the head CT scan had an Injury Severity Score (ISS) greater than 9, Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) less than 15, and evidence of trauma above the clavicles.

Discussion:

None of the patients with a traumatic injury required a neurosurgical intervention after sustaining a low-energy fall (0/713).

Conclusion:

Head CT scans should have a limited role in the workup of this patient population and should be reserved for patients with a history and physical exam findings that support head trauma, an ISS > 9 and GCS < 15.

History and physical exam predictors of intracranial injury in the elderly fall patient: A prospective multicenter study

OBJECTIVES

A prior single-center study demonstrated historical and exam features predicting intracranial injury (ICI) in geriatric patients with low-risk falls. We sought to prospectively validate these findings in a multicenter population.

METHODS

This is a prospective observational study of patients ≥65 years presenting after a fall to three EDs. Patients were eligible if they were at baseline mental status and were not triaged to the trauma bay. Fall mechanism, head strike history, headache, loss of consciousness (LOC), anticoagulants/antiplatelet use, dementia, and signs of head trauma were recorded. Radiographic imaging was obtained at the discretion of treating physicians. Patients were called at 30 days to determine outcome in non-imaged patients.

RESULTS

723 patients (median age 83, interquartile range 74-88) were enrolled. Although all patients were at baseline mental status, 76 had GCS <15, and 154 had dementia. 406 patients were on anticoagulation/antiplatelet agents. Fifty-two (7.31%) patients had traumatic ICI. Two study variables were helpful in predicting ICI: LOC (odds ratio (OR) 2.02) and signs of head trauma (OR 2.6). The sensitivity of these items was 86.5% (CI 73.6-94) with a specificity of 38.8% (CI 35.1-42.7). The positive predictive value in this population was 10% (CI 7.5-13.3) with a negative predictive value of 97.3% (CI 94.4-98.8). Had these items been applied as a decision rule, 273 patients would not have undergone CT scanning, but 7 injuries would have been missed.

CONCLUSION

In low-risk geriatric fall patients, the best predictors of ICI were physical findings of head trauma and history of LOC.

Delayed intracranial hemorrhage in elderly anticoagulated patients sustaining a minor fall

BACKGROUND

Falls are a common cause of hospitalization, morbidity, and mortality among the elderly in the United States. Evidence-based imaging recommendations for evaluation of delayed intracranial hemorrhage (DICH) are not generally agreed upon. The purpose of this project was to evaluate the incidence of DICH detected by head computer tomography (CT) among an elderly population on pre-injury anticoagulant or antiplatelet (ACAP) therapy.

METHODS

Data from a Level 1 Trauma Center trauma registry was used to assess the incidence of DICH in an elderly population of patients (≥65 years) who sustained a minor fall while on pre-injury ACAP medications. Counts and percentages are reported.

RESULTS

Data on 1076 elderly trauma patients were downloaded, of which 838 sustained a minor fall and 513 were found to be using a pre-injury ACAP medication. One patient (0.46%) with a DICH was identified out of 218 patients who received a routine repeat head CT. Aspirin and warfarin were the most common pre-injury ACAP medications and 19.27% (42/218) of patients were found to be using multiple ACAP medications.

CONCLUSIONS

Universal screening protocols promote immediate-term patient safety, but do so at a great expense with respect to health expenditures and increased radiation exposure. This analysis highlights the need for an effective risk assessment tool for DICH that would reduce the burden of unnecessary screenings while still identifying life-threatening intracranial hemorrhages in affected patients.

Beware of the Anticoagulated Elderly with Minor Head Injury

A 69-year-old man first presented to the emergency department after a fall. He had no history of loss of consciousness or vomiting. He sustained a 3 cm long laceration over the right occipital region of the head. There was no fracture in the X-rays of the skull. He was on warfarin because of cardiac problem. He was discharged after suturing. He re-attended the next morning because of left sided weakness. Non-contrast brain computed tomogram showed acute subdural haematoma. Burr holes were performed subsequently. Special precautions should be undertaken in managing the elderly with minor head injury, with a lower threshold for computed tomography and coagulation profile studies.

Risk of Intracranial Hemorrhage in Ground-level Fall With Antiplatelet or Anticoagulant Agents

OBJECTIVES

Anticoagulant and antiplatelet medications are known to increase the risk and severity of traumatic intracranial hemorrhage (tICH), even with minor head trauma. Most studies on bleeding propensity with head trauma are retrospective, are based on trauma registries, or include heterogeneous mechanisms of injury. The goal of this study was to determine the rate of tICH from only a common low-acuity mechanism of injury, that of a ground-level fall, in patients taking one or more of the following antiplatelet or anticoagulant medications: aspirin, warfarin, prasugrel, ticagrelor, dabigatran, rivaroxaban, apixaban, or enoxaparin.

METHODS

This was a prospective cohort study conducted at a Level I tertiary care trauma center of consecutive patients meeting the inclusion criteria of a ground-level fall with head trauma as affirmed by the treating clinician, a computed tomography (CT) head obtained, and taking and one of the above antiplatelet or anticoagulants. Patients were identified prospectively through electronic screening with confirmatory chart review. Emergency department charts were abstracted without subsequent knowledge of the hospital course. Patients transferred with a known abnormal CT head were excluded. Primary outcome was rate of tICH on initial CT head. Rates with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were compared.

RESULTS

Over 30 months, we enrolled 939 subjects. The mean ± SD age was 78.3 ± 11.9 years and 44.6% were male. There were a total of 33 patients with tICH (3.5%, 95% CI = 2.5%-4.9%). Antiplatelets had a rate of tICH of 4.3% (95% CI = 3.0%-6.2%) compared to anticoagulants with a rate of 1.7% (95% CI = 0.4%-4.5%). Aspirin without other agents had an tICH rate of 4.6% (95% CI = 3.2%-6.6%); of these, 81.5% were taking low-dose 81 mg aspirin. Two patients received a craniotomy (one taking aspirin, one taking warfarin). There were four deaths (three taking aspirin, one taking warfarin). Most (72.7%) subjects with tICH were discharged home or to a rehabilitation facility. There were no tICH in 31 subjects taking a direct oral anticoagulant. CIs were overlapping for the groups.

CONCLUSION

There is a low incidence of clinically significant tICH with a ground-level fall in head trauma in patients taking an anticoagulant or antiplatelet medication. There was no statistical difference in rate of tICH between antiplatelet and anticoagulants, which is unanticipated and counterintuitive as most literature and teaching suggests a higher rate with anticoagulants. A larger data set is needed to determine if small differences between the groups exist.

Clinical indications of computed tomography (CT) of the head in patients with low-energy geriatric hip fractures

OBJECTIVE

To define the role of head computed tomography (CT) scans in the geriatric population with isolated low-energy femur fractures and describe the pertinent clinical variables which are associated with positive CT findings with the objective to decrease the number of unnecessary CT scans performed.

DESIGN

Retrospective review.

SETTING

Level I trauma centre.

PATIENTS

Eleven hundred ninety-two (1192) patients sustaining a femur fracture following a low-energy fall.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENT

Pertinent clinical variables that were associated with CTs that yielded positive findings.

RESULTS

Two hundred fifty patients (21%) underwent a head CT scan as part of their evaluation. Of these patients, 83% suffered proximal femur fractures, 11% shaft fractures and 6% distal fractures. The majority of the patients were evaluated by the emergency department (ED) with only 18% (44/250) being evaluated by the trauma team. Average patient age was 83 years (range 65-99 years). One hundred seventy-three patients (69%) were on some form of antiplatelet medication or anticoagulation. Of the 250 patients who underwent head CT scan, 16 (6%) patients had acute findings (haemorrhage - 15, infarct - 1), and none of the patients required neurosurgical intervention.

CONCLUSION

None of the patients with a traumatic injury required a neurosurgical invention after sustaining a low energy fall (0/1192). Head CT scans should have a limited role in the work-up of this patient population and should be reserved for patients with a history and physical findings that support head trauma.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Prognostic level III. See instructions for authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Routine repeat head CT may not be indicated in patients on anticoagulant/antiplatelet therapy following mild traumatic brain injury

Introduction

Evaluation recommendations for patients on anticoagulant and antiplatelet (ACAP) therapy that present after mild traumatic brain injury (TBI) are controversial. At our institution, an initial noncontrast head computed tomography (HCT) is performed, with a subsequent HCT performed six hours later to exclude delayed intracranial hemorrhage (ICH). This study was performed to evaluate the yield and advisability of this approach.

Methods

We performed a retrospective review of subjects undergoing evaluation for ICH after mild TBI in patients on ACAP therapy between January of 2012 and April of 2013. We assessed for the frequency of ICH on both the initial noncontrast HCT and on the routine six-hour follow-up HCT. Additionally, chart review was performed to evaluate the clinical implications of ICH, when present, and to interrogate whether pertinent clinical and laboratory data may predict the presence of ICH prior to imaging. We used multivariate generalized linear models to assess whether presenting Glasgow Coma Score (GCS), loss of consciousness (LOC), neurological or physical examination findings, international normalized ratio, prothrombin time, partial thromboplastin time, platelet count, or specific ACAP regimen predicted ICH.

Results

144 patients satisfied inclusion criteria. Ten patients demonstrated initial HCT positive for ICH, with only one demonstrating delayed ICH on the six-hour follow-up HCT. This patient was discharged without any intervention required or functional impairment. Presenting GCS deviation (p<0.001), LOC (p=0.04), neurological examination findings (p<0.001), clopidogrel (p=0.003), aspirin (p=0.03) or combination regimen (p=0.004) use were more commonly seen in patients with ICH.

Conclusion

Routine six-hour follow-up HCT is likely not indicated in patients on ACAP therapy, as our study suggests clinically significant delayed ICH does not occur. Additionally, presenting GCS deviation, LOC, neurological examination findings, clopidogrel, aspirin or combination regimen use may predict ICH, and, in the absence of these findings, HCT may potentially be forgone altogether.

The epidemic of pre-injury oral antiplatelet and anticoagulant use

BACKGROUND

As the population ages, an increasing number of trauma patients are taking antiplatelet and anticoagulant medications (ACAP) prior to their injuries. These medications increase their risk of hemorrhagic complications, particularly intracerebral hemorrhage. Clopidogrel and warfarin are common and their mechanisms well understood, but optimal reversal methods continue to evolve. The novel direct thrombin and factor Xa inhibitors are less well described and do not have existing antidotes.

METHODS

This article reviews the relevant literature on traumatic outcomes with use of ACAP medications, as well as data on ideal reversal strategies. Suggested algorithms are introduced, and future research directions discussed.

RESULTS

Although they are beneficial in preventing clot formation, once bleeding occurs ACAP medications contribute to increased morbidity and mortality, particularly in geriatric patient populations. The efficacy of clopidogrel reversal with platelet transfusions and DDAVP remains unclear. Warfarin use is best treated with the algorithm-driven use of plasma, vitamin K, prothrombin complex concentrates (PCCs) and possibly recombinant factor VIIa depending upon specific patient and injury factors. Optimal treatment for direct thrombin and factor Xa inhibitors has yet to be developed, but PCCs are promising for rivaroxaban and apixaban while dabigatran is best treated with medication cessation and the possible addition of activated PCCs or hemodialysis.

CONCLUSION

New developments in reversal of the ACAP medications are promising, particularly PCCs for warfarin and the factor Xa inhibitors. Function assays and clear antidotes are needed for the thrombin and Xa inhibitors. Research on outcomes and appropriate treatments is actively ongoing.

Immediate and delayed traumatic intracranial hemorrhage in patients with head trauma and preinjury warfarin or clopidogrel use

STUDY OBJECTIVE

Patients receiving warfarin or clopidogrel are considered at increased risk for traumatic intracranial hemorrhage after blunt head trauma. The prevalence of immediate traumatic intracranial hemorrhage and the cumulative incidence of delayed traumatic intracranial hemorrhage in these patients, however, are unknown. The objective of this study is to address these gaps in knowledge.

METHODS

A prospective, observational study at 2 trauma centers and 4 community hospitals enrolled emergency department (ED) patients with blunt head trauma and preinjury warfarin or clopidogrel use from April 2009 through January 2011. Patients were followed for 2 weeks. The prevalence of immediate traumatic intracranial hemorrhage and the cumulative incidence of delayed traumatic intracranial hemorrhage were calculated from patients who received initial cranial computed tomography (CT) in the ED. Delayed traumatic intracranial hemorrhage was defined as traumatic intracranial hemorrhage within 2 weeks after an initially normal CT scan result and in the absence of repeated head trauma.

RESULTS

A total of 1,064 patients were enrolled (768 warfarin patients [72.2%] and 296 clopidogrel patients [27.8%]). There were 364 patients (34.2%) from Level I or II trauma centers and 700 patients (65.8%) from community hospitals. One thousand patients received a cranial CT scan in the ED. Both warfarin and clopidogrel groups had similar demographic and clinical characteristics, although concomitant aspirin use was more prevalent among patients receiving clopidogrel. The prevalence of immediate traumatic intracranial hemorrhage was higher in patients receiving clopidogrel (33/276, 12.0%; 95% confidence interval [CI] 8.4% to 16.4%) than patients receiving warfarin (37/724, 5.1%; 95% CI 3.6% to 7.0%), relative risk 2.31 (95% CI 1.48 to 3.63). Delayed traumatic intracranial hemorrhage was identified in 4 of 687 (0.6%; 95% CI 0.2% to 1.5%) patients receiving warfarin and 0 of 243 (0%; 95% CI 0% to 1.5%) patients receiving clopidogrel.

CONCLUSION

Although there may be unmeasured confounders that limit intergroup comparison, patients receiving clopidogrel have a significantly higher prevalence of immediate traumatic intracranial hemorrhage compared with patients receiving warfarin. Delayed traumatic intracranial hemorrhage is rare and occurred only in patients receiving warfarin. Discharging patients receiving anticoagulant or antiplatelet medications from the ED after a normal cranial CT scan result is reasonable, but appropriate instructions are required because delayed traumatic intracranial hemorrhage may occur.

Management of minor head injury in patients receiving oral anticoagulant therapy: a prospective study of a 24-hour observation protocol

STUDY OBJECTIVE

Patients receiving warfarin who experience minor head injury are at risk of intracranial hemorrhage, and optimal management after a single head computed tomography (CT) scan is unclear. We evaluate a protocol of 24-hour observation followed by a second head CT scan.

METHODS

In this prospective case series, we enrolled consecutive patients receiving warfarin and showing no intracranial lesions on a first CT scan after minor head injury treated at a Level II trauma center. We implemented a structured clinical pathway, including 24-hour observation and a CT scan performed before discharge. We then evaluated the frequency of death, admission, neurosurgery, and delayed intracranial hemorrhage.

RESULTS

We enrolled and observed 97 consecutive patients. Ten refused the second CT scan and were well during 30-day follow-up. Repeated CT scanning in the remaining 87 patients revealed a new hemorrhage lesion in 5 (6%), with 3 subsequently hospitalized and 1 receiving craniotomy. Two patients discharged after completing the study protocol with 2 negative CT scan results were admitted 2 and 8 days later with symptomatic subdural hematomas; neither received surgery. Two of the 5 patients with delayed bleeding at 24 hours had an initial international normalized ratio greater than 3.0, as did both patients with delayed bleeding beyond 24 hours. The relative risk of delayed hemorrhage with an initial international normalized ratio greater than 3.0 was 14 (95% confidence interval 4 to 49).

CONCLUSION

For patients receiving warfarin who experience minor head injury and have a negative initial head CT scan result, a protocol of 24-hour observation followed by a second CT scan will identify most occurrences of delayed bleeding. An initial international normalized ratio greater than 3 suggests higher risk.

Minor head injury in warfarinized patients: indicators of risk for intracranial hemorrhage

BACKGROUND

Head injury represents one of the most important and frequent traumatic pathology in the emergency department. Among the different risk factors, preinjury use of warfarin has received considerable attention in trauma literature. The aim of this study was to identify further risk indicators of intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) to improve risk stratification of warfarinized patients with minor head injuries.

METHODS

Medical records of 1,554 adult patients with minor head injuries evaluated by the Emergency Department of Azienda Ospedaliera, Universitaria Careggi from January 2007 to February 2008 were analyzed retrospectively. All the patients included in the study were subjected to blood tests. The international normalized ratio (INR) measured on admission was correlated with the results of head computed tomography scan.

RESULTS

Of the 1,410 patients included in the study, 75 (5.2%) were warfarin anticoagulated at the time of trauma. The INR measured on admission was 2.37 ± 1.04 (mean ± standard deviation), and this value was significantly associated with occurrence of ICH after head trauma (r = 0.37; p < 0.005). For 12 (of 75) patients of this group, the findings of the computed tomography scans were positive. The receiver operating characteristic curve show that the most effective INR cutoff value was 2.43, with a sensitivity of 92%, a specificity of 66%, and positive and negative predictive values of 33% and 97%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

This study highlights the strong relationship between INR values and the probability of ICH, as shown in previous studies. The high negative predictive value of the identified cutoff, if confirmed, could be used to exclude ICH.

Intracranial hemorrhage after blunt head trauma in children with bleeding disorders

OBJECTIVE

To determine computerized tomography (CT) use and prevalence of traumatic intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) in children with and without congenital and acquired bleeding disorders.

STUDY DESIGN

We compared CT use and ICH prevalence in children with and without bleeding disorders in a multicenter cohort study of 43 904 children <18 years old with blunt head trauma evaluated in 25 emergency departments.

RESULTS

A total of 230 children had bleeding disorders; all had Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) scores of 14 to 15. These children had higher CT rates than children without bleeding disorders and GCS scores of 14 to 15 (risk ratio, 2.29; 95% CI, 2.15 to 2.44). Of the children who underwent imaging with CT, 2 of 186 children with bleeding disorders had ICH (1.1%; 95% CI, 0.1 to 3.8) , compared with 655 of 14 969 children without bleeding disorders (4.4%; 95% CI, 4.1-4.7; rate ratio, 0.25; 95% CI, 0.06 to 0.98). Both children with bleeding disorders and ICHs had symptoms; none of the children required neurosurgery.

CONCLUSION

In children with head trauma, CTs are obtained twice as often in children with bleeding disorders, although ICHs occurred in only 1.1%, and these patients had symptoms. Routine CT imaging after head trauma may not be required in children without symptoms who have congenital and acquired bleeding disorders.

Incidence and predictors of intracranial hemorrhage after minor head trauma in patients taking anticoagulant and antiplatelet medication

BACKGROUND

The yield of head computed tomography (CT) for patients who suffered head trauma with a presenting Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score of 15 has been reported to be low, even in patients who are anticoagulated or on antiplatelet therapy. We undertook this study to (1) determine the frequency of intracranial hemorrhage in anticoagulated patients and patients on antiplatelet therapy and its impact on clinical management, (2) identify predictors of positive imaging findings, and (3) assess potential differences between anticoagulation and antiplatelet therapy.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective review of the trauma registry at our institution, a Level II trauma center. All trauma registry patients with a minor head injury registered between the years 2004 and 2006 who were taking warfarin or clopidogrel, had a presenting GCS score of 15, and underwent head CT were included in this study. Intracranial hemorrhage on head CT was considered a positive result.

RESULTS

One hundred forty-one patients (male, n=67; female, n=74), mean age 79 years (range, 36-101 years), were included in this study. Forty-one patients (29%) were diagnosed with intracranial hemorrhage. Thirty-nine (95%) of these 41 patients underwent reversal and/or discontinuation of clopidogrel and/or warfarin. Five patients required surgical evacuation of an intracranial hemorrhage. Four patients died. Loss of consciousness (Wald=7.468, β=1.179, p=0.008) predicted a positive CT result. Type of medication (warfarin, aspirin, or clopidogrel) did not reach statistical significance as a predictor of positive result.

CONCLUSION

Despite a presenting GCS score of 15, patients with minor head injury from the trauma registry at our institution taking anticoagulation or antiplatelet therapy have a high incidence of intracranial hemorrhage especially after reported loss of consciousness.

The value of sequential computed tomography scanning in anticoagulated patients suffering from minor head injury

BACKGROUND

Since 1999, the Italian guidelines have been used at our department for the management of patients with mild head injury (MHI). According to these guidelines, a computed tomography (CT) scan should be obtained in all patients with coagulopathy and these should routinely undergo strict observation during the first 24 hours after injury; in addition they should have a control CT scan before discharge. With the increased use of anticoagulant therapy in the elderly population, admitting patients in such treatment with a MHI to the emergency rooms has become very common. The aim of our study was to evaluate the need of performing a control CT scan in patients on anticoagulation treatment who showed neither intracranial pathology on the first CT-scan nor neurologic worsening during the observation period.

METHODS

We prospectively analyzed the course of all patients on anticoagulation treatment consecutively admitted to our unit between October 2005 and December 2006 who suffered from a MHI and showed a normal initial CT scan. All patients underwent strict observation during the first 24 hours after admission and had a control CT scan performed before discharge.

RESULTS

One hundred thirty-seven patients were included in this study. Only two patients (1.4%) showed hemorrhagic changes. However, neither of them developed concomitant neurologic worsening nor needed admitting or surgery.

CONCLUSION

According with our data, patients on anticoagulation treatment suffering from MHI could be managed with strict neurologic observation without routinely performing a control CT scan that can be reserved for the rare patients showing new clinical symptoms.

Clinically suspected coagulopathy in blunt head trauma

Patients with moderate to severe head injury and abnormal coagulation studies have a significantly higher risk of brain injury. The objective of this study was to determine the association of clinical suspicion of coagulopathy and intracranial injury (ICI) among patients sustaining blunt head trauma, including minor injuries. As part of the NEXUS II blunt head injury study, enrolled patients were prospectively evaluated for ICI and suspicion of coagulopathy. We examined the relationship between suspicion of coagulopathy and the presence of any clinically significant or "therapeutically inconsequential" ICI based on head computed tomography (CT) scan results. The NEXUS II study enrolled 13,728 patients, including 493 with suspicion of coagulopathy. Significant ICI was present in 46 (9.3%; 95% confidence interval [CI] 6.9-12.2) patients with suspected coagulopathy, and in 460 of 9863 (4.7%; 95% CI 4.3-5.1) patients without such suspicion. "Therapeutically inconsequential" findings were found on head CT scan in 74 patients, and 7 of these had suspected coagulopathy. Interventions including intubation, intracranial pressure monitoring, or craniotomy were performed in 5 of these 7 (71%; 95% CI 29-96) individuals, compared with only 3 of 67 (4%; 95% CI 1-12) patients without suspicion of coagulopathy. Initial clinical suspicion of coagulopathy, independent of laboratory confirmation, is associated with a greater prevalence of significant ICI injury after blunt head trauma; it also substantially increases the risk of morbidity despite the presence of an apparent "therapeutically inconsequential" injury. CT scanning of the head should be performed initially based on clinical suspicion of coagulopathy.

Epidemiology of blunt head injury victims undergoing ED cranial computed tomographic scanning

STUDY OBJECTIVE

We sought to describe the epidemiology of emergency department (ED) patients with blunt head injury undergoing cranial computed tomography (CT) scanning for the evaluation of possible traumatic brain injury (TBI).

METHODS

Prospective, multicenter, observational study of ED patients undergoing cranial CT after blunt head injury. Patient's date of birth, sex, and race/ethnicity were documented before CT scanning. Individual patients were considered to have "significant" TBI if the official radiographic interpretation at the end of all imaging studies associated with the trauma was consistent with any of a set of predefined diagnoses. The relative prevalence of TBI among various prespecified groups from those undergoing cranial CT scanning was also calculated.

RESULTS

Of 13728 patients who were enrolled, 8988 (65%) were men and 1193 (8.7%) had a significant acute TBI. Demographic findings associated with increased risk of TBI, among patients selected for scanning, included the following: age below 10 years (relative risk [RR] = 1.44, 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.19-1.77); age above 65 years (RR = 1.59; 95% CI, 1.40-1.80), and male sex (RR = 1.27; 95% CI, 1.30-1.43).

CONCLUSION

Among patients selected for cranial CT scanning after blunt head injury, men, patients younger than 10 years, and those older than 65 years have an increased likelihood of significant TBI.

Traumatic Brain Injury in Anticoagulated Patients

BACKGROUND

Coumadin is widely used in the elderly population. Despite its widespread use, little is known about its effect on the outcome of elderly traumatic brain-injured patients. This study was undertaken to describe the outcomes of such a cohort.

METHODS

Clinical material was identified from a Level I trauma center prospective head injury database, and a database obtained from the American College of Surgeons Committee on Trauma Verification and Review Committee from 1999 to 2002. Both databases contain many relevant variables, including age, sex, Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score, mechanism of injury, Injury Severity Score, International Normalized Ratio (INR), computed tomography (CT) findings, operative procedure, time to operating room, complications, length of stay, and outcome at hospital discharge.

RESULTS

For patients with GCS scores less than 8, average INR was 6.0, with almost 50% having an initial value greater than 5.0. Overall mortality was 91.5%. For the 77 patients with GCS scores of 13 to 15, average INR was 4.4. Overall mortality for this group was 80.6%. A subset of patients deteriorated to a GCS score of less than 10 just hours after injury, despite most having normal initial CT scans. Mortality in this group was 84%.

CONCLUSIONS

All patients on warfarin should have an INR performed, and a CT scan should be done in most anticoagulated patients. All supratherapeutically anticoagulated patients, as well as any anticoagulated patient with a traumatic CT abnormality, should be admitted for neurologic observation and consideration given to short term reversal of anticoagulation. Routine repeat CT scanning at 12 to 18 hours or when even subtle signs of neurologic worsening occur is a strong recommendation. A multi-institutional, prospective trial using these guidelines would be a first step toward demonstrating improved outcomes in the anticoagulated patient population after head trauma.

An evaluation of the effect that the implementation of the NICE rules may have on a diagnostic imaging department for the early management of head injuries

INTRODUCTION

Guidelines by the National Institute of Clinical Excellence (NICE) for the early management of minor head injuries initiate the use of computed tomography (CT) for patients who may be at risk of developing intracranial haematoma. This retrospective study was designed to evaluate the effect the implementation of the NICE guidelines would have on the diagnostic imaging department of a local district general hospital. The main objective was to establish if there would be an increase in the number of CT head referrals for patients with minor head injuries. Secondly to assess how the implementation of these guidelines would affect the workload to the diagnostic imaging department in terms of cost and time, and to discuss the issue of radiation dose to patients.

METHOD

A sample of 100 patients who were referred from the Accident and Emergency department (A&E) for plain skull radiographs, over a 4-month period were selected. The clinical information on each of these patients' was then extracted and a data collection sheet was to assess each patient according to the NICE criteria.

RESULTS AND CONCLUSION

The study found an 18% (n=100) increase in the referral rate for CT heads for patients presenting with minor head injuries. It was also found that the use of these guidelines would mean a decrease in cost to the diagnostic imaging department of £324. Furthermore a saving of 10h of radiographers' time was established, although the effective radiation dose to patients would be increased by 29mSv. The NICE guidelines have proved efficient in identifying patients with intracranial damage although this coincides with an 18% (n=100) increase in referral rates for CT and increased radiation dose to patients. However, the use of these guidelines would reduce workload to the diagnostic imaging department in terms of cost and time.

Trauma in the anticoagulated patient

An increasing number of people are taking anticoagulants for the prophylaxis of thromboembolic disease. This may cause problems when they attend hospital following trauma. Patients may also develop spontaneous bleeding that may have similar effects to bleeding after an injury.

This article discusses the risks of bleeding (especially in head injury); the risks of stopping anticoagulation; how anticoagulation should be reversed and how anticoagulation should affect the approach to the head-injured patient.

Preinjury warfarin use among elderly patients with closed head injuries in a trauma center

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to determine the impact of warfarin use on the severity of injury among elderly patients presenting with closed head injuries.

METHODS

A cohort of patients 55 years of age or older with closed head injuries taken to a tertiary trauma center between April 1993 and March 2001 was retrospectively identified. Patient characteristics, mechanism of injury, type and severity of injury, and hospital survival data were obtained from the trauma registry. Each case then was reviewed for completeness of information, assessment of preinjury warfarin use, and comorbidity.

RESULTS

Among the 384 patients presenting with closed head injuries, 35 (9%) were receiving warfarin before their trauma. As compared with nonusers, anticoagulated patients had a higher frequency of isolated head trauma (54% vs. 32%; p = 0.008), more severe head injuries (65.7% vs. 44.1%; p = 0.02), and a higher rate of mortality (40% vs. 21%, p = 0.01). These associations remained evident even after population differences in age, gender, comorbidities, and mechanism of injury were taken into account. Indeed, according to multivariate logistic regression models, warfarin use was associated with a statistically significant risk of death (odds ratio [OR], 2.73; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.22-6.12), statistically significant odds for more severe head injury (OR, 2.39; 95% CI, 1.10-5.17), and odds for isolated head injury that almost reached statistical significance (OR, 1.79; 95% CI, 0.82-3.90).

CONCLUSIONS

Among patients 55 years of age or older who present with closed head injury, the use of warfarin before trauma appears to be associated with a higher frequency of isolated head trauma, more severe head trauma, and a higher likelihood of death. The findings of this retrospective study support the concern about the adverse effects of anticoagulants in cases of head trauma.

Minor head injuries in adults: a review of current guidelines

A plethora of minor head injury guidelines have been published in the last few years. The aim of many of these guidelines has been either to subcategorize groups of patients with minor head injuries, or to identify clinical risk factors for an abnormal head computed tomography (CT) scan in patients with a minor head injury. The original definition of minor head injury was a Glasgow Coma Score (GCS) of 13- 15. This has now been superseded by a more narrow definition of patients with a GCS of 15 only. A variety of clinical correlates have been identified that enable GCS 15 patients to be subcategorized into high or low risk for an abnormal head CT. This article aims to review the commonly used clinical correlates that appear in many minor head injury guidelines. The current, most widely used minor head injury guidelines are discussed.

Complications of preinjury warfarin use in the trauma patient

BACKGROUND

The frequency of use of warfarin anticoagulation increases significantly in the elderly population. It remains controversial whether this puts these patients at increased risk for hemorrhagic complications after trauma.

METHODS

We prospectively evaluated consecutive trauma patients who were taking warfarin and compared their outcomes to a group of age-matched patients with head injuries but not taking warfarin.

RESULTS

One hundred fifty-nine trauma patients on warfarin were evaluated, 94 (59%) with some type of head trauma; 25 of these 94 patients (27%) had documented intracranial trauma. Fifteen patients died (9.4%); they had an international normalized ratio of 3.3 +/- 1.6 versus 3.0 +/- 2.1 for survivors in the warfarin group (p = 0.585). Twelve deaths were in the group of 25 patients with intracranial injuries (48%). Three patients without head injury died (5%) of other causes not related to warfarin or hemorrhage at a mean of 13 days after admission. Ten of 12 patients on warfarin with intracranial injuries who died had documented loss of consciousness (LOC); two patients who died secondary to an isolated intracranial injury had no LOC. Of 70 age-matched patients with head trauma not taking warfarin, 47 (67%) had intracranial injury and 5 of these died (10%) (p < 0.001 for both values compared with study patients). There were no significant differences for patients with intracranial injury comparing those on warfarin and those who were not in terms of age, gender, mechanism of injury, Injury Severity Score, or Glasgow Come Scale score.

CONCLUSION

We conclude that the preinjury use of warfarin does not place the trauma patient at increased risk for fatal hemorrhagic complications in the absence of head trauma. Furthermore, the presence of a head trauma alone is not predictive of mortality. However, the presence of intracranial injury is strongly associated with a mortality rate that is significantly higher than patients with head trauma who are not taking warfarin. LOC is also associated with mortality, but the absence of loss of consciousness does not reliably indicate the absence of intracranial injury or risk of death.

Time to deterioration of the elderly, anticoagulated, minor head injury patient who presents without evidence of neurologic abnormality

BACKGROUND

Generally accepted guidelines regarding the care of the elderly, anticoagulated minor head injury patient do not exist within the trauma literature.

METHODS

Charts were reviewed on all anticoagulated, minor head injury patients older than 65 years between January 1993 and May 2000. Postinjury course was examined for neurologic changes, times, coagulation/radiographic studies, reversal, operative intervention, and outcome.

RESULTS

Thirty-two patients were identified. Twenty-four patients were discharged from the Emergency Department. Three of the remaining eight patients had initial Glasgow Coma Scale scores of 15, 15, and 14 but became comatose over a mean course of 3.83 hours. A fourth patient presented comatose 6 hours postinjury, down from "acting normal." Three of these four patients died.

CONCLUSION

Elderly, anticoagulated patients with minor head trauma risk neurologic deterioration within 6 hours of injury, despite an initially normal neurologic examination. Early cranial computed tomographic scanning and close observation for a minimum of 6 hours are indicated.

A meta-analysis of GCS 15 head injured patients with loss of consciousness or post-traumatic amnesia

OBJECTIVES

The classification of patients with "minor head injury" has relied largely upon the Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS). The GCS however is an insensitive way of defining this heterogeneous subgroup of patients. The aim of the study was to develop an extended GCS 15 category by meta-analysis of previously published case-control studies that have identified symptom risk factors for an abnormal head tomogram.

METHODS

Eligibility for the study was defined as: (1) Full papers and not abstracts. (2) Case-control or nested case-control studies on GCS 15 patients (adults or adults plus children). Outcome variable being head tomography: normal or abnormal. (3) Documentation of one or more symptom variables such that the odds ratio could be calculated. Five symptom variables were defined for the purpose of the study: headache, nausea, vomiting, blurred vision, and dizziness.

RESULTS

Three articles fulfilled the criteria for the study. The Mantel-Haenszel test using a pooled estimate was used to calculate the common odds ratio for an abnormal head tomogram for each of the five symptom variables. The odds ratio for the symptom variables was: dizziness 0.594 (95%CI 0.296 to 1.193), blurred vision 0.836 (95%CI 0.369 to 1.893), headache 0.909 (95% CI: 0.601 to 1.375), severe headache 3.211 (95% CI: 2.212 to 4.584), nausea 2.125 (95% CI 1.467 to 3.057), vomiting 4.398 (95% CI 2.790 to 6.932).

CONCLUSION

The results of this study provide a framework on which GCS category 15 patients can be stratified into four risk categories based upon their symptoms.

Intracranial complications of preinjury anticoagulation in trauma patients with head injury

BACKGROUND

We have evaluated our recent experience as a Level I trauma center to test the hypothesis that preinjury anticoagulation adversely affects the morbidity and mortality of trauma patients with an intracranial injury.

METHODS

Records of 380 patients admitted to the trauma service from January 1997 to December 1998 who at the time of admission were taking warfarin, low-molecular-weight heparin, aspirin, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, clopidogrel, dipyridamole, pentoxifylline, or naproxen were reviewed. Thirty-seven patients with intracranial injuries were identified and compared with a matched (age, gender, mechanism, and severity of injury) control group of 37 patients with similar head injury but not taking any anticoagulant randomly selected from the trauma registry for that same time period.

RESULTS

The control and anticoagulated groups were comparable in terms of age, 75 +/- 8 versus 74 +/- 11 years (p = 0.655); gender, 22 men/15 women versus 21 men/16 women; mechanism of injury, 30 falls/7 motor vehicle crashes versus 30 falls/7 motor vehicle crashes; and length of hospital stay, 11 +/- 14 versus 10 +/- 11 days (p = 0.853). In the anticoagulated group, the mean Injury Severity Score was 17.0 +/- 7.8 and the mean Glasgow Coma Scale score was 11.8 +/- 4.0; these were not significantly different from the control group, which had a mean Injury Severity Score of 19.8 +/- 8.1 (p = 0.143) and a Glasgow Coma Scale score of 12.5 +/- 2.6 (p = 0.378). There were 14 deaths (38%) in the anticoagulation group, versus 3 deaths in the control group (8%) (p = 0.006). In the anticoagulation group, 4 of 12 patients (33%) taking warfarin died, whereas 9 of 19 patients (47%) taking aspirin died (p = 0.285). All deaths were secondary to head injuries; all deaths in the control group and all but one in the anticoagulated group were the result of a fall; 6 of 10 anticoagulated patients who fell on stairs died, and 5 of these were taking aspirin only.

CONCLUSION

These data indicate that the trauma patient with preinjury anticoagulation such as warfarin or even aspirin who has an intracranial injury has a four- to fivefold higher risk of death than the nonanticoagulated patient. The efficacy of reversing the anticoagulant effect at the time of hospital admission remains to be evaluated.

Preinjury warfarin does not impact outcome in trauma patients

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to determine whether the preinjury condition of anticoagulation had an adverse impact on patients sustaining injury.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis was performed for prospectively collected registry data from 1995-2000 from all accredited trauma centers in Pennsylvania. The registry was queried for all trauma patients who had anticoagulation therapy as a preinjury condition (PIC). This group served as our experimental cohort. A control cohort (not having warfarin therapy as a PIC) was developed using case-matching techniques for age, sex, Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS), Injury Severity Score (ISS), A Severity Characterization of Trauma (ASCOT) score, and in the head injured patients, International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-9-CM) diagnoses. Head and non-head injured patients were evaluated separately. The cohorts were examined for 28-day mortality, intensive care unit length of stay (ICU-LOS), hospital length of stay (HOS-LOS), PICs, occurrences, discharge destinations, and functional status at discharge. Chi2 and Student's t test were used to evaluate the data; p values < 0.05 were considered significant.

RESULTS

Two thousand nine hundred forty-two patients were available for analysis. The prevalence of PICs was significantly greater in the warfarin group for both the head and non-head injured populations (p < 0.003 and p < 0.0001, respectively). The incidence of occurrences in the non-head injured population was statistically higher for the warfarin patients (p < 0.001), but showed no difference in the head injured group regardless of warfarin use (p = 0.15). Functional status at discharge demonstrated no clinically significant difference between the warfarin and non-warfarin groups in both head and non-head injured populations. There was no difference in discharge destination in the head injured population; however, in the non-head injured population a greater percentage of non-warfarin patients was discharged to home when compared with the warfarin patients.

CONCLUSION

Our data suggest that the PIC of anticoagulation with warfarin does not adversely impact mortality or LOS outcomes in both head and non-head injured patients. In non-head injured patients, however, the occurrence rates and discharge destination were different. More research needs to be done to determine whether this is related to anticoagulation or other reasons (i.e., number of PICs). These data should be used when weighing risk/benefit ratios of prescribing chronic anticoagulation.

Mild head injury, anticoagulants, and risk of intracranial injury

We studied intracranial damage in patients with mild head injuries who were taking warfarin. Of the 215,785 individuals who visited the Mount Auburn and Beth Israel accident and emergency departments during our study, we identified records for 144 patients by anticoagulation status and computed tomography (CT) imaging. We retrospectively reviewed these patients and ten (7%, 95% CI 3-11) with clinically important injuries on cranial CT. Our findings suggest that patients with head injuries who receive anticoagulants have a similar or greater risk of intracranlal injury to those falling into a previously defined moderate-risk category, invalidating a previous conclusion that CT scanning is unnecessary in such patients.