Electrocardiographic ST-segment elevation: the diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction by morphologic analysis of the ST segment

Systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy of ST-segment elevation for acute coronary occlusion

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the diagnostic sensitivity and specificity of ST-segment elevation on a 12‑lead ECG in detecting ACO across any coronary artery, challenging the current STEMI-NSTEMI paradigm.

METHODS

Studies from MEDLINE and Scopus (2012-2023) comparing ECG findings with coronary angiograms were systematically reviewed and analyzed following PRISMA-DTA guidelines. QUADAS-2 assessed the risk of bias.

STUDY SELECTION

Studies included focused on AMI patients and provided data enabling the construction of contingency tables for sensitivity and specificity calculation, excluding those with non-ACS conditions, outdated STEMI criteria, or a specific focus on bundle branch blocks or other complex diagnoses. Data were extracted systematically and pooled test accuracy estimates were computed using MetaDTA software, employing bivariate analyses for within- and between-study variation. The primary outcomes measured were the sensitivity and specificity of ST-segment elevation in detecting ACO.

RESULTS

Three studies with 23,704 participants were included. The pooled sensitivity of ST-segment elevation for detecting ACO was 43.6% (95% CI: 34.7%-52.9%), indicating that over half of ACO cases may not exhibit ST-segment elevation. The specificity was 96.5% (95% CI: 91.2%-98.7%). Additional analysis using the OMI-NOMI strategy showed improved sensitivity (78.1%, 95% CI: 62.7%-88.3%) while maintaining similar specificity (94.4%, 95% CI: 88.6%-97.3%).

CONCLUSION

The findings reveal a significant diagnostic gap in the current STEMI-NSTEMI paradigm, with over half of ACO cases potentially lacking ST-segment elevation. The OMI-NOMI strategy could offer an improved diagnostic approach. The high heterogeneity and limited number of studies necessitate cautious interpretation and further research in diverse settings.

Retrospective evaluation of the ST segment electrocardiographic features in 180 healthy dogs

OBJECTIVES

Normal features of the ST segment are poorly characterised in dogs. This study aimed to describe ST segment characteristics in a population of healthy dogs.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Medical records were reviewed to identify healthy dogs that underwent an electrocardiogram. Several ST segment qualitative parameters were evaluated: presence/absence of deviation, type of deviation (depression/elevation) and morphological patterns of depression (horizontal, downsloping, upsloping and sagging) and elevation (horizontal, concave and convex). Moreover, the amplitude of ST segment depression/elevation was measured. The potential effect of sex, bodyweight, age and somatotype on the presence/absence of ST segment deviation was evaluated through binary logistic regression.

RESULTS

One hundred and eighty dogs were enrolled. The deviation was evident in 43 of 180 dogs (23.9%), among which 36 showed depression and seven showed elevation. The median depression amplitude was 0.1 (range 0.05 to 0.3) mV. The mean elevation amplitude was 0.136 ±0.055 mV. Concerning depression morphology, the horizontal pattern was overrepresented, followed by the downsloping and upsloping ones. Concerning elevation morphology, all dogs showed a concave pattern. No meaningful effect of sex, bodyweight, age and somatotype on the presence/absence of ST segment deviation was documented.

CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE

Normal features of canine ST segment were described and made available for clinical use.

Electrocardiographic diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction in a pacemaker patient: a case report

Background

The electrocardiographic diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction (AMI) in the setting of cardiac pacing is often challenging. The original Sgarbossa criteria proposed in 1996 were demonstrated to be valid for diagnosis of AMI in both ventricular paced rhythm and left bundle branch block. To improve accuracy, the modified Sgarbossa criteria (MSC) were proposed.

Case presentation

We presented a case of electrocardiographic diagnosis of AMI in a pacemaker patient. The Electrocardiogram (ECG) was false negative by using the original Sgarbossa criteria, whereas true positive by the MSC at a ratio of − 0.20.

Conclusions

The application of MSC using an appropriate ratio (− 0.20 or − 0.25) may facilitate a timely diagnosis of AMI. Physicians should carefully choose the appropriate cutoff in a case-by-case basis.

Acute Myopericarditis in the Post COVID-19 Recovery Phase

The COVID-19 viral infection, caused by the novel coronavirus severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2), is a currently ongoing global pandemic that, as of mid-October, 2020, has resulted in more than 38.7 million confirmed cases globally and has caused more than 1.1 million fatalities. COVID-19 infection is associated with severe life threatening respiratory and cardiac complications such as acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), pneumonia, shock, cardiac arrhythmias, myocardial infarction and heart failure, particularly in the acute infectious stage. Acute myopericarditis is another reported cardiac complication of COVID-19. Case reports have been limited in reporting the effects of COVID-19 in the post-symptomatic period.

In this article, we present a case of acute myopericarditis resulting 6 to 8 weeks after testing positive for COVID-19. Here we will breakdown the initial emergency department (ED) presentation, with particular attention to the electrocardiogram (ECG) findings of acute myopericarditis. This case, to the our best knowledge and after an extensive literature review, depicts the first case of myopericarditis in the post COVID-19 infection recovery phase.

What is the Significance of Elevated Troponin I in Children and Adolescents? A Diagnostic Approach

Troponin is a marker that displays cardiac injury quickly and accurately. In adults, troponin elevation is usually associated with coronary artery disease and requires urgent cardiac catheterization. In healthy children, myocardial injury is rare and may develop due to many different causes. Therefore, troponin elevation in children and adolescents does not usually require emergency cardiac catheterization. The aim of this study is to assess the most common causes of troponin elevation in children and adolescents and to show which diagnostic tests are helpful in assessing pediatric patients with elevated troponin. Patients who had been diagnosed with troponin I elevation (> 0.06 ng/ml) at Dr. Sami Ulus Maternity, Children's Health and Disease Training and Research Hospital between 2007 and 2018 were retrospectively evaluated. Patients undergoing cardiac surgery and those with severe congenital heart disease were excluded from the study. The medical records of the patients were examined and age, gender, diagnostic tests, and diagnosis were evaluated. During the study period, the records of 972 patients were obtained. 213 patients were excluded from the study because of heart surgery, congenital heart disease, and neonatal asphyxia or sepsis. Of the remaining 759 patients, 58% were male, 42% were female, and the median age was 4 years (3 days to 17 years). The most frequent causes are myopericarditis (n: 164), drug intoxications (n: 85), carbon monoxide poisoning (n: 74), perimyocarditis (n: 65), and intensive inhalation β agonist use in acute asthma and lower respiratory tract infections (n: 70). Patients diagnosed with myocarditis and myopericarditis were admitted with a complaint of chest pain, and the diagnosis was made by history, physical examination, ECG, and echocardiographic findings. Unlike adults, troponin I elevation may be associated with many cardiac and non-cardiac pathologies in children. The most common pathologies in cardiac etiology are myopericarditis and perimyocarditis and can be diagnosed by history, physical examination, ECG, and echocardiography. Cardiac catheterization is not necessary except for rare cardiac pathologies and does not alter the prognosis.

Acute Myopericardial Syndromes

Acute myopericardial syndromes are common but can be challenging to manage and potentially have life-threatening complications. Careful clinical history, physical examination, electrocardiogram interpretation, and application of diagnostic criteria are needed to make an accurate diagnosis, exclude concomitant disease, and properly treat patients. Therapy for acute pericarditis should be guided per the underlying cause. For the most common causes, nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs or aspirin with the addition of colchicine remains the mainstay of therapy. Patients with hemodynamic compromise who are resistant to therapy or display high-risk features should prompt hospitalization and initiation of more aggressive and/or invasive therapy.

Intelligent use of advanced capabilities of diagnostic ECG algorithms in a monitoring environment

A large number of ST-elevation notifications are generated by cardiac monitoring systems, but only a fraction of them is related to the critical condition known as ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) in which the blockage of coronary artery causes ST-segment elevation. Confounders such as acute pericarditis and benign early repolarization create electrocardiographic patterns mimicking STEMI but usually do not benefit from a real-time notification. A STEMI screening algorithm able to recognize those confounders utilizing capabilities of diagnostic ECG algorithms in variation analysis of ST segments helps to avoid triggering a non-actionable ST-elevation notification. However, diagnostic algorithms are generally designed to analyze short ECG snapshots collected in low-noise resting position and hence are susceptible to high levels of noise common in a monitoring environment. We developed a STEMI screening algorithm which performs a real-time signal quality evaluation on the ECG waveform to select the segments with quality high enough for subsequent analysis by a diagnostic ECG algorithm. The STEMI notifications generated by this multi-stage STEMI screening algorithm are significantly fewer than ST-elevation notifications generated by a continuous ST monitoring strategy.

A new 4-variable formula to differentiate normal variant ST segment elevation in V2-V4 (early repolarization) from subtle left anterior descending coronary occlusion - Adding QRS amplitude of V2 improves the model

INTRODUCTION

Precordial normal variant ST elevation (NV-STE), previously often called "early repolarization," may be difficult to differentiate from subtle ischemic STE due to left anterior descending (LAD) occlusion. We previously derived and validated a logistic regression formula that was far superior to STE alone for differentiating the two entities on the ECG. The tool uses R-wave amplitude in lead V4 (RAV4), ST elevation at 60 ms after the J-point in lead V3 (STE60V3) and the computerized Bazett-corrected QT interval (QTc-B). The 3-variable formula is: 1.196 x STE60V3 + 0.059 × QTc-B - 0.326 × RAV4 with a value ≥23.4 likely to be acute myocardial infarction (AMI).

HYPOTHESIS

Adding QRS voltage in V2 (QRSV2) would improve the accuracy of the formula.

METHODS

355 consecutive cases of proven LAD occlusion were reviewed, and those that were obvious ST elevation myocardial infarction were excluded. Exclusion was based on one straight or convex ST segment in V2-V6, 1 millimeter of summed inferior ST depression, any anterior ST depression, Q-waves, "terminal QRS distortion," or any ST elevation >5 mm. The NV-STE group comprised emergency department patients with chest pain who ruled out for AMI by serial troponins, had a cardiologist ECG read of "NV-STE," and had at least 1 mm of STE in V2 and V3. R-wave amplitude in lead V4 (RAV4), ST elevation at 60 ms after the J-point in lead V3 (STE60V3) and the computerized Bazett-corrected QT interval (QTc-B) had previously been measured in all ECGs; physicians blinded to outcome then measured QRSV2 in all ECGs. A 4-variable formula was derived to more accurately classify LAD occlusion vs. NV-STE and optimize area under the curve (AUC) and compared with the previous 3-variable formula.

RESULTS

There were 143 subtle LAD occlusions and 171 NV-STE. A low QRSV2 added diagnostic utility. The derived 4-variable formula is: 0.052*QTc-B - 0.151*QRSV2 - 0.268*RV4 + 1.062*STE60V3. The 3-variable formula had an AUC of 0.9538 vs. 0.9686 for the 4-variable formula (p = 0.0092). At the same specificity as the 3-variable formula [90.6%, at which cutpoint (≥23.4), 123 of 143 MI were correctly classified for 86% sensitivity], the sensitivity of the new formula at cutpoint ≥17.75 is 90.2%, with 129/143 correctly classified MI, identifying an additional 6 cases. The cutpoint with the highest accuracy (92.0%) was at a cutoff value ≥18.2, with 88.8% sensitivity, 94.7% specificity, and a positive and negative likelihood ratio of 16.9 (95% CI: 8.9-32) and 0.12 (95% CI: 0.07-0.19). At this cutpoint, it correctly classified an additional 11 cases (289 of 315, vs. 278 of 315): 127/143 for MI (an additional 4 cases) and 162/171 for NV-STE (an additional 7 cases).

CONCLUSION

On the ECG, a 4-variable formula was derived which adds QRSV2; it differentiates subtle LAD occlusion from NV-STE better than the 3-variable formula. At a value ≥18.2, the formula (0.052*QTc-B - 0.151*QRSV2 - 0.268*RV4 + 1.062*STE60V3) was very accurate, sensitive, and specific, with excellent positive and negative likelihood ratios. This formula needs to be validated.

Chameleons: Electrocardiogram Imitators of ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction

The imperative for timely reperfusion therapy for patients presenting with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) underscores the need for clinicians to have an understanding of how to distinguish patterns of STEMI from its imitators. These imitating diagnoses may confound an evaluation, potentially delaying necessary therapy. Although numerous diagnoses may mimic STEMI, several morphologic clues may allow the physician to determine if the pattern is concerning for either STEMI or a mimicking diagnosis. Furthermore, obtaining a satisfactory history, comparing previous electrocardiograms, and assessing serial tests may provide valuable clues.

ECG signs of acute myocardial ischemia in the prehospital setting of a suspected acute coronary syndrome and its association with outcomes

AIMS

The aims of this study were (a) to determine the prehospital prevalence of electrocardiographic (ECG) signs of acute myocardial ischemia in patients with suspected acute coronary syndrome and (b) to describe the relationships between the various ECG patterns and the diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction (AMI) and outcomes.

METHODS

Prospective cohort study using data from an interventional trial in acute chest pain patients transported by the emergency medical services. These patients were classified into 3 groups: patients with ECG showing signs of acute myocardial ischemia, patients with ECG showing other abnormal changes (bundle-branch block, pacemaker rhythm, Q-wave or T-wave inversion) and patients without significant pathologic findings. All P values are age-adjusted.

RESULTS

Among 1546 patients, 312 (20%) had ECG signs of acute myocardial ischemia. Of them, 57% had a final diagnosis of AMI versus 26% of those with other abnormal ECGs and 12% of those with ECG without significant pathologic findings (P<.0001). In all, 53% of all AMI cases involved patients without ECG signs of acute myocardial ischemia. Although ECG signs of acute myocardial ischemia predicted heart failure and ventricular tachyarrhythmias both prior to and after hospital admission, there was no significant difference in 30-day mortality between the 3 patient groups (4.3%, 3.7%, and 1.2%, respectively, P=.11).

CONCLUSION

Among patients with a clinical suspicion of AMI in the prehospital setting, the prevalence of ECG signs suggesting AMI was low, as was the ability to identify AMI patients using ECG findings only. We therefore need better instruments in the prehospital triage of patients with acute chest pain.

The neglected lead on electrocardiogram: T wave inversion in lead aVL, nonspecific finding or a sign for left anterior descending artery lesion?

BACKGROUND

The electrocardiogram (ECG) is the most important diagnostic tool for acute myocardial infarction (AMI). T wave inversion (TWI) in lead aVL has not been emphasized or well recognized.

OBJECTIVE

This study examined the relationship between the presence of TWI before the event and mid-segment left anterior descending (MLAD) artery lesion in patients with AMI.

METHODS

Retrospective charts of patients with acute coronary syndrome between the months of January 2009 and December 2011 were reviewed. All patients with MLAD lesion were identified and their ECG reviewed for TWI in lead aVL.

RESULTS

Coronary angiography was done on 431 patients. Of these, 125 (29%) had an MLAD lesion. One hundred and six patients (84.8%) had a lesion > 50% and 19 patients (15.2%) had a lesion < 50%. Of the 106 patients who had a MLAD lesion > 50%, 90 patients (84.9%) had TWI in lead aVL and one additional lead. Of the 19 patients who had an MLAD lesion < 50%, 8 patients (42.1%) had TWI in lead aVL and one additional lead. Isolated TWI in lead aVL had an overall sensitivity of 76.7% (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.65-0.86), a specificity of 71.4% (95% CI 0.45-0.88), a positive predictive value of 92%, a negative predictive value of 41.7%, a positive likelihood ratio of 2.7 (95% CI 1.16-6.22), and negative likelihood ratio of 0.32 (95% CI 0.19-0.58) for predicting a MLAD lesion of > 50% (p = 0.0011).

CONCLUSIONS

TWI in lead aVL might signify a mid-segment LAD lesion. Recognition of this finding and early appropriate referral to a cardiologist might be beneficial. Additional studies are needed to validate this finding.

Electrocardiographic criteria for ST-elevation myocardial infarction in patients with left ventricular hypertrophy

Patients with electrocardiographic (ECG) left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) have repolarization abnormalities of the ST segment that may be confused with an ischemic current of injury. We analyzed the ACTIVATE-SF database, a registry of consecutive emergency department ST-segment elevation (STE) myocardial infarction diagnoses from 2 medical centers. Univariate analysis was performed to identify ECG variables associated with presence of an angiographic culprit lesion. Recursive partitioning was then applied to identify a clinical decision-making rule that maximizes sensitivity and specificity for presence of an angiographic culprit lesion. Seventy-nine patients with ECG LVH underwent emergency cardiac catheterization for primary angioplasty. Patients with a culprit lesion had greater magnitude of STE (3.0 ± 1.8 vs 1.9 ± 1.0 mm, p = 0.005), more leads with STE (3.1 ± 1.6 vs 2.0 ± 1.8 leads, p = 0.002), and a greater ratio of STE to R-S-wave magnitude (median 25% vs 9.2%, p = 0.003). Univariate application of ECG criteria had limited sensitivity and a high false-positive rate for identifying patients with an angiographic culprit lesion. In patients with anterior territory STE, using a ratio of ST segment to R-S-wave magnitude ≥25% as a diagnostic criteria for STE myocardial infarction significantly improved specificity for an angiographic culprit lesion without decreasing sensitivity (c-statistic 0.82), with a net reclassification improvement of 37%. In conclusion, application of an ST segment to R-S-wave magnitude ≥25% rule may augment current criteria for determining which patients with ECG LVH should undergo primary angioplasty.

Differentiating ST-elevation myocardial infarction from nonischemic ST-elevation in patients with chest pain

Current guidelines state that patients with compatible symptoms and ST-segment elevation (STE) in ≥2 contiguous electrocardiographic leads should undergo immediate reperfusion therapy. Aggressive attempts at decreasing door-to-balloon times have led to more frequent activation of primary percutaneous coronary intervention (pPCI) protocols. However, it remains crucial to correctly differentiate STE myocardial infarction (STEMI) from nonischemic STE (NISTE). We assessed the ability of experienced interventional cardiologists in determining whether STE represents acute STEMI or NISTE. Seven readers studied electrocardiograms of consecutive patients showing STE. Patients with left bundle branch block or ventricular rhythms were excluded. Readers decided if, based on electrocardiographic results, they would have activated the pPCI protocol. If NISTE was chosen, readers selected from 12 possible explanations as to why STE was present. Of 84 patients, 40 (48%) had adjudicated STEMI. The percentage for which readers recommended pPCI varied (33% to 75%). Readers' sensitivity and specificity ranged from 55% to 83% (average 71%) and 32% to 86% (average 63%), respectively. Positive and negative predictive values ranged from 52% to 79% (average 66%) and 67% to 79% (average 71%), respectively. Broad inconsistencies existed among readers as to the chosen reasons for NISTE classification. In conclusion, we found wide variations in experienced interventional cardiologists in differentiating STEMI with a need for pPCI from NISTE.

Utilization of ST-segment deviation sum and change scores to identify acute myocardial infarction

OBJECTIVE

No information is currently available regarding the optimal cutoff values of the baseline ST-segment deviation sum (STDsum(baseline)) and 60-minute ST-segment deviation change (STDchange(60 min)) for predicting acute myocardial infarction (AMI).

METHODS

A retrospective study was performed in 783 admitted patients with chest pain who had suspected acute coronary syndrome and absence of left ventricular hypertrophy or bundle branch block on the initial electrocardiogram (ECG). The STDsum(baseline) was defined as the sum in millimeters (1 mm = 0.1 mV) of the absolute value of ST-segment deviations in all 12 leads at the initiation of continuous 12-lead ECG monitoring session. The STDchange(60 min) was defined as the absolute value of the difference between the baseline and 60-minute STDsum. Three cutoff values are reported and represent the smallest values in which the positive likelihood ratio (+LR) for AMI was greater than or equal to 5, 10, and 20, respectively.

RESULTS

Acute myocardial infarction occurred in 162 (20.7%) patients. The smallest cutoff value of the STDsum(baseline) for AMI with a +LR equal to or greater than 5, 10, and 20 was 9.6, 12.4, and 14.1 mm, respectively. In the subset of 699 patients without ST-segment elevation AMI on initial ECG, the smallest cutoff value of the STDchange(60 min) for AMI with a +LR equal to or greater than 5, 10, and 20 was 2.4, 3.5, and 7.9 mm, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Clinical studies need to be performed to determine if STDsum and STDchange, in conjunction with physician pretest probability of AMI, can be used to select patients who may benefit from emergent reperfusion therapy and other aggressive medical management strategies.

Analyzing prominent T waves and ST-segment abnormalities in acute myocardial infarction

BACKGROUND

Hyperacute T waves and the non-concave appearance of the ST segment are early changes that may be seen on the electrocardiogram (ECG) in an acute myocardial infarction (AMI) patient. There are specific morphological changes in these ECG findings that can help distinguish them from other conditions with similar ECG patterns. The differential diagnosis of prominent T waves and ST-segment elevation is well known, however, certain tools to distinguish ECG patterns with various etiologies have been developed and proven useful to the emergency physician.

OBJECTIVES

1) To discuss and review the more common differential diagnosis of prominent T waves and how to identify the hyperacute T wave of AMI. 2) To review the distinction and determination of a concave and non-concave ST segment that may be initially overlooked.

CASE REPORT

A 42-year-old woman with minimal cardiac risk factors developed an ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) that illustrates the evolution of early and classic ECG changes associated with her infarct.

CONCLUSIONS

The classic STEMI is ingrained in the emergency physician's mind, however, sometimes other lesser known and obvious ECG patterns can present early on in the evolution of disease, and these morphological patterns should be identified and treated accordingly.

Differentiating ST elevation myocardial infarction and nonischemic causes of ST elevation by analyzing the presenting electrocardiogram

Guidelines recommend that patients with suggestive symptoms of myocardial ischemia and ST-segment elevation (STE) in > or =2 adjacent electrocardiographic leads should receive immediate reperfusion therapy. Novel strategies aimed to reduce door-to-balloon time, such as prehospital wireless electrocardiographic transmission, may be dependent on the interpretation accuracy of the electrocardiogram (ECG) readers. We assessed the ability of experienced electrocardiographers to differentiate among STE, acute STE myocardial infarction (STEMI), and nonischemic STE (NISTE). A total of 116 consecutive ECGs showing STE were studied. Fifteen experienced cardiologists were asked to decide, based on the ECG and assuming that the patient had compatible symptoms, whether they would send each patient for primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI). If NISTE was chosen, the reader selected 1 or more 12 possible options to explain the choice. Of 116 patients, only 8 had STEMI. The percentage of ECGs for which PPCI was recommended for the patient by the individual readers varied widely (7.8% to 33%). There was no significant difference between the North American and Other Countries readers (p = 0.13). The sensitivity and specificity of the individual readers ranged from 50% to 100% (average 75%) and 73% to 97% (average 85%), respectively. There were broad inconsistencies among the readers in the chosen reasons used to classify NISTE. In conclusion, we found wide variations among experienced electrocardiographers in reading ECGs with STE and differentiating STEMI with need for PPCI from NISTE. There is a need to revise our current electrocardiographic criteria for differentiating STEMI from NISTE.

Electrocardiogram differentiation of benign early repolarization versus acute myocardial infarction by emergency physicians and cardiologists

OBJECTIVES

ST-segment elevation (STE) related to benign early repolarization (BER), a common normal variant, can be difficult to distinguish from acute myocardial infarction (AMI). The authors compared the electrocardiogram (ECG) interpretations of these two entities by emergency physicians (EPs) and cardiologists.

METHODS

Twenty-five cases (13 BER, 12 AMI) of patients presenting to the emergency department with chest pain were identified. Criteria for BER required four of the following: 1) widespread STE (precordial greater than limb leads), 2) J-point elevation, 3) concavity of initial up-sloping portion of ST segment, 4) notching or irregular contour of J point, and 5) prominent, concordant T waves. Additional BER criteria were 1) stable ECG pattern, 2) negative cardiac injury markers, and 3) normal cardiac stress test or angiography. AMI criteria were 1) regional STE, 2) positive cardiac injury markers, and 3) identification of culprit coronary artery by angiography in less than eight hours of presentation. The 25 ECGs were distributed to 12 EPs and 12 cardiologists (four in academic medicine, four in community practice, and four in community academics [health maintenance organization] in each physician group). The physicians were informed of the patients' age, gender, and race, and they then interpreted the ECGs as BER or AMI. Undercalls (AMI misdiagnosed as BER) and overcalls (BER misdiagnosed as AMI) were calculated for each physician group.

RESULTS

Cardiologists correctly interpreted 90% of ECGs, and EPs correctly interpreted 81% of ECGs. The proportion of undercalls (missed AMI/total AMI) was 2.8% for cardiologists (95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.09% to 5.5%) compared with 9.7% for EPs (95% CI = 4.8% to 14.6%) (p = 0.02). The proportion of overcalls (missed BER/total BER) was 17.3% for cardiologists (95% CI = 11.4% to 23.3%) versus 27.6% for EPs (95% CI = 20.6% to 34.6%) (p = 0.03). The mean number of years in practice was 19.8 for cardiologists (95% CI = 19 to 20.5) and 11 years for EPs (95% CI = 10.5 to 12.0) (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Although correct interpretation was high in both groups, cardiologists, who had significantly more years of practice, had fewer misinterpretations than EPs in distinguishing BER from AMI electrocardiographically.

Upwardly concave ST segment morphology is common in acute left anterior descending coronary occlusion

ST elevation (STE) in anterior precordial leads, in association with upwardly convex morphology (M) or straightM, is associated with anterior acute myocardial infarction (aAMI). Upwardly concaveM is characteristic of pseudoinfarction patterns such as early repolarization. A retrospective review was done of diagnostic electrocardiograms (EKG) of consecutive patients presenting to our Emergency Department (ED) who underwent emergent primary percutaneous intervention (PCI) and had proven left anterior descending (LAD) occlusion. If all leads from V2-V6 were upwardly concave, the EKG was classified as concaveM. If one lead was convex, the EKG had convexM. If no leads were convex and at least one was straight, it had straightM. Non-concaveM was defined as either convexM or straightM. Borderline STE was defined if the EKG did not have 2 consecutive leads with >or= 2 mm of STE. "Subtle," as opposed to "diagnostic," morphology was defined as concaveM without terminal QRS distortion. Data were analyzed with descriptive statistics. There were 37 patients identified who met the inclusion criteria and whose records were available for review. ConcaveM was found in 16 of 37 (43%), 4 with terminal QRS distortion. Measurements resulted in a classification of borderline STE in 15 of 37 (41%) (9 of whom had subtle morphology) for Rater 1 and 12 of 37 (32%) (7 of whom had subtle morphology) for Rater 2, while 19% to 24% had both "subtle" morphology and borderline ST elevation. ConcaveM, as compared with convexM or terminal QRS distortion, was associated with a shorter duration of symptoms (p < 0.05). It is concluded that concave morphology cannot be used to exclude STEMI with LAD occlusion. Many patients with LAD occlusion have borderline ST elevation with subtle morphology. Concave morphology is associated with a shorter duration of symptoms.

ST Segment and T Wave Abnormalities Not Caused by Acute Coronary Syndromes

This article reviews the ST segment and T wave abnormalities seen in non-acute coronary syndrome (ACS) electrocardiograph presentations. Particular emphasis is placed on the distinction of these non-ACS syndromes from acute coronary syndrome related ST segment and or T wave change.

ECG Patterns Confounding the ECG Diagnosis of Acute Coronary Syndrome: Left Bundle Branch Block, Right Ventricular Paced Rhythms, and Left Ventricular Hypertrophy

The ECG has limitations in the evaluation of the chest-pain patient, including the presence of confounding ECG patterns; the ECG patterns that confound the diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction(AMI) include left bundle branch block (LBBB), ventricular paced rhythms (VPR), and left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH). These patterns produce new ST-segment/T-wave abnormalities, which are the new normal findings in these patients and may lead the clinician astray in two distinct instances: (1) diagnosing ECG change related to acute coronary syndromes (ACS) when the abnormality results solely from the confounding pattern; and (2) not acknowledging the confounding nature of these ECG patterns in the evaluation of potential ACS, thereby placing excessive diagnostic confidence in the ECG. This article highlights the diagnostic dilemma encountered in these confounding ECG patterns; the discussion focuses on the expected ECG abnormalities in these patients and the findings seen in ACS.

Disagreement in the interpretation of electrocardiographic ST segment elevation: a source of error for emergency physicians?

Evaluation of the electrocardiogram (ECG) is a complex, subjective process with the potential for interobserver disagreement. The objective of this study was to determine the ECG patterns with discrepant interpretations, the rates of disagreement in the determination of both the presence of ST segment elevation (STE) and morphology. ECGs were reviewed in a retrospective fashion by attending EPs for STE and waveform morphology. Those ECGs that were interpreted in a discrepant fashion were then analyzed to detect patterns of disagreement. ECGs from 599 patients were reviewed. Two hundred eleven patients (35.2% of the total patient population surveyed) had STE as determined by at least one attending EP; 40 (19% of the STE population) patients had STE determined by 1 EP, 21 (10% of the STE population) patients by 2 EPs, and 150 (71% of the STE population) patients by 3 EPs. The STE of 61 (28.9%) ECGs were interpreted in a discrepant fashion. The average STE was 1.31 mm per lead for ECGs with disagreement and 2.93 mm per lead for ECGs with agreement (P<.05). ECGs with reciprocal ST depression were more likely to have agreement with regard to the STE (P<.05). Fourteen ECGs (8.2% of 171 ECGs with STE determined by at least 2 EPs) had ST segment morphology interpreted in a discrepant fashion. Disagreement in the determination of electrocardiographic ST segment elevation by EPs occurs frequently and is related to the amount of STE present on the ECG. Electrocardiographic patterns responsible for this interpretive disagreement of ST segment elevation can represent an unfortunate but potentially predictable source of error in emergency medical care.

Electrocardiographic ST segment elevation: a comparison of AMI and non-AMI ECG syndromes

Chest pain (CP) patients presenting to the ED may manifest electrocardiographic ST segment elevation (STE). AMI (acute myocardial infarction) is a less frequent cause of such abnormality and one of many patterns responsible for ST segment elevation in ED CP patients. We performed a retrospective comparative review of the electrocardiographic features of various STE syndromes, focusing on differences between AMI and non-AMI syndromes. The electrocardiograms (ECGs) of consecutive ED adult CP patients (with 3 serial troponin I determinations) were interpreted by 3 attending emergency physicians. These ECGs with STE represented the study population used for analysis. Various electrocardiographic features such as STE, ST segment depression (STD), STE morphology, anatomic distribution of STE, and the number of leads with STE were recorded; derived values such as total STE, total ST segment deviation, and average STE per lead were calculated. Interobserver reliability concerning STE morphology was determined. AMI was diagnosed by abnormal serum troponin I values (>0.1 mg/dL) followed by a rise and fall of the serum marker; STE diagnoses of non-AMI causes were determined by medical record review. Five hundred ninety-nine CP patients were entered in the study with 212 (35%) individuals showing STE, 55 (26%) with electrocardiographic AMI and 157 (74%) with non-AMI electrocardiographic syndromes. Anatomic location within the AMI group included 32 inferior and inferior variants, 18 anterior and anterior variants, and 5 lateral; non-AMI anatomic locations included 56 inferior and inferior variants, 98 anterior and anterior variants, and 3 lateral; anterior STE occurred significantly more often in non-AMI syndromes. Total STE was 15.3 mm in AMI patients and 7.4 mm in non-AMI patients (P =.0004). The number of leads with STE was not significantly different between the two groups, 3.4 mm in AMI and 4.1 in non-AMI syndromes. ST segment elevation per lead was not significantly different in the 2 groups, 4.4 mm in AMI versus 1.8 mm in non-AMI syndromes. Total ST segment deviation (sum of STE and STD) was significantly greater in AMI syndromes, 17.8 mm in AMI compared with 10.5 mm in non-AMI syndromes (P =.00009). The presence of STD occurred at statistically similar rates in both groups. The morphology of the STE occurred in significantly different rates between AMI and non-AMI patterns, concave more often in non-AMI patterns (P <.00001) and nonconcave more often in AMI (P <.00001). Non-AMI causes of STE account for the majority of electrocardiographic syndromes encountered in ED chest pain patients. These findings alone are not adequate to determine the electrocardiographic cause of the ST segment elevation in chest pain patients. When determining AMI versus non-AMI with the ECG, these various findings should be used in the consideration of the overall clinical picture (history, examination, and electrocardiogram) in chest pain patients with ST segment elevation.

Electrocardiographic ST segment elevation: left ventricular aneurysm

Left ventricular aneurysm (LVA), also described as dyskinetic left ventricular segment, is defined as a localized area of infarcted myocardium that bulges outward during both systole and diastole. LVAs most often are noted after large anterior wall events but may also be encountered status after inferior and posterior wall injuries. In most cases, LVA is manifested electrocardiographically by varying degrees of ST segment elevation (STE), which may be difficult to distinguish from ST segment changes caused by acute myocardial infarction. The STE is generally associated with well-developed, completed Q waves in the anterior precordial leads, and there will not be reciprocal ST depression in the contralateral leads. This article focuses on the electrocardiographic findings useful in making the diagnosis of left ventricular aneurysm as well as distinguishing LVA from other STE syndromes.

Reciprocal ST segment depression: impact on the electrocardiographic diagnosis of ST segment elevation acute myocardial infarction

Acute myocardial infarction (AMI) is one of many causes of electrocardiographic ST segment elevation (STE) in ED chest pain (CP) patients; at times, the electrocardiographic diagnosis may be difficult. Coexistent ST segment depression has been reported to assist in the differentiation of non-infarction causes of STE from AMI-related ST segment elevation. The objective was to determine the effect of AMI diagnosis on the presence of STD among ED CP patients with electrocardiographic STE. Adult CP patients with electrocardiographic STE in at least 2 anatomically distributed leads were reviewed for the presence or absence of ST segment depression in at least 1 lead and separated into 2 groups, both with and without ST segment depression. A comparison of the 2 groups was performed in 2 approaches: all STE patients and then only with STE patients who lacked confounding electrocardiographic pattern (bundle branch block [BBB], left ventricular hypertrophy [LVH], or right ventricular paced rhythm [VPR]). All patients in the study underwent prolonged observation in the ED (at least 8 hours) with 3 serial troponin T determinations and 3 electrocardiograms (ECG). AMI was diagnosed by abnormal serum troponin T values (>0.1 mg/dL); electrocardiographic STE diagnoses of non-AMI causes were determined by medical record review. There were 171 CP patients with STE were entered in the study with 112 (65.5%) individuals show ST segment depression. When considering all study patients, ST segment depression was present at statistically equal rates in AMI and non-AMI situations (P = NS). The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value for the electrocardiographic diagnosis of AMI were 63%, 34%, 30%, and 67%, respectively. Patients with confounding patterns (LVH 46, BBB 19, and VPR 6) were removed from the analysis group, leaving 100 patients for analysis; 38 of these patients had ST segment depression. When considering this group of study patients, ST segment depression was present significantly more often in AMI patients (P <.0001). The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value for the electrocardiographic diagnosis of AMI were 69%, 93%, 93%, and 71%, respectively. Clinical diagnoses were as follows: 56 AMI, 50 USAP, and 65 noncoronary syndrome. When all CP patients with electrocardiographic STE are considered, the presence of ST segment depression is not helpful in distinguishing AMI from non-AMI. If one considers only patterns which lack electrocardiographic ST segment depression caused by altered intraventricular conduction, the presence of ST segment depression strongly suggests the diagnosis of AMI. In these cases, reciprocal ST segment depression is of considerable value in establishing the electrocardiographic diagnosis of STE AMI.