Cost-effectiveness of noninvasive testing and treatment strategies for H. pylori infection in children with dyspepsia

A Culture-Based Strategy Is More Cost Effective Than an Empiric Therapy Strategy in Managing Pediatric Helicobacter pylori Infection

BACKGROUND

Helicobacter pylori infection is a major cause of peptic ulcers and gastric cancer. This study aimed to compare the eradication rate and essential costs of culture-based and empiric therapy strategies in treating pediatric H. pylori infection.

METHODS

We retrospectively enrolled patients aged <18 years with a diagnosis of H. pylori infection who received esophagogastroduodenoscopy at two medical centers in southern Taiwan from 1998 to 2018. Patients with positive cultures and minimum inhibitory concentration test results were allocated to a culture-based strategy, and those with negative cultures or without culture as an empiric therapy strategy. We collected demographic data and eradication rates, and calculated the total essential costs of treating a hypothetical cohort of 1,000 pediatric patients based on the two strategies.

RESULTS

Ninety-six patients were enrolled, of whom 55 received a culture-based strategy and 41 received an empiric therapy strategy. The eradication rates with the first treatment were 89.1 and 75.6% in the culture-based and empiric therapy strategy, respectively. There were no significant differences in age, sex, and endoscopic diagnosis between the two strategies. For every 10% increase in those receiving a culture-based strategy, the total cost would have been reduced by US$466 in a hypothetical cohort of 1,000 patients. For every 10% increase in successful eradication rate, the total cost was reduced by US$24,058 with a culture-based strategy and by US$20,241 with an empiric therapy strategy.

CONCLUSIONS

A culture-based strategy was more cost effective than an empiric therapy strategy in treating pediatric H. pylori-infected patients.

Helicobacter Pylori "Test-and-Treat" Strategy for Management of Dyspepsia: A Comprehensive Review

OBJECTIVES:

Deciding on whether the Helicobacter pylori test-and-treat strategy is an appropriate diagnostic–therapeutic approach for patients with dyspepsia invites a series of questions. The aim present article addresses the test-and-treat strategy and attempts to provide practical conclusions for the clinician who diagnoses and treats patients with dyspepsia.

METHODS:

Bibliographical searches were performed in MEDLINE using the keywords Helicobacter pylori, test-and-treat, and dyspepsia. We focused mainly on data from randomized controlled trials (RCTs), systematic reviews, meta-analyses, cost-effectiveness analyses, and decision analyses.

RESULTS:

Several prospective studies and decision analyses support the use of the test-and-treat strategy, although we must be cautious when extrapolating the results from one geographical area to another. Many factors determine whether this strategy is appropriate in each particular area. The test-and-treat strategy will cure most cases of underlying peptic ulcer disease, prevent most potential cases of gastroduodenal disease, and yield symptomatic benefit in a minority of patients with functional dyspepsia. Future studies should be able to stratify dyspeptic patients according to their likelihood of improving after treatment of infection by H. pylori.

CONCLUSIONS:

The test-and-treat strategy will cure most cases of underlying peptic ulcer disease and prevent most potential cases of gastroduodenal disease. In addition, a minority of infected patients with functional dyspepsia will gain symptomatic benefit. Several prospective studies and decision analyses support the use of the test-and-treat strategy. The test-and-treat strategy is being reinforced by the accumulating data that support the increasingly accepted idea that “the only good H. pylori is a dead H. pylori”.

[Prevalence of Helicobacter pylori infection in children evaluated at "Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre", RS, Brazil]

OBJECTIVES

To determine prevalence of Helicobacter pylori infection in a group of symptomatic patients between 2 and 18 years old who were submitted to gastric biopsy during upper endoscopy done in the period of 1990-97. To correlate the histological findings with clinical and endoscopical data.

METHODS

A cross-sectional study done after review of clinical and histopathological data. Histopathological sections were reviewed by a pathologist, who did not know the clinical information and the previous histopathological reports.

RESULTS

Among 181 patients evaluated, prevalence of Helicobacter pylori infection was 24.86% (45 positive cases). In pathological analysis, gastritis was found in 38/45 of the positive Helicobacter pylori patients and in 45/136 negative Helicobacter pylori. Gastric ulceration was found in 6/45 positive Helicobacter pylori and in 3/136 negative Helicobacter pylori.

CONCLUSION

This study stated a significative association between Helicobacter pylori infection and pathological abnormalities in children evaluated in the "Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre", RS, Brazil.

Ten-day triple therapy with ranitidine bismuth citrate, amoxicillin, and clarithromycin in eradicating Helicobacter pylori

OBJECTIVE

Fourteen-day therapy with ranitidine bismuth citrate, amoxicillin, and clarithromycin has been shown to have a high Helicobacter pylori eradication rate (> 90%) in U.S. trials. The aim of this study was to determine the H. pylori eradication rate of a ranitidine bismuth citrate-based triple regimen of shorter duration (10 days), which has been shown to be effective in Europe.

METHODS

Dyspeptic patients who had a positive baseline 13C-urea breath test and either a positive antral rapid urease test or positive IgG serology were studied. Treatment consisted of ranitidine bismuth citrate 400 mg, clarithromycin 500 mg, and amoxicillin 1 g, all given b.i.d. for 10 days. Eradication was determined >4 wk after completion of therapy by the 13C-urea breath test (enrichment <2.4%). Results are expressed for intent-to-treat (all patients randomized even if they did not take the drug) and per-protocol (major protocol violators excluded) analyses.

RESULTS

Seventy-seven patients with a mean age of 48 +/- 1.8 yr were studied. Forty-eight patients had eradication of H. pylori with this regimen (62%), 16 patients (21%) did not have eradication, and 13 patients (17%) did not return for breath testing. By intent-to-treat analysis the eradication rate was 62% (95% confidence intervals [CI], 51%, 73%) and by per-protocol analysis the eradication rate was 75% (95% CI, 63%, 85%).

CONCLUSIONS

Ten-day, twice-daily therapy with ranitidine bismuth citrate, amoxicillin, and clarithromycin has an eradication rate that ranges from 62-75%. Fourteen-day therapy may be preferable because of higher eradication rates.

Treatment of Helicobacter pylori

Overwhelming evidence implicates Helicobacter pylori as a significant causative factor in many gastroduodenal diseases. Effective multidrug antimicrobial regimens are available for cure of the infection, so investigative efforts are focusing on cost-effectiveness and treatment outcome in various populations. Potential associations between H. pylori and nongastric disorders are being examined. Recognition that infection is largely acquired during childhood has emphasized the need to study pediatric issues. Posttreatment studies confirm the importance of the bacterium in pathogenesis and relapse of peptic ulcer disease. Antimicrobial resistance has a negative impact on cure of the infection and healing of gastroduodenal lesions. Methodology to evaluate H. pylori antimicrobial susceptibility has been standardized by the National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards, and minimum inhibitory concentration breakpoints to standardize resistance assays are being established. Surveillance of H. pylori antimicrobial resistance is underway in a Centers for Disease Control and Prevention multisite project in the United States.