Effects of alendronate on gastric and duodenal mucosa

Endoscopic comparison of alendronate alone and the enteric-coated alendronate with calcitriol combination in postmenopausal Korean females

BACKGROUND/AIMS

This study was performed to compare the mucosal findings after esophagogastroduodenoscopy in two groups before and after the use of alendronate only and following administration of the enteric-coated alendronate (5 mg) and calcitriol (0.5 µg) combined drug (Maxmarvil, Yuyu Co.).

METHODS

The study population consisted of 33 postmenopausal healthy female volunteers, aged 50 to 70 years (mean age, 58 ± 5) without gastrointestinal symptoms and with normal baseline endoscopic findings. Esophagogastroduodenoscopy was performed at baseline and was repeated 2 weeks later after daily intake of Maxmarvil (n = 17 subjects) or alendronate only (n = 16 subjects). Mucosal injury scores were reported by an endoscopist after 2 weeks of treatment with each medication schedule.

RESULTS

Esophageal mucosal injuries developed in two of 16 subjects in the alendronate only group and 0 of 17 in the Maxmarvil group. Gastric mucosal injuries developed in eight subjects in the alendronate group and four subjects in the Maxmarvil group; this difference was statistically significant.

CONCLUSIONS

The mucosal damage scores for the alendronate group (total score 24) were significantly higher than those for the Maxmarvil group (total score 9) in the esophagus and stomach. Therefore, this study suggested that enteric-coated Maxmarvil is less harmful to gastrointestinal mucosa than alendronate, and may improve the tolerability of osteoporosis medication in clinical practice.

The effect of plasma chemical oxidation of titanium alloy on bone-implant contact in rats

Many different technologies have been used to enhance osseointegration in orthopaedic and dental implant surgery. Hydroxyapatite coatings, pure or in combination with growth factors or bisphosphonates, showed improved osseointegration of titanium alloy implants. We choose a different approach to enhance osseointegration: plasma chemical oxidation was used to modify the surface of titanium alloy implants. This technique converts the nm-thin natural occurring titanium oxide layer on an implant to a 4 μm thick ceramic coating (TiOB surface). Bioactive TiOB surfaces have a macroporous structure and were loaded with calcium and phosphorus, while bioinert TiOB surfaces are smooth. A rat tibial model with bilateral placement of titanium alloy implants was employed to analyze the bone response to TiOB surfaces in vivo. 64 rats were randomly assigned to four groups of implants: (1) titanium alloy (control), (2) titanium alloy, type III anodization, (3) bioinert TiOB surface and (4) bioactive TiOB surface. Mechanical fixation, peri-implant-bone area and bone contact were evaluated by pull-out tests and histology at three and eight weeks. Shear strength and bone contact at eight weeks were significantly increased in the bioactive TiOB group compared to all other groups. The results of plasma chemical oxidation in a rat model showed that the bioactive TiOB surface has a positive effect on implant anchorage by enhancing the bone-implant contact in normal bone.

Optimal management of peptic ulcer disease in the elderly

Recent data report that the incidence of peptic ulcer is decreasing in the general population; conversely, the rates of gastric and duodenal ulcer hospitalization and mortality remain very high in older patients. Two major factors that might explain this epidemiological feature in the elderly population are the high prevalence of Helicobacter pylori infection and the increasing prescriptions of gastroduodenal damaging drugs, including NSAIDs and/or aspirin (acetylsalicylic acid). The main goals for treating peptic ulcer disease in old age are to reduce recurrence of the disease and to prevent complications, especially bleeding and perforation. The available treatments for peptic ulcer are essentially based on gastric acid suppression with antisecretory drugs and the eradication of H. pylori infection. The aim of this article is to report the available data on clinical efficacy and tolerability of peptic ulcer treatments in elderly patients and provide recommendations for their optimal use in this special population. Proton pump inhibitor (PPI)-based triple therapies for 7 days are highly effective for the cure of H. pylori-positive peptic ulcers as well as for reducing ulcer recurrence. Antisecretory drugs are also the treatment of choice for NSAID- or aspirin-related peptic ulcers and are useful as preventive therapy in chronic users of NSAIDs and low-dose aspirin as antiplatelet therapy. Antisecretory PPI therapy has a favourable tolerability profile in geriatric patients; however, monitoring is suggested in older patients with frequent pulmonary infections, gastrointestinal malabsorption, unexplained chronic diarrhoea, osteoporosis or those taking concomitant cytochrome P450 2C19-metabolized medications. The overall approach to the geriatric patient should include a comprehensive geriatric assessment that ensures multidimensional evaluation of the patient in order to better define the clinical risk of adverse outcomes in the older patient with peptic ulcer and its complications.

Gastric and esophagus events before and during treatment of osteoporosis

Prior studies have indicated an excess risk of gastroduodenal ulcers and esophagus perforations with the use of bisphosphonates. However, little is known about the contribution of comorbid conditions and concomitant drug use on this risk. We studied the risk of esophagus and gastric events in patients on a wide range of drugs against osteoporosis both before and after initiation of these drugs. We studied a nationwide register-based cohort from Denmark with all users of drugs against osteoporosis between 1996 and 2006 (n = 103,562) as cases and three age- and sex-matched controls from the general population (n = 310,683). In a crude analysis, most drugs were already associated with an increased risk of esophagitis, esophageal ulcerations, or esophageal perforations or gastroduodenal ulcers before initiation of the drugs. Upon adjustment, this excess risk disappeared for most drugs except parathyroid hormone and its analogues, etidronate and clodronate. Only for etidronate, alendronate, and raloxifene were sufficient data present for events after initiation of the drugs, and for these, an increased risk was present for all events except gastroduodenal ulcers with raloxifene. Several drugs against osteoporosis are associated with an increased risk of esophagitis, esophageal ulcers, esophageal perforation, and gastroduodenal ulcers. However, the increase was already present before initiation of the drug for several types of drugs against osteoporosis. This points at an effect of the underlying condition being treated or comorbid conditions and drugs being provided in patients with osteoporosis, such as nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and corticosteroids.

Bisphosphonate increases risk of gastroduodenal ulcer in rheumatoid arthritis patients on long-term nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drug therapy

BACKGROUND

Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients are at increased risk of peptic ulcers (PU) induced by nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs (NSAIDs). However, the impact of potential drug interactions on the development of PU has yet to be determined in a daily clinical setting. The aim was to estimate the clinical important interactions for PU presented by comedication in Japanese RA outpatients on long-term NSAID treatment.

METHODS

This retrospective cohort study enrolled 196 consecutive RA outpatients on NSAID medication for at least 3 months. Potential risk factors for endoscopic PU were analyzed in RA outpatients on longterm NSAID treatment.

RESULTS

PU incidence was 31% with bisphosphonate co-therapy and 17% without the co-therapy. PU incidence was only 5% in subjects with proton pump inhibitors (PPI) or prostaglandin E1 analogues (PG) co-therapy, 14% with histamine-H(2) receptor antagonists(H2RA) co-therapy, and 27% without anti-ulcer agents. In multivariate logistic regression analysis, bisphosphonate co-therapy remained a significant risk factor for PU (OR, 2.29; 95% CI, 1.09-4.81). Other risk factors for ulcer development were advanced age (greater than 60 years) and smoking (OR, 2.58; 95% CI, 1.03-6.49 and OR, 2.71; 95% CI, 1.13-5.53, respectively.) Factors that significantly reduced the incidence of PU were H2RA or PPI/PG cotherapies (OR, 0.29; 95% CI, 0.12-0.68.).

CONCLUSIONS

Bisphosphonate co-therapy as well as advanced age and smoking was found to be a significant risk factor in PU, while co-therapies of standard-dose H2RA or PPI/PG proved effective in preventing PU in Japanese RA patients on long-term NSAID treatment.

Determinants of the short-term gastric damage caused by NSAIDs in man

BACKGROUND

The short-term gastric damage seen with non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) in man may involve inhibition of cyclooxygenase (COX-1) and COX-2 as well as the topical irritancy, which is dependant on the acidity (pKa) and/or lipophilicity (log P(7.4)).

AIM

To study the quantitative relationship between NSAID-induced short-term gastric damage, their physicochemical properties and contrasting roles of COX-1 and COX-2 inhibition.

METHODS

We identified studies that allowed a qualitative comparison of the gastric injury (Lanza scores) induced by NSAIDs with their pKa and log P(7.4). Damage was correlated with gastric COX inhibition and potency to inhibit COX-1 and 2 and their COX-2/COX-1 selectivity ratio.

RESULTS

The gastric damage correlates significantly with pKa (r = -0.69; P < 0.01), log P (r = -0.58, P < 0.05) and potency of the NSAIDs to inhibit COX-1 (r = -0.61, P < 0.02), but not with COX-2 inhibition or COX-2/COX-1 selectivity.

CONCLUSION

Against a background of COX-1 and COX-2 inhibition, the physicochemical properties of NSAID appear to play an important role in short-term gastric damage.

Drug injury in the upper gastrointestinal tract: effects of alendronate

Osteoporosis is a disease characterized by an increase in bone resorption and a decline in bone density, which leads to increased susceptibility to bone fractures. Long-term therapy is needed to increase bone mineral density and maintain bone strength. Safe and well-tolerated medical therapies are required for long-term maintenance. Alendronate, an oral bisphosphonate, has been used for treatment of osteoporosis since the mid 1990s; however, recent studies have suggested alendronate can have significant gastrointestinal side effects. Most data suggest that the risk of these effects is low and not significantly higher than with placebo but there are limited reports that suggest otherwise, in both clinical trials and animal studies. Alendronate continues to remain an important mainstay of osteoporosis therapy.

Alendronate improves bone mineral density in primary biliary cirrhosis: a randomized placebo-controlled trial

Bone loss is a well-recognized complication of primary biliary cirrhosis (PBC). Although it has been suggested that alendronate might improve bone mineral density (BMD) in PBC, no randomized placebo-controlled trial has been conducted. The primary aim of this study was to compare the effects of alendronate versus placebo on BMD and biochemical measurements of bone turnover in patients with PBC-associated bone loss. We conducted a double-blinded, randomized, placebo-controlled trial. Patients with a PBC and BMD t score of less than -1.5 were randomized to receive 70 mg per week of alendronate or placebo over 1 year. BMD of the lumbar spine and proximal femur were measured at entry and at 1 year. Changes from baseline in BMD and biochemical measurements of bone turnover were assessed. Thirty-four patients were enrolled. Seventeen patients were randomized to each arm. After 1 year, a significantly larger improvement (P = .005) in spine BMD was observed in the alendronate group (0.09 +/- 0.03 g/cm2 SD from baseline) compared with the placebo group (-0.003 +/- 0.02 g/cm2 SD from baseline). A larger improvement (P = .046) was also observed in the femoral BMD of alendronate patients versus placebo. BMD changes were independent of concomitant estrogen therapy. The rate of adverse effects was similar in both groups. In conclusion, in patients with PBC-related bone loss, alendronate significantly improves BMD compared with placebo. Although in this study oral alendronate appears to be well tolerated in patients with PBC, larger studies are needed to formally evaluate safety.

Protective effect of melatonin and omeprazole against alendronat-induced gastric damage

Alendronate causes serious gastrointestinal adverse effects. We aimed to investigate if free radicals have any role in the damage induced by alendronate and if melatonin or omeprazole is protective against this damage. Rats were administered 20 mg/kg alendronate by gavage for 4 days, either alone or following treatment with melatonin or omeprazole. On the last day, following drug administration, pilor ligation was performed, and 2 hr later rats were killed and stomachs were removed. Gastric acidity and tissue ulcer index values, lipid peroxidation, and myeloperoxidase and glutathione levels, as well as the histologic appearance of the stomach tissues, were determined. Chronic oral administration of alendronate induced significant gastric damage, increasing lipid peroxidation and myeloperoxidase activity, while tissue glutathione levels decreased. Treatment with omeprazole or melatonin prevented this damage as well as the changes in biochemical parameters, and melatonin appeared to be more efficient than omeprazole in protecting the mucosa. Intraperitoneal administration of alendronate did not cause much gastric irritation. Findings of the present study suggest that alendronate induces oxidative gastric damage by a local irritant effect and that melatonin and omeprazole are protective against this damage due to their antioxidant properties.

Protective effect of taurine against alendronate-induced gastric damage in rats

Alendronate (ALD) causes serious gastrointestinal adverse effects. The aim of this study was to investigate whether taurine (TAU), a semi-essential amino acid and an antioxidant, improves the alendronate-induced gastric injury. Rats were administered 20 mg/kg ALD by gavage for 4 days, either alone or following treatment with TAU (50 mg/kg, i.p.). On the last day of treatment, following drug administration, pylorus ligation was performed and 2 h later, rats were killed and stomachs were removed. Gastric acidity and tissue ulcer index values, lipid peroxidation and glutathione (GSH) levels, myeloperoxidase (MPO) activity as well as the histologic appearance of the stomach tissues were determined. Chronic oral administration of ALD induced significant gastric damage, increasing lipid peroxidation, MPO activity and collagen content, as well as decreasing tissue GSH levels. Treatment with TAU prevented the damage and also the changes in biochemical parameters. Findings of the present study suggest that ALD induces oxidative gastric damage by a local irritant effect, and that TAU ameliorates this damage by its antioxidant and/or membrane-stabilizing effects.

Gastroprotective effect of leukotriene receptor blocker montelukast in alendronat-induced lesions of the rat gastric mucosa

Alendronate causes serious gastrointestinal adverse effects. We aimed to investigate if montelukast, a leukotriene receptor antagonist, is protective against this damage. Rats were administered 20 mg/kg alendronate by gavage for 4 days, either alone or following treatment with montelukast (10 mg/kg). On the last day, following drug administration, pilor ligation was performed and 2 h later, rats were killed and stomach, liver and kidney tissues were removed. Gastric acidity, gastric tissue ulcer index values and malondialdehyde (MDA); an end product of lipid peroxidation, and glutathione (GSH) levels; a key antioxidant, as well as myeloperoxidase (MPO) activity; an indirect marker of tissue neutrophil infiltration were determined, and the histologic appearance of the stomach, liver and kidney tissues were studied. Chronic oral administration of alendronate induced significant gastric damage, increasing myeloperoxidase activity and lipid peroxidation, while tissue glutathione levels decreased. Similarly, in the alendronate group MDA levels and MPO activities of liver and kidney tissues were increased and GSH levels were decreased. Treatment with montelukast prevented the damage as well as the changes in biochemical parameters in all tissues studied. Findings of the present study suggest that alendronate is a local irritant that causes inflammation through neutrophil infiltration and oxidative damage in tissues, and that montelukast is protective against this damage by its anti-inflammatory effect.

Octreotide ameliorates alendronate-induced gastric injury

Alendronate causes serious gastrointestinal adverse effects. The aim of this study was to investigate whether octreotide, a synthetic somatostatin analogue, improves the alendronate-induced gastric injury. Rats were administered 20mg/kg alendronate by gavage for 4 days, either alone or following treatment with octreotide (0.1 ng/kg, i.p.). On the last day, following drug administration, pilor ligation was performed and 2h later, rats were killed and stomachs were removed. Gastric acidity and tissue ulcer index values, lipid peroxidation (as assessed by malondialdehyde, MDA) and glutathione (GSH) levels, myeloperoxidase (MPO) activity as well as the histologic appearance of the stomach tissues were determined. Chronic oral administration of alendronate induced significant gastric damage, increasing lipid peroxidation (37.1+/-3.2 nmol/g) and myeloperoxidase activity (57.6+/-3.7 U/g), while tissue glutathione levels (09.+/-0.1 micromol/g) decreased. Treatment with octreotide prevented this damage as well as the changes in biochemical parameters (MDA: 23.4+/-1.3 nmol/g; MPO: 31.68 U/g; GSH: 15.+/-0.1 micromol/g). Findings of the present study suggest that alendronate induces oxidative gastric damage by a local irritant effect, and that octreotide ameliorates this damage by inhibiting neutrophil infiltration and reducing lipid peroxidation. Therefore, its therapeutic role as a "ulcer healing" agent must be further elucidated in alendronate-induced gastric mucosal injury.

Preventing osteoporotic fractures with bisphosphonates: a review of the efficacy and tolerability

Although change in bone mineral density was the outcome most commonly measured in early clinical trials of osteoporosis therapies, it is now understood that the most clinically important outcome is reduction in the risk of fractures. Of currently available osteoporosis therapies, the bisphosphonates have been most thoroughly investigated in studies with fracture risk as the primary outcome. The most widely studied bisphosphonates include etidronate, alendronate and risedronate. Alendronate and risedronate have the most compelling evidence for vertebral and non-vertebral fracture reduction. This review provides a comprehensive overview of the anti-fracture efficacy of bisphosphonates at the spine, hip, and non-vertebral sites.

Oral bisphosphonates and upper gastrointestinal tract problems: what is the evidence?

OBJECTIVE

To review and evaluate the evidence regarding possible associations of bisphosphonate use with upper gastrointestinal (GI) tract adverse events (AEs).

METHODS

We reviewed and summarized published information and abstracts regarding upper GI tract safety and tolerability of bisphosphonates, including laboratory and animal studies, epidemiological (observational) studies, endoscopy studies, and randomized controlled trials (RCTs). The evidence was summarized by using the principles of evidence-based medicine, giving the greatest credence to high-quality RCTs.

RESULTS

Clinical reports of esophagitis associated with bisphosphonate use appear to have declined in frequency once the importance of proper administration was explained to physicians after early reports of complications. Conflicting results have been reported in endoscopy studies; some reported no significant increase in upper GI tract lesions, whereas others reported a higher incidence of gastric (but not esophageal) lesions among patients taking oral bisphosphonates. Endoscopy studies that reported differences were of short duration (2 weeks) and were not of double-blind design. Results from large RCTs involving thousands of participants detected no increase in upper GI tract AEs among individuals treated with bisphosphonates. Other studies of patients who discontinued taking bisphosphonates and were randomized to blinded re-treatment with either a bisphosphonate or placebo show that most patients (>85%) were able to continue treatment, with no difference in AEs between the bisphosphonate and placebo groups.

CONCLUSIONS

The highest level of evidence, RCTs, suggests little or no increase in risk of upper GI tract problems if bisphosphonates are administered properly. Upper GI tract symptoms are common among patients with osteoporosis. The evidence suggests that many upper GI tract AEs reported during therapy with bisphosphonates may reflect a high background incidence of upper GI tract complaints and an increased sensitivity to detection rather than a causal relationship to therapy.

Osteoporosis in elderly: prevention and treatment

Osteoporosis is a major clinical problem in older women and men. Almost any bone can fracture as a result of the increased bone fragility of osteoporosis. These fractures are associated with higher health care costs, physical disability, impaired quality of life, and increased mortality. Because the incidence of osteoporotic fracture increases with advancing age, measures to diagnose and prevent osteoporosis and its complications assume a major public health concern. BMD is a valuable tool to identify patients at risk for fracture, to make therapeutic decisions, and to monitor therapy. Several other modifiable and nonmodifiable risk factors for osteoporosis have also been identified. Treatment of potentially modifiable risk factors along with exercise and calcium and vitamin D supplementation forms an important adjunct to pharmacologic management of osteoporosis. Improved household safety can reduce the risk of falls. Hip protectors have been found to be effective in nursing home population. The pharmacologic options include bisphosphonates, HRT, SERMs and calcitonin. PTH had received FDA advisory committee approval. Alendronate has been approved for treatment of osteoporosis in men, and other treatments for men are under evaluation.

The gastrointestinal tolerability and safety of oral bisphosphonates

Oral bisphosphonates are effective for osteoporosis and other hyperresorptive bone disorders. Although well-tolerated in efficacy trials, some oral aminobisphosphonates have been associated with upper gastrointestinal intolerance and injury in postmarketing experience. Clinical trials often underestimate the rate of adverse events in clinical practice, and ethics prohibit direct evaluation of toxicity in high-risk patients. Accordingly, animal models and endoscopy studies of oral bisphosphonates provide valuable insight. It is unclear whether variation in ulcerogenic potential reflects differences in dosing, formulation or chemical structure. Furthermore, the clinical relevance of endoscopic lesions is uncertain. Ongoing postmarketing review will determine whether differences in endoscopic damage predict tolerability and safety in clinical practice. However, physicians and patients should consider risk factors for oesophageal injury when initiating therapy.

Pharmacotherapy of osteoporosis in postmenopausal women: focus on safety

The therapy of osteoporosis has made enormous strides in the last decade. There is now a range of interventions, each with its pros and cons. Calcium and vitamin D supplementation remain the foundation and have few safety issues. Bisphosphonates are widely used, though gastrointestinal tolerance is a problem with some oral preparations. Intravenous administration may circumvent this, although this introduces the smaller problem of acute phase reactions. The side effect profile of hormone replacement therapy (HRT) is still being delineated after 40 years of use, with substantial new information expected in the next few years. This will clarify its place in the medical management of the menopause. Raloxifene appears to have a superior safety profile to HRT, though its efficacy on bone may be less. While none of these options is suitable for everyone, the range of available therapies does mean that most patients can find an intervention that is effective and acceptable.

Alendronate: an update of its use in osteoporosis

Alendronate (alendronic acid) is a nitrogen-containing bisphosphonate which binds to bone surfaces and inhibits bone resorption by osteoclasts. Oral alendronate 5 or 10 mg/day produces sustained increases in bone mineral density (BMD) in postmenopausal women with or without osteoporosis, in men with primary osteoporosis and in both men and women with or without osteoporosis receiving systemic corticosteroid therapy. Histomorphometric analyses have found that alendronate does not appear to impair bone quality. Alendronate reduced the risk of radiographic vertebral fracture, clinical vertebral fracture or hip fracture by 47 to 56% in postmenopausal women who had > or = 1 existing vertebral fracture and in those with no existing vertebral fractures but who had osteoporosis. In a number of comparative trials in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis, alendronate 10 mg/day was found to be more effective at inducing sustained increases in BMD than intranasal calcitonin, and at least as effective as conjugated estrogens and raloxifene. Alendronate 70 mg administered once weekly and 35 mg twice weekly are as effective at increasing BMD as 10 mg/day in this patient group. In clinical trials, alendronate was generally well tolerated when taken as recommended. Adverse events tended to be transient and associated with the upper GI tract, most commonly including abdominal pain, nausea, dyspepsia, acid regurgitation and musculoskeletal pain. No statistically significant differences between alendronate 10 mg/day and placebo have been found in the incidence of upper GI adverse events in large clinical trials. However, postmarketing surveillance reported a low incidence of adverse events related to the oesophagus. Specific instructions aimed at reducing the risk of upper GI adverse events have been provided by the manufacturer.

CONCLUSIONS

Alendronate is effective and generally well tolerated in the treatment of women or men with primary (including postmenopausal) or corticosteroid-induced osteoporosis and in the prevention of osteoporosis in postmenopausal women. The drug has been associated with upper GI tract adverse events, although the extent to which alendronate is responsible for these events has not been clearly established. Alendronate should be considered a treatment of choice in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis. Alendronate is also a suitable treatment option for primary osteoporosis in men and for corticosteroid-induced osteoporosis in both men and women.

Gastrointestinal Adverse Effects of Bisphosphonates

The bisphosphonate class of drugs are now utilized extensively in the treatment of patients with osteoporosis and Paget's disease. Gastrointestinal (GI) adverse effects, especially those associated with esophageal injury, have been of increasing concern to clinicians. Studies in humans and animals have shown that the mucosal erosion and ulceration seen with bisphosphonates is a result of direct contact with these agents. Numerous endoscopic studies in healthy volunteers and postmenopausal women have also demonstrated the potential of bisphosphonates to cause stomach and duodenal ulcers. However, serious GI adverse events have not been noted in several large efficacy trials. Esophageal injury has for the most part been avoided by appropriate administration instructions, and gastroduodenal injury appears to be an acute phenomenon not associated with significant complications, except in certain high-risk situations, for example in the presence of existing distal esophageal disease or motility disorders, or with concurrent use of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs or anticoagulants. From the standpoint of GI safety, the bisphosphonates are well tolerated and not associated with serious adverse events.

Comparative safety of bone remodeling agents with a focus on osteoporosis therapies

This article reviews the different treatments currently available for osteoporosis and examines the benefits and adverse events that are associated with each. While emphasizing safety considerations, this review summarizes the following treatments for osteoporosis: calcium supplements, fluoride, hormone replacement therapy, raloxifene, bisphosphonates, salmon calcitonin, and calcitriol. Before prescribing any of these agents, the clinician should review the risk/benefit profile of each drug in the context of the individual patient's history, concomitant diseases, concurrent medications, and general physical condition.

Osteoporosis therapies for rheumatoid arthritis patients: minimizing gastrointestinal side effects

OBJECTIVE

This manuscript identifies characteristics that put people with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) at high risk for osteoporosis or gastrointestinal (GI) disturbances. The manuscript then reviews therapies available for osteoporosis in the United States and makes recommendations about choosing therapies that minimize GI adverse effects in RA patients at high risk for such events.

DATA SOURCES

References identified through MEDLINE, abstracts, and prescribing information for individual drugs.

DATA EXTRACTION

Characteristics that predispose patients to osteoporosis and GI problems were identified. Data on individual osteoporosis therapies were assessed by risk-benefit analysis and appropriateness for use in patients at risk for GI disturbances.

DATA SYNTHESIS

High risk of osteoporosis in people with RA is caused by disease activity, medication effects, physical inactivity, and standard risk factors such as postmenopausal status and increased age. Patients with RA are frequently at high GI risk if they are receiving nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs or corticosteroids. Because of the high potential for erosive esophagitis and other upper GI disorders with alendronate, caution is warranted in prescribing alendronate to RA patients with high GI risk. In such patients, estrogen replacement therapy, selective estrogen receptor modulators, or calcitonin should be considered for treatment, and either estrogen replacement therapy or selective estrogen receptor modulators should be considered for osteoporosis prevention.

CONCLUSIONS

Assessment of GI risk is important in patients with RA and osteoporosis. Risk factors should be considered when choosing osteoporosis therapies.

Placebo-controlled, randomized, evaluator-blinded endoscopy study of risedronate vs. aspirin in healthy postmenopausal women

BACKGROUND

Bisphosphonates are effective treatments for osteoporosis. Since some primary amino bisphosphonates are associated with oesophageal injury, we conducted a study of the upper gastrointestinal effects of risedronate, a pyridinyl bisphosphonate.

METHODS

Healthy, postmenopausal women received risedronate 5 mg (n=26), aspirin 2600 mg (n=27), or placebo (n=27) daily for 14 days and underwent endoscopy at baseline, Day 8 and Day 15.

RESULTS

Oesophageal erosions were noted in one subject in the aspirin group, two in the placebo group, and none in the risedronate group, and an ulcer in one aspirin-treated subject. Gastric erosions and ulcers were observed most frequently in the aspirin group. Gastric ulcers were noted in eight subjects in the aspirin group, one in the placebo group, and none in the risedronate group (P=0.010, placebo vs. aspirin; P=0.002, risedronate vs. aspirin). Duodenal erosions and ulcers were observed in the aspirin group only. Gastroduodenal erosion scores of three or more occurred more frequently in the aspirin than in the risedronate and placebo groups (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Risedronate 5 mg was not associated with oesophageal or gastroduodenal ulcers in healthy, postmenopausal women, a population representative of patients who will receive risedronate in the clinical setting.

A randomized controlled trial to assess alendronate-associated injury of the upper gastrointestinal tract

BACKGROUND

Aminobisphosphonates are recommended for postmenopausal osteoporosis but have been associated with injury to the upper gastrointestinal tract.

AIM

To conduct a randomized controlled trial, to assess the endoscopic damage caused by alendronate and its effect on gastric mucosal prostaglandin synthesis.

METHODS

Seventy-six healthy volunteers age 40-60 years, with normal baseline endoscopy were randomly assigned to treatment with: (A) ASA 650 mg q. d.s.; (B) alendronate 10 mg o.d.; or (C) placebo o.d. for 14 days. Mucosal injury scores on day 14 of treatment were reported by a blinded endoscopist. Gastric biopsies were analysed for prostaglandin E2 (PGE2) concentration by radioimmunoassay.

RESULTS

Oesophageal injury did not differ among treatment groups. Gastric ulcers developed in five out of 26 subjects given ASA, two out of 25 given alendronate, and none of 25 given placebo. The mucosal damage scores for the alendronate group exceeded those for the placebo group in the gastric body but not at other sites. Injury scores for ASA exceeded those for placebo in the duodenum, antrum, body, and fundus. The mean change in log10[PGE2] (ng/mg protein) was - 0.07 for placebo, - 0.80 for ASA, and + 0.62 for alendronate (differences not significant).

CONCLUSIONS

Alendronate is associated with injury and ulceration of the gastric mucosa. This effect was not associated with any significant change in gastric mucosal PGE2 levels.

Gastric damage in the rat with nitrogen-containing bisphosphonates depends on pH

BACKGROUND

The use of nitrogen-containing bisphosphonates (N-BPs) has been reported to be associated with gastrointestinal intolerance. The fasted, indomethacin-treated rat provides a model for assessing the gastrointestinal effects of these compounds.

AIMS

The aims of this study were to elucidate the effect of pH on N-BP-induced gastric damage, and to evaluate the structure-activity relationship between N-BP anti-resorptive and gastric effects.

METHODS

Fasted rats were dosed concomitantly with indomethacin (40 mg/kg, subcutaneously) and an N-BP (pamidronate, alendronate, or risedronate at 150 or 300 mg/kg, orally), with the N-BP dosing solutions adjusted to pH 2, 4 or 7. The aminopentane and aminohexane N-BPs (150, 225 or 300 mg/kg, orally) were only tested at pH 4 only.

RESULTS

Nitrogen-containing bisphosphonate-induced gastric damage was pH-dependent, with increased damage at increasing pH.

CONCLUSIONS

Gastric damage potential did not correlate with bone anti-resorptive effects, and the more potent anti-resorptive N-BPs were not necessarily more damaging to the stomach.

Endoscopic comparison of esophageal and gastroduodenal effects of risedronate and alendronate in postmenopausal women

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Bisphosphonates are effective treatment for osteoporosis, but upper gastrointestinal injury associated with some compounds has caused concern. This study compared the incidence of gastric ulcers after treatment with risedronate, a pyridinyl bisphosphonate, and alendronate, a primary amino bisphosphonate. Esophageal and gastroduodenal injury assessed by endoscopy scores was a secondary endpoint.

METHODS

Healthy, postmenopausal women (n = 515) received 5 mg risedronate (n = 255) or 10 mg alendronate (n = 260) for 2 weeks. At baseline and on days 8 and 15, subjects underwent endoscopy and evaluator-blinded assessment of the esophageal, gastric, and duodenal mucosa.

RESULTS

Gastric ulcers were observed during the treatment period in 9 of 221 (4.1%) evaluable subjects in the risedronate group compared with 30 of 227 (13.2%) in the alendronate group (P < 0.001). Mean gastric endoscopy scores for the risedronate group were lower than those for the alendronate group at days 8 and 15 (P </= 0.001). Mean esophageal and duodenal endoscopy scores were similar in the 2 groups at days 8 and 15. Esophageal ulcers were noted in 3 evaluable subjects in the alendronate group, compared with none in the risedronate group, and duodenal ulcers were noted in 1 evaluable subject in the alendronate group and 2 in the risedronate group.

CONCLUSIONS

At doses used for the treatment of osteoporosis, risedronate was associated with a significantly lower incidence of gastric ulcers than alendronate. These findings confirm that bisphosphonates differ in their potential to damage the gastroesophageal mucosa.

Alendronate increases lumbar spine bone mineral density in patients with Crohn's disease

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Low bone mineral density (BMD) is a common complication of Crohn's disease and may lead to increased morbidity and mortality because of fractures. We investigated the effect of treatment with the bisphosphonate alendronate on bone mass and markers of bone remodeling in patients with Crohn's disease.

METHODS

A 12-month double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial examined the effect of a 10-mg daily dose of alendronate. Thirty-two patients with a bone mass T score of -1 of the hip or lumbar spine were studied. The main outcome measure was the difference in the mean percent change in BMD of the lumbar spine measured by dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry. Secondary outcome measures included changes in BMD of the hip and total body and biochemical markers of bone turnover (S-osteocalcin, urine pyridinoline, and urine deoxypyridinoline excretion).

RESULTS

Mean (+/-SEM) BMD of the lumbar spine showed an increase of 4.6% +/- 1.2% in the alendronate group compared with a decrease of 0.9% +/- 1.0% in patients receiving placebo (P < 0.01). BMD of the hip increased by 3.3% +/- 1.5% in the alendronate group compared with a smaller increase of 0.7% +/- 1.1% in the placebo group (P = 0.08). Biochemical markers of bone turnover decreased significantly in the alendronate group (P < 0.001). Alendronate was well tolerated, and there was no difference in adverse events among treatment groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Treatment with alendronate, 10 mg daily, significantly increased BMD in patients with Crohn's disease and was safe and well tolerated.

Synthesis and preclinical pharmacology of 2-(2-aminopyrimidinio) ethylidene-1,1-bisphosphonic acid betaine (ISA-13-1)-a novel bisphosphonate

PURPOSE

To validate our hypothesis that a bisphosphonate (BP) having a nitrogen-containing heterocyclic ring on the side chain, and with no hydroxyl on the geminal carbon would possess increased activity, and better oral bioavailability due to enhanced solubility of its calcium complexes/salts and weaker Ca chelating properties.

METHODS

A novel BP, 2-(2-aminopyrimidinio)ethylidene-1, 1-bisphosphonic acid betaine (ISA-13-1) was synthesized. The physicochemical properties and permeability were studied in vitro. The effects on macrophages, bone resorption (young growing rat model), and tumor-induced osteolysis (Walker carcinosarcoma) were studied in comparison to clinically used BPs.

RESULTS

The solubility of the Ca salt of ISA-13-1 was higher, and the log beta(Ca:BP) stability constant and the affinity to hydroxyapatite were lower than those of alendronate and pamidronate. ISA-13-1 exhibited effects similar to those of alendronate on bone volume, on bone osteolysis, and on macrophages, following delivery by liposomes. ISA-13-1 was shown to have 1.5-1.7 times better oral absorption than the other BPs with no deleterious effects on the tight junctions of intestinal tissue.

CONCLUSIONS

The similar potency to clinically used BPs, the increased oral absorption as well as the lack of effect on tissue tight junction of ISA-13-1 warrant its further consideration as a potential drug for bone diseases.

Alendronate gastric ulcers

BACKGROUND

It appears likely that drugs other than NSAIDs may cause ulcers and ulcer complications (e.g. potassium chloride). Alendronate (Fosamax) is used in the treatment and prevention of metabolic bone disease and has also been associated with severe oesophageal damage and stricture. We have previously shown that the dose of alendronate used for Paget's disease (40 mg) causes gastric damage similar to NSAIDs. The usual dose for the treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis is 10 mg per day.

AIM

To investigate whether the 10 mg dose of alendronate causes gastric ulcers.

METHODS

We performed an endoscopist-blind, crossover, randomized, single-centre comparison of 10 mg of alendronate/day and placebo in volunteers aged 40 years or more. Video-endoscopy was used to evaluate the presence and degree of mucosal damage to the oesophagus, stomach, or duodenal bulb after 7 and 14 days of treatment.

RESULTS

Twenty-four healthy volunteers participated, including 15 women and nine men, ranging in age from 41 to 52 years. Visible gastric mucosal damage was present in nine (38%) who received alendronate compared to three (13%) in the placebo group. There was a marked difference in the severity of mucosal damage; there were no ulcers or large erosions in those receiving placebo. In contrast, potentially clinically significant gastric mucosal injury was seen in six subjects receiving alendronate (two developed antral ulcers and four had large (4-8 mm) superficial antral erosions) compared to none in the placebo group (P = 0.0219). One subject developed oesophageal damage in the form of multiple linear superficial erosions in the mid and distal oesophagus. Duodenal injury was not seen.

CONCLUSION

Alendronate causes gastric ulceration, suggesting that alendronate use may be associated with ulcer complications such as acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding. The results of this study suggest the need for post-marketing surveillance to clarify the nature, frequency and magnitude of any potential gastrointestinal side-effects associated with the use of this drug.

Alendronate induces antinociception in mice, not related with its effects in bone

The antinociceptive effect of alendronate was studied. The bisphosphonate was i.p. administered and two tests were carried out: acetic acid in mice and formalin test in rats. In the acetic acid test, alendronate induced a dose-dependent antinociceptive effect that was statistically significant for the doses of 10, 20 and 40 mg/kg, and could be detected 48 hr after its administration. In the formalin test, however, alendronate, at the doses of 10 and 20 mg/kg, did not modify the pain score nor the number of flinches, when it was administered either 30 or 60 min before the test. However it must be noted that doses inducing analgesic effect are close to those inducing toxicity.