1
|
Ivashkin VT, Maev IV, Trukhmanov AS, Lapina TL, Storonova OA, Zayratyants OV, Dronova OB, Kucheryavyy YA, Pirogov SS, Sayfutdinov RG, Uspenskiy YP, Sheptulin AA, Andreev DN, Rumyantseva DE. Recommendations of the Russian Gastroenterological Association in Diagnosis and Treatment of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2020. [DOI: 10.22416/1382-4376-2020-30-4-70-97] [Citation(s) in RCA: 39] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- V. T. Ivashkin
- Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University)
| | - I. V. Maev
- Moscow State University of Medicine and Dentistry
| | - A. S. Trukhmanov
- Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University)
| | - T. L. Lapina
- Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University)
| | - O. A. Storonova
- Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University)
| | | | | | | | - S. S. Pirogov
- Herzen Moscow Oncology Research Center — Branch of the National Medical Research Radiology Center
| | - R. G. Sayfutdinov
- Kazan State Medical Academy — Branch of the Russian Medical Academy of Continuous Professional Education
| | | | - A. A. Sheptulin
- Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University)
| | | | - D. E. Rumyantseva
- Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University)
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Miwa H, Igarashi A, Teng L, Uda A, Deguchi H, Tango T. Systematic review with network meta-analysis: indirect comparison of the efficacy of vonoprazan and proton-pump inhibitors for maintenance treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease. J Gastroenterol 2019; 54:718-729. [PMID: 30919071 PMCID: PMC6647489 DOI: 10.1007/s00535-019-01572-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/22/2018] [Accepted: 03/14/2019] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Long-term maintenance treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is important to prevent relapse. Proton-pump inhibitors (PPIs) are used for both treatment and maintenance therapy of GERD. Recently, a potassium-competitive acid blocker vonoprazan was launched in Japan. We evaluated the comparative efficacy of vonoprazan and other PPIs for GERD maintenance. METHODS A systematic literature search was performed using MEDLINE and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials. Double-blind randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of PPIs, vonoprazan, and placebo for GERD maintenance published in English or Japanese were selected. Among them, studies conducted at the recommended dose and for the recommended use, and containing information on maintenance rate based on endoscopic assessment, were included. The comparative efficacies of treatments were estimated by performing a Bayesian network meta-analysis, which assessed the consistency assumption. Outcomes were number or rate of patients who maintained remission. RESULTS Of 4001 articles identified, 22 RCTs were eligible for analysis. One study published as an abstract was hand-searched and added. The consistency hypothesis was not rejected for the analysis. The odds ratio of vonoprazan 10 mg to each PPI was 13.92 (95% credible interval [CI] 1.70-114.21) to esomeprazole 10 mg; 5.75 (95% CI 0.59-51.57) to rabeprazole 10 mg; 3.74 (95% CI 0.70-19.99) to lansoprazole 15 mg; and 9.23 (95% CI 1.17-68.72) to omeprazole 10 mg. CONCLUSIONS The efficacy of vonoprazan in GERD maintenance treatment may be higher than that of some PPIs. However, a direct comparison of vonoprazan and PPIs is required to confirm these effects.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hiroto Miwa
- 0000 0000 9142 153Xgrid.272264.7Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Hyogo College of Medicine, 1-1 Mukogawa, Nishinomiya, Hyogo 663-8501 Japan
| | - Ataru Igarashi
- 0000 0001 2151 536Xgrid.26999.3dDepartment of Health Economics and Outcomes Research, Graduate School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, The University of Tokyo, Hongo 7-3-1, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113-0033 Japan
| | - Lida Teng
- 0000 0001 2151 536Xgrid.26999.3dDepartment of Health Economics and Outcomes Research, Graduate School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, The University of Tokyo, Hongo 7-3-1, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113-0033 Japan
| | - Akihito Uda
- 0000 0001 0673 6017grid.419841.1Japan Medical Affairs, Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Ltd, 1-1, Nihonbashi-honcho 2-chome, Chuo-ku, Tokyo 103-8668 Japan
| | - Hisato Deguchi
- 0000 0001 0673 6017grid.419841.1Japan Medical Affairs, Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Ltd, 1-1, Doshomachi 4-chome, Chuo-ku, Osaka 541-0054 Japan
| | - Toshiro Tango
- Center for Medical Statistics, 2-9-6 Higashi Shimbashi, Minato-ku, Tokyo 105-0021 Japan
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Al-Badriyeh D, Alabbadi I, Fahey M, Al-Khal A, Zaidan M. Multi-indication Pharmacotherapeutic Multicriteria Decision Analytic Model for the Comparative Formulary Inclusion of Proton Pump Inhibitors in Qatar. Clin Ther 2016; 38:1158-73. [PMID: 27021610 DOI: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2016.03.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/20/2015] [Revised: 02/17/2016] [Accepted: 02/01/2016] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE The formulary inclusion of proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) in the government hospital health services in Qatar is not comparative or restricted. Requests to include a PPI in the formulary are typically accepted if evidence of efficacy and tolerability is presented. There are no literature reports of a PPI scoring model that is based on comparatively weighted multiple indications and no reports of PPI selection in Qatar or the Middle East. This study aims to compare first-line use of the PPIs that exist in Qatar. The economic effect of the study recommendations was also quantified. METHODS A comparative, evidence-based multicriteria decision analysis (MCDA) model was constructed to follow the multiple indications and pharmacotherapeutic criteria of PPIs. Literature and an expert panel informed the selection criteria of PPIs. Input from the relevant local clinician population steered the relative weighting of selection criteria. Comparatively scored PPIs, exceeding a defined score threshold, were recommended for selection. FINDINGS Weighted model scores were successfully developed, with 95% CI and 5% margin of error. The model comprised 7 main criteria and 38 subcriteria. Main criteria are indication, dosage frequency, treatment duration, best published evidence, available formulations, drug interactions, and pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties. Most weight was achieved for the indications selection criteria. Esomeprazole and rabeprazole were suggested as formulary options, followed by lansoprazole for nonformulary use. The estimated effect of the study recommendations was up to a 15.3% reduction in the annual PPI expenditure. Robustness of study conclusions against variabilities in study inputs was confirmed via sensitivity analyses. IMPLICATIONS The implementation of a locally developed PPI-specific comparative MCDA scoring model, which is multiweighted indication and criteria based, into the Qatari formulary selection practices is a successful evidence-based cost-cutting exercise. Esomeprazole and rabeprazole should be the first-line choice from among the PPIs available at the Qatari government hospital health services.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Ibrahim Alabbadi
- Biopharmaceutics and Clinical Pharmacy Department, Faculty of Pharmacy, The University of Jordan, Amman, Jordan
| | - Michael Fahey
- Clinical Support Services Unit, Hamad Medical Corporation, Doha, Qatar
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Fujishiro M, Higuchi K, Kato M, Kinoshita Y, Iwakiri R, Watanabe T, Takeuchi T, Sugisaki N, Okada Y, Ogawa H, Arakawa T, Fujimoto K. Long-term efficacy and safety of rabeprazole in patients taking low-dose aspirin with a history of peptic ulcers: a phase 2/3, randomized, parallel-group, multicenter, extension clinical trial. J Clin Biochem Nutr 2015; 56:228-39. [PMID: 26060354 PMCID: PMC4454079 DOI: 10.3164/jcbn.15-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/10/2015] [Accepted: 01/26/2015] [Indexed: 12/22/2022] Open
Abstract
A 24-week, double-blind, clinical trial of rabeprazole for the prevention of
recurrent peptic ulcers caused by low-dose aspirin (LDA) has been reported, but
trials for longer than 24 weeks have not been reported. The aim of this study is to
assess the long-term efficacy and safety of rabeprazole for preventing peptic ulcer
recurrence on LDA therapy. Eligible patients had a history of peptic ulcers on
long-term LDA (81 or 100 mg/day) therapy. Patients with no recurrence of
peptic ulcers at the end of the 24-week double-blind phase with rabeprazole (10- or
5-mg once daily) or teprenone (50 mg three times daily) entered the extension
phase. Rabeprazole doses were maintained for a maximum of 76 weeks, including the
double-blind 24-week period and the extension phase period (long-term rabeprazole 10-
and 5-mg groups). Teprenone was randomly switched to rabeprazole 10 or 5 mg for
a maximum of 52 weeks in the extension phase (newly-initiated rabeprazole 10- and
5-mg groups). The full analysis set consisted of 151 and 150 subjects in the
long-term rabeprazole 10- and 5-mg groups, respectively, and the cumulative
recurrence rates of peptic ulcers were 2.2 and 3.7%, respectively. Recurrent
peptic ulcers were not observed in the newly-initiated rabeprazole 10- and 5-mg
groups. No bleeding ulcers were reported. No clinically significant safety findings,
including cardiovascular events, emerged. The use of long-term rabeprazole 10- and
5-mg once daily prevents the recurrence of peptic ulcers in subjects on low-dose
aspirin therapy, and both were well-tolerated.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mitsuhiro Fujishiro
- Department of Endoscopy and Endoscopic Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, 7-3-1 Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113-8655, Japan
| | - Kazuhide Higuchi
- Second Department of Internal Medicine, Osaka Medical College, 2-7 Daigaku-cho, Takatsuki, Osaka 569-8686, Japan
| | - Mototsugu Kato
- Division of Endoscopy, Hokkaido University Hospital, Nishi 5-chome, Kita 14-jou, Kita-ku, Sapporo, Hokkaido 060-8648, Japan
| | - Yoshikazu Kinoshita
- Department of Internal Medicine II, Faculty of Medicine, Shimane University, 89-1 Enya-cho, Izumo, Shimane 693-8501, Japan
| | - Ryuichi Iwakiri
- Department of Internal Medicine & Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, Saga Medical School, 5-1-1 Nabeshima, Saga 849-8501, Japan
| | - Toshio Watanabe
- Department of Gastroenterology, Osaka City University Graduate School of Medicine, 1-5-7 Asahi-cho, Abeno-ku, Osaka 545-8586, Japan
| | - Toshihisa Takeuchi
- Second Department of Internal Medicine, Osaka Medical College, 2-7 Daigaku-cho, Takatsuki, Osaka 569-8686, Japan
| | - Nobuyuki Sugisaki
- Clinical Development, Japan/Asia Clinical Research Product Creation Unit, Eisai Product Creation Systems, Eisai Co., Ltd., 4-6-10 Koishikawa, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 112-8088, Japan
| | - Yasushi Okada
- Clinical Research Institute and Cerebrovascular Medicine, National Hospital Organization, Kyushu Medical Center, 1-8-1 Jigyohama, Chuo-ku, Fukuoka 810-8563, Japan
| | - Hisao Ogawa
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kumamoto University, 1-1-1 Honjo, Chuo-ku, Kumamoto 860-8556, Japan ; National Cerebral and Cardiovascular Center, 5-7-1 Fujishiro-dai, Suita, Osaka, 565-8565, Japan
| | - Tetsuo Arakawa
- Department of Gastroenterology, Osaka City University Graduate School of Medicine, 1-5-7 Asahi-cho, Abeno-ku, Osaka 545-8586, Japan
| | - Kazuma Fujimoto
- Department of Internal Medicine, Saga Medical School, 5-1-1 Nabeshima, Saga 849-8501, Japan
| | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Gastroesophageal reflux disease: drug therapy. Rev Assoc Med Bras (1992) 2011. [DOI: 10.1016/s0104-4230(11)70124-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
|
6
|
|
7
|
Kira F, Suzuki T, Suyama Y, Nishimura S, Ogura K. Response to air insufflation in patients with non-erosive gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (NERD). J Int Med Res 2011; 39:215-21. [PMID: 21672324 DOI: 10.1177/147323001103900123] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
This study compared changes in intragastric pressure (IGP) in response to a gastric distension stimulus caused by air insufflation in 25 patients with non-erosive gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (NERD) and 34 healthy volunteers (controls). In four NERD patients, IGP responses were also measured before and after oral treatment with 10 mg rabeprazole daily for 2 weeks. The rate of increase in IGP at the start of insufflation was significantly higher in NERD patients than in controls. The time to appearance of symptoms (i.e. time to threshold) was significantly shorter in NERD patients than in controls. Direct measurement of IGP showed that visceral hypersensitivity and impaired fundal relaxation are both characteristic of NERD. Administration of rabeprazole led to a marked prolonging of time to threshold, indicating that treatment could alleviate this hypersensitivity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- F Kira
- Division of Gastroenterology, Tokyo Metropolitan Police Hospital, Nakano-ku, Tokyo, Japan
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
8
|
Prevention of relapse of healed reflux esophagitis is related to the duration of intragastric pH > 4. J Clin Gastroenterol 2010; 44:475-8. [PMID: 20502348 DOI: 10.1097/mcg.0b013e3181dd9c5b] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/09/2023]
Abstract
Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) are the preferred treatment for maintenance of healed reflux esophagitis (RE). However, little is known regarding the relationship between prevention of RE relapse and degree of gastric acid suppression. The aim of this review was to examine this relationship in further detail. Data from four comparative studies on maintenance PPI therapy for prevention of relapse of RE were combined with data from two pharmacodynamic studies of duration of intragastric pH >4 during the 24-hour period on day 5 of PPI dosing in healthy subjects. A log-linear model was fitted to the data using the method of maximum likelihood. Variability in relapse rates and pH data was taken into account using a binomial and normal likelihood function, respectively. Pharmacodynamic studies resulted in a wide range of acid-suppressive effect, and based on corresponding maintenance of RE healing rates with different PPIs and doses, an inverse (non-linear) statistically significant relationship between percentage of time with pH >4 and maintenance of RE healing was identified (P<0.001). These findings indicate that long-term maintenance of healed RE is related to the extent of acid suppression in a 24-hour period.
Collapse
|
9
|
Donnellan C, Preston C, Moayyedi P, Sharma N. WITHDRAWN: Medical treatments for the maintenance therapy of reflux oesophagitis and endoscopic negative reflux disease. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2010:CD003245. [PMID: 20166065 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd003245.pub3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/23/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GORD) - reflux of stomach contents +/- bile into the oesophagus causing symptoms such as heartburn and acid reflux - is a common relapsing and remitting disease which often requires long-term maintenance therapy. Patients with GORD may have oesophagitis (inflammation of the oesophagus) or a normal endoscopy (endoscopy negative reflux disease or ENRD). OBJECTIVES To assess the effects of continuous maintenance therapy in adults with GORD (both ENRD and healed oesophagitis). SEARCH STRATEGY We searched Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (The Cochrane Library Issue 2, 2003), MEDLINE (1966 to 2003), EMBASE (1980 to 2003), CINAHL (1982-2003), and the National Research Register (Issue 2, 2003) and reference lists of articles. We also contacted manufacturers and researchers in the field. SELECTION CRITERIA Randomised controlled studies comparing PPIs, H2RAs, prokinetics, sucralfate and combinations either in comparison to another treatment regimen or to placebo in adults with reflux oesophagitis and ENRD. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS One author extracted data from included trials and a second author carried out an unblinded check. Two authors independently assessed trial quality. Study authors were contacted for additional information. MAIN RESULTS Maintenance of patients with healed oesophagitis: For a healing dose of PPI (generally the standard dose given by the manufacturer) versus placebo, the relative risk (RR) for oesophagitis relapse was 0.26 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.19 to 0.36); versus H2RAs the RR was 0.36 (95% CI 0.28 to 0.46) and versus maintenance PPIs the RR was 0.63 (95% CI 0.55 to 0.73). However overall adverse effects were also more common and headaches were more common when comparing healing PPIs to H2RAs.For a maintenance dose of PPI (half of the standard dose) versus placebo, the RR for oesophagitis relapse was 0.46 (95% CI 0.38 to 0.57) and versus H2RAs the RR was 0.57 (95% CI 0.47 to 0.69). Overall adverse effects were more common.H2RAs were of marginal help but beneficial for symptomatic relief. Prokinetics and sucralfate were also more effective than placebo.For ENRD patients: Limited data with one RCT showed benefit for omeprazole 10 mg once daily over placebo (RR 0.4; 95% CI 0.29 to 0.53). AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS The findings in this review support the long-term treatment of oesophagitis to prevent relapse, both endoscopically and symptomatically. Healing doses of PPIs are more effective than all other therapies, although there is an increase in overall adverse effects compared to placebo, and headache occurrence compared to H2RAs. H2RAs prevent relapse more effectively than placebo, demonstrating a role for PPI-intolerant patients. Prokinetics and sucralfate both show benefit over placebo, but the former is no longer licenced. There is only limited data for ENRD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Clare Donnellan
- Gastroenterology, University of Leeds, Room 190A, B Floor, Clarendon Wing, LGI, Leeds, West Yorkshire, UK, LS1 3EX
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
10
|
Abstract
BACKGROUND Treatments for Barrett's oesophagus, the precursor lesion of adenocarcinoma, are available but whether these therapies effectively prevent the development of adenocarcinoma, and in some cases eradicate the Barrett's oesophagus segment, remains unclear. OBJECTIVES To summarise, quantify and compare the efficacy of pharmacological, surgical and endoscopic treatments for the eradication of dysplastic and non-dysplastic Barrett's oesophagus and prevention of these states from progression to adenocarcinoma. SEARCH STRATEGY We searched CENTRAL (The Cochrane Library 2004, issue 4), MEDLINE (1966 to June 2008) and EMBASE (1980 to June 2008). SELECTION CRITERIA Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing medical, endoscopic or non-resectional surgical treatments for Barrett's oesophagus. The primary outcome measures were complete eradication of Barrett's and dysplasia at 12 months, and reduction in the number of patients progressing to cancer at five years or latest time point. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS Three authors independently extracted data and assessed the quality of the trials included in the analysis. MAIN RESULTS Sixteen studies, including 1074 patients, were included. The mean number of participants in the studies was small (n = 49; range 8 to 208). Most studies did not report on the primary outcomes. Medical and surgical interventions to reduce symptoms and sequelae of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GORD) did not induce significant eradication of Barrett's oesophagus or dysplasia. Endoscopic therapies (photodynamic therapy (PDT with aminolevulinic acid or porfimer sodium), argon plasma coagulation (APC) and radiofrequency ablation (RFA)) all induced regression of Barrett's oesophagus and dysplasia. The data for photodynamic therapy were heterogeneous with a mean eradication rate of 51% for Barrett's oesophagus and between 56% and 100% for dysplasia, depending on the treatment regimens. The variation in photodynamic therapy eradication rates for dysplasia was dependent on the drug, source and dose of light. Radiofrequency ablation resulted in eradication rates of 82% and 94% for Barrett's oesophagus and dysplasia respectively, compared to a sham treatment. Endoscopic treatments were generally well tolerated, however all were associated with some buried glands, particularly following argon plasma coagulation and photodynamic therapy, as well as photosensitivity and strictures induced by porfimer sodium based photodynamic therapy in particular. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS Despite their failure to eradicate Barrett's oesophagus, the role of medical and surgical interventions to reduce the troubling symptoms and sequelae of GORD is not questioned. Whether therapies for GORD reduce the cancer risk is not yet known. Ablative therapies have an increasing role in the management of dysplasia within Barrett's and current data would favour the use of radiofrequency ablation compared with photodynamic therapy. Radiofrequency ablation has been shown to yield significantly fewer complications than photodynamic therapy and is very efficacious at eradicating both dysplasia and Barrett's itself. However, long-term follow-up data are still needed before radiofrequency ablation can be used in routine clinical care without the need for very careful post-treatment surveillance. More clinical trial data and in particular randomised controlled trials are required to assess whether or not the cancer risk is reduced in routine clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jonathan RE Rees
- Hutchison/MRC Research CentreMRC Cancer Cell UnitHills RoadCambridgeUKCB22 2XZ
| | - Pierre Lao‐Sirieix
- Hutchison/MRC Research CentreMRC Cancer Cell UnitHills RoadCambridgeUKCB22 2XZ
| | - Angela Wong
- Hutchison/MRC Research CentreMRC Cancer Cell UnitHills RoadCambridgeUKCB22 2XZ
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
11
|
Baldwin CM, Keam SJ. Rabeprazole: a review of its use in the management of gastric acid-related diseases in adults. Drugs 2009; 69:1373-401. [PMID: 19583455 DOI: 10.2165/00003495-200969100-00007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
Rabeprazole (Aciphex, Alfence, Pariet) is a proton pump inhibitor (PPI) used for the treatment of adults with conditions requiring a reduction of gastric acid secretion such as erosive or ulcerative gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GORD), non-erosive reflux disease (NERD), duodenal and gastric ulcers, and pathological hypersecretory conditions including Zollinger-Ellison syndrome (ZES). It is also used as part of combination therapy for the eradication of Helicobacter pylori, a pathogen frequently implicated in the development of gastric and duodenal ulcers. Rabeprazole has a well established efficacy and safety profile in the treatment of gastric acid-related diseases. Rabeprazole is a useful, well tolerated and cost-effective option for the treatment of GORD, NERD, peptic ulcer and other gastric acid-related diseases (including ZES), and provides an appropriate alternative to other currently available PPIs, with the added benefits of having a consistent efficacy profile and low drug interaction potential due to its predominantly nonenzymatic metabolism.
Collapse
|
12
|
Pallotta S, Pace F, Marelli S. Rabeprazole: a second-generation proton pump inhibitor in the treatment of acid-related disease. Expert Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol 2008; 2:509-22. [PMID: 19072398 DOI: 10.1586/17474124.2.4.509] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
Rabeprazole is a proton pump inhibitor (PPI) presenting a very advantageous pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic profile over older PPIs. In particular, this drug has a very fast onset of action, due to a short activation time and a very high pKa, and may therefore be defined as a 'second generation' PPI. The aim of this article is to provide an update on the pharmacology and clinical profile of rabeprazole and its use in acid-related disorders, with a particular focus on its role in gastroesophageal reflux disease; in the treatment and prevention of duodenal and gastric ulcers and Zollinger-Ellison syndrome; in the therapy of the extraesophageal manifestations of gastroesophageal reflux disease (in particular the respiratory and ear, nose and throat ones); and in the eradication of Helicobacter pylori.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stefano Pallotta
- University of Milan, Via GB Grassi, 74, 20157 Milano, MI, Italy.
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
13
|
Syed AA, Syeda A. Spectrophotometric determination of certain benzimidazole proton pump inhibitors. Indian J Pharm Sci 2008; 70:507-10. [PMID: 20046782 PMCID: PMC2792556 DOI: 10.4103/0250-474x.44605] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/19/2007] [Revised: 01/17/2008] [Accepted: 08/10/2008] [Indexed: 11/26/2022] Open
Abstract
Spectrophotometric method for the determination of certain proton pump inhibitors belonging to the benzimidazole class of compounds has been developed. The method is based on the reaction of omeprazole, lansoprazole, pantoprazole, rabeprazole and esomeprazole with iron (III) and subsequent reaction with ferricyanide under neutral condition which yields Prussian blue product with maximum absorption at 720–730 nm. The commonly encountered excipients and additives that often accompany pharmaceutical preparations did not interfere with the determination. The method was applied for the determination of omeprazole, lansoprazole, pantoprazole, rabeprazole and esomeprazole in pharmaceutical preparations and no difference was found statistically. Thus, the spectrophotometric method can be applied as inexpensive, rapid, easy, accurate and precise method for the routine analysis of the five proton pump inhibitors in pharmaceutical preparations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A A Syed
- Department of Studies in Chemistry, University of Mysore, Mysore-570 006, India
| | | |
Collapse
|
14
|
Doan QV, Lange SM, Elfant A, Aguilar D, Reyes E, Lynn RB, Dubois RW. Disease-specific cost savings of treating nighttime versus daytime gastroesophageal reflux disease in an employed population. J Med Econ 2008; 11:23-40. [PMID: 19450108 DOI: 10.3111/13696990701815545] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The extent to which proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) can offset direct medical costs by reducing symptoms related to gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) in order to improve work productivity is not well understood. This study aimed to evaluate the economic impact of treating GERD with PPIs versus no treatment, from an employer's perspective. STUDY DESIGN An economic model was developed to simulate symptom reduction and breakthrough symptoms as well as associated costs over 1 year among a population of 100,000 with a 20% GERD prevalence rate. Medical costs, including GERD-related office visits, hospitalisations and procedures, were delineated by symptom severity. Indirect costs represented the monetised work productivity loss. PPI treatment costs $2/day (standard dose). RESULTS The GERD burden was substantial ($62,500,000). Treatment yielded $32,600,000 in savings ($1,630 saved/patient/year), mostly from reducing indirect costs. Treatment produced greater savings among nighttime GERD patients throughout the PPI cost range ($1-$5/day). Savings dropped if the price of standard doses of PPI exceeded $3.92/day for the treatment of daytime GERD patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Quan V Doan
- Cerner LifeSciences, Beverly Hills, CA, USA.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
15
|
Pace F, Annese V, Prada A, Zambelli A, Casalini S, Nardini P, Bianchi Porro G. Rabeprazole is equivalent to omeprazole in the treatment of erosive gastro-oesophageal reflux disease. A randomised, double-blind, comparative study of rabeprazole and omeprazole 20 mg in acute treatment of reflux oesophagitis, followed by a maintenance open-label, low-dose therapy with rabeprazole. Dig Liver Dis 2005; 37:741-50. [PMID: 16024305 DOI: 10.1016/j.dld.2005.04.026] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/25/2005] [Accepted: 04/20/2005] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Previous studies have shown similar effects of rabeprazole and omeprazole, when used at the same dose in the treatment of reflux oesophagitis. However, such studies have been conducted as superiority studies but interpreted as equivalence ones. AIM To properly assess the comparative efficacy of rabeprazole and omeprazole in inducing complete endoscopic healing and symptom relief in patients with reflux oesophagitis. METHODS Patients (n=560) with Savary-Miller grade I-III reflux oesophagitis were randomised in a double-blind, double-dummy fashion to rabeprazole or omeprazole 20 mg once daily for 4-8 weeks. Then, patients endoscopically healed and symptomatically relieved were openly maintained with rabeprazole 10 mg or 2x10 mg once daily (in the event of clinical and/or endoscopic relapse) for a maximum of 48 weeks. RESULTS After 4-8 weeks of treatment, healing (primary end-point) was observed in 228/233 (97.9%) patients in the rabeprazole group and in 231/237 (97.5%) in the omeprazole one (equivalence effect demonstrated by p<0.0001 at Blackwelder test and an upper confidence limit at 97.5% of 0.023). However, rabeprazole was faster in inducing heartburn relief than omeprazole (2.8+/-0.2 versus 4.7+/-0.5 days of therapy to reach the first day with satisfactory heartburn relief, p=0.0045 at log-rank test). In the maintenance phase, 15.2% of patients had an endoscopic and/or clinical relapse. CONCLUSION Rabeprazole is equivalent to omeprazole in healing reflux oesophagitis, but shows a faster activity on reflux symptoms in the early treatment phase.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- F Pace
- Department of Gastroenterology, Luigi Sacco University Hospital, Via G.B. Grassi, 74, 20157 Milan, Italy.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
16
|
Caos A, Breiter J, Perdomo C, Barth J. Long-term prevention of erosive or ulcerative gastro-oesophageal reflux disease relapse with rabeprazole 10 or 20 mg vs. placebo: results of a 5-year study in the United States. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2005; 22:193-202. [PMID: 16091056 DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2036.2005.02555.x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Erosive gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is a chronic condition requiring long-term maintenance treatment. However, few trials of proton pump inhibitors in maintaining healing of erosive or ulcerative GERD are conducted for longer than 1 year. AIM To compare the efficacy and safety of 10- and 20-mg rabeprazole with placebo in the 5-year maintenance of healing in patients previously diagnosed with erosive/ulcerative GERD healed in an acute efficacy trial. METHODS Patients (N = 497) were randomized to receive once-daily doses of 10- or 20-mg rabeprazole or placebo. The primary efficacy measure was endoscopically documented absence of oesophageal erosions or ulcerations. RESULTS After 5 years, relapse rates in both rabeprazole groups were significantly lower than with placebo (rabeprazole 20 mg, 11%; 10 mg, 23%; placebo, 63%; P < 0.001 for rabeprazole vs. placebo; P = 0.005 for rabeprazole 20 mg vs. 10 mg). Both rabeprazole doses were significantly superior to placebo in preventing relapse of heartburn frequency and improving patient quality of life. Analyses of adverse events, biopsy findings and laboratory values showed no evidence of clinically significant effects. CONCLUSIONS Five-year maintenance therapy with rabeprazole is effective in preventing relapse of erosive or ulcerative GERD and is well tolerated.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Caos
- Central Florida Clinical Studies, Ocoee, FL 34761, USA.
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
17
|
Donnellan C, Sharma N, Preston C, Moayyedi P. Medical treatments for the maintenance therapy of reflux oesophagitis and endoscopic negative reflux disease. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2005:CD003245. [PMID: 15846653 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd003245.pub2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 62] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GORD) - reflux of stomach contents +/- bile into the oesophagus causing symptoms such as heartburn and acid reflux - is a common relapsing and remitting disease which often requires long-term maintenance therapy. Patients with GORD may have oesophagitis (inflammation of the oesophagus) or a normal endoscopy (endoscopy negative reflux disease or ENRD). OBJECTIVES To assess the effects of continuous maintenance therapy in adults with GORD (both ENRD and healed oesophagitis). SEARCH STRATEGY We searched Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (The Cochrane Library Issue 2, 2003), MEDLINE (1966 to 2003), EMBASE (1980 to 2003), CINAHL (1982-2003), and the National Research Register (Issue 2, 2003) and reference lists of articles. We also contacted manufacturers and researchers in the field. SELECTION CRITERIA Randomised controlled studies comparing PPIs, H2RAs, prokinetics, sucralfate and combinations either in comparison to another treatment regimen or to placebo in adults with reflux oesophagitis and ENRD. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS One author extracted data from included trials and a second author carried out an unblinded check. Two authors independently assessed trial quality. Study authors were contacted for additional information. MAIN RESULTS Maintenance of patients with healed oesophagitis: For a healing dose of PPI (generally the standard dose given by the manufacturer) versus placebo, the relative risk (RR) for oesophagitis relapse was 0.26 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.19 to 0.36); versus H2RAs the RR was 0.36 (95% CI 0.28 to 0.46) and versus maintenance PPIs the RR was 0.63 (95% CI 0.55 to 0.73). However overall adverse effects were also more common and headaches were more common when comparing healing PPIs to H2RAs. For a maintenance dose of PPI (half of the standard dose) versus placebo, the RR for oesophagitis relapse was 0.46 (95% CI 0.38 to 0.57) and versus H2RAs the RR was 0.57 (95% CI 0.47 to 0.69). Overall adverse effects were more common.H2RAs were of marginal help but beneficial for symptomatic relief. Prokinetics and sucralfate were also more effective than placebo. For ENRD patients: Limited data with one RCT showed benefit for omeprazole 10 mg once daily over placebo (RR 0.4; 95% CI 0.29 to 0.53). AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS The findings in this review support the long-term treatment of oesophagitis to prevent relapse, both endoscopically and symptomatically. Healing doses of PPIs are more effective than all other therapies, although there is an increase in overall adverse effects compared to placebo, and headache occurrence compared to H2RAs. H2RAs prevent relapse more effectively than placebo, demonstrating a role for PPI-intolerant patients. Prokinetics and sucralfate both show benefit over placebo, but the former is no longer licenced. There is only limited data for ENRD.
Collapse
|
18
|
Thjodleifsson B. Review of rabeprazole in the treatment of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease. Expert Opin Pharmacother 2005; 5:137-49. [PMID: 14680443 DOI: 10.1517/14656566.5.1.137] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/25/2023]
Abstract
Gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is an increasing health problem in developed countries and is associated with enormous costs in terms of reduced quality of life, loss of productivity, health expenses and mortality. The gastrointestinal disease with the highest annual direct costs in the US (in the year 2000) was GERD (9.3 billion US dollars). GERD is primarily a motility disorder of the oesophagus, however, there are no available promotility drugs on the market. The main symptoms are heartburn and acid regurgitation arising from the reflux of gastric acid, which is the only factor at present suited for pharmacological intervention. The proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) give optimal benefit in the treatment of GERD. The sales of PPIs in the year 2002 amounted to 12 billion US dollars in North America and 4 billion US dollars in Europe and the sales have been increasing by > 10% annually. This paper reviews the use of PPIs in the treatment of GERD with particular focus on one of the newer agents, rabeprazole.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bjarni Thjodleifsson
- Landspitali University Hospital, Department of Gastroenterology, Hringbraut, Reykjavík, 101 Iceland.
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Ishiki K, Mizuno M, Take S, Nagahara Y, Yoshida T, Yamamoto K, Okada H, Yokota K, Oguma K, Shiratori Y. Helicobacter pylori eradication improves pre-existing reflux esophagitis in patients with duodenal ulcer disease. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2004; 2:474-9. [PMID: 15181615 DOI: 10.1016/s1542-3565(04)00165-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 34] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND & AIMS There has been significant controversy over the relationship between Helicobacter pylori infection and reflux esophagitis. We investigated the effects of eradicating H. pylori on the reflux esophagitis found in patients with peptic ulcers. METHODS Prospective posteradication evaluations were conducted yearly in 162 H. pylori-positive patients who had reflux esophagitis together with peptic ulcer disease (4 women and 158 men, mean age = 49.1 yr). The Los Angeles classification of the patients' esophagitis was: grade A, 90; grade B, 63; and grade C, 9. The follow-up evaluations began 1 to 2 months after completion of the eradication treatment (mean time of follow-up = 22 mo), and consisted of endoscopy and an interview focusing on heartburn. RESULTS Six patients were withdrawn from the study because of adverse drug reactions or a failure to regularly keep their appointments. After eradication therapy, we observed endoscopically that reflux esophagitis had improved in 87 (55.8%) of the 156 patients. The improvement rate was significantly higher in patients cured of infection (60.8%) than in those with persistent H. pylori infection (38.9%) (P = 0.04). Body mass index (odds ratio = 0.86, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.76-0.97), cure of infection (3.68, 95% CI = 1.56-8.69), the absence of a hiatal hernia (3.90, 95% CI = 1.83-8.28), and an ulcer located in the duodenum (2.75, 95% CI = 1.33-5.70) were identified as significant independent factors for the improvement of reflux esophagitis. CONCLUSIONS In patients with reflux esophagitis associated with duodenal ulcer, a significant improvement in pre-existing reflux esophagitis was noted after H. pylori eradication.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kuniharu Ishiki
- Department of Internal Medicine, Nippon Kokan Fukuyama Hospital, Japan
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
20
|
Wurm P, de Caestecker J. Pharmacotherapy for chronic gastro-oesophageal reflux disease and Barrett's oesophagus. Expert Opin Pharmacother 2003; 4:1049-61. [PMID: 12831333 DOI: 10.1517/14656566.4.7.1049] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/13/2023]
Abstract
Over the last two decades there have been major advances in the medical treatment of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GORD) and Barrett's oesophagus. Motility agents, H(2)-receptor antagonists and proton-pump inhibitors (PPI) have all been evaluated in short- and long-term studies. Symptomatic response needs to be differentiated from healing of oesophagitis and maintenance of remission. Clinical trials have convincingly demonstrated the superiority of PPIs to motility agents and H(2)-receptor antagonists for all clinical aspects of GORD. Barrett's oesophagus requires lifelong acid suppression. Treatment with standard doses of PPIs is often insufficient and higher doses are frequently required. Medical treatment does not appear to result in clinically significant regression of Barrett's oesophagus.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Peter Wurm
- Digestive Diseases Centre, Royal Leicester Infirmary, LE1 5WW, UK.
| | | |
Collapse
|
21
|
Abstract
Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is associated with several symptoms, such as heartburn, belching, and regurgitation, which arise from esophageal exposure to gastric acid. Symptoms may occur in the absence of endoscopically observed esophageal mucosal damage and inflammation. These patients represent the majority of those who present with GERD symptoms. Although acid suppression therapy is a logical approach to relieving GERD symptoms, it has been thought to relieve symptoms less reliably in patients with endoscopically negative, or symptomatic GERD than in those with erosive GERD. Two multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trials were conducted in the United States to evaluate the efficacy of rabeprazole sodium 10 mg and 20 mg compared with placebo for the relief of heartburn and other symptoms associated with symptomatic GERD. Results from these studies indicated that rabeprazole 10 or 20 mg once daily relieved heartburn within the first 1 or 2 days of treatment and also had significant positive effects on other GERD symptoms, including regurgitation, belching, bloating, satiety, and nausea. Overall, these results suggest that rabeprazole may hold a significant therapeutic advantage in the treatment of heartburn and other symptoms associated with endoscopically negative GERD, particularly in the majority of patients who often are treated empirically without, or before, endoscopic evaluation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sheldon Sloan
- Department of Medical Affairs, Janssen Pharmaceutica Inc., 1125 Trenton-Harbourton Road, Titusville, NJ 08560-0200, USA
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Miner P, Orr W, Filippone J, Jokubaitis L, Sloan S. Rabeprazole in nonerosive gastroesophageal reflux disease: a randomized placebo-controlled trial. Am J Gastroenterol 2002; 97:1332-9. [PMID: 12094846 DOI: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2002.05769.x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 117] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Clinical results to date suggest that antisecretory therapy may be less effective in providing symptom relief for patients with nonerosive gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) than for patients with erosive disease. This study was carried out to assess the efficacy and rapidity of once-daily rabeprazole (10 mg or 20 mg) in relieving symptoms in endoscopically negative patients with moderately severe GERD symptoms and to evaluate the safety of these doses over 4 wk. METHODS This placebo-controlled, double blind study enrolled 203 men and women with moderately severe symptoms of GERD. After a 2-wk, single-blind placebo run-in phase, patients were randomized to receive 10 mg or 20 mg of rabeprazole or placebo once daily for 4 wk. RESULTS Rabeprazole rapidly and effectively relieved heartburn, with significant improvements on day 1 of dosing. It also improved most other GERD-related symptoms, including regurgitation, belching, bloating, early satiety, and nausea. Both rabeprazole doses were significantly superior to the placebo with respect to time to the first 24-h heartburn-free interval (2.5 and 4.5 days for 10 mg and 20 mg of rabeprazole, respectively, vs 21.5 days for the placebo) and first daytime or nighttime heartburn-free interval (1.5-3 days for rabeprazole groups vs 12.5-15 days for the placebo), as well as to percentage of time patients were heartburn-free and free of antacid use. Both rabeprazole doses were well tolerated. CONCLUSIONS Based on these findings and prior studies, rabeprazole reliably relieves GI symptoms equally well in both nonerosive GERD and erosive GERD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Philip Miner
- Oklahoma Foundation for Digestive Research, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, USA
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
23
|
Abstract
UNLABELLED Rabeprazole is an inhibitor of the gastric proton pump. It causes dose-dependent inhibition of acid secretion. In 8-week studies, among patients with gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GORD), rabeprazole 20 mg/day or 10mg twice daily was as effective as omeprazole and superior to ranitidine in the healing of GORD. Symptom relief with rabeprazole was superior to that provided by placebo and ranitidine and similar to omeprazole. In long-term trials rabeprazole 10 mg/day was similar to omeprazole 20 mg/day in a 2-year study and superior to placebo in 1-year studies, in both the maintenance of healing and prevention of symptoms in patients with healed GORD. In nonerosive GORD, 4-week studies have shown rabeprazole to be more effective than placebo in relieving heartburn and various other gastrointestinal symptoms. Data among patients with Barrett's oesophagus suggest rabeprazole 20 mg/day may be more effective than placebo in maintaining healing of associated oesophagitis after 1 year of treatment. One-week triple Helicobacter pylori eradication therapy with rabeprazole plus clarithromycin and amoxicillin achieved eradication rates of > or =85%. Rabeprazole is as effective as omeprazole and lansoprazole when included as part of a triple-therapy regimen for the eradication of H. pylori. Eradication rates of >90% were achieved when rabeprazole 20 to 40 mg/day was included as part of a quadruple eradication regimen. As monotherapy for peptic ulcer healing and symptom relief, 4- to 8-week studies have shown rabeprazole 10 to 40 mg/day to be superior to placebo and ranitidine and have similar efficacy to omeprazole. Preliminary 1-year data among 16 patients with Zollinger-Ellison syndrome suggest rabeprazole 60 to 120 mg/day can resolve and prevent the recurrence of symptoms and endoscopic lesions associated with this condition. In clinical trials of up to 2 years' duration the tolerability of rabeprazole is similar to that of placebo, ranitidine and omeprazole. Common adverse events assigned to rabeprazole have been diarrhoea, headache, rhinitis, nausea, pharyngitis and abdominal pain. Histological changes and increases in serum gastrin levels were unremarkable and typical of proton pump inhibitors. No dosage adjustment is necessary in renal and mild to moderate hepatic impairment. CONCLUSION Rabeprazole is a well tolerated proton pump inhibitor. It has proven efficacy in healing, symptom relief and prevention of relapse of peptic ulcers and GORD and can form part of effective H. pylori eradication regimens. It is an important alternative to H(2) antagonists and an additional treatment option to other proton pump inhibitors in the management of acid-related disorders.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C I Carswell
- Adis International Limited, Auckland, New Zealand.
| | | |
Collapse
|
24
|
Marzo M, Alonso P, Bonfill X, Fernández M, Ferrandiz J, Martínez G, Mearín F, Mascort JJ, Piqué JM, Ponce J, Sáez M. [Clinical practice guideline on the management of patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD)]. GASTROENTEROLOGIA Y HEPATOLOGIA 2002; 25:85-110. [PMID: 11841764 DOI: 10.1016/s0210-5705(02)70245-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- M Marzo
- Centro Cochrane Iberoamericano, Casa de la Convalecencia, Sant Antoni, Barcelona Spain
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
25
|
Alves de Freitas J. Effectiveness and Tolerability of Rabeprazole 20mg as Once-Daily Monotherapy in Treatment of Erosive or Ulcerative Gastro-Oesophageal Reflux Disease. Clin Drug Investig 2002. [DOI: 10.2165/00044011-200222050-00002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
|