Lack of prognostic usefulness of hepatic venous pressures and hemodynamic values in a select group of patients with severe alcoholic cirrhosis

Global prevalence, incidence, and outcomes of alcohol related liver diseases: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Alcohol related liver disease (ARLD) is one of the major chronic liver diseases worldwide. This review aimed to describe the global prevalence, incidence, and outcomes of ARLD.

METHODS

Medline, Embase, The Cochrane Library, and China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI) were searched from inception to May 31, 2022. The language was restricted to English or Chinese. According to the criteria, articles describing the basic characteristics of the population were selected. Two reviewers extracted the data independently.

RESULTS

A total of 372 studies were identified: 353 were used for prevalence analysis, 7 were used for incidence analysis, and 114 were used to for outcome analysis. The prevalence of ARLD worldwide was 4.8%. The prevalence in males was 2.9%, which was higher than female (0.5%). Among the ethnic groups, the percentage was highest in Caucasians (68.9%). Alcoholic liver cirrhosis comprised the highest proportion in the disease spectrum of ARLD at 32.9%. The prevalence of ascites in ARLD population was highest (25.1%). The ARLD population who drinking for > 20 years accounted for 54.8%, and the average daily alcohol intake was 146.6 g/d. About 59.5% of ARLD patients were current or former smokers, and 18.7% were complicated with hepatitis virus infection. The incidence was 0.208/1000 person-years. The overall mortality was 23.9%, and the liver-related mortality was 21.6%.

CONCLUSION

The global prevalence of ARLD was 4.8% and was affected by sex, region, drinking years, and other factors. Therefore, removing the factors causing a high disease prevalence is an urgent requisite.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

PROSPERO Nr: CRD42021286192.

Use of portal pressure studies in the management of variceal haemorrhage

Portal hypertension occurs as a complication of liver cirrhosis and complications such as variceal bleeding lead to significant demands on resources. Endoscopy is the gold standard method for screening cirrhotic patients however universal endoscopic screening may mean a lot of unnecessary procedures as the presence of oesophageal varices is variable hence a large time and cost burden on endoscopy units to carry out both screening and subsequent follow up of variceal bleeds. A less invasive method to identify those at high risk of bleeding would allow earlier prophylactic measures to be applied. Hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG) is an acceptable indirect measurement of portal hypertension and predictor of the complications of portal hypertension in adult cirrhotics. Varices develop at a HVPG of 10-12 mmHg with the appearance of other complications with HPVG > 12 mmHg. Variceal bleeding does not occur in pressures under 12 mmHg. HPVG > 20 mmHg measured early after admission is a significant prognostic indicator of failure to control bleeding varices, indeed early transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) in such circumstances reduces mortality significantly. HVPG can be used to identify responders to medical therapy. Patients who do not achieve the suggested reduction targets in HVPG have a high risk of rebleeding despite endoscopic ligation and may not derive significant overall mortality benefit from endoscopic intervention alone, ultimately requiring TIPS or liver transplantation. Early HVPG measurements following a variceal bleed can help to identify those at risk of treatment failure who may benefit from early intervention with TIPS. Therefore, we suggest using HVPG measurement as the investigation of choice in those with confirmed cirrhosis in place of endoscopy for intitial variceal screening and, where indicated, a trial of B-blockade, either intravenously during the initial pressure study with assessment of response or oral therapy with repeat HVPG six weeks later. In those with elevated pressures, primary medical prophylaxis could be commenced with subsequent close monitoring of HVPG thus negating the need for endoscopy at this point. All patients presenting with variceal haemorrhage should undergo HVPG measurement and those with a gradient greater than 20 mmHg should be considered for early TIPS. By introducing portal pressure studies into a management algorithm for variceal bleeding, the number of endoscopies required for further intervention and follow up can be reduced leading to significant savings in terms of cost and demand on resources.

ASAT/ALAT ratio provides prognostic information independently of Child-Pugh class, gender and age in non-alcoholic cirrhosis

OBJECTIVE

The aspartate amino transferase/alanine amino transferase (ASAT/ALAT) ratio is increased in cirrhosis. Some studies indicate that the ratio may provide prognostic information as well. The purpose of this study was to further elucidate the role of the ASAT/ALAT ratio as a predictor of survival by assessing it together with classical risk factors such as age, gender and Child-Pugh (CP) class in a mixed cohort of patients with cirrhosis.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Eighty-nine patients with alcoholic cirrhosis and 81 patients with non-alcoholic cirrhosis treated at Aker University Hospital between 1999 and 2004 were identified retrospectively. Survival data from these patients per August 2006 were retrieved from the Norwegian Death Registry. Clinical and biochemical data at time of diagnosis were assessed as predictors of survival using the Kaplan-Meier method and Cox regression models.

RESULTS

Median ASAT/ALAT ratio was significantly higher in alcoholic cirrhosis (2.42) as compared with non-alcoholic cirrhosis (1.42). In both groups, a ratio above the median was predictive of poor outcome, p=0.024 and p=0.032, respectively. Other significant predictors of death were CP class (p<0.001), clinical decompensation (p<0.001) and age (p=0.001). Cox regression analyses showed that the ASAT/ALAT ratio was a predictor of death independently of CP class, gender and age in non-alcoholic, but not in alcoholic cirrhosis. The estimated increased hazard (risk of dying) in non-alcoholic cirrhosis was 5% (CI: 1-8%) per 0.10 increase in ASAT/ALAT ratio.

CONCLUSIONS

A high ASAT/ALAT ratio is associated with increased mortality in cirrhosis. In non-alcoholic patients the ratio may provide prognostic information independently of classical risk factors.

Review article: the therapeutic and prognostic benefit of portal pressure reduction in cirrhosis

BACKGROUND

Hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG) measurement is not a routinely used technique, despite its therapeutic and prognostic value.

AIM

To review the role of HVPG from published literature.

METHODS

Systematic literature review.

RESULTS

In acute variceal bleeding, HVPG is prognostic identifying 'difficult to treat' group, which now has defined clinical correlations. In secondary prevention of portal hypertensive bleeding, a reduction to < or = 12 mmHg confers near complete protection against rebleeding. The target of > or = 20% HVPG reduction from baseline needs prospective assessment to test a change of therapy, if no reduction occurs. The acute HVPG response to beta-blockade needs further assessment. In primary prevention, the cost-effectiveness of HVPG measurement is not favourable given the efficacy of medical therapy. In chronic liver disease, wedge hepatic venous pressure (WHVP) is prognostic for survival. Pharmacological reduction in portal pressure decreases complications and improves survival, possibly independent of a concomitant improvement in liver function. This latter requires urgent confirmation as it is clinically very relevant. HVPG monitoring can be used to assess anti-viral therapy particularly in cirrhosis, ergonomically combined with transjugular biopsy.

CONCLUSIONS

The prognostic and therapeutic value of HVPG is established beyond portal hypertensive bleeding for which there are some clinical surrogates. HVPG measurement should now be part of everyday clinical practice.

The transjugular route: the key hole to the liver world

Portal hypertensive complications are major causes of morbidity and mortality in patients with liver cirrhosis. The advent of the transjugular route with its minimal access allows non-surgical management of portal hypertension, therapy of venous complications of liver transplantation, monitoring of therapy for portal hypertension, hepatic venous pressure gradient and is also the major route to treat hepatic venous obstruction syndromes. In addition, the transjugular route is a safe route to perform a liver biopsy (transjugular liver biopsy) and allows retrograde evaluation of the portal vein. All these procedures can be combined in the same session. These hepatic interventional radiological skills should be incorporated into the expertise of the liver team in specialised hepatological centres, particularly in liver transplant centres as they are especially useful in improving outcomes of cirrhotic patients on the liver transplantation waiting list. A limitation in achieving this goal, could be the number of experienced radiologists, but hepatologists can be trained, at least for the most simple procedures (transjugular liver biopsy and hepatic venous pressure gradient). This would allow wider applicability and use of these diagnostic and therapeutic techniques, all through a 2 mm hole in the neck--the key hole to the liver world.

Hepatic vein pressure gradient reduction and prevention of variceal bleeding in cirrhosis: a systematic review

BACKGROUND & AIMS

A reduction of the hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG) to </=12 mm Hg or by >/=20% of baseline prevents variceal bleeding in cirrhosis. Because some inconsistent data have argued against the clinical application of these hemodynamic targets, we performed a systematic review of available studies from the Cochrane Library and MEDLINE.

METHODS

Hemodynamic targets were HVPG reduction (1) to </=12 mm Hg; (2) by >/=20% with final value >12 mm Hg; (3) by >/=20% or to </=12 mm Hg. Meta-regression analysis was used to explore heterogeneity.

RESULTS

Twelve studies were identified including 943 patients. Pooled odds ratios for bleeding for the 3 hemodynamic targets were, respectively, 0.21 (95% CI: 0.10-0.45; P = .0001), 0.25 (95% CI: 0.11-0.56; P = .001), and 0.17 (95% CI: 0.09-0.33; P = .001). A significant heterogeneity was found for the 2 last estimates, and meta-regression analysis showed that this was caused by an exceedingly long interval between HVPG measurements in 1 study. After exclusion of that study, heterogeneity disappeared, and the pooled odds ratios were, respectively, 0.19 (95% CI: 0.11-0.34; P = .0001) and 0.14 (95% CI: 0.09-0.21; P = .0001). The beneficial effect of HVPG reduction for first bleeding was similar to that for recurrent bleeding. Mortality was significantly reduced for HVPG reduction by >/=20% or to </=12 mm Hg (pooled odds ratio, 0.39; 95% CI: 0.19-0.81, P = .012).

CONCLUSIONS

HVPG reduction to </=12 mm Hg or by >/=20% significantly reduces the risk of bleeding, and a reduction of >/=20% significantly reduces mortality. These hemodynamic targets should be considered for clinical practice and for randomized controlled trials.

[Invasive diagnosis of portal hypertension in cirrhosis: a critical evaluation of the hepatic venous pressure gradient measurement]

Portal hypertension is defined by an increased pressure gradient between the portal vein and the inferior vena cava (N < 5 mmHg). The most commonly used technique to assess the severity of portal hypertension is the catheterization of one hepatic vein with measurement of pressures in a free position and in a wedged position using preferably a balloon catheter. The hepatic venous pressure gradient is calculated by the difference between both pressures. In most cirrhotic processes, venous pressure gradient gives a good evaluation of portal hypertension however, portal vein pressure can be higher than wedged hepatic venous pressure, particularly in presence of an increased pre-sinusoidal resistance. In such cases, a direct access to portal vein might be needed to assess the severity of portal hypertension. For an accurate interpretation of the hepatic venous pressure gradient, several strict criteria must be followed; otherwise the validity of measurements might be seriously questioned. Hepatic venous pressure gradient has been used as a prognostic marker of portal hypertension, particularly for the occurrence of bleeding from gastrophageal varices which almost never occur below a threshold value of 12 mmHg. However, the prognostic value of the hepatic venous pressure gradient for survival is still a controversial matter On the other hand, the use of hepatic venous pressure gradient has been proposed to monitor the pharmacological treatment of portal hypertension and it is generally accepted that reaching a same threshold value of 12 mmHg should almost completely abolish the risk of first or recurrent variceal bleeding. A large number of studies have also reported that a 20% hepatic venous pressure gradient decrease should be considered as a significant response to therapy, the risk of the first or recurrent bleeding being significantly reduced in responders. But again there are conflicting results.

Alcohol and the liver

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To highlight salient recent discoveries and results of clinical trials in alcoholic liver disease (ALD). The burden of care for ALD patients is hefty and the prevalence of alcohol abuse may be increasing in both the developed and the underdeveloped world.

RECENT FINDINGS

Molecular mechanisms of alcoholism are being identified but not of the predisposition to alcoholic liver injury, except perhaps for polymorphism of a cytotoxic T-cell antigen. The Mayo End-stage Liver Disease (MELD) score performs well in assessing the prognosis of ALD; serological biomarkers for predicting ALD outcome are of uncertain value. Concomitant liver disease (e.g., obesity, hepatitis C, and iron overload) aggravates the severity of ALD; conversely, alcohol abuse may be a cryptic co-factor in some cases of non-alcoholic fatty liver. For alcoholic hepatitis, nutritional support is the mainstay of treatment; steroids are considered by some (but not all) as safe and effective therapy, whereas manipulations of tumor necrosis factor-alpha activity have been disappointing, or of unproven benefit at best. In liver transplantation for ALD, methods are being devised to monitor recidivism and to ameliorate its risk and that of co-morbid psychiatric conditions.

SUMMARY

Much of the pathogenesis of ALD has been identified and headway has been made in predicting its prognosis. However, much remains to be done to elucidate the molecular genetics of the risk of developing ALD and in formulating safe, effective therapies for alcoholic hepatitis.

Serum albumin and platelet count but not portal pressure are predictive of death in patients with Child-Pugh A hepatitis C virus-related cirrhosis

AIM

The presence of esophageal varices has been reported to be a prognostic factor in patients with compensated hepatitis viral C induced cirrhosis. We studied the prognostic value of hepatic venous pressure gradient in addition to epidemiological and clinical parameters in these patients.

METHODS

Among patients with Child-Pugh A hepatitis C induced cirrhosis, prospectively followed in two Parisian centres, 100 had measurement of occluded and free hepatic venous pressures. We evaluated hepatic venous pressures as a predictive factor of death by Cox models (survival) and Fine and Gray models (liver-deaths).

RESULTS

Median hepatic occluded pressure and gradient were 21.5 (15-24) and 13 mm Hg (9-15), respectively. The median duration of follow-up was 85 months (range: 70-112); 38 deaths or liver transplantation were registered. Hepatic venous pressure gradient was not significantly related to survival in the studied population but as a continuous variable was predictive of death from liver disease. On multivariable analysis serum albumin <40 g/L and platelet count <90,000 /mm(3) were the only selected prognostic factors.

CONCLUSION

Hepatic venous pressure gradient has a limited value for assessing the prognosis of patients with Child-Pugh A hepatitis C virus induced cirrhosis; prognosis is accurately predicted by serum albumin and platelet count.