Neodymium:yttrium-aluminum garnet contact laser ablation of Barrett's high grade dysplasia and early adenocarcinoma

Spatial distribution of dysplasia in Barrett's esophagus segments before and after endoscopic ablation therapy: a meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Dysplasia in Barrett's esophagus (BE) is focal and difficult to locate. The aim of this meta-analysis was to understand the spatial distribution of dysplasia in BE before and after endoscopic ablation therapy.

METHODS

A systematic search was performed of multiple databases to July 2019. The location of dysplasia prior to ablation was determined using a clock-face orientation (right or left half of the esophagus). The location of the dysplasia post-ablation was classified as within the tubular esophagus or at the top of the gastric folds (TGF).

RESULTS

13 studies with 2234 patients were analyzed. Pooled analysis from six studies (819 lesions in 802 patients) showed that before ablation, dysplasia was more commonly located in the right half versus the left half (odds ratio [OR] 4.3; 95 % confidence interval [CI] 2.33 - 7.93; P < 0.001). Pooled analysis from seven studies showed that dysplasia after ablation recurred in 101 /1432 patients (7.05 %; 95 %CI 5.7 % - 8.4 %). Recurrence of dysplasia was located more commonly at the TGF (n = 68) than in the tubular esophagus (n = 34; OR 5.33; 95 %CI 1.75 - 16.21; P = 0.003). Of the esophageal lesions, 90 % (27 /30) were visible, whereas only 46 % (23 /50) of the recurrent dysplastic lesions at the TGF were visible (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Before ablation, dysplasia in BE is found more frequently in the right half of the esophagus versus the left. Post-ablation recurrence is more commonly found in the TGF and is non-visible, compared with the tubular esophagus, which is mainly visible.

In situ vaccination with laser interstitial thermal therapy augments immunotherapy in malignant gliomas

INTRODUCTION

Laser interstitial thermal therapy (LITT) remains a promising advance in the treatment of primary central nervous system malignancies. As indications for its use continue to expand, there has been growing interest in its ability to induce prolonged blood brain barrier (BBB) permeability through hyperthermia, potentially increasing the effectiveness of current therapeutics including BBB-impermeant agents and immunotherapy platforms.

METHODS

In this review, we highlight the mechanism of hyperthermic BBB disruption and LITT-induced immunogenic cell death in preclinical models and humans. Additionally, we summarize ongoing clinical trials evaluating a combination approach of LITT and immunotherapy, which will likely serve as the basis for future neuro-oncologic treatment paradigms.

RESULTS

There is evidence to suggest a highly immunogenic response to laser interstitial thermal therapy through activation of both the innate and adaptive immune response. These mechanisms have been shown to potentiate standard methods of oncologic care. There are only a limited number of clinical trials are ongoing to evaluate the utility of LITT in combination with immunotherapy.

CONCLUSION

LITT continues to be studied as a possible technique to bridge the gap between exciting preclinical results and the limited successes seen in the field of neuro-oncology. Preliminary data suggests a substantial benefit for use of LITT as a combination therapy in several clinical trials. Further investigation is required to determine whether or not this treatment paradigm can translate into long-term durable results for primary intracranial malignancies.

Therapeutic endoscopy and endoscopic ultrasound for gastrointestinal malignancies

Gastrointestinal endoscopy and endoscopic ultrasound not only provide strategies to diagnose and stage malignancy, but also to administer palliative and definitive care. Options for anticancer therapy include endoscopic mucosal resection, photodynamic therapy, thermal therapy, self-expanding metal stents and recently, endoscopic ultrasound-guided therapy, such as intratumoral injection. This review summarizes the available endoscopic techniques with a discussion of indications and recent clinical data pertaining to gastrointestinal malignancy. This review will inform the reader of emerging treatment options and stress the importance of incorporating gastroenterologists into the multidisciplinary approach in the management of gastrointestinal cancers.

Endoscopic management of Barrett's esophagus: advances in endoscopic techniques

Barrett's esophagus (BE) is a well-known premalignant condition that can be associated with the development of dysplasia and adenocarcinoma. In the past, esophagectomy was the standard treatment for patients with BE with high grade dysplasia (HGD) and early cancer (EC). However, esophagectomy is not necessarily the only treatment response to HGD and EC anymore. Over the past decade, a number of endoscopic therapies have been developed for management of BE. These include endoscopic mucosal resection, thermal ablation techniques that use laser irradiation, multipolar electrocoagulation, argon plasma coagulation, photodynamic therapy, and the recently developed cryotherapy and radiofrequency ablation.

Diode laser treatment of Barrett's esophagus: long-term results

Different ablation techniques have been utilized in the treatment of Barrett's esophagus (BE) to reduce the risk of degeneration. Treatment complications, risk of recurrence, and buried intestinal metaplasia (IM) are all major concerns. The effect of diode laser treatment on BE, studied in a group of patients over a long-term period, is presented here. All patients with histology of IM or low-grade dysplasia (LGD) treated with diode laser therapy for BE and followed for at least 24 months were included in the study. Treatment sessions were carried out every 3 months and bioptic follow-up examinations were done yearly. Patients without antireflux surgery received proton pump inhibitors. A total of 20 patients with IM, four of them with LGD, were treated with 161 laser sessions (in mean eight per patient) without complications. Complete, sustained endoscopic and histologic remission was obtained in 13 patients (11/12 with BE ≤ 3 cm and 2/8 with BE >3 cm, p < 0.01) and a mean of 83 ± 27% of the metaplasic tissue was removed in all the patients. All four cases of LGD healed to squamous tissue. No buried metaplasia, recurrences, or disease progressions were reported after a mean follow-up of 6 years and 2 months. Diode laser ablation is a safe and effective method in most cases of short BE, while it is less effective in the long form, requiring a large number of sessions. Long-term results show that the risk of recurrence and of buried intestinal metaplasia underneath neosquamous epithelium is negligible.

Treatment for Barrett's oesophagus

BACKGROUND

Treatments for Barrett's oesophagus, the precursor lesion of adenocarcinoma, are available but whether these therapies effectively prevent the development of adenocarcinoma, and in some cases eradicate the Barrett's oesophagus segment, remains unclear.

OBJECTIVES

To summarise, quantify and compare the efficacy of pharmacological, surgical and endoscopic treatments for the eradication of dysplastic and non-dysplastic Barrett's oesophagus and prevention of these states from progression to adenocarcinoma.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched CENTRAL (The Cochrane Library 2004, issue 4), MEDLINE (1966 to June 2008) and EMBASE (1980 to June 2008).

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing medical, endoscopic or non-resectional surgical treatments for Barrett's oesophagus. The primary outcome measures were complete eradication of Barrett's and dysplasia at 12 months, and reduction in the number of patients progressing to cancer at five years or latest time point.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Three authors independently extracted data and assessed the quality of the trials included in the analysis.

MAIN RESULTS

Sixteen studies, including 1074 patients, were included. The mean number of participants in the studies was small (n = 49; range 8 to 208). Most studies did not report on the primary outcomes. Medical and surgical interventions to reduce symptoms and sequelae of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GORD) did not induce significant eradication of Barrett's oesophagus or dysplasia. Endoscopic therapies (photodynamic therapy (PDT with aminolevulinic acid or porfimer sodium), argon plasma coagulation (APC) and radiofrequency ablation (RFA)) all induced regression of Barrett's oesophagus and dysplasia. The data for photodynamic therapy were heterogeneous with a mean eradication rate of 51% for Barrett's oesophagus and between 56% and 100% for dysplasia, depending on the treatment regimens. The variation in photodynamic therapy eradication rates for dysplasia was dependent on the drug, source and dose of light. Radiofrequency ablation resulted in eradication rates of 82% and 94% for Barrett's oesophagus and dysplasia respectively, compared to a sham treatment. Endoscopic treatments were generally well tolerated, however all were associated with some buried glands, particularly following argon plasma coagulation and photodynamic therapy, as well as photosensitivity and strictures induced by porfimer sodium based photodynamic therapy in particular.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Despite their failure to eradicate Barrett's oesophagus, the role of medical and surgical interventions to reduce the troubling symptoms and sequelae of GORD is not questioned. Whether therapies for GORD reduce the cancer risk is not yet known. Ablative therapies have an increasing role in the management of dysplasia within Barrett's and current data would favour the use of radiofrequency ablation compared with photodynamic therapy. Radiofrequency ablation has been shown to yield significantly fewer complications than photodynamic therapy and is very efficacious at eradicating both dysplasia and Barrett's itself. However, long-term follow-up data are still needed before radiofrequency ablation can be used in routine clinical care without the need for very careful post-treatment surveillance. More clinical trial data and in particular randomised controlled trials are required to assess whether or not the cancer risk is reduced in routine clinical practice.

The role of photodynamic therapy in the esophagus

Photodynamic therapy (PDT) is a drug and device therapy using photosensitizer drugs activated by laser light for mucosal ablation. Porfimer sodium PDT has been used extensively with proven long-term efficacy and durability for the ablation of Barrett esophagus and high-grade dysplasia. and early esophageal adenocarcinoma. However, continued use is hampered by an associated stricture risk and prolonged photosensitivity (4-6 weeks). Promising single-center European studies using other forms of PDT, such as aminolevulinic acid PDT, have not been replicated elsewhere, limiting the widespread use of other forms of PDT. Future use of PDT in esophageal disease depends on the development of improved dosimetry and patient selection to optimize treatment outcomes, while minimizing adverse events and complications.

Endoluminal therapy for esophageal disease: an introduction

This introductory article summarizes decades of research from many dedicated gastrointestinal endoscopists. It provides a background to Barrett esophagus (BE), exploring the risk of progression to dysplasia and esophageal adenocarcinoma. Two premalignant conditions, BE and colon adenoma, are compared, including their progression to esophageal adenocarcinoma and colon and rectal carcinoma, respectively. A comparison of the risks of surgical treatment and post-surgical complications of these cancers and of the strikingly different paradigms for their prevention is presented. The article concludes with the rationale for endoscopic treatment of Barrett disease.

Pilot study on light dosimetry variables for photodynamic therapy of Barrett's esophagus with high-grade dysplasia

PURPOSE

Photodynamic therapy (PDT) is used to treat Barrett's esophagus with high-grade dysplasia and mucosal carcinoma. Outcomes are variable with some patients having persistent disease, whereas others develop strictures. The aims of this study were (a) to compare porfimer sodium tissue uptake, light dose, and esophageal thickness with clinical outcomes and (b) to determine the selectivity of porfimer sodium uptake in diseased and normal epithelium.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

Forty-eight hours after porfimer sodium infusion, patients underwent mucosal biopsy for quantification of the porfimer sodium. Laser light was delivered at 48 hours and again 24 or 48 hours later. Porfimer sodium was extracted from the biopsy samples and quantified using fluorescence spectroscopy. The enhanced photodynamic dose was determined as [porfimer sodium content * light dose/esophageal thickness]. PDT efficacy was determined 6 to 8 weeks later based on persistence or complete ablation of dysplasia or carcinoma.

RESULTS

Mean porfimer sodium content of 6.2 mg/kg (range, 2.6-11.2 mg/kg) and mean total light dose of 278 J/cm (range, 225-360 J/cm) resulted in a complete treatment. Mean porfimer sodium tissue content of 3.9 mg/kg (range, 2.1-8.1 mg/kg) and mean total light dose of 268 J/cm (range, 250-350 J/cm) resulted in an incomplete treatment. The total esophageal thickness (range, 1.7-6.0 mm) and enhanced photodynamic dose were correlated with treatment outcome.

CONCLUSIONS

Esophageal thickness is the strongest predictor of treatment outcome. The porfimer sodium content of Barrett's and normal tissue is not significantly different. "Photodynamic dose" for esophageal PDT should incorporate the esophageal thickness.

Endoscopic mucosal resection in the upper gastrointestinal tract

Endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) is a technique used to locally excise lesions confined to the mucosa. Its main role is the treatment of advanced dysplasia and early gastrointestinal cancers. EMR was originally described as a therapy for early gastric cancer. Recently its use has expanded as a therapeutic option for ampullary masses, colorectal cancer, and large colorectal polyps. In the Western world, the predominant indication for EMR in the upper gastrointestinal tract is the staging and treatment of advance dysplasia and early neoplasia in Barrett’s esophagus. This review will describe the basis, indications, techniques, and complications of EMR, and its role in the management of Barrett’s esophagus.

Columnar lined (Barrett's) esophagus: future perspectives

Columnar lined esophagus (CLE) or Barrett's esophagus is the precursor for esophageal adenocarcinoma. Future advances in understanding and management of this condition as well as improving the quality of care of CLE patients depends on answering essential questions. It is important to standardize the criteria for CLE definition. The rapid increase in incidence of CLE and adenocarcinoma raises serious concerns that the current management of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) needs reassessment. The risk factors that determine who will and will not develop CLE are as yet undetermined. There is a need to develop a clinical risk stratification tool, which will help in determining who should be screened. The impact of elimination of GERD on the natural history of CLE is one important area for future research. The benefit of surveillance strategies remains unproven and the ideal endoscopic frequency, protocols and markers of cancer risk are unknown. Dysplasia may not provide the gold standard marker of cancer risk because of some inherited problems. A better technique than the current endoscopic pinch biopsy protocol is needed. To overcome the limitations of histological markers, many other markers of cancer risk needs to be developed and validated. The key question as to whether cancer risk is actually reduced by the new ablation modalities remains unanswered. The natural history of dysplasia and its management needs to be clarified. Although many questions have to be answered, it seems, however, that at least some answers exist, and these and proposals for answering some of these questions are underlined throughout this review.

Five-year efficacy and safety of photodynamic therapy with Photofrin in Barrett's high-grade dysplasia

BACKGROUND

Barrett's esophagus (BE) with high-grade dysplasia (HGD) is a risk factor for development of esophageal carcinoma. Photodynamic therapy (PDT) with Photofrin (PHO) has been used to eliminate HGD in BE.

OBJECTIVE

Our purpose was to compare PHOPDT plus omeprazole with omeprazole only (OM).

DESIGN

Five-year follow-up of a randomized, multicenter, multinational, pathology-blinded HGD trial.

SETTING

30 sites in 4 countries.

PATIENTS

208.

INTERVENTIONS

Patients with BE and HGD were randomized (2:1) to PHOPDT (n=138) or OM (n=70) into a 2-year trial followed up for 3 more years. PHOPDT patients received 2 mg/kg PHO intravenously followed by endoscopic laser light exposure of Barrett's mucosa at a wavelength of 630 nm within 40 to 50 hours to a maximum of 3 courses at least 90 days apart. Both groups received 20 mg of OM twice daily. Pathologists at one center assessed biopsy specimens in a blinded fashion.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENT

HGD ablation status over 5 years of follow-up.

RESULTS

At 5 years PHOPDT was significantly more effective than OM in eliminating HGD (77% [106/138] vs 39% [27/70], P<.0001). A secondary outcome measure preventing progression to cancer showed a significant difference (P=.027) with about half the likelihood of cancer occurring in PHOPDT (21/138 [15%]) compared with OM (20/70 [29%]), with a significantly (P=.004) longer time to progression to cancer favoring PHOPDT.

LIMITATIONS

Not all patients were available for follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

This 5-year randomized trial of BE patients with HGD demonstrates that PHOPDT is a clinically and statistically effective therapy in producing long-term ablation of HGD and reducing the potential impact of cancer compared with OM.

Endoscopic therapy of dysplasia and early-stage cancers of the esophagus

Endoscopic treatments have become a viable alternative for some patients with early-stage esophageal neoplasia. Although esophagectomy remains the standard of care for high-grade dysplasia and superficial cancers, surgical morbidity and mortality may deter patients who are medically unfit or reluctant to undergo surgery. Photodynamic therapy (PDT) and endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) are the best-studied nonsurgical approaches at present. PDT has been reported to eradicate high-grade dysplasia (HGD) and early Barrett's cancers at rates ranging from 75% to 100% and 17% to 100%, respectively, and a recent randomized controlled trial confirmed that PDT may prevent progression of HGD to cancer. Complete remission rates greater than 90% have also been reported with EMR and other mucosa-ablating interventions, although recurrence rates necessitate close endoscopic surveillance and retreatment in some patients. In addition to PDT and EMR, several emerging endoscopic treatment options for superficial esophageal neoplasia may provide attractive alternatives to surgery.

Cost-benefit analysis of capsule endoscopy compared with standard upper endoscopy for the detection of Barrett's esophagus

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Esophageal capsule endoscopy (ECE) is a promising new technology for the detection of esophageal pathology. Potential advantages for Barrett's esophagus (BE) screening include ability to return to work as a result of lack of intravenous sedation.

METHODS

We designed a Markov model to compare lifetime costs and life expectancy for a cohort of 50-year old men with chronic GERD for the presence of BE. We compared the base-case strategy of no screening for BE to 2 competing screening strategies: (1) ECE followed by upper endoscopy (EGD) if BE were suspected or if there was poor visualization on the ECE; and (2) standard sedated EGD with biopsy. Cost estimates were obtained from a third-party payer perspective. For each strategy we determined lifetime costs, life-years gained, numbers of esophageal cancers detected, death rates from esophageal cancer, and procedural deaths.

RESULTS

Initial EGD was more expensive but more effective compared with the no screening strategy. Assuming a theoretical cohort of 10,000 patients with GERD, initial EGD cost $1988 and was associated with 18.54 life-years compared with $2392 and 18.36 life-years for the ECE arm and $901 and 18.30 life-years for the no screening arm. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of screening with EGD compared with the no screening arm was $4530 per life-year gained. The model was robust to a wide range of sensitivity analyses.

CONCLUSIONS

Initial EGD appears more effective and less costly compared with ECE under base-case conditions for patients with chronic GERD undergoing screening for BE.

Endoluminal therapy for Barrett's esophagus

This article reviews methods to minimize the complications associated with endoscopic therapy for patients with Barrett's esophagus. To place this discussion in context, the natural history of Barrett's esophagus and the risks associated with progression to dysplasia and invasive carcinoma are reviewed. Operative esophageal resection traditionally is recommended for patients with Barrett's high-grade dysplasia and early carcinoma, and these surgical risks also are reviewed. Finally, all currently approved and commercially available methods for endoscopic ablation and resection of Barrett's disease are categorized according to their application methods of ablation: focal ablation, field ablation, and mucosal resection. The clinical experience with these devices is reviewed with their associated adverse events and complications. Caveats, concerns, and recommendations are discussed to help minimize the complications associated with the use of these important technologies that hold the promise of removing or destroying Barrett's disease to prevent the development of invasive carcinoma.

Endoprevention of esophageal cancer: endoscopic ablation of Barrett's metaplasia and dysplasia

This review describes the use of endoscopic therapy for the treatment of Barrett's disease and the prevention of esophageal carcinoma, predominantly a disease of older white men. While the term endoprevention may be novel, gastroenterologists have been using endoscopic techniques to prevent colon cancer for decades. For the endoprevention of Barrett's carcinoma, the regulatory approval for the use of porfimer sodium photodynamic therapy was an important milestone, as this treatment has been proven to safely ablate Barrett's glandular epithelium, including high-grade dysplasia, and significantly decrease the risk for the development of invasive cancer in several single-center studies, a prospective multicenter randomized controlled study using expert centralized histopathology analysis and long-term single-center results. Newer methods of mucosal ablation, such as the radiofrequency balloon, have been developed for the treatment of patients with Barrett's metaplasia or dysplasia. These newly developed techniques are able to treat large fields of glandular epithelium in a short treatment procedure using safe, effective, durable methods for the complete ablation of Barrett's metaplasia and low-grade dysplasia. These techniques may finally allow the interventional gastrointestinal endoscopist to prevent the development of esophageal carcinoma, just as colonoscopy with polypectomy has prevented colon cancer. However, it will be critically important to document the safety, durability and efficacy of these devices. Ultimately, the impact of successful Barrett's ablation on the incidence of Barrett's carcinoma, and the need for postablation surveillance endoscopy must be determined.

Photodynamic therapy for Barrett's esophagus with high-grade dysplasia

This article describes advances in photodynamic therapy for patients with Barrett's esophagus and high-grade dysplasia-an important, minimally invasive treatment option proven to safely and durably ablate Barrett's dysplasia and prevent carcinoma while preserving the gastroesophageal junction.

Current Strategies in the management of Barrett's esophagus

Barrett's esophagus has become a very important topic in gastroenterology. Its management may vary from essentially a surveillance strategy to highly invasive esophagectomy. The variation in management strategies has occurred because of the current perceptions regarding cancer risks, which range from almost negligible to an incidence of 30% in high-grade dysplasia. Although it is clear that most patients with Barrett's esophagus without dysplasia will not require therapy, the prospect of continued surveillance is unpleasant at best. Promising future tools and techniques for surveillance and treatment are described in this review.

Evaluation of double staining combined with endosonography in detection of early esophageal cancer and precancerous lesions

AIM: To investigate the effect of double staining, methylene blue and Lugol's solution, combined with endosonography in the detection of early cancer and precancerous lesions of esophagus.

METHODS: Ninety-six patients with doubtful esophageal diseases were involved in this study. The lesions were firstly treated with methylene blue (20 g/L) and then Lugol's solution (30 g/L). Biopsies were performed in the parts stained by methylene blue but unstained by Lugol's solution. Endosonography was also performed in the patients diagnosed with esophageal cancer, severe atypical hyperplasia, and Barrett's esophagus.

RESULTS: Seven patients with esophagus cancer (including 2 cases of early cancer), 14 with atypical hyperplasia (7 light, 4 moderate, 3 severe), 3 with Barrett's esophagus, 8 with ulcer and 36 with inflammation. The total positive rate of double staining is 70.8%. The accuracy rate of endosonography is 92.3% (12/13) in detecting the infiltration depth and the mediastinal lymph node metastasis of early esophageal cancer and precancerous lesions.

CONCLUSION: The double staining of methylene blue and Lugol's solution combined with endosonography is helpful in the diagnosis of esophageal diseases, especially the early cancer and precancerous lesions.

Photodynamic therapy with porfimer sodium for ablation of high-grade dysplasia in Barrett's esophagus: international, partially blinded, randomized phase III trial

BACKGROUND

Barrett's esophagus (BE) may lead to high-grade dysplasia (HGD) and adenocarcinoma. The objective was to examine the impact of treating patients with BE and with HGD by using porfimer sodium (POR) and photodynamic therapy (PDT) for ablating HGD and reducing the incidence of esophageal adenocarcinoma.

METHODS

The design was a multicenter, partially blinded (pathology), randomized clinical trial conducted in patients with BE who have HGD. There were 30 contributing centers. A total of 485 patients were screened, with 208 in the intent-to-treat population and 202 in the safety population. Patients were randomized on a 2:1 basis to compare PDT with POR plus omeprazole (PORPDT) with omeprazole only (OM). The main outcome measurement was complete HGD ablation occurring at any time during the study period.

RESULTS

There was a significant difference (p < 0.0001) in favor of PORPDT (106/138 [77%]) compared with OM (27/70 [39%]) in complete ablation of HGD at any time during the study period. The occurrence of adenocarcinoma in the PORPDT group (13%) (n=18) was significantly lower (p < 0.006) compared with the OM group (28%) [corrected] (n=20). The safety profile showed 94% of patients in the PORPDT group and 13% of patients in the OM group had treatment-related adverse effects. The limitations of the study were that PDT therapy may have had to be applied more than once and that patients spent more time in treatment. The patients and the physicians were not blinded to the treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

PORPDT in conjunction with omeprazole is an effective therapy for ablating HGD in patients with BE and in reducing the incidence of esophageal adenocarcinoma.

Endoscopic therapy for Barrett's esophagus

With the increase in the rate of esophageal adenocarcinoma in the United States and the Western world matched with the high morbidity and mortality of esophagectomy, there is an increasing need for new and effective techniques to treat and prevent esophageal adenocarcinoma. A wide variety of endoscopic mucosal ablative techniques have been developed for early esophageal neoplasia. However, long-term control of neoplasic risk has not been demonstrated. Most studies show that specialized intestinal metaplasia may persist underneath neo-squamous mucosa, posing a risk for subsequent neoplastic progression. In this article we review current published literature on endoscopic therapies for the management of Barrett's esophagus.

Technology Insight: ablative techniques for Barrett's esophagus—current and emerging trends

New mucosal ablative techniques that can be used in the esophagus have emerged over the past two decades. These techniques have been developed primarily to treat the precursors of esophageal adenocarcinoma: dysplasia in Barrett's esophagus and early esophageal cancer. Although high-grade dysplasia and early stage cancer can be treated with esophagectomy, the inherent morbidity and mortality of esophageal adenocarcinoma and the morbidities, difficulties, costs and limitations of the current technology mean that there has been a significant increase in interest and research regarding alternative treatments such as ablative techniques. At this stage it is not clear which of the numerous endoscopic ablative techniques available-photodynamic therapy, laser therapy, multipolar electrocoagulation, argon plasma coagulation, endoscopic mucosal resection, radiofrequency ablation or cryotherapy-will emerge as superior. In addition, it has yet to be determined whether the risks associated with ablation therapy are less than the risk of Barrett's esophagus progressing to cancer. Whether ablation therapy eliminates or significantly reduces the risk of cancer, eliminates the need for surveillance endoscopy, or is cost-effective, also remains to be seen. Comparative trials that are now underway should help to answer these questions.

Endoscopic treatment of high-grade dysplasia and early cancer in Barrett's oesophagus

Barrett's oesophagus is the premalignant precursor of oesophageal adenocarcinoma. Non-dysplastic metaplasia can progress to low-grade dysplasia, high-grade dysplasia, and finally to invasive cancer. Although the frequency of adenocarcinoma in patients with Barrett's oesophagus is low, surveillance is justified because the outcome of adenocarcinoma is poor. Oesophagectomy remains the standard treatment for patients with high-grade dysplasia and superficial carcinoma. However, it has been associated with substantial morbidity and mortality and some patients are judged unfit for surgery. In this review, the present status of less invasive procedures is discussed. Endotherapy preserves the integrity of the oesophagus and allows a better quality of life to patients at low risk of developing lymph-node metastases. Opposition to endoscopic treatment is based mainly on the identification of undetected foci of cancer and high-grade dysplasia in oesophagectomy samples. The current ablative techniques used are photodynamic therapy, argon plasma coagulation, laser treatment, and endoscopic mucosal resection.

Advances in Barrett's esophagus and esophageal adenocarcinoma

Despite advances in diagnosis and therapy, esophageal adenocarcinoma remains an aggressive and usually lethal tumor. This review focuses on the epidemiology of esophageal adenocarcinoma and its presumed precursor lesion, Barrett's esophagus; the pathogenesis of the cancer; advances in treatment of adenocarcinoma and Barrett's esophagus; and strategies for cancer prevention. Emphasis is placed on recent literature. Although the absolute number of cases of adenocarcinoma in the United States is still small, the incidence of this cancer has increased dramatically in the last 40 years, and adenocarcinoma is now the predominant form of esophageal cancer in this country. Recent evidence suggests that Barrett's esophagus is more prevalent in asymptomatic individuals than previously appreciated. The pathogenesis of Barrett's esophagus is poorly understood. Given that some subjects will have repeated bouts of severe erosive esophagitis and never develop Barrett's esophagus, host factors must play an important role. The utility of neoadjuvant radiation and chemotherapy in those with adenocarcinoma, although they are widely practiced, is not of clear benefit, and some authorities recommend against it. Ablative therapies, as well as endoscopic mucosal resection, hold promise for those with superficial cancer or high-grade dysplasia. Most series using these modalities feature relatively short follow-up, and longer-term data will be necessary to better describe the effects of these therapies. The value of chemoprevention in subjects with dysplastic Barrett's esophagus by use of cyclooxygenase 2 inhibitors, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, or proton pump inhibitors is unknown. Similarly, although endoscopic screening is widely practiced, its value in patients with chronic gastroesophageal reflux disease symptoms is of unproven value, and recommending bodies are divided as to its practice.

Visible endoscopic and histologic changes in the cardia, before and after complete Barrett's esophagus ablation

BACKGROUND

Adverse events associated with the thermal ablation of Barrett's esophagus (BE) include the generation of gastric mucosa buried beneath the neosquamous regrowth, and unrecognized development and growth of adenocarcinomas. No reports exist regarding the endoscopic appearance and histology of the cardia before and after BE ablation. The aim of our study was to assess the relative frequency of the occurrence of visible endoscopic and histologic changes in the cardia, before and after complete BE ablation.

METHODS

A subset analysis of patients with uncomplicated BE, BE with dysplasia, or early carcinoma, who had been enrolled into one of 4 ongoing prospective studies of mucosal ablation, was examined. Eighty-two patients were identified who entered a BE ablation study, with 75 of these completing BE mucosal ablation. Cardia biopsy specimens were taken in all patients before ablation and serially after BE ablation. Cardia histology was graded by using the modified Sydney System for gastritis.

RESULTS

Before ablation, cardia nodules were noted in 3, cardia intestinal metaplasia (IM) in 7 (8.5%), and none harbored cardia dysplasia. Postablation surveillance ranged from 3 to 75 months (mean 31.1 months [19.5]). Six subjects (8%) developed cardia nodules during surveillance; cardia IM was found in 21(28%), with 17 of these being a new finding (incidence of 25%). Cardia low-grade dysplasia incidence was 1.3% and high-grade dysplasia was 4% after BE ablation.

CONCLUSIONS

The pathophysiology of the abnormal cardia histology and the endoscopic lesions (nodules) is unclear, but endoscopic surveillance of not only the neosquamous epithelium but also the cardia should be considered after ablation, especially in those high-grade dysplasia and early adenocarcinoma BE patients.

Present status of photodynamic therapy for high-grade dysplasia in Barrett's esophagus

GOALS

Review recent developments in Barrett's dysplasia including regulatory approval of porfimer sodium photodynamic therapy.

BACKGROUND

Barrett's esophagus is thought to be the result of long-standing gastroesophageal reflux disease and is known to be the most important risk factor for the development of esophageal adenocarcinoma. The natural history of Barrett's esophagus is not well known, but the annual incidence of invasive adenocarcinoma is estimated to be 0.5% (reported range, 0.2%-2.0%). This represents an increased risk for esophageal cancer of 30 to 60 times higher than normal subjects. As for colorectal cancer, malignant degeneration is Barrett's esophagus is thought to occur through a continuum of histologic stages: metaplasia, dysplasia and neoplasia. Barrett's high-grade dysplasia (formerly referred to as carcinoma in situ) is the histologic stage of disease that immediately precedes the development of invasive carcinoma.

CONCLUSIONS

Previously, Barrett's high-grade dysplasia patients were routinely referred for esophageal resection surgery based upon the assumption of inevitable progression to cancer, the high rate of undiagnosed synchronous cancers, and few treatment alternatives. Important developments in Barrett's high-grade dysplasia include recent publications regarding the natural history of Barrett's high-grade dysplasia and the regulatory approval for endoscopic ablation therapy using porfimer sodium photodynamic therapy (Photofrin PDT).

Endoscopic treatment of Barrett's oesophagus

Barrett's oesophagus develops as a consequence of severe gastro-oesophageal reflux. The importance of Barrett's oesophagus lies in the small risk of developing high-grade dysplasia and subsequent adenocarcinoma. Because of poor treatment results in patients with advanced adenocarcinoma, surveillance of patients with Barrett's oesophagus for the development of dysplasia, although not uncontroversial, is widely practised in the gastroenterological community. The aim of surveillance is to detect adenocarcinoma in an early stadium where surgical cure is possible. In recent years several endoscopic treatments for both high-grade dysplasia and intramucosal adenocarcinoma have been developed. In this review some basic aspects of Barrett's oesophagus are discussed together with endoscopic treatments such as endoscopic mucosal resection, local thermal treatments and photodynamic therapy. Although surgical resection is probably the treatment of choice in fit patients, local endoscopic treatments should be considered in patients with high-grade dysplasia or intramucosal carcinoma who are unfit or unwilling to have surgery.

Prevention and management of early esophageal cancer

Early esophageal cancer is defined by its limitation to the esophageal mucosa and submucosa. It has become a curable malignant disease, in sharp contrast to the dismal prognosis of esophageal cancer at advanced stages, which still represents the majority of patients. Understanding the risk factors, establishing surveillance programs for patients at risk, and developing preventative interventions such as dietary and lifestyle changes or pharmacologic interventions hold the potential of reducing the incidence of the disease and of shifting the stage distribution toward early cancer. Endoscopic ultrasound examination is pivotal for distinguishing early from advanced stages of the disease because it allows for accurate assessment of tumor infiltration and regional lymph node involvement. The therapeutic mainstay for early esophageal cancer remains surgery. New, less invasive surgical techniques are being tested that are associated with less morbidity and mortality than standard radical esophagectomies. For patients who are not candidates for surgery, definitive chemoradiation is a viable alternative. New endoscopic ablation techniques, such as endoscopic mucosa resection and photodynamic therapy, are potential alternatives to surgery in patients with cancers limited to the mucosa. For patients with adenocarcinoma of the gastroesophageal junction with submucosal involvement, adjuvant chemoradiation should be considered because of its potential to increase survival.

A critical review of the diagnosis and management of Barrett's esophagus: the AGA Chicago Workshop

BACKGROUND & AIMS

The diagnosis and management of Barrett's esophagus (BE) are controversial. We conducted a critical review of the literature in BE to provide guidance on clinically relevant issues.

METHODS

A multidisciplinary group of 18 participants evaluated the strength and the grade of evidence for 42 statements pertaining to the diagnosis, screening, surveillance, and treatment of BE. Each member anonymously voted to accept or reject statements based on the strength of evidence and his own expert opinion.

RESULTS

There was strong consensus on most statements for acceptance or rejection. Members rejected statements that screening for BE has been shown to improve mortality from adenocarcinoma or to be cost-effective. Contrary to published clinical guidelines, they did not feel that screening should be recommended for adults over age 50, regardless of age or duration of heartburn. Members were divided on whether surveillance prolongs survival, although the majority agreed that it detects curable neoplasia and can be cost-effective in selected patients. The majority did not feel that acid-reduction therapy reduces the risk of esophageal adenocarcinoma but did agree that nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs are associated with a cancer risk reduction and are of promising (but unproven) value. Participants rejected the notion that mucosal ablation with acid suppression prevents adenocarcinoma in BE but agreed that this may be an appropriate strategy in a subgroup of patients with high-grade dysplasia.

CONCLUSIONS

Based on this review of BE, the opinions of workshop members on issues pertaining to screening and surveillance are at variance with published clinical guidelines.

Barrett's esophagus: management of high-grade dysplasia and cancer

Esophagectomy remains the treatment of choice for the appropriate patient with Barrett's adenocarcinoma invading beyond the mucosa, without evidence of distant metastasis or invasion of adjacent organs. On the other hand, therapeutic management of patients with Barrett's high-grade dysplasia (HGD) or mucosal adenocarcinoma should be individualized, taking into account the patient's preferences, willingness to return for frequent endoscopic biopsies, and medical fitness to undergo esophagectomy. Surgery has to be considered the best treatment for HGD or superficial carcinoma, unless contraindicated by severe comorbidities, because it has proven to be the only treatment that is successful in curing the condition and preventing recurrent HGD or the development of invasive cancer. Nonsurgical treatment by photodynamic therapy or endoscopic mucosal resection may be a less invasive and organ-sparing option for elderly, poor-risk patients but it is still to be considered an investigational therapy that should only be conducted under a clinical trial protocol. Finally, intensive endoscopic biopsy surveillance of patients with HGD is another investigational option that may allow prompt treatment of cancer if it develops. However, few data document the safety of this observational approach.

High-Energy Laser Therapy of Barrett’s Esophagus: Preliminary Results

We present the preliminary results obtained by our research group utilizing Nd:YAG and diode lasers to treat Barrett's esophagus (BE). A total of 15 patients with BE (mean age 58 years) underwent endoscopic laser therapy: 11 with intestinal metaplasia, 2 with low-grade dysplasia, and 2 with high-grade dysplasia. The mean length of BE was 4 cm (range 1-12 cm). Six of these patients also underwent antireflux surgery, and nine were prescribed acid-suppressive medication. Endoscopic Nd:YAG laser treatment was carried out from 1997 to 1999; thereafter, diode laser was employed. The mean follow-up of these patients after the first laser session was 28 months. Patients underwent a mean of 6.5 laser sessions (range 3-17 sessions), with no apparent complications. The mean energy per session was 1705 JJ. Only six of these patients (40%) showed complete endoscopic and histologic remission, but a mean of 77% (SD 23.8%) of the total metaplastic tissue in all these patients was ablated. The percentage of healed mucosa was higher in patients with short-segment BE (92%) ( p < 0.05) and in subjects treated by two or more laser sessions per centimeter of BE length (89%) ( p < 0.05). All four patients with dysplasia showed histologic regression to nondysplastic BE or to squamous epithelium, without recurrence during a mean follow-up of 30 months. The patients who underwent antireflux surgery and those prescribed pharmacologic treatment had similar results. Nd:YAG and diode laser treatment of BE is a safe, effective procedure; it required two sessions per centimeter of metaplasia; and it achieved complete regression of the dysplasia. Further studies are necessary to quantify its effect on cancer incidence.

Endoscopic therapeutic esophageal interventions: old, new, borrowed and . . . methylene blue?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Endoscopic interventions in the esophagus continue to evolve. This article reviews some of the notable advances over the past year in endoscopic therapy for the esophagus.

RECENT FINDINGS

In 2002 several endoscopic therapies were reintroduced or modified. Ablative treatments, including Nd:YAG laser, photodynamic therapy, and thermal contact treatments have been shown to be effective for Barrett esophagus and some early esophageal cancers. The addition of endoscopic mucosal resection may improve these therapies. Endoscopic stenting remains the dominant endoscopic palliative modality for unresectable esophageal cancers, and modifications of this therapy have focused on reducing side effects and complications. Innovations in endoscopic treatments for strictures and bleeding esophageal varices have been proposed and may improve outcomes, although probably only marginally. Additional endoscopic antireflux procedures have been introduced, although the results of long-term studies still need to be published before their place in the treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease can be determined.

SUMMARY

Rather than heralding novel endoscopic therapeutics, 2002 was a year of retooling and refining existing techniques.

Barrett esophagus

PURPOSE

The importance of an in-depth understanding about Barrett esophagus is ultimately to decrease the mortality and morbidity from esophageal adenocarcinoma cancer by early detection of metaplasia and dysplasia and appropriate therapy. This review summarizes several publications in the past year related to the epidemiology, pathogenesis, screening and surveillance, new methods for detection of metaplasia/dysplasia, and advances in the treatment of Barrett esophagus.

RECENT FINDINGS

Patients with Barrett esophagus are characterized by the presence of risk factors usually indicative of severe types of gastroesophageal reflux disease. Recent insights into epidemiology and pathogenesis have shown that the risk of high-grade dysplasia and adenocarcinoma may be related to the increasing length of Barrett esophagus, size of hiatus hernia, and severity of acid reflux. The role of smoking and alcohol consumption remains controversial. Increasing the number of biopsies by repeat standard endoscopy can enhance the yield of intestinal metaplasia in patients with suspected short-segment Barrett esophagus. Costs of surveillance using standard endoscopy and random biopsies would be very high and using special techniques to target specific areas could ultimately help in cost reduction. Emerging data on new techniques and technology such as vital staining with methylene blue and protoporphyrin fluorescence can increase the yield of metaplasia and dysplasia. Biomarkers studies have revealed that p53 mutation by the loss of heterozygosity can help detect patients with low and high risk for cancer progression. Studies thus far have been unclear whether acid suppression alone can impact the malignant progression in Barrett esophagus patients. Inhibition of cyclooxygenase by aspirin or nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs may be a promising chemoprevention strategy against dysplasia and esophageal adenocarcinoma development as shown in some recent studies. Nonsurgical treatment by photodynamic therapy or mucosal resection may be a less invasive and organ-sparing option for some patients with high-grade dysplasia and early adenocarcinoma.

SUMMARY

In the past year we have made major strides in our knowledge of this premalignant lesion. Recent studies have shed light in a better understanding of the epidemiology of Barrett esophagus, including clinical and endoscopic factors associated with high-grade dysplasia or esophageal adenocarcinoma and various biomarkers that would identify patient subsets with low and high risk for cancer progression. This will eventually have significant implications on the screening, surveillance, and treatment of the disease. Advanced endoscopic therapies including mucosectomy or photodynamic therapy may be emerging options in patients with intraepithelial neoplasia.

Use of lasers in Barrett's esophagus

Lasers are used in the management of Barrett's esophagus for specific tasks. First is for the ablation of non-dysplastic and dysplastic Barrett's as part of an aggressive, minimally invasive, yet unproven preventive interventional strategy for both low-risk and high-risk of progression subgroups. Secondly is for potentially curative treatment of early mucosal cancers (Tis and T1mN0M0). Finally, lasers are used for palliation of dysphagia for advanced tumors. The first two laser uses should be considered experimental and undertaken in the setting of an institutionally approved research protocol. Paramount to the success of ablation of dysplastic and early cancerous Barrett's is careful selection of patients by meticulous video endoscopic inspection of the mucosa, use of high frequency and dedicated endosonography (to uncover unsuspected tumors that penetrate the submucosa or involve lymph nodes that cannot be targeted by laser treatment), and experienced GI pathologists. Lasers can also play an important adjuvant role in the management of dysphagia for advanced cancers: however, the specific patients' characteristics for this group of patients is currently not well-defined in this era of easily placed expandable metallic stents.