Infliximab: lifetime use for maintenance is appropriate in Crohn's Disease. PRO: maintenance therapy is superior to episodic therapy

Diagnostic delay in Crohn's disease is associated with a complicated disease course and increased operation rate

OBJECTIVES

The impact of diagnostic delay (a period from appearance of first symptoms to diagnosis) on the clinical course of Crohn's disease (CD) is unknown. We examined whether length of diagnostic delay affects disease outcomes.

METHODS

Data from the Swiss IBD cohort study were analyzed. Patients were recruited from university centers (68%), regional hospitals (14%), and private practices (18%). The frequencies of occurrence of bowel stenoses, internal fistulas, perianal fistulas, and CD-related surgery (intestinal and perianal) were analyzed.

RESULTS

A total of 905 CD patients (53.4% female, median age at diagnosis 26 (20-36) years) were stratified into four groups according to the quartiles of diagnostic delay (0-3, 4-9, 10-24, and ≥25 months, respectively). Median diagnostic delay was 9 (3-24) months. The frequency of immunomodulator and/or antitumor necrosis factor drug use did not differ among the four groups. The length of diagnostic delay was positively correlated with the occurrence of bowel stenosis (odds ratio (OR) 1.76, P=0.011 for delay of ≥25 months) and intestinal surgery (OR 1.76, P=0.014 for delay of 10-24 months and OR 2.03, P=0.003 for delay of ≥25 months). Disease duration was positively associated and non-ileal disease location was negatively associated with bowel stenosis (OR 1.07, P<0.001, and OR 0.41, P=0.005, respectively) and intestinal surgery (OR 1.14, P<0.001, and OR 0.23, P<0.001, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

The length of diagnostic delay is correlated with an increased risk of bowel stenosis and CD-related intestinal surgery. Efforts should be undertaken to shorten the diagnostic delay.

Practical application of anti-TNF therapy for luminal Crohn's disease

Anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF) therapy to treat inflammatory bowel disease has been available for more than a decade. Although extensive data on the outcome of anti-TNF therapy from individual clinical trials and patient cohorts are available, integrated guidance on the best use of such therapy to achieve optimal clinical outcomes when managing patients with luminal Crohn's disease is lacking. This review combines published data to establish practical strategies for anti-TNF therapy with respect to effective and safe timing of introduction, use of concurrent immunosuppressive therapy, dose escalation, managing relapse, changing drugs, pregnancy and breast feeding, and stopping drug treatment.

Epidemiology and natural history of inflammatory bowel diseases

In the West, the incidence and prevalence of inflammatory bowel diseases has increased in the past 50 years, up to 8-14/100,000 and 120-200/100,000 persons, respectively, for ulcerative colitis (UC) and 6-15/100,000 and 50-200/100,000 persons, respectively, for Crohn's disease (CD). Studies of migrant populations and populations of developing countries demonstrated a recent, slow increase in the incidence of UC, whereas that of CD remained low, but CD incidence eventually increased to the level of UC. CD and UC are incurable; they begin in young adulthood and continue throughout life. The anatomic evolution of CD has been determined from studies of postoperative recurrence; CD begins with aphthous ulcers that develop into strictures or fistulas. Lesions usually arise in a single digestive segment; this site tends to be stable over time. Strictures and fistulas are more frequent in patients with ileal disease, whereas Crohn's colitis remains uncomplicated for many years. Among patients with CD, intestinal surgery is required for as many as 80% and a permanent stoma required in more than 10%. In patients with UC, the lesions usually remain superficial and extend proximally; colectomy is required for 10%-30% of patients. Prognosis is difficult to determine. The mortality of patients with UC is not greater than that of the population, but patients with CD have greater mortality than the population. It has been proposed that only aggressive therapeutic approaches, based on treatment of early recurrent lesions in asymptomatic individuals, have a significant impact on progression of these chronic diseases.

Cost effectiveness of treatments for inflammatory bowel disease

Traditionally, half of the direct costs associated with chronic inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD) [Crohn's disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC)] have related to hospital inpatient treatment for a sub-group of more severely affected, often therapy-resistant individuals. The advent of effective but relatively expensive biological agents has increased the contribution of drugs to overall medical care costs. This has focussed interest on the relative cost effectiveness of rival therapies for IBD and, in particular, on the affordability of long-term biological therapy. The purpose of this article is to review the available literature on this topic and to identify areas for future research. Head-to-head trials of competing treatment options are uncommon and clinical trials have seldom addressed cost effectiveness. In UC, models have explored the cost utility of 'high-' versus 'standard-' dose 5-aminosalicylic acid (5-ASA) therapy and the theoretical impact of improved adherence with once-daily formulations. In CD, cost-utility models for anti-tumour necrosis factor (TNF) drugs versus standard care have suggested consistently that incremental benefits are achieved at increased overall cost. However, studies of varying design have produced a wide spectrum of incremental cost-effectiveness ratio estimates, which highlights the challenges and limitations of existing modelling techniques.

What is the optimal therapy for Crohn's disease: step-up or top-down?

Crohn's disease (CD) is an idiopathic chronic inflammatory disorder of the digestive tract, which is incurable. Present therapeutic guidelines follow a sequential step-up approach that focuses on treating acute disease or 'inducing clinical remission' and subsequently aims to 'maintain clinical response'. In view of the chronic relapsing-remitting disabling disease course, new treatment approaches have been sought with the ultimate end point of disease course modification and mucosal healing. A recent preliminary study from D'Haens et al. has provided evidence suggesting that reversing the treatment paradigm from a 'step-up' to a 'top-down' approach may positively alter the natural course of this illness. Their findings indicate that early use of biologic therapy, in combination with immunomodulators, resulted in remission occuring more rapidly than the conventional 'step-up' treatment, with a longer time period to relapse, a decreased need for treatment with corticosteroids, a faster reduction in clinical symptoms, rapid decline in biochemical inflammatory markers (C-reactive protein) and improved endoscopic mucosal healing. These results, supported by previous studies on infliximab use, may hold a promising outcome of fewer stricturing complications, hospitalizations and surgeries for patients with CD. However, we need to better define the timing and candidates for the 'top-down' approach as we are still uncertain about the safety data and the long-term benefits if biologic agents are given as routine maintenance treatment, since most of the trials in CD have been short term, and approximately 30% of patients might have been overtreated. Future clinical trials will be crucial in answering these questions.

Loss of treatment response to infliximab maintenance therapy in Crohn's disease: a payor perspective

OBJECTIVES

To assess the incidence and economic implications of loss of treatment response among patients with Crohn's disease (CD) treated with infliximab maintenance therapy.

METHODS

This was a retrospective observational study of infliximab response and costs among patients with CD using a large health-care claims database. Patients with CD receiving infliximab maintenance therapy with an initial response were selected from the Integrated Healthcare Information Services claims database (1999-2005). Patients' claim histories were used to identify patterns of response to infliximab treatment. Incidence of loss of response was estimated using Kaplan-Meier method. Annual total health-care and CD-related costs were estimated and adjusted for inflation to 2005 US dollars. Generalized linear model was used to assess the impact of loss of response on treatment costs.

RESULTS

The study sample included 262 patients with CD with an initial response to infliximab therapy. Within 24 months of therapy initiation, 77% of patients lost treatment response. Upward dose adjustment, a new drug therapy for CD, and CD-related emergency room or inpatient visits were the three most common indicators of loss of response. Both annual total and CD-related health-care costs for patients who lost treatment response during the first year were found to be approximately one-third higher than for those who did not lose response.

CONCLUSIONS

The majority of patients who had initial responses to infliximab maintenance treatment subsequently lost response within 2 years. Loss of response was associated with a significant increase in total health-care and CD-related costs.

Minimizing infliximab toxicity in the treatment of inflammatory bowel disease

BACKGROUND

Infliximab is a widely used biological agent for the treatment of inflammatory bowel disease, and has a favorable risk/benefit ratio.

AIM

It is useful to know that patients treated with infliximab are exposed to developing adverse events that could be reduced with a prudent and a rational clinical approach and by optimizing the treatment protocol.

METHODS

PubMed (including Epub) was searched in October 2006 and again in March 2007.

RESULTS

The high immunogenic potential of infliximab determines the antibodies that inhibit the effect of infliximab and the appearance of subsequent acute and delayed infusion reactions. Infliximab has an immunomodulatory effect, thus increasing the risk of serious and latent infections. Screening for tuberculosis, HBV, opportunistic or latent infections, heart failure, and haematological, neurological and hepatological disorders must be performed before infliximab therapy. There is no definitive evidence that infliximab increases the risk of neoplasia. Mortality in infliximab-treated patients does not appear increased compared to the controls.

CONCLUSIONS

Infliximab safety is similar to that of conventional immunomodulators and patients treated had similar rates of mortality, neoplasm and lymphoma as patients not treated with infliximab. Patients treated with infliximab have an increased risk of serious infections but it is not related to infliximab therapy.

Infliximab in Crohn's disease: a look at the (not so distant) future

Although infliximab has brought about a major advance in the treatment of Crohn's disease (CD), several questions remain unanswered. In particular, there is no consensus regarding the best timing to use it in the ideal therapeutic algorithm. Another controversial issue is whether this medication should be given or not for life once proven effective in the individual patient. Therapy with infliximab has also been associated to the development of intestinal strictures in CD: hence, some authors have discouraged its use in their presence. Finally, given its powerful antiinflammatory action, infliximab could in theory be effective in preventing postsurgical recurrence of CD, an as yet almost inescapable consequence of "curative" surgery. This review will focus on and discuss the relevant recent literature related to these issues with special regard to the efficacy and safety of infliximab in the presence of intestinal strictures and the potential role of this medication in preventing recurrence after surgery.

Infusion services in the gastroenterology practice

Gastroenterology practices looking to diversify their services may want to consider infusion therapies as an opportunity to provide a valuable service to patients and create an additional revenue stream. Although patients with gastrointestinal diseases may benefit from such infusions as crystalloid fluids for rehydration or iron for the treatment of inflammatory bowel disease is currently the only infusion therapy likely to be of economic benefit to the practice. The focus of this article is on the infusion of biologic agents, and it is assumed that such therapies will continue to play an important role in the management of inflammatory bowel disease for many years.

Review article: evolutionary advances in the delivery of aminosalicylates for the treatment of ulcerative colitis

Ulcerative colitis is a chronic and debilitating disease that involves inflammation of the colonic mucosa. Current therapies aim to reduce the symptom burden of ulcerative colitis and maintain disease quiescence. The standard first-line treatment for mild-to-moderate ulcerative colitis is 5-aminosalicylate therapy, which is available in oral and rectal (topical) formulations. While current 5-aminosalicylate formulations are effective in the majority of patients, they are associated with a number of limitations including inconvenient dosing regimens and poor patient acceptability, which may lead to non-compliance with prescribed therapy. A variety of improved delivery mechanisms have been developed in an effort to overcome these limitations. Micropellet formulations and high-dose tablets appear to offer comparable efficacy and tolerability to conventional formulations, although any benefit in terms of long-term patient compliance remains to be proven. Novel methods of delivery, such as those using a combination of hydrophilic and lipophilic matrices, designed to provide once-daily dosing in a high-strength tablet, may offer a significant improvement in the therapy of active and quiescent ulcerative colitis. This review examines the limitations of current 5-aminosalicylate formulations and reports on the evolution of novel oral formulations designed to overcome these limitations, maximize patient compliance during both induction and maintenance of quiescence, and optimize overall clinical outcomes.

What's new: innovative concepts in inflammatory bowel disease

Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) has been the subject of recent intense research and development. A greater insight into the basic pathological mechanisms of ulcerative colitis (UC) and Crohn's disease (CD) has resulted in the emergence of more sophisticated and effective management options. Additionally, established therapies are attracting renewed interest with novel dosage regimens and new formulations offering improved efficacy whilst maintaining an excellent tolerance profile. High dose 5-aminosalicylic acid (5-ASA) has been a focus for investigation in recent clinical trials. The ASCEND study, which compared a 4.8 g/day dose with a 2.4 g/day dose, demonstrated that high dose mesalazine was significantly superior in achieving treatment success and symptom control, whilst maintaining a comparable tolerance and safety profile. The development of biotechnology agents targeted against tumour necrosis factor (TNF) provides promise of new treatment options in both CD and UC. The efficacy of CDP571, adalimumab and certolizumab have been investigated in CD, and infliximab, which is currently approved as an agent in inflammatory and fistulizing CD, has also been recently investigated in UC. Investigational pipeline molecules such as natalizumab, MLN-02, an anti-interleukin 12 antibody and sargramostim, have also shown encouraging results from early studies and are now undergoing evaluation in large clinical trials.