Sensitivity of immunochemical fecal occult blood test to small colorectal adenomas

Role of demographics in noninvasive testing for colorectal cancer screening: do targeted cut-off values improve detection?

BACKGROUND

Fecal immunochemical test (FIT) is a yearly alternative colorectal screening modality for average risk individuals unwilling or unable to undergo invasive colorectal cancer (CRC) screening due to cost and accessibility. This study aimed to determine whether FIT should be interpreted within the context of patient demographics and medical history.

METHODS

Patients >50 years old who had a FIT followed by colonoscopy within 1 year were analyzed based on age, race, BMI, social and medical comorbidities. False positive (FP) and false negative (FN) FIT results within each patient demographic and medical history variable were determined by comparing with the gold standard of colonoscopy using χ2 analysis.

RESULTS

One thousand twenty-five patients were reviewed. 21.8% of FIT results were positive. Factors which differed in positive FIT rates were age (P=0.003), smoking (P<0.001), alcohol (P=0.001), and hypertension (P<0.001). The difference in rates of FP and FN FIT outcomes among each variable underwent further subanalysis. The FP was 66.8% and the FN rate was 12.8%. Higher FN outcomes were noted in those above 70, males and smokers, though the result was only statistically significant for males (P=0.009). Females were observed to have higher FP rates (P=0.019).

CONCLUSIONS

Females had higher FP FIT rates compared to males, indicating that sex may influence FIT outcomes and should be accounted for when interpreting FIT results. This information can be utilized to identify populations at higher risk of FP or FN FIT results to target CRC screening. Additionally, recalculating the FP and FN rates for each variable may help determine new FIT targets.

Performance of the Fecal Immunochemical Test in Detecting Advanced Colorectal Neoplasms and Colorectal Cancers in People Aged 40-49 Years: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

The incidence of early-onset colorectal cancer (CRC) is increasing. Many guidelines recommend initiating screening at 45 years. This study investigated the detection rate of advanced colorectal neoplasm (ACRN) by using fecal immunochemical tests (FITs) in individuals aged 40-49 years.

METHODS

PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases were searched from inception to May 2022. The primary outcomes were the detection rates and positive predictive values of FITs for ACRN and CRC in people aged 40-49 (younger age group) and ≥50 years (average risk group).

RESULTS

Ten studies with 664,159 FITs were included. The FIT positivity rate was 4.9% and 7.3% for the younger age and average risk groups, respectively. Younger individuals with positive FIT results had significantly higher risks of ACRN (odds ratio [OR] 2.58, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.79-3.73) or CRC (OR 2.86, 95% CI 1.59-5.13) than did individuals in the average-risk group, regardless of FIT results. Individuals aged 45-49 years with positive FIT results had a similar risk of ACRN (OR 0.80, 95% CI 0.49-1.29) to that of people aged 50-59 years with positive FIT results, although significant heterogeneity was observed. The positive predictive values of the FIT were 10-28.1% for ACRN and 2.7-6.8% for CRC in the younger age group.

CONCLUSION

The detection rate of ACRN and CRC based on FITs in individuals aged 40-49 years is acceptable, and the yield of ACRN might be similar between individuals aged 45-49 and 50-59 years. Further prospective cohort and cost-effective analysis are warranted.

Colon capsule endoscopy in colorectal cancer screening: a randomised controlled trial

Introduction

The use of capsule endoscopy has become an approved method in small bowel diagnostics, but the same level of integration is not seen in large bowel diagnostics. We will use colon capsule endoscopy (CCE) as a filter test in colorectal cancer (CRC) screening between the faecal immunochemical test (FIT) and colonoscopy. We aim to investigate the clinical performance, population acceptability, and economic implications of the procedure in a large-scale clinical trial.

Methods and analysis

We will randomly allocate 124 214 Danish citizens eligible for participation in the national CRC screening programme within the Region of Southern Denmark to either an intervention group or a control group. Prior to submitting a FIT, citizens randomised to the intervention group will be informed about their opportunity to undergo CCE, instead of colonoscopy, if the FIT is positive. Suspected cancers; >3 adenomas <10 mm in size, 1 adenoma >10 mm in size or >4 adenomas regardless of size, detected during CCE will generate an invitation to colonoscopy as per regular screening guidelines, whereas citizens with suspected low risk polyps will re-enter the biennial screening programme. Citizens with no CCE findings will be excluded from screening for 8 years. In the control group, citizens will follow standard screening procedures.

Ethics and dissemination

All participants must consent prior to capsule ingestion. All collected data will be handled and stored in accordance with current data protection legislation. Approvals from the regional ethics committee (ref. S-20190100) and the Danish data protection agency have been obtained (ref. 19/29858).

Trial registration details

The study has been registered with ClinicalTrials.gov under: NCT04049357.

Future Prospects of Colorectal Cancer Screening: Characterizing Interval Cancers

Tumors that are not detected by screening tests are known as interval cancers and are diagnosed clinically after a negative result in the screening episode but before the next screening invitation. Clinical characteristics associated with interval colorectal cancers have been studied, but few molecular data are available that describe interval colorectal cancers. A better understanding of the clinical and biological characteristics associated with interval colorectal cancer may provide new insights into how to prevent this disease more effectively. This review aimed to summarize the current literature concerning interval colorectal cancer and its epidemiological, clinical, and molecular features.

Colorectal adenocarcinomas diagnosed following a negative faecal immunochemical test show high-risk pathological features in a colon screening programme

AIMS

The faecal immunochemical test (FIT) is used every 2 years to screen average-risk British Columbians aged 50-74 years, with follow-up colonoscopy for positive results. Non-screen-detected colorectal adenocarcinomas are defined as those detected within 25 months following a negative FIT. We aimed to more clearly characterise these malignancies.

METHODS AND RESULTS

A medical chart and focused pathology review of colorectal malignancies from 926 individuals who completed FIT in the British Columbia Colon Screening Program in 2014, and whose pathology reports were available for review, was conducted. This cohort was divided into two groups: individuals with colorectal adenocarcinomas diagnosed following a positive FIT (screen-detected) and individuals with colorectal adenocarcinoma diagnosed within 25 months of a negative FIT (FIT-interval cancers). Rates of clinically relevant pathological parameters, as outlined in the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC), 8th edition, were compared between the screen-detected and FIT-interval cancer groups. A total of 876 screen-detected and 50 FIT-interval cancers were identified. FIT-interval cancers exhibited higher rates of high-grade differentiation (including poorly differentiated and undifferentiated cases; P < 0.01) and aggressive histotype (signet ring cell and mucinous carcinomas; P < 0.01) than did screen-detected cancers after Bonferroni correction. Colorectal adenocarcinoma diagnosed after a negative FIT may therefore be associated with worse prognostic determinants than screen-detected cancers.

CONCLUSION

FIT-interval cancers are associated with high-risk pathological features; the possibility that more aggressive, fast-growing lesions which arise in the interval after truly negative FITs cannot be ruled out. Further study of a larger cohort of FIT-interval cancers controlling for interaction among the different pathologic parameters will be undertaken.

Multitarget Stool DNA Screening in Clinical Practice: High Positive Predictive Value for Colorectal Neoplasia Regardless of Exposure to Previous Colonoscopy

OBJECTIVES

Multitarget stool DNA (MT-sDNA) testing has grown as a noninvasive screening modality for colorectal cancer (CRC), but real-world clinical data are limited in the post-FDA approval setting. The effect of previous colonoscopy on MT-sDNA performance is not known. We aimed to evaluate findings of colorectal neoplasia (CRN) at diagnostic colonoscopy in patients with positive MT-sDNA testing, stratified by patient exposure to previous colonoscopy.

METHODS

We identified consecutive patients completing MT-sDNA testing over a 39-month period and reviewed the records of those with positive tests for neoplastic findings at diagnostic colonoscopy. MT-sDNA test positivity rate, adherence to diagnostic colonoscopy, and the positive predictive value (PPV) of MT-sDNA for any CRN and neoplastic subtypes were calculated.

RESULTS

Of 16,469 MT-sDNA tests completed, testing returned positive in 2,326 (14.1%) patients. After exclusion of patients at increased risk for CRC, 1,801 patients remained, 1,558 (87%) of whom underwent diagnostic colonoscopy; 918 of 1,558 (59%) of these patients had undergone previous colonoscopy, whereas 640 (41%) had not. Any CRN was found in 1,046 of 1,558 patients (PPV = 67%). More neoplastic lesions were found in patients without previous colonoscopy (73%); however, the rates remained high among those who had undergone previous colonoscopy (63%, P < 0.0001). The large majority (79%) of patients had right-sided neoplasia.

DISCUSSION

MT-sDNA has a high PPV for any CRN regardless of exposure to previous colonoscopy. Right-sided CRN was found at colonoscopy in most patients with positive MT-sDNA testing, representing a potential advantage over other currently available screening modalities for CRC.

Fecal immunochemical test in cancer screening - colonoscopy outcome in FIT positives and negatives

Objectives: Fecal immunochemical test (FIT) is used in colorectal cancer (CRC) screening, but evaluations of multiple sample strategies in colonoscopy screening cohorts are rare. The aim of this study was to assess accuracy of FIT for advanced neoplasia (AN) with two fecal samples in a colonoscopy screening cohort. Materials and methods: The study comprised 1155 participants of the colonoscopy arm in SCREESCO (Screening of Swedish Colons, NCT02078804), a randomized controlled study on CRC screening of 60-year-olds from the Swedish average-risk population. Participants provided two FIT samples prior to colonoscopy. First sample, mean of two, and any of the two samples above cut off level were assessed. Colonoscopy findings (CRC, advanced adenoma (AA), AN (CRC + AA) and adenoma characteristics) were evaluated in uni- and multivariable analysis in relation to FIT positivity (at ≥10 µg hemoglobin (Hb)/g). Results: Of 1155 invited, 806 (416 women, 390 men) participated. CRC, AA and non-AA were found in one (0.1%), 80 (9.9%) and 145 (18%), respectively. Sensitivity and specificity for AN were 20%/93%, 25%/92% and 26%/89% for first, mean of two and any of the two samples respectively at cut off level 10 µg/g, corresponding to 60 (74%)-65 (80%) participants with missed AN. The difference in sensitivity between screening strategies was non-significant. The specificity for first sample was significantly higher than for any of the two samples at cut off 10 µg/g (p = .02) and 20 µg/g (p = .04). FIT positivity in participants with adenoma was associated with pedunculated shape (p = .007) and high-risk dysplasia (p = .009). Conclusions: In an average-risk colonoscopy screening cohort of 60-year-olds, sensitivity for AN was modest and did not increase when using two samples instead of one. FIT predominantly detected adenomas with pedunculated shape and high-risk dysplasia, and participants with flat or broad based adenomas may thus be missed in screening.

Cost-effectiveness analysis of postpolypectomy colonoscopy surveillance using Japanese data

OBJECTIVE

Recommendations vary on postpolypectomy surveillance, and no consensus has been reached even regarding the necessity of risk stratification based on polyp characteristics for surveillance. We examined an optimal postpolypectomy surveillance program by performing a cost-effectiveness analysis.

METHODS

We performed a Markov model analysis using parameters based on Japanese data and evaluated four postpolypectomy surveillance programs with respect to their effectiveness in terms of quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs), cost-effectiveness and required number of colonoscopies. Two were non-risk-stratified programs with 1-year (program 1) and 3-year (program 2) postpolypectomy surveillance colonoscopy, and the other two were risk-stratified programs. In program 3, surveillance colonoscopy was performed 3, 10 and 10 years after resection of advanced adenomas, low-risk adenomatous polyps, and no polyps, respectively. In program 4, those intervals were shortened to 1, 3 and 5 years, respectively.

RESULTS

Risk-stratified programs (3 and 4) yielded higher QALYs with lower costs than non-risk-stratified programs (1 and 2). Program 4 yielded higher QALYs (23.046) and lower required cost (107,717 JPY) than program 3. The required number of colonoscopies for program 4 was 1.2, 1.5 and 1.6 times that for programs 1, 2 and 3, respectively. A probabilistic sensitivity analysis showed that the probability of program 4 being chosen as the most cost-effective was highest.

CONCLUSIONS

After polypectomy, risk-stratified colonoscopy surveillance based on the polyp characteristics should be considered. A risk-stratified program with relatively short examination intervals could be effective and cost-effective in Japan, although further investigation and consideration of colonoscopy capacity are required.

Participant-Related Risk Factors for False-Positive and False-Negative Fecal Immunochemical Tests in Colorectal Cancer Screening: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

OBJECTIVES

Colorectal cancer (CRC) screening using fecal immunochemical tests (FIT) may reduce CRC-related mortality but its effectiveness is influenced by the limited accuracy of FIT. Identifying individuals at increased risk of a false FIT result could improve screening, but the available evidence is conflicting. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis on risk factors for false-positive and false-negative FIT results in CRC screening.

METHODS

A systematic search in MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library identified publications (before 29 January 2017) on risk factors (known at time of FIT invitation) associated with false FIT results (presence/absence of advanced neoplasia) in a CRC screening setting. Risk of bias was assessed using QUIPS. In meta-analysis, summary relative risk ratios and corresponding 95% confidence intervals were calculated for each risk factor.

RESULTS

Of 518 records identified, 14 studies with 54,499 participants in total were included for analysis. In meta-analysis, male sex was associated with a significantly lower risk of false-positivity (RR 0.84, CI 0.74-0.94), whereas participants using non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) had a higher risk (RR 1.16, CI 1.06-1.27). The use of anticoagulants was most frequently studied, without a significant effect on FIT positivity. Males (RR 1.83, CI 1.53-2.19), participants with a family history for CRC (RR 1.61, CI 1.19-2.15), hyperglycemia (RR 1.29, CI 1.02-1.65), hypertension (RR 1.50, CI 1.14-1.98), obesity (RR 1.38, CI 1.11-1.71), and (former) smokers (RR 1.93, CI 1.52-2.45) were all at significantly higher risk for false-negative results. Age was not found to have a systematic effect on either FIT false-positivity or false-negativity in meta-analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

Multiple risk factors, known at time of FIT invitation, are associated with false FIT results in CRC screening. This information can be used to identify populations risking false reassurance after a negative result or unnecessary colonoscopy after a positive result, and to further optimize CRC screening effectiveness.

Back-to-back colon capsule endoscopy and optical colonoscopy in colorectal cancer screening individuals

AIM

The aim was to determine the polyp detection rate and per-patient sensitivity for polyps > 9 mm of colon capsule endoscopy (CCE) compared with colonoscopy as well as the diagnostic accuracy of CCE.

METHOD

Individuals who had a positive immunochemical faecal occult blood test during screening had investigator blinded CCE and colonoscopy. Participants underwent repeat endoscopy if significant lesions detected by CCE were considered to have been missed by colonoscopy.

RESULTS

There were 253 participants. The polyp detection rate was significantly higher in CCE compared with colonoscopy (P = 0.02). The per-patient sensitivity for > 9 mm polyps for CCE and colonoscopy was 87% (95% CI: 83-91%) and 88% (95% CI: 84-92%) respectively. In participants with complete CCE and colonoscopy examinations (N = 126), per-patient sensitivity of > 9 mm polyps in CCE (97%; 95% CI: 94-100%) was superior to colonoscopy (89%; 95% CI: 84-94%). A complete capsule endoscopy examination (N = 134) could detect patients with intermediate or greater risk (according to the European guidelines) with an accuracy, sensitivity, specificity and positivity rate of 79%, 93%, 69% and 58% respectively, using a cut-off of at least one polyp > 10 mm or more than two polyps.

CONCLUSION

CCE is superior to colonoscopy in polyp detection rate and per-patient sensitivity to > 9 mm polyps, but only in complete CCE examinations. The rate of incomplete CCE examinations must be improved.

Stool Based Testing for Colorectal Cancer: an Overview of Available Evidence

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The goal of this review is to summarize stool-based testing for colorectal cancer (CRC). The key questions answered in this review were the advantages and limitations of each available stool-based test for CRC and to examine their comparative efficacy.

RECENT FINDINGS

Guaiac-based fecal occult blood testing (gFOBT) is no longer a relevant test for CRC screening. fecal immunochemical testing (FIT) tests, especially quantitative assays, are clearly a reliable stool-based test. Multitarget DNA (mtsDNA) stool testing may represent a viable option as well, although cost and test characteristics are yet fully defined. FIT and mtsDNA represent the options for stool-based CRC screening. In larger screening centers, quantitative FIT assays represent an attractive option for stool-based testing. Qualitative FIT has applicability in smaller centers. Although a large validation trial showed promising results for mtsDNA, further head-to-head trials with FIT will help define the ultimate role of mtsDNA. Ultimately, however, the best test for CRC screening is the one performed stool-based CRC screening as an initial or alternative option can increase participation in CRC screening.

Case-control study of candidate gene methylation and adenomatous polyp formation

PURPOSE

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is one of the most common and preventable forms of cancer but remains the second leading cause of cancer-related death. Colorectal adenomas are precursor lesions that develop in 70-90 % of CRC cases. Identification of peripheral biomarkers for adenomas would help to enhance screening efforts. This exploratory study examined the methylation status of 20 candidate markers in peripheral blood leukocytes and their association with adenoma formation.

METHODS

Patients recruited from a local endoscopy clinic provided informed consent and completed an interview to ascertain demographic, lifestyle, and adenoma risk factors. Cases were individuals with a histopathologically confirmed adenoma, and controls included patients with a normal colonoscopy or those with histopathological findings not requiring heightened surveillance (normal biopsy, hyperplastic polyp). Methylation-specific polymerase chain reaction was used to characterize candidate gene promoter methylation. Odds ratios (ORs) and 95 % confidence intervals (95% CIs) were calculated using unconditional multivariable logistic regression to test the hypothesis that candidate gene methylation differed between cases and controls, after adjustment for confounders.

RESULTS

Complete data were available for 107 participants; 36 % had adenomas (men 40 %, women 31 %). Hypomethylation of the MINT1 locus (OR 5.3, 95% CI 1.0-28.2) and the PER1 (OR 2.9, 95% CI 1.1-7.7) and PER3 (OR 11.6, 95% CI 1.6-78.5) clock gene promoters was more common among adenoma cases. While specificity was moderate to high for the three markers (71-97 %), sensitivity was relatively low (18-45 %).

CONCLUSION

Follow-up of these epigenetic markers is suggested to further evaluate their utility for adenoma screening or surveillance.

Risk Factors for False Fecal Immunochemical Test Results in Colorectal Cancer Screening

GOALS

We investigated the factors associated with false fecal immunochemical test (FIT) results for advanced colorectal neoplasm (ACRN).

BACKGROUND

Data on whether certain subgroups of patients have an increased risk of inaccurate FIT results are extremely limited.

STUDY

This was a retrospective study conducted in a university hospital in Korea from June 2013 to May 2015. Out of 34,547 participants who had an FIT completed, we analyzed a total of 3990 subjects aged 50 years and above who underwent colonoscopy.

RESULTS

The rates of false-negative and false-positive results were 58.0% and 15.7%, respectively. Elevated fasting blood glucose [adjusted odds ratio (AOR), 0.59; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.36-0.97], the presence of high-grade dysplasia (AOR, 0.49; 95% CI, 0.25-0.95), 3 or more adenomas (AOR, 0.56; 95% CI, 0.35-0.89), cancer (AOR, 0.20; 95% CI, 0.11-0.38), and distal ACRN (AOR, 0.61; 95% CI, 0.39-0.96) were associated with a lower risk of false-negative FIT results. The presence of proximal ACRN (AOR, 1.59; 95% CI, 1.01-2.51) and adenoma ≥10 mm (AOR, 4.38; 95% CI, 2.17-8.87) were associated with a higher risk of false-negative results. Older age (70 y and above; AOR, 1.67; 95% CI, 1.29-2.17), diverticulum (AOR, 1.94; 95% CI, 1.45-2.58), and hemorrhoid (AOR, 1.63; 95% CI, 1.32-2.01) were associated with false-positive results.

CONCLUSIONS

Subjects with a higher risk of false-negative results should be prioritized for earlier colonoscopy and subjects with inaccurate results should be more cautiously considered for screening by using modalities other than FIT. Our findings will contribute to individualization of screening programs.

Reduced and Full-Preparation CT Colonography, Fecal Immunochemical Test, and Colonoscopy for Population Screening of Colorectal Cancer: A Randomized Trial

BACKGROUND

Population screening for colorectal cancer (CRC) is widely adopted, but the preferred strategy is still under debate. We aimed to compare reduced (r-CTC) and full cathartic preparation CT colonography (f-CTC), fecal immunochemical test (FIT), and optical colonoscopy (OC) as primary screening tests for CRC.

METHODS

Citizens of a district of Florence, Italy, age 54 to 65 years, were allocated (8:2.5:2.5:1) with simple randomization to be invited by mail to one of four screening interventions: 1) biennial FIT for three rounds, 2) r-CTC, 3) f-CTC, 4) OC. Patients tested positive to FIT or CTC (at least one polyp ≥6mm) were referred to OC work-up. The primary outcomes were participation rate and detection rate (DR) for cancer or advanced adenoma (advanced neoplasia). All statistical tests were two-sided.

RESULTS

Sixteen thousand eighty-seven randomly assigned subjects were invited to the assigned screening test. Participation rates were 50.4% (4677/9288) for first-round FIT, 28.1% (674/2395) for r-CTC, 25.2% (612/2430) for f-CTC, and 14.8% (153/1036) for OC. All differences between groups were statistically significant (P = .047 for r-CTC vs f-CTC; P < .001 for all others). DRs for advanced neoplasia were 1.7% (79/4677) for first-round FIT, 5.5% (37/674) for r-CTC, 4.9% (30/612) for f-CTC, and 7.2% (11/153) for OC. Differences in DR between CTC groups and FIT were statistically significant (P < .001), but not between r-CTC and f-CTC (P = .65).

CONCLUSIONS

Reduced preparation increases participation in CTC. Lower attendance and higher DR of CTC as compared with FIT are key factors for the optimization of its role in population screening of CRC.

Optimal use of colonoscopy and fecal immunochemical test for population-based colorectal cancer screening: a cost-effectiveness analysis using Japanese data

OBJECTIVE

There have been few cost-effectiveness analyses of population-based colorectal cancer screening in Japan, and there is no consensus on the optimal use of total colonoscopy and the fecal immunochemical test for colorectal cancer screening with regard to cost-effectiveness and total colonoscopy workload. The present study aimed to examine the cost-effectiveness of colorectal cancer screening using Japanese data to identify the optimal use of total colonoscopy and fecal immunochemical test.

METHODS

We developed a Markov model to assess the cost-effectiveness of colorectal cancer screening offered to an average-risk population aged 40 years or over. The cost, quality-adjusted life-years and number of total colonoscopy procedures required were evaluated for three screening strategies: (i) a fecal immunochemical test-based strategy; (ii) a total colonoscopy-based strategy; (iii) a strategy of adding population-wide total colonoscopy at 50 years to a fecal immunochemical test-based strategy.

RESULTS

All three strategies dominated no screening. Among the three, Strategy 1 was dominated by Strategy 3, and the incremental cost per quality-adjusted life-years gained for Strategy 2 against Strategies 1 and 3 were JPY 293 616 and JPY 781 342, respectively. Within the Japanese threshold (JPY 5-6 million per QALY gained), Strategy 2 was the most cost-effective, followed by Strategy 3; however, Strategy 2 required more than double the number of total colonoscopy procedures than the other strategies.

CONCLUSIONS

The total colonoscopy-based strategy could be the most cost-effective for population-based colorectal cancer screening in Japan. However, it requires more total colonoscopy procedures than the other strategies. Depending on total colonoscopy capacity, the strategy of adding total colonoscopy for individuals at a specified age to a fecal immunochemical test-based screening may be an optimal solution.

Characteristics of colorectal tumours in asymptomatic patients with negative immunochemical faecal occult blood test results

The immunochemical faecal occult blood test (iFOBT) is a simple, non-invasive colorectal cancer (CRC) screening method for reducing CRC-related mortality. However, the sensitivity of iFOBT is imperfect and certain colonic neoplasms that require removal may be missed. The aim of this study was to investigate the incidence and characteristics of CRC in asymptomatic, iFOBT-negative patients who underwent opportunistic screening. A total of 919 subclinical patients (276 iFOBT-positive and 643 iFOBT-negative) in the health screening program of our hospital underwent total colonoscopy (TCS) within 2 years after iFOBT. The patients were divided into an iFOBT-positive and an iFOBT-negative group and the TCS findings were compared between the two groups. Although the incidence of advanced neoplasia (CRC, high-grade dysplasia, adenoma sized ≥10 mm and tubulovillous adenoma) was significantly higher in the iFOBT-positive group, these lesions were also found in 6.3% of iFOBT-negative patients. The lesions tended to be proximally located and non-protruding. In conclusion, screening with iFOBT remains clinically significant. However, colonoscopy is indispensable for reducing the incidence and mortality of CRC.

Factors affecting faecal immunochemical test positive rates: demographic, pathological, behavioural and environmental variables

OBJECTIVES

Positive rates in faecal immunochemical test (FIT)-based colorectal cancer screening programmes vary, suggesting that differences between programmes may affect test results. We examined whether demographic, pathological, behavioural, and environmental factors affected haemoglobin concentration and positive rates where samples are mailed.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study; 34,298 collection devices were sent, over five years, to screening invitees (median age 60.6). Participant demographics, temperature on sample postage day, and previous screening were recorded. Outcomes from colonoscopy performed within a year following FIT were collected. Multivariate logistic regression identified significant predictors of test positivity.

RESULTS

Higher positive rate was independently associated with male gender, older age, lower socioeconomic status, and distally located neoplasia, and negatively associated with previous screening (p < 0.05). Older males had higher faecal haemoglobin concentrations and were less likely to have a false positive result at colonoscopy (p < 0.05). High temperature on the sample postage day was associated with reduced haemoglobin concentration and positivity rate (26-35℃: Odds ratio 0.78, 95% confidence interval 0.66-0.93), but was not associated with missed significant neoplasia at colonoscopy (p > 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Haemoglobin concentrations, and therefore FIT positivity, were affected by factors that vary between screening programmes. Participant demographics and high temperature at postage had significant effects. The impact of temperature could be reduced by seasonal scheduling of invitations. The importance of screening, and following up positive test results, particularly in older males, should be promoted.

Factors associated with false-positive and false-negative fecal immunochemical test results for colorectal cancer screening

BACKGROUND

Certain subgroups have higher rates of false fecal immunochemical test (FIT) results, yet few studies have addressed this topic.

OBJECTIVE

To identify demographic factors associated with false-positive and false-negative FIT results in colorectal cancer screening.

DESIGN

Retrospective database review of prospectively collected data.

SETTING

A bowel cancer screening center in Hong Kong invited participants for colorectal cancer screening (2008-2012).

PATIENTS

Study participants who underwent both FIT and colonoscopy in the first year (n = 4482) and underwent colonoscopy after negative FIT results for 3 consecutive years (n = 857).

MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS

The diagnostic accuracy and predictive values of FIT according to participant characteristics.

RESULTS

The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive values, and negative predictive values for advanced neoplasia were 33.1%, 91.9%, 19.0%, and 96.0%, respectively. Participants 66 to 70 years of age had higher sensitivity, whereas older age, smoking, and use of aspirin/nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs were associated with lower specificity. The rates of false-positive and false-negative results were 8.1% and 66.9%, respectively. Older age (66-70 years; adjusted odds ratio [AOR] 1.95; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.35-2.81; P < .001), smoking (AOR 1.68; 95% CI, 1.08-2.61; P = .020), and the presence of polypoid adenoma (AOR 1.71; 95% CI, 1.14-2.57; P = .009) were associated with false-positive results. Younger participants (AOR for elderly participants 0.31) and the use of aspirin/nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (AOR 4.44) in participants with 1 FIT with negative results and the absence of high-grade dysplasia (AOR for presence 0.41) were associated with false-negative results.

LIMITATIONS

Self-referred participants who received one type of qualitative FIT.

CONCLUSION

These findings could be used to target screening more toward those with a higher risk of false-negative results and those with a lower risk of false-positive results for earlier colonoscopy.

Colorectal cancer screening: tests, strategies, and perspectives

Screening has a central role in colorectal cancer (CRC) control. Different screening tests are effective in reducing CRC-specific mortality. Influence on cancer incidence depends on test sensitivity for pre-malignant lesions, ranging from almost no influence for guaiac-based fecal occult blood testing (gFOBT) to an estimated reduction of 66–90% for colonoscopy. Screening tests detect lesions indirectly in the stool [gFOBT, fecal immunochemical testing (FIT), and fecal DNA] or directly by colonic inspection [flexible sigmoidoscopy, colonoscopy, CT colonography (CTC), and capsule endoscopy]. CRC screening is cost-effective compared to no screening but no screening strategy is clearly better than the others. Stool tests are the most widely used in worldwide screening interventions. FIT will soon replace gFOBT. The use of colonoscopy as a screening test is increasing and this strategy has superseded all alternatives in the US and Germany. Despite its undisputed importance, CRC screening is under-used and participation rarely reaches 70% of target population. Strategies to increase participation include ensuring recommendation by physicians, introducing organized screening and developing new, more acceptable tests. Available evidence for DNA fecal testing, CTC, and capsule endoscopy is reviewed.

Characteristics of adenomas detected by fecal immunochemical test in colorectal cancer screening

BACKGROUND

Fecal immunochemical test (FIT) diagnostic accuracy for colorectal adenoma detection in colorectal cancer screening is limited.

METHODS

We analyzed 474 asymptomatic subjects with adenomas detected on colonoscopy in two blinded diagnostic tests studies designed to assess FIT diagnostic accuracy. We determined the characteristics of adenomas (number, size, histology, morphology, and location) and the risk of metachronous lesions (according to European guidelines). Finally, we performed a logistic regression to identify those variables independently associated with a positive result.

RESULTS

Advanced adenomas were found in 145 patients (75.6% distal and 24.3% only proximal to splenic flexure). Patients were classified as low (59.5%), intermediate (30.2%), and high risk (10.3%) according to European guidelines. At a 100-ng/mL threshold, FIT was positive in 61 patients (12.8%). Patients with advanced adenomas [odds ratio (OR), 8.8; 95% confidence interval (CI), 4.76-16.25], distal advanced adenomas (OR, 6.7; 95% CI, 1.9-8.8), high risk (OR, 20.1; 95% CI, 8.8-45.8), or intermediate risk lesions (OR, 6; 95% CI, 2.9-12.4) had more probabilities to have a positive test. The characteristics of adenomas independently associated were number of adenomas (OR, 1.22; 95% CI, 1.04-1.42), distal flat adenomas (OR, 0.44; 95% CI, 0.21-0.96), pedunculated adenomas (OR, 2.28; 95% CI, 1.48-3.5), and maximum size of distal adenomas (mm; OR, 1.24; 95% CI, 1.16-1.32).

CONCLUSIONS

European guidelines classification and adenoma location correlates with the likelihood of a positive FIT result.

IMPACT

This information allows us to understand the FIT impact in colorectal cancer prevention. Likewise, it should be taken into account in the development of new colorectal adenomas biomarkers.

Association between early stage colon neoplasms and false-negative results from the fecal immunochemical test

BACKGROUND & AIMS

The fecal immunochemical test (FIT) can identify patients with advanced colorectal neoplasms, but it also has a high rate of false-negative results. It would be helpful to characterize colorectal neoplasms that are not detected by FIT to aid in development of new tests. We characterized colorectal neoplasms from patients who had negative results from the FIT.

METHODS

We analyzed data from 18,296 subjects who were screened for colorectal cancer by colonoscopy and the FIT at the Health Management Center of National Taiwan University Hospital from September 2005 through September 2010. We identified 4045 subjects with colorectal neoplasms (3385 with nonadvanced adenomas, 632 with advanced adenomas, and 28 with cancer). We analyzed the sensitivity of the FIT in identifying these patients, along with information on lesion size, location, and morphology.

RESULTS

The FIT identified patients with nonadvanced adenomas, advanced adenomas, and cancer with sensitivity values of 10.6% (95% confidence interval [CI], 10.2%-12.3%), 28.0% (95% CI, 24.6%-31.7%), and 78.6% (95% CI, 58.5%-91.0%), respectively. The FIT detected proximal advanced adenomas and nonpolypoid lesions with lower levels of sensitivity than distal advanced adenomas; it had a high false-negative rate in detection of adenomas <15 mm (adjusted odds ratio, 2.85; 95% CI, 1.79-4.54) and nonpolypoid adenomas (adjusted odds ratio, 2.15; 95% CI, 1.22-3.80), after adjusting for demographic characteristics, colonoscopy findings, and potential confounders. The FIT produced a higher percentage of false-negative results in detection of carcinoma in situ and T1 cancer than in T2-T4 cancers (66.7% sensitivity vs 100%; P = .049).

CONCLUSIONS

The FIT produces a high rate of false-negative results for patients with small or nonpolypoid adenomas. Early-stage cancers are associated with a high rate of false-negative results from the FIT.

The "Iowa get screened" colon cancer screening program

OBJECTIVE

To implement a colon cancer screening program for uninsured or underinsured Iowans.

METHODS

All 1995 uninsured patients or patients with Iowa Care insurance aged 50 to 64 years attending the University of Iowa Clinic or the Iowa City Free Medical Clinic were mailed information about the project. Recruitment also took place in person, by having the clinic receptionist hand subjects a research packet, and through community posters. Individuals with colonic symptoms or who were up to date with screening were ineligible. Eligible subjects received a free fecal immunochemical test (FIT), and those with positive FITs were provided with a colonoscopy at no cost to them.

RESULTS

Of 449 individuals who completed eligibility forms (23% of the study population), 297 (66%) were eligible and were provided with an FIT. Two-hundred thirty-five (79%) returned a stool sample, with 49 (21%) testing positive. Thirty of the 49 (61%) individuals had a colonoscopy, and 20 individuals had at least 1 polyp biopsied. Thirteen individuals had at least 1 tubular adenoma; 2 had adenomas more than 1 cm in diameter, with no colon cancers identified. Face-to-face recruitment had the highest rate of returned FITs (72%) compared with handing the subject a research packet (3%) or a mailing only (9%) (Chi-square, P < .001).

CONCLUSION

There was high interest in and compliance with colon cancer screening using a FIT among underinsured individuals. Although the FIT positivity rate was higher than expected, many individuals did not complete recommended follow-up colonoscopies. Population-based strategies for offering FIT could significantly increase colon cancer screening among disadvantaged individuals, but programs will have to develop sustainable mechanisms to include the necessary organization and address substantial costs of providing mass screening, as well as facilitating and providing colonoscopies for those who test positive.

Risk factors for false positive and for false negative test results in screening with fecal occult blood testing

Differences in the risk of a false negative or a false positive fecal immunochemical test (FIT) across subgroups may affect optimal screening strategies. We evaluate whether subgroups are at increased risk of a false positive or a false negative FIT result, whether such variability in risk is related to differences in FIT sensitivity and specificity or to differences in prior CRC risk. Randomly selected, asymptomatic individuals were invited to undergo colonoscopy. Participants were asked to undergo one sample FIT and to complete a risk questionnaire. We identified patient characteristics associated with a false negative and false positive FIT results using logistic regression. We focused on statistically significant differences as well as on variables influencing the false positive or negative risk for which the odds ratio exceeded 1.25. Of the 1,426 screening participants, 1,112 (78%) completed FIT and the questionnaire; 101 (9.1%) had advanced neoplasia. 102 Individuals were FIT positive, 65 (64%) had a false negative FIT result and 66 (65%) a false positive FIT result. Participants at higher age and smokers had a significantly higher risk of a false negative FIT result. Males were at increased risk of a false positive result, so were smokers and regular NSAID users. FIT sensitivity was lower in females. Specificity was lower for males, smokers and regular NSAID users. FIT sensitivity was lower in women. FIT specificity was lower in males, smokers and regular NSAID users. Our results can be used for further evidence based individualization of screening strategies.

Current status of screening for colorectal cancer

BACKGROUND

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is a leading cause of cancer morbidity and mortality. A well-defined precursor lesion (adenoma) and a long preclinical course make CRC a candidate for screening. This paper reviews the current evidence for the most important tests that are widely used or under development for population-based screening.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

In this narrative review, we scrutinized all papers we have been aware of, and carried out searches in PubMed and Cochrane library for relevant literature.

RESULTS

Two screening methods have been shown to reduce CRC mortality in randomised trials: repetitive faecal occult blood testing (FOBT) reduces CRC mortality by 16%; once-only flexible sigmoidoscopy (FS) by 28%. FS screening also reduces CRC incidence (by 18%), FOBT does not. Colonoscopy screening has a potentially larger effect on CRC incidence and mortality, but randomised trials are lacking. New screening methods are on the horizon but need to be tested in large clinical trials before implementation in population screening.

CONCLUSIONS

FS screening reduces CRC incidence and CRC mortality by removal of adenomas; FOBT reduces CRC mortality by early detection of cancer. Several other tests are available, but none has been evaluated in randomised trials. Screening strategies differ considerably across countries.

Using resource modelling to inform decision making and service planning: the case of colorectal cancer screening in Ireland

Background

Organised colorectal cancer screening is likely to be cost-effective, but cost-effectiveness results alone may not help policy makers to make decisions about programme feasibility or service providers to plan programme delivery. For these purposes, estimates of the impact on the health services of actually introducing screening in the target population would be helpful. However, these types of analyses are rarely reported. As an illustration of such an approach, we estimated annual health service resource requirements and health outcomes over the first decade of a population-based colorectal cancer screening programme in Ireland.

Methods

A Markov state-transition model of colorectal neoplasia natural history was used. Three core screening scenarios were considered: (a) flexible sigmoidoscopy (FSIG) once at age 60, (b) biennial guaiac-based faecal occult blood tests (gFOBT) at 55–74 years, and (c) biennial faecal immunochemical tests (FIT) at 55–74 years. Three alternative FIT roll-out scenarios were also investigated relating to age-restricted screening (55–64 years) and staggered age-based roll-out across the 55–74 age group. Parameter estimates were derived from literature review, existing screening programmes, and expert opinion. Results were expressed in relation to the 2008 population (4.4 million people, of whom 700,800 were aged 55–74).

Results

FIT-based screening would deliver the greatest health benefits, averting 164 colorectal cancer cases and 272 deaths in year 10 of the programme. Capacity would be required for 11,095-14,820 diagnostic and surveillance colonoscopies annually, compared to 381–1,053 with FSIG-based, and 967–1,300 with gFOBT-based, screening. With FIT, in year 10, these colonoscopies would result in 62 hospital admissions for abdominal bleeding, 27 bowel perforations and one death. Resource requirements for pathology, diagnostic radiology, radiotherapy and colorectal resection were highest for FIT. Estimates depended on screening uptake. Alternative FIT roll-out scenarios had lower resource requirements.

Conclusions

While FIT-based screening would quite quickly generate attractive health outcomes, it has heavy resource requirements. These could impact on the feasibility of a programme based on this screening modality. Staggered age-based roll-out would allow time to increase endoscopy capacity to meet programme requirements. Resource modelling of this type complements conventional cost-effectiveness analyses and can help inform policy making and service planning.

Urine Metabolite Profiling of Human Colorectal Cancer by Capillary Electrophoresis Mass Spectrometry Based on MRB

Aim. The study was to investigate the metabolic profile of urine metabolites and to elucidate their clinical significance in patients with colorectal cancer. Methods. Colorectal cancers from early stage and advanced stage were used in this study. Urine samples of colorectal cancer patients and healthy adults were collected and subjected to capillary electrophoresis mass spectrometry based on moving reaction boundary analysis. The metabolic data were analyzed by SPSS 17.0 to find urinary biomarkers for colorectal cancer. Results. The results indicated that the urine metabolic profiling of colorectal cancer patients had significant changes compared with the normal controls, and there were also differences between early stage and advanced colorectal cancer patients. Compared with the control group, the levels of isoleucine, valine, arginine, lactate acid and leucine increased (P < 0.05), but those of histidine, methionine, serine, aspartic acid, citric acid, succinate, and malic acid decreased in urine samples from colorectal cancer (P < 0.05). Furthermore, the levels of isoleucine and valine were lower in urine of patients with advanced colorectal cancer than those in early stage colorectal cancer (P < 0.05). Conclusion. The technique of capillary electrophoresis mass spectrometry based on MRB could reveal the significant metabolic alterations during progression of colorectal cancer, and the method is feasible and may be useful for the early diagnosis of colorectal cancer.

The effect of colonoscopy preparation quality on adenoma detection rates

BACKGROUND

Colonoscopy reduces the risk of colorectal cancer mortality by removing precancerous adenomas. The detection rate of subcentimeter (<10 mm) polyps is lower for procedures with inadequate preparation quality.

OBJECTIVE

To compare the adenoma detection rates of small (6-9 mm) and diminutive (≤ 5 mm) adenomas in patients with poor and fair quality preparations with those with adequate quality preparations.

DESIGN

Cross-sectional study and multivariable, hierarchical model.

SETTING

Roudebush Veterans Affairs Medical Center.

PATIENTS

This study involved 8800 colonoscopies performed from 2001 to 2010.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS

Preparation quality rating, polyp size, and polyp histology.

RESULTS

Preparation quality was rated as fair in 2809 (31.9%) and poor in 829 (9.4%) colonoscopies. In patients with poor compared with adequate quality, the detection rate was lower for diminutive adenomas (odds ratio [OR] 0.57; 95% CI, 0.47-0.70) but not for small adenomas (OR 0.84; 95% CI, 0.65-1.07). There were no differences in the detection rate of diminutive (OR 1.08; 95% CI, 0.94-1.24]) or small (OR 1.09; 95% CI, 0.94-1.27) adenomas in patients with fair compared with adequate quality preparation. Detection of advanced histology in patients with poor preparation quality was lower than in those with adequate quality (P = .027; 3.3% vs 5.0%), but there was no difference in those with fair compared with adequate quality (P = .893; 4.9% vs 5.0%).

LIMITATIONS

Single-center study; no standardization of preparation quality or size measurements.

CONCLUSIONS

A fair preparation quality rating does not decrease the detection rate for adenomas of any size or for advanced histology, suggesting that fair quality may be considered adequate and that follow-up intervals may not need to be shortened. Poor preparation quality decreases the detection rate of diminutive adenomas and advanced histology, suggesting substandard colonoscopy performance.

Cost-effectiveness of population-based screening for colorectal cancer: a comparison of guaiac-based faecal occult blood testing, faecal immunochemical testing and flexible sigmoidoscopy

BACKGROUND

Several colorectal cancer-screening tests are available, but it is uncertain which provides the best balance of risks and benefits within a screening programme. We evaluated cost-effectiveness of a population-based screening programme in Ireland based on (i) biennial guaiac-based faecal occult blood testing (gFOBT) at ages 55-74, with reflex faecal immunochemical testing (FIT); (ii) biennial FIT at ages 55-74; and (iii) once-only flexible sigmoidoscopy (FSIG) at age 60.

METHODS

A state-transition model was used to estimate costs and outcomes for each screening scenario vs no screening. A third party payer perspective was adopted. Probabilistic sensitivity analyses were undertaken.

RESULTS

All scenarios would be considered highly cost-effective compared with no screening. The lowest incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER vs no screening euro 589 per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) gained) was found for FSIG, followed by FIT euro 1696) and gFOBT (euro 4428); gFOBT was dominated. Compared with FSIG, FIT was associated with greater gains in QALYs and reductions in lifetime cancer incidence and mortality, but was more costly, required considerably more colonoscopies and resulted in more complications. Results were robust to variations in parameter estimates.

CONCLUSION

Population-based screening based on FIT is expected to result in greater health gains than a policy of gFOBT (with reflex FIT) or once-only FSIG, but would require significantly more colonoscopy resources and result in more individuals experiencing adverse effects. Weighing these advantages and disadvantages presents a considerable challenge to policy makers.

Is fecal occult blood testing more sensitive for left- versus right-sided colorectal neoplasia? A systematic literature review

Owing to its slow development from removable precursor lesions and early cancer stages with good prognosis, screening for colorectal cancer holds potential to reduce both the incidence and mortality of the disease. While sigmoidoscopy only detects left-sided neoplasia, there is accumulating evidence that colonoscopy is also more effective in protecting from neoplasia in the left versus the right colon and rectum. In this context, it is an important question whether the sensitivity of the most common noninvasive screening tool for colorectal cancer, fecal occult blood testing (FOBT), also differs for left- versus right-sided neoplasia. Therefore, we systematically searched the literature for prospective screening studies conducted in average-risk adults that performed FOBT (immunochemical and/or guaiac-based) and colonoscopy among all participants, and reported site-specific sensitivities of FOBT for advanced colorectal neoplasia. Most of the seven included studies showed a higher sensitivity of FOBT for advanced neoplasia in the left versus right colon, but this finding needs to be confirmed since the available literature is scarce and not entirely consistent.

Serum metabolomics as a novel diagnostic approach for gastrointestinal cancer

Conventional tumor markers are unsuitable for detecting carcinoma at an early stage and lack clinical efficacy and utility. In this study, we attempted to investigate the differences in serum metabolite profiles of gastrointestinal cancers and healthy volunteers using a metabolomic approach and searched for sensitive and specific metabolomic biomarker candidates. Human serum samples were obtained esophageal (n = 15), gastric (n = 11), and colorectal (n = 12) cancer patients and healthy volunteers (n = 12). A model for evaluating metabolomic biomarker candidates was constructed using multiple classification analysis, and the results were assessed with receiver operating characteristic curves. Among the 58 metabolites, the levels of nine, five and 12 metabolites were significantly changed in the esophageal, gastric and colorectal cancer patients, respectively, compared with the healthy volunteers. Multiple classification analysis revealed that the variations in the levels of malonic acid and L-serine largely contributed to the separation of esophageal cancer; gastric cancer was characterized by changes in the levels of 3-hydroxypropionic acid and pyruvic acid; and L-alanine, glucuronoic lactone and L-glutamine contributed to the separation of colorectal cancer. Our approach revealed that some metabolites are more sensitive for detecting gastrointestinal cancer than conventional biomarkers. Our study supports the potential of metabolomics as an early diagnostic tool for cancer.

Sensitivity of immunochemical faecal occult blood testing for detecting left- vs right-sided colorectal neoplasia

Background:

Faecal occult blood tests (FOBTs) are used for colorectal cancer (CRC) screening. We aimed to assess the sensitivity of an immunochemical FOBT for detecting advanced colorectal neoplasia in the left vs the right colon and to explore reasons for potential differences in site-specific test performance.

Methods:

We prospectively measured faecal occult blood levels by a quantitative immunochemical FOBT (RIDASCREEN) in 2310 average-risk subjects undergoing screening colonoscopy. We compared diagnostic performance for subjects with left- vs right-sided advanced neoplasia, as well as patient characteristics and adenoma characteristics that have been suggested to impact faecal haemoglobin levels.

Results:

Sensitivities for subjects with left- vs right-sided advanced neoplasia were 33% (95% confidence interval (CI), 26–41%) and 20% (CI, 11–31%) (P=0.04) at a specificity of 95% (overall sensitivity: 29%) and the areas under the receiver-operating characteristics curve were 0.71 (CI, 0.69–0.72) and 0.60 (CI, 0.58–0.63), respectively. Pedunculated shape was strikingly more common in participants with left- vs right-sided advanced neoplasia (47% vs 14%). In logistic regression analyses adjusted for site, pedunculated shape was statistically significantly associated with test sensitivity (P=0.04).

Conclusions:

The immunochemical FOBT in our study was more sensitive for detecting subjects with left- vs right-sided advanced colorectal neoplasia. Our findings may stimulate further diagnostic research in the field as well as modelling analyses to estimate the potential effect of site-specific test performance on the effectiveness of annual or biennial FOBT-based screening programmes, in particular with respect to protection from right-sided CRC.

Colorectal cancer screening for average-risk North Americans: an economic evaluation

BACKGROUND

Colorectal cancer (CRC) fulfills the World Health Organization criteria for mass screening, but screening uptake is low in most countries. CRC screening is resource intensive, and it is unclear if an optimal strategy exists. The objective of this study was to perform an economic evaluation of CRC screening in average risk North American individuals considering all relevant screening modalities and current CRC treatment costs.

METHODS AND FINDINGS

An incremental cost-utility analysis using a Markov model was performed comparing guaiac-based fecal occult blood test (FOBT) or fecal immunochemical test (FIT) annually, fecal DNA every 3 years, flexible sigmoidoscopy or computed tomographic colonography every 5 years, and colonoscopy every 10 years. All strategies were also compared to a no screening natural history arm. Given that different FIT assays and collection methods have been previously tested, three distinct FIT testing strategies were considered, on the basis of studies that have reported "low," "mid," and "high" test performance characteristics for detecting adenomas and CRC. Adenoma and CRC prevalence rates were based on a recent systematic review whereas screening adherence, test performance, and CRC treatment costs were based on publicly available data. The outcome measures included lifetime costs, number of cancers, cancer-related deaths, quality-adjusted life-years gained, and incremental cost-utility ratios. Sensitivity and scenario analyses were performed. Annual FIT, assuming mid-range testing characteristics, was more effective and less costly compared to all strategies (including no screening) except FIT-high. Among the lifetimes of 100,000 average-risk patients, the number of cancers could be reduced from 4,857 to 1,393 [corrected] and the number of CRC deaths from 1,782 [corrected] to 457, while saving CAN$68 per person. Although screening patients with FIT became more expensive than a strategy of no screening when the test performance of FIT was reduced, or the cost of managing CRC was lowered (e.g., for jurisdictions that do not fund expensive biologic chemotherapeutic regimens), CRC screening with FIT remained economically attractive.

CONCLUSIONS

CRC screening with FIT reduces the risk of CRC and CRC-related deaths, and lowers health care costs in comparison to no screening and to other existing screening strategies. Health policy decision makers should consider prioritizing funding for CRC screening using FIT.

Sex differences in performance of fecal occult blood testing

OBJECTIVES

Immunological and guaiac-based fecal occult blood tests (iFOBTs and gFOBTs) are widely used for early detection of colorectal cancer (CRC). We aimed to assess potential sex differences in performance of iFOBTs and gFOBT in the screening setting.

METHODS

The sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values for detection of advanced colorectal neoplasms (CRC or advanced adenoma) were assessed by sex for a range of cutpoints of a quantitative iFOBT (RIDASCREEN Hemoglobin), six qualitative iFOBTs, and a gFOBT (HemOccult) among 1,157 male and 1,167 female participants of the German screening colonoscopy program (mean age: 63.0 and 62.0 years, respectively).

RESULTS

The prevalence of advanced colorectal neoplasms was much higher among men (13.5%) than among women (7.5%). At any cutpoint of the quantitative iFOBT, and for all qualitative iFOBTs and the gFOBT, the sensitivity and positive predictive value were substantially higher, and specificity and negative predictive value were substantially lower among men than among women. At the cutpoint of 2 μg/g stool given by the manufacturer of the quantitative iFOBT, sensitivity, specificity, and the positive and negative predictive values were 47.6, 85.0, 33.0, and 91.3% among men, and 30.7, 89.5, 19.3, and 94.1% among women (P value for sex differences 0.001, 0.002, 0.004, and 0.019, respectively). Sex differences in predictive values were mostly explained by sex differences in the prevalence of advanced colorectal neoplasms.

CONCLUSIONS

There are major sex differences in the performance of fecal occult blood testing, which might require careful attention in the interpretation of test results, and in the design, modeling, and evaluation of CRC screening strategies.

Stool DNA testing to screen for colorectal cancer in the Medicare population: a cost-effectiveness analysis

BACKGROUND

The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services considered whether to reimburse stool DNA testing for colorectal cancer screening among Medicare enrollees.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the conditions under which stool DNA testing could be cost-effective compared with the colorectal cancer screening tests currently reimbursed by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services.

DESIGN

Comparative microsimulation modeling study using 2 independently developed models.

DATA SOURCES

Derived from literature.

TARGET POPULATION

A cohort of persons aged 65 years. A sensitivity analysis was also conducted, in which a cohort of persons aged 50 years was studied.

TIME HORIZON

Lifetime.

PERSPECTIVE

Third-party payer.

INTERVENTION

Stool DNA test every 3 or 5 years in comparison with currently recommended colorectal cancer screening strategies.

OUTCOME MEASURES

Life expectancy, lifetime costs, incremental cost-effectiveness ratios, and threshold costs.

RESULTS OF BASE-CASE ANALYSIS

Assuming a cost of $350 per test, strategies of stool DNA testing every 3 or 5 years yielded fewer life-years and higher costs than the currently recommended colorectal cancer screening strategies. Screening with the stool DNA test would be cost-effective at a per-test cost of $40 to $60 for stool DNA testing every 3 years, depending on the simulation model used. There were no levels of sensitivity and specificity for which stool DNA testing would be cost-effective at its current cost of $350 per test. Stool DNA testing every 3 years would be cost-effective at a cost of $350 per test if the relative adherence to stool DNA testing were at least 50% better than that with other screening tests.

RESULTS OF SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS

None of the results changed substantially when a cohort of persons aged 50 years was considered.

LIMITATION

No pathways other than the traditional adenoma-carcinoma sequence were modeled.

CONCLUSION

Stool DNA testing could be a cost-effective alternative for colorectal cancer screening if the cost of the test substantially decreased or if its availability would entice a large fraction of otherwise unscreened persons to receive screening.

Stool DNA testing to screen for colorectal cancer in the Medicare population: a cost-effectiveness analysis

BACKGROUND

The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services considered whether to reimburse stool DNA testing for colorectal cancer screening among Medicare enrollees.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the conditions under which stool DNA testing could be cost-effective compared with the colorectal cancer screening tests currently reimbursed by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services.

DESIGN

Comparative microsimulation modeling study using 2 independently developed models.

DATA SOURCES

Derived from literature.

TARGET POPULATION

A cohort of persons aged 65 years. A sensitivity analysis was also conducted, in which a cohort of persons aged 50 years was studied.

TIME HORIZON

Lifetime.

PERSPECTIVE

Third-party payer.

INTERVENTION

Stool DNA test every 3 or 5 years in comparison with currently recommended colorectal cancer screening strategies.

OUTCOME MEASURES

Life expectancy, lifetime costs, incremental cost-effectiveness ratios, and threshold costs.

RESULTS OF BASE-CASE ANALYSIS

Assuming a cost of $350 per test, strategies of stool DNA testing every 3 or 5 years yielded fewer life-years and higher costs than the currently recommended colorectal cancer screening strategies. Screening with the stool DNA test would be cost-effective at a per-test cost of $40 to $60 for stool DNA testing every 3 years, depending on the simulation model used. There were no levels of sensitivity and specificity for which stool DNA testing would be cost-effective at its current cost of $350 per test. Stool DNA testing every 3 years would be cost-effective at a cost of $350 per test if the relative adherence to stool DNA testing were at least 50% better than that with other screening tests.

RESULTS OF SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS

None of the results changed substantially when a cohort of persons aged 50 years was considered.

LIMITATION

No pathways other than the traditional adenoma-carcinoma sequence were modeled.

CONCLUSION

Stool DNA testing could be a cost-effective alternative for colorectal cancer screening if the cost of the test substantially decreased or if its availability would entice a large fraction of otherwise unscreened persons to receive screening.

Colorectal cancer screening

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The review will summarize the state of the art in colon cancer screening. Recently published screening guidelines will be reviewed so physicians can understand them and how to deal with the differences. Each screening modality presently in use will then be reviewed with emphasis on efficacy and problems.

RECENT FINDINGS

During the past two decades research has clearly demonstrated colon cancer screening to be effective. New modalities such as virtual colonoscopy and stool DNA screening have been introduced and are recommended by some organizations but not others. Ages to discontinue screening have also been suggested. Fecal immunochemical testing exhibits some advantages over guaiac-based testing. Problematic issues with the effectiveness of colonoscopy have arisen, particularly in the proximal colon. Both technical and biological reasons have been suggested for this decrease in effectiveness.

SUMMARY

Colon cancer screening is effective and continues to improve. Refinements of guidelines as well as refinements in each screening modality have occurred. Several screening tools are newly available and quality studies and efforts for present and new tests are imperative.

Comparison of guaiac-based and quantitative immunochemical fecal occult blood testing in a population at average risk undergoing colorectal cancer screening

OBJECTIVES

Although some studies have shown that the quantitative, immunochemical fecal occult blood test (FOBT) (qFIT) has better performance characteristics than the standard guaiac-based FOBT (GT) for identifying advanced colorectal neoplasia (ACRN), there is limited information on test performance of these tests in average-risk populations.

METHODS

Seven hundred seventy consecutive average-risk patients from four centers who were undergoing screening colonoscopy also provided stool samples. Stool specimens from three consecutive bowel movements were applied to a hemoccult II test card (Beckman Coulter, Fullerton, CA) and OC-SENSA MICRO (Eiken Chemical, Tokyo, Japan) sampling probes at the same time. We measured the diagnostic value of the qFIT for detecting an ACRN by using three criteria: sensitivity, specificity, and likelihood ratios. A receiver operating characteristic curve for determining the qFIT cutoff values and the number of tests that best discriminated between ACRNs and other findings were determined.

RESULTS

Seventy-eight ACRNs were identified during colonoscopy. At all hemoglobin thresholds, the sensitivity of the qFIT was higher than that of the GT for cancer or ACRN. The sensitivity and specificity of the GT for detecting advanced adenomas, cancer, and ACRNs were 13.6%/92.4%, 30.8%/92.4%, and 16.7%/92.9%, respectively. Using the 100 ng/ml cut point and three-sample qFIT results, the sensitivity and specificity of the qFIT for detecting advanced adenomas, cancer, and ACRNs were 33.9%/90.6%, 84.6%/89.8%, and 43.7%/91.9%, respectively. The area under the curve for cancer indicated that using either 2 or 3 tests provided the best discrimination for cancer.

CONCLUSIONS

The qFIT provides a higher sensitivity for detecting ACRN and cancer than the GT, and has an acceptable specificity that significantly reduces the need for colonoscopic evaluation in the screened population.

Quantitative immunochemical fecal occult blood testing for colorectal adenoma detection: evaluation in the target population of screening and comparison with qualitative tests

OBJECTIVES

Quantitative and qualitative immunochemical fecal occult blood tests (FOBTs) have been proposed for noninvasive colorectal cancer screening, but comparative evaluation is lacking. The aim of this study was to determine the diagnostic accuracy of two (quantitative) enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA)-based immunochemical FOBTs for identifying colorectal adenomas in the target population of screening and to compare the results with six (qualitative) immunochromatographic FOBTs, previously evaluated in the same study participants using the same stool samples.

METHODS

A total of 1,319 participants of screening colonoscopy at average risk for colorectal neoplasia (mean age 63 years; age range 31-86 years; 50% men) were recruited prospectively from January 2006 to December 2007 in collaboration with 20 gastroenterological practices in Germany. Fecal hemoglobin and hemoglobin-haptoglobin levels were measured using an automated ELISA (RIDASCREEN). Test performance characteristics at different cutoff values were derived by comparing the results of stool testing with the results of colonoscopy in a blinded manner.

RESULTS

A total of 130 participants (10%) had an advanced adenoma. The area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve with regard to advanced adenomas was 0.68 (0.65-0.71) for hemoglobin and 0.64 (0.61-0.67) for hemoglobin-haptoglobin (P=0.034). At a specificity of approximately 95%, the sensitivity (95% confidence interval) for advanced adenomas was 33% (25-42%) for hemoglobin and 24% (17-32%) for hemoglobin-haptoglobin, respectively. The sensitivity for hemoglobin was very close to sensitivities of the six qualitative FOBTs at (strongly divergent) levels of specificity observed for the latter.

CONCLUSIONS

ELISA-based measurement of hemoglobin was superior to hemoglobin-haptoglobin, but showed a similar sensitivity for advanced adenomas compared with (qualitative) immunochromatographic FOBTs at defined levels of specificity. Compared with the latter, its quantitative nature offers advantages in terms of transparency and flexibility regarding the positivity threshold (e.g., specificity can be oriented toward available colonoscopy resources or personal risk profiles) and in terms of a higher level of standardization regarding test analysis and interpretation.

Perspectives of colorectal cancer screening in Germany 2009

Adequate screening methods can decrease colorectal cancer (CRC) mortality. The guaiac test for fecal occult-blood (FOBT) is part of the German CRC Screening Program since 1970 and has evidence level Ia. In randomized multicenter-studies FOBT has an average sensitivity of 24% and decreases CRC mortality up to 30%. Immunological tests for human haemoglobin (iFOBT) show better performance characteristics than guaiac FOBT, with augmented sensitivity and specificity. However, the single tests show wide differences in diagnostic performance and iFOBT is not yet covered by insurance companies although it should replace the guaiac test for CRC screening. Visual colonoscopy, which was introduced to the German National Cancer Screening Program in 2002, is the gold standard for the diagnosis of colorectal neoplasia. From 2003 to 2007 more than 2.8 million examinations have been documented in Germany. The prevalence of adenomas is around 20% and of CRC about 0.7% to 1.0% of the screenings. Seventy percent of the carcinomas detected during screening are in an early stage (UICC I and II). Furthermore, screening colonoscopy is a cost saving procedure with a low complication rate (0.25% overall). Insurance companies save 216€ for each screening colonoscopy mainly by prevention of neoplasia due to polypectomy. In Germany, virtual colonography by computed tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance imaging still lacks standardization of the hard and software. In experienced centres the sensitivity for CRC and large polyps of CT colonography is comparable to colonoscopy but in meta-analyses the ranking is lower. New technologies like computer-aided colonoscopies with sheath or double balloon techniques are coming up as well as capsule colonoscopy, which sensitivity for large polyps is about 70%. Advised by his physician, the patient can choose his most acceptable examination method from this whole set of screening tools.

Identification of colorectal adenomas by a quantitative immunochemical faecal occult blood screening test depends on adenoma characteristics, development threshold used and number of tests performed

BACKGROUND

Faecal occult blood tests (FOBT) are faulted by low sensitivity for advanced adenomatous polyps (AAP). Quantified, immunochemical, haemoglobin (Hb)-specific immunochemical FOBT (I-FOBT) measurements are now used for colorectal screening.

AIMS

To correlate adenoma characteristics to amount of faecal Hb lost and to evaluate sensitivity and specificity for AAP by faecal Hb development threshold used and number of I-FOBTs collected.

METHODS

Three daily I-FOBTs were collected and analysed in 1221 patients scheduled for colonoscopy. Faecal Hb was analysed as ngHb/mL of buffer and the highest result related to colonoscopy findings.

RESULTS

In 1204 patients without cancer, colonoscopy identified adenomas in 294, 99 with AAPs. Adenoma patients had elevated faecal Hb increasing with advanced histology, size, pedunculated shape and multiplicity (P < 0.001 for all). At 50 ngHb/mL threshold, sensitivity and specificity for AAPs were 54.5% (95%CI 44.7, 64.7) and 88.1% (95%CI 86.2, 90.1) for three tests. At higher thresholds, sensitivity decreased, but was significantly higher with more samples collected. Conversely, specificity increased at higher thresholds, but decreased with more samples.

CONCLUSIONS

Faecal Hb loss from adenomas is significantly associated with size, number and advanced features. Sensitivity and specificity for AAPs are determined by test threshold chosen and number of samples collected; these determine the number of colonoscopies needed for positive tests.

Editorial: It's time to make organized colorectal cancer screening convenient and easy for patients

Colorectal cancer (CRC) screening is widely recommended, but underused. To increase screening rates, we need to implement organized and population-based systems to promote CRC screening among people in a single region, health plan, or health system. This is ideally accomplished using fecal immunochemical tests (FITs), which can be sent through a mass mailing. The study by Levi and colleagues shows that patients using aspirin, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), anti-platelet agents, or anti-coagulants do not need to stop these medications while doing the fecal collection. This makes the testing more convenient for patients, and avoids the risk of adverse cardiovascular events caused by stopping these medications.