Sorafenib-induced liver failure

Drug-Induced Liver Injury After Liver Transplantation

Drug-induced liver injury (DILI) is an adverse reaction to many drugs in common use that in a liver transplantation (LT) recipient may cause graft dysfunction and may even lead to graft loss and the need for retransplantation. However, several potential clinical scenarios, such as graft rejection and infection, can confound the diagnosis of suspected DILI in the setting of LT. This makes causal assessment of a new liver injury more uncertain and has traditionally precluded collection of bona fide cases of DILI affecting LT patients in prospective DILI registries and cohorts. Although no studies have yet determined a greater susceptibility of the transplant patient to DILI, these patients nevertheless present certain risk factors that can theoretically increase the risk of DILI. These include the fact that these patients are polymedicated, use drugs that are potentially hepatotoxic, and can have coexisting hepatitis B or C viruses in addition to other factors found in nontransplant patients, such as genetic variants. Therefore, awareness is crucial of any potential hepatotoxic effect of drugs used in the LT recipient and their possible implication in any case of liver dysfunction. In the present article, we review the most common drugs used in LT recipients from a liver safety perspective and address the main pitfalls in attributing causality in this clinical setting. We also affirm the need for further research and collaboration in this somewhat neglected topic in the field of DILI.

Gross and microscopic changes of liver neoplasms and background hepatic structures following neoadjuvant therapy

Liver transplantation is a surgical option with curative intent used in the management of some cases of hepatocellular carcinoma and cholangiocarcinoma (hilar, rarely intrahepatic). A number of different therapeutic modalities including ablative techniques, arterially directed therapies, radiation and chemotherapy are used in the neoadjuvant setting prior to liver transplantation with the goals of preventing tumour progression, decreasing post-transplant recurrence and possibly downstaging patients with tumour burden beyond what is acceptable by current transplant criteria. Pathologists evaluating hepatic explants must be aware of these neoadjuvant therapies and the alterations induced by them in both tumourous and non-tumourous tissue. In this review, we discuss common neoadjuvant therapies used in in this setting, as well as the gross and microscopic changes induced by these presurgical treatments within hepatic neoplasms as well as the background hepatic parenchyma and nearby structures. Select secondary tumours involving the liver which are pretreated will also be discussed. Finally, proper reporting of these changes will be mentioned.

Liver Protective Effects of Renin-Angiotensin System Inhibition Have No Survival Benefits in Hepatocellular Carcinoma Induced By Repetitive Administration of Diethylnitrosamine in Mice

BACKGROUND:

Preclinical studies have demonstrated that renin-angiotensin system (RAS) signalling has strong tumour-promoting effects and RAS inhibition was associated with improvement in the overall survival in some cancer types including hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).

OBJECTIVE:

We aimed to investigate the effect of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs) or angiotensin-II-receptor blockers (ARBs) on the survival of mice with diethylnitrosamine (DEN) induced HCC.

METHODS:

HCC was induced by weekly i.p. administration of DEN. Mice were treated with sorafenib (SO) (30 mg/kg), perindopril (PE) (1 mg/kg), fosinopril (FO) (2 mg/kg), losartan (LO) (10 mg/kg), PE (1 mg/kg) + SO (30 mg/kg), FO (2 mg/kg) + SO (30 mg/kg), or LO (10 mg/kg) + SO (30 mg/kg). Survival analysis was done using the Kaplan-Meier method, and the log-rank test was used for assessing the significance of difference between groups.

RESULTS:

The administration of PE, FO and LO as monotherapy or as combined with SO resulted in marked improvement in the liver histologic picture with no impact on overall survival of mice.

CONCLUSION:

Interfering the RAS either through the inhibition of ACE or the blockade of angiotensin II type 1 (AT1) receptors has similar effects on the liver of DEN-induced HCC mice and is not associated with longer survival due to detrimental effects of DEN on other organs. Hence, repetitive administration of DEN in such models of HCC is not suitable for mortality assessment studies.

Fulminant Hepatitis in a Patient with Hepatocellular Carcinoma Related to Nonalcoholic Steatohepatitis Treated with Sorafenib

We describe a case of acute liver failure in a patient with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma related to nonalcoholic steatohepatitis during sorafenib treatment. A 74-year-old man with diabetes mellitus and hypertension was diagnosed with hepatocellular carcinoma associated with fatty liver. Three weeks after sorafenib therapy, at Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status 3, he developed jaundice, general weakness, flapping tremor, nausea, and anorexia. Sorafenib was stopped: laboratory tests showed a relevant elevation of transaminases suggesting diagnosis of acute hepatitis. During hospital admission, the patient died of liver failure. Sorafenib is the first successful target therapy effective for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma. The most common adverse events are fatigue, hand-foot skin reaction, skin rash/desquamation, diarrhea, and hypertension, whereas liver dysfunction is uncommon. To our knowledge, this is the first patient reported in the literature with hepatocellular carcinoma related to nonalcoholic steatohepatitis who died of rapid worsening of liver function during sorafenib treatment.

Organ Atrophy Induced by Sorafenib and Sunitinib - Quantitative Computed Tomography (CT) Evaluation of the Pancreas, Thyroid Gland and Spleen

Background

To evaluate organ atrophy induced by sorafenib and sunitinib, we retrospectively reviewed the CT scans of renal cell carcinoma (RCC) patients receiving molecular targeted therapy (MTT) using sorafenib or sunitinib, and performed volumetric analysis of the pancreas, thyroid gland, and spleen.

Material/Methods

Thirteen RCC patients receiving MTT were assigned as the evaluation cases (MTT group), while thirteen additional RCC patients not receiving MTT were retrieved as the Control group. We evaluated the baseline and follow-up CT studies. The volume of the three organs estimated by CT volumetry was compared between the baseline and follow-up CTs. The atrophic ratio of the organ volume in the follow-up CT to that in the baseline CT was calculated, and compared between the MTT and Control groups.

Results

All measured organs in the MTT group showed statistically significant volume loss, while no significant change was observed in the Control group. Mean atrophic ratio in the MTT group was 0.74, 0.58, and 0.82 for the pancreas, thyroid and spleen, respectively. The differences in atrophic ratios between both groups were all statistically significant (P<0.05).

Conclusions

Single-agent sorafenib or sunitinib therapy induced statistically significant atrophy in the pancreas, thyroid, and spleen.

Tyrosine kinase inhibitors: friends or foe in treatment of hepatic fibrosis?

Aberrant activity of tyrosine kinases has been proved to be associated with multiple diseases including fibrotic diseases. Tyrosine kinases inhibitors (TKIs) might be a novel approach to transform the anti-fibrotic treatment. However, both beneficial and adverse effects are observed by researchers when using these TKIs in either preclinical animal models or patients with hepatic fibrosis. Since hepatotoxicity of TKIs is the leading cause for drug withdrawals thus limits its application in anti-fibrosis, not only efficacy but also safety of TKIs should be paid great concerns. It has been observed in a few studies that TKIs could induce relatively high rate of hepatic biochemical markers elevations and even result in liver failure. Fortunately, several strategies have been adopt to handle with the hepatotoxicity. Accumulating evidences suggest that hepatic stellate cells (HSC) play a pivotal role in hepatic fibrogenesis, so it might be a good option to develop selective TKIs specifically targeting HSCs. The present review will briefly summarize the anti-fibrotic mechanism of TKIs, adverse effects of TKIs as well as the novel developed selective delivery of TKIs.

Hepatotoxicity of targeted therapy for cancer

INTRODUCTION

Understanding the mechanism of DILI with MTA, and how to avoid and manage these toxicities is essential for minimising inferior cancer treatment outcomes. An organised and comprehensive overview of MTA-associated hepatotoxicity is lacking; this review aims to fill the gap.

AREAS COVERED

A literature review was performed based on published case reports and relevant studies or articles pertaining to the topics on PubMed. Food and Drug Administration drug information documents and search on the US National Library of Medicine LiverTox database was performed for all relevant MTA.

EXPERT OPINION

MTA-associated hepatotoxicity is common but rarely fatal. The pattern of hepatotoxicity is predominantly idiosyncratic. Pharmacogenomics show potential in predicting patients at risk of poorly metabolising or developing immunoallergic responses to MTA, but prospective data is scant. Preventing reactivation of viral hepatitis using anti-viral drugs, and avoidance of drug combinations at high risk of negative interactions are the most readily preventable measures for DILI.

New Insight into the Anti-liver Fibrosis Effect of Multitargeted Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors: From Molecular Target to Clinical Trials

Tyrosine kinases (TKs) is a family of tyrosine protein kinases with important functions in the regulation of a broad variety of physiological cell processes. Overactivity of TK disturbs cellular homeostasis and has been linked to the development of certain diseases, including various fibrotic diseases. In regard to liver fibrosis, several TKs, such as vascular endothelial growth factor receptor, platelet-derived growth factor receptor, fibroblast growth factor receptor, and epidermal growth factor receptor kinases, have been identified as central mediators in collagen production and potential targets for anti-liver fibrosis therapies. Given the essential role of TKs during liver fibrogenesis, multitargeted inhibitors of aberrant TK activity, including sorafenib, erlotinib, imatinib, sunitinib, nilotinib, brivanib and vatalanib, have been shown to have potential for treating liver fibrosis. Beneficial effects are observed by researchers of this field using these multitargeted TK inhibitors in preclinical animal models and in patients with liver fibrosis. The present review will briefly summarize the anti-liver fibrosis effects of multitargeted TK inhibitors and molecular mechanisms.

Drug-Induced Liver Injury

CONTEXT

Drug-induced liver injury (DILI) represents a diverse set of responses following exposure to any manufactured or naturally occurring chemical compound. Drug-induced liver injury is of major concern owing to the ever increasing number of compounds introduced into the market for treatment of various diseases as well as the increasing popularity of herbals, which lend themselves to self-medication but are not rigorously regulated.

OBJECTIVE

To provide an overview of the prevalence, classification, and diagnosis of DILI with emphasis on pathogenesis and the role of a liver biopsy. To focus on the most common, emerging, and herbal agents that cause DILI with emphasis on the histologic pattern of injury observed.

DATA SOURCES

A review of the literature was drawn from the PubMed (US National Library of Medicine) repository, textbooks, and online databases. All figures were taken from cases seen at our tertiary referral center, which is 1 of 12 participating sites in the National Institutes of Health-funded Drug-Induced Liver Injury Network.

CONCLUSIONS

Drug-induced liver injury due to prescription, over-the-counter, and herbal products is a major cause of liver disease in the United States and around the world. Diagnosis of DILI is challenging because there is no single clinical, laboratory, or histologic feature specific to DILI. Accurate diagnosis requires establishing a causal relationship with the suspected agent and excluding competing causes of liver injury. The liver biopsy is an essential component in the management of DILI by offering clues to the underlying pathogenesis, providing prognostic information, and guiding therapy.

Hepatotoxicity with vascular endothelial growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors: A meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials

A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCT) was conducted to determine the relative risk (RR) of hepatotoxicity with vascular endothelial growth factor receptor (VEGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI). Citations from PubMed/Medline, abstracts from major conferences, clinicaltrials.gov and package inserts were reviewed to include RCTs comparing arms with or without a VEGFR TKI. The RRs of all-grade ALT, AST, ALP and bilirubin elevation in 18,282 patients from 52 trials were 1.57 (95% CI 1.38-1.79, p<0.001), 1.57 (95% CI 1.36-1.81, p<0.001), 1.20 (95% CI 1.09-1.83, p<0.001) and 1.55 (95% CI 1.21-1.97, p<0.001) respectively, and high-grade elevations were 1.66 (95% CI 1.25-2.20, p=0.001), 1.61 (95% CI 1.21-2.14, p=0.001), 1.02 (95% CI 0.70-1.47, p=0.932) and 1.34 (95% CI 1.0-1.81, p=0.054) respectively compared to those in the non-TKI group. The incidence of hepatic failure with VEGFR TKIs was 0.8%.

Hepatitis C virus reactivation in cancer patients in the era of targeted therapies

The purpose of this review is to summarize the evidence of hepatitis C reactivation in cancer patients in the era of targeted therapies. Targeted therapies are novel therapeutics frequently used in cancer patients. During treatment with targeted therapies, viral replication is one of the major problems that can occur. The PubMed database, ASCO, and ASCO Gastrointestinal Cancer Symposium abstracts were searched up until September 15, 2013 using the following search keywords: “targeted therapies, rituximab, alemtuzumab, brentuximab, hepatitis, hepatitis C reactivation, tyrosine kinase inhibitors, imatinib, mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) inhibitors, everolimus, anti-HER therapies, trastuzumab, pertuzumab, lapatinib, anti-epidermal growth factor receptor therapies, cetuximab, panitumumab, and ipilimumab”. Papers considered relevant for the aim of this review were selected by the authors. The data about rituximab-induced hepatic flare in hepatitis C virus (HCV) positive patients is controversial. However, there is the possibility of life-threatening hepatic flare that can develop after HCV ribonucleic acid (HCV-RNA) viral load increases. Routine follow-up of liver function tests should be advised. Especially in high-risk patients, such as those with baseline chronic active hepatitis and cirrhosis, and where there are plans to administer rituximab concomitantly with corticosteroids, it is advised to have close follow-up of HCV viral load. The data is insufficient to make accurate statements about the association of alemtuzumab therapy and HCV reactivation. However, alemtuzumab may cause deep immunosuppression. Due to this, it is better to follow up with liver function tests and HCV RNA levels during alemtuzumab therapy. Brentuximab has effects on antibody dependent cellular toxicity and may decrease humoral immunity. Thus, we believe that during brentuximab treatment of HCV infected patients, clinicians may encounter hepatitis C reactivation. There have been no reported cases of hepatitis C reactivation with imatinib therapy. However, there are many reports of hepatitis B reactivation with imatinib treatment. Based on the evidence of hepatitis B reactivation with imatinib and the effects of imatinib on immune system functions, we suggest that imatinib therapy might be a risk factor for HCV reactivation. Anti-human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 therapies are not associated with hepatic flare in HCV infected patients. Post-transplant studies reported that mTOR was safely administered to patients with active hepatitis C without causing hepatic flare. Cetuximab and panitumumab have not been associated with HCV reactivation. Two cases of HCV infected melanoma were safely treated with ipilimumab without any HCV reactivation or hepatic flare. Targeted therapies are a new and emerging area of oncology treatment modalities. While treating HCV infected cancer patients, clinicians should be mindful of the immunosuppressive properties of targeted therapies. Further randomized trials are needed to establish algorithms for this issue.

Saikosaponin-d affects the differentiation, maturation and function of monocyte-derived dendritic cells

Saikosaponin-d (Ssd) is a triterpenoid saponin derived from Bupleurum falcatum L., which has been shown to exhibit a variety of pharmacological properties, including anti-inflammatory, antibacterial and antiviral properties. The aim of the present study was to investigate the effect of Ssd on the differentiation, maturation and function of human monocyte-derived dendritic cells (DCs) isolated from condylomata acuminata patients. The results of the present study demonstrated that Ssd reduced the differentiation of DCs, as evidenced by decreased expression levels of cluster of differentiation (CD)1a, CD80 and CD86 molecules and increased CD14 expression. Expression levels of the mannose receptor and CD32 were also significantly elevated, which was associated with enhanced fluorescein isothiocyanate-dextran endocytic activity. Furthermore, Ssd treatment promoted DC maturation by increasing the expression levels of CD40, CD83, CD80 and CD86. In addition, the function of mature DCs, including the secretion of IL-12 and the stimulation of lymphocyte proliferation, was significantly increased following Ssd administration. In conclusion, the present study indicated that Ssd exhibited immunomodulatory effects and may be a novel potent chemopreventive drug candidate for the treatment of condylomata acuminata.

Hepatotoxicity of tyrosine kinase inhibitors: clinical and regulatory perspectives

The introduction of small-molecule tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) in clinical oncology has transformed the treatment of certain forms of cancers. As of 31 March 2013, 18 such agents have been approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA), 15 of these also by the European Medicines Agency (EMA), and a large number of others are in development or under regulatory review. Unexpectedly, however, their use has been found to be associated with serious toxic effects on a number of vital organs including the liver. Drug-induced hepatotoxicity has resulted in withdrawal from the market of many widely used drugs and is a major public health issue that continues to concern all the stakeholders. This review focuses on hepatotoxic potential of TKIs. The majority of TKIs approved to date are reported to induce hepatic injury. Five of these (lapatinib, pazopanib, ponatinib, regorafenib and sunitinib) are sufficiently potent in this respect as to require a boxed label warning. Onset of TKI-induced hepatotoxicity is usually within the first 2 months of initiating treatment, but may be delayed, and is usually reversible. Fatality from TKI-induced hepatotoxicity is uncommon compared to hepatotoxic drugs in other classes but may lead to long-term consequences such as cirrhosis. Patients should be carefully monitored for TKI-induced hepatotoxicity, the management of which requires individually tailored reappraisal of the risk/benefit. The risk is usually manageable by dose adjustment or a switch to a suitable alternative TKI. Confirmation of TKI-induced hepatotoxicity can present challenges in the presence of hepatic metastasis and potential drug interactions. Its diagnosis in a patient with TKI-sensitive cancer requires great care if therapy with the TKI suspected to be causal is to be modified or interrupted as a result. Post-marketing experience with drugs such as imatinib, lapatinib and sorafenib suggests that the hepatotoxic safety of all the TKIs requires diligent surveillance.

Risk of liver toxicity with the angiogenesis inhibitor pazopanib in cancer patients

PURPOSE

The angiogenesis inhibitor pazopanib has been approved for the treatment of advanced renal cell cancer (RCC) and soft tissue sarcoma. Severe and fatal hepatotoxicity has been observed in its clinical studies. This analysis was conducted to determine the risk of liver toxicity by a systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical trials.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Databases from PubMed, Web of Science and abstracts presented at ASCO meetings up to January, 2012 were searched to identify relevant studies. Eligible studies included prospective trials of cancer patients treated with pazopanib starting at 800 mg daily. Summary incidence rates, relative risks, and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using a fixed- or random-effects model.

RESULTS

A total of 1478 patients from 10 clinical trials were included. The incidences of all-grade aspartate aminotransferase (AST), alanine transaminase (ALT), and bilirubin elevation were 39.6% (95% CI 31.2-48.6%), 41.4% (95% CI 34.1-49.0%), and 24.8% (95% CI 16.3-35.3%), respectively. The incidences of high-grade (Grade 3 and 4) AST, ALT and bilirubin elevation were 6.9% (95% CI 5.5-8.6%), 9.4% (95% CI 7.8-11.4%), and 3.4% (2.4-5.0%), respectively. In comparison with placebo, pazopanib significantly increased the risk of high-grade AST elevation (RR 6.56, 95% CI 2.04-21.07, p = 0.002) and ALT elevation (RR 4.33, 95% CI 1.88-10.0, p = 0.001). However, the risks of high-grade bilirubin elevation (RR 1.31, 95% CI 0.47-3.64) and fatal hepatotoxicity (RR 2.51, 95% CI 0.12-51.91, p = 0.55) were not significantly elevated.

CONCLUSION

The use of pazopanib was associated with a significantly increased risk of severe non-fatal hepatotoxicity in cancer patients.

Targeting the PDGF signaling pathway in the treatment of non-malignant diseases

Platelet-derived growth factor (PDGF) is a family of mesenchymal mitogens with important functions during the embryonal development and in the control of tissue homeostasis in the adult. The PDGF isoforms exert their effects by binding to α-and β-tyrosine kinase receptors. Overactivity of PDGF signaling has been linked to the development of certain malignant and non-malignant diseases, including atherosclerosis and various fibrotic diseases. Different types of PDGF antagonists have been developed, including inhibitory monoclonal antibodies and DNA aptamers against PDGF isoforms and receptors, and receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors. Beneficial effects have been recorded using such inhibitors in preclinical models and in patients with certain malignant as well as non-malignant diseases. The present communication summarizes the use of PDGF antagonists in the treatment of non-malignant diseases.

Hepatocellular carcinoma treated with sorafenib: early detection of treatment response and major adverse events by contrast-enhanced US

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Early prediction of tumour response and major adverse events (AEs), especially liver failure, in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is essential for maximizing the clinical benefits of sorafenib. To evaluate the usefulness of dynamic contrast-enhanced ultrasound (DCE-US) for the early prediction of tumour response and major AEs in HCC patients.

METHODS

Thirty-seven HCC patients were started on a reduced dosage of sorafenib, subsequently increased to the standard dosage. Tumour response at 1 month was assessed by CT using the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST). Major AEs were defined as grade 3 or higher. DCE-US was performed before treatment (day 0) and on days 7, 14 and 28. Changes in perfusion parameters in the tumour and liver parenchyma between day 0 and later time points were compared between treatment responders and nonresponders based on RECIST and between patients who experienced major AEs and those who did not. Tumour results were also compared with progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS).

RESULTS

Tumour perfusion parameters based on the area under the time-intensity curve (AUC) were statistically significant, with AUC during washin on day 14, the most relevant for tumour response (P = 0.0016) and AUC during washin on day 7, the most relevant for both PFS (P = 0.009) and OS (P = 0.037). A decrease in total AUC between days 0 and 7 in the liver parenchyma was strongly correlated with major AEs (P = 0.0002).

CONCLUSION

DCE-US may be useful for the early prediction of tumour response and major AEs in patients with HCC.

A contemporary update on rates and management of toxicities of targeted therapies for metastatic renal cell carcinoma

BACKGROUND

To provide an updated review of adverse events associated with sunitinib, pazopanib, bevacizumab, temsirolimus, axitinib, everolimus and sorafenib and their management.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We performed a PubMed and Cochrane-based review of side effects associated with the seven agents including product monographs to provide an outline of treatment measures aiming to reduce their toxicities. Subject and outcome of interest, design type, sample size, pertinence and quality, and detail of reporting were the indicators of manuscript quality.

RESULTS

All targeted therapies cause adverse events. Most adverse events may be prevented or tested before they escalate to severe levels.

CONCLUSION

Prevention, early recognition, and prompt management of side effects are of key importance and avoid unnecessary dose reductions, which may undermine treatment efficacy.

Fatal case of sorafenib-associated idiosyncratic hepatotoxicity in the adjuvant treatment of a patient with renal cell carcinoma

Background

Sorafenib is an orally available kinase inhibitor with activity at Raf, PDGFβ and VEGF receptors that is licensed for the treatment of advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC) and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Current evidence-based post-nephrectomy management of individuals with localized RCC consists of surveillance-based follow up. The SORCE trial is designed to investigate whether treatment with adjuvant sorafenib can reduce recurrence rates in this cohort.

Case presentation

Here we report an idiosyncratic reaction to sorafenib resulting in fatal hepatotoxicity and associated renal failure in a 62 year-old man treated with sorafenib within the SORCE trial.

Conclusion

This is the first reported case of sorafenib exposure associated fatal toxicity in the adjuvant setting and highlights the unpredictable adverse effects of novel adjuvant therapies.

Cryotherapy is associated with improved clinical outcomes of Sorafenib therapy for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma

We assessed the safety and efficacy of sorafenib with cryotherapy (cryoRx) in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). One hundred four HCC patients were enrolled, who met the following criteria: (i) Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer stage C; (ii) HCC without distant metastasis; (iii) the presence of portal vein thrombosis (PVT); (iv) Child-Pugh class A or B; and (v) life expectancy of at least 12 weeks. The patients were randomly divided into sorafenib-cryoRx and sorafenib (control) groups. Primary endpoint was time to progression (TTP); secondary endpoints included overall survival (OS) and tolerability. Microvessel density (MVD) was assessed by CD34-immunostaining. After a median 10.5 (4–26) months follow-up, the data showed that median TTP was 9.5 (8.4–13.5) months in combinatorial therapy group vs. 5.3 (3.8–6.9) months in sorafenib group (P = 0.02). The median OS was 12.5 (95 % CI 10.6–16.4) months in combination therapy group vs. 8.6 (7.3–10.4) months in sorafenib group (P = 0.01). Low MVD patients in combination therapy exhibited significantly longer median TTP and OS than controls. High MVD was predictive of poor responses to sorafenib. CryoRx did not increase frequency/degree of sorafenib-related adverse events. Therefore, it was concluded that the addition of cryoRx significantly improved clinical outcomes of Sorafenib therapy in advanced HCC with acceptable tolerance and similar safety profiles as previously reported.

High toxicity of sorafenib for recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma after liver transplantation

Treatment options of recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) after liver transplantation are limited and data on systemic compounds for advanced tumor stages in transplant recipients are sparse. We retrospectively analyzed the toxicity, tolerability, and efficacy of sorafenib in combination with mTOR inhibitors (mTORi), or calcineurin inhibitors (CNI) in transplant recipients with recurrent HCC. In total, 20 of 92 patients transplanted for HCC within a 10-year time period, experienced tumor recurrence. In case of ineligibility for other treatment options, patients received sorafenib (n = 13). In addition, CNI were stopped and switched to mTORi in nine patients, whereas CNI were continued in four patients. Grade 3-4 adverse events were observed in 92% of all patients necessitating sorafenib discontinuation in 77%. The most common severe adverse events were acute hepatitis, diarrhea, hand-foot - skin reaction and bone marrow suppression. In patients receiving sorafenib/mTORi one patient achieved partial response, and four achieved stable disease. In this cohort of liver transplant recipients side effects prevented full dosing of sorafenib and necessitated discontinuation of sorafenib in the majority of patients, yet antitumor efficacy seemed promising in combination with mTORi.

The effects of sorafenib on the portal hypertensive syndrome in patients with liver cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma--a pilot study

BACKGROUND

Increased intrahepatic vascular resistance and hyperperfusion in the splanchnic circulation are the principal mechanisms leading to portal hypertension in cirrhosis. Several preclinical studies have demonstrated a beneficial effect of the multikinase inhibitor sorafenib on the portal hypertensive syndrome.

AIM

To investigate the effect of sorafenib on hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG), systemic hemodynamics and intrahepatic mRNA expression of proangiogenic, profibrogenic and proinflammatory genes.

METHODS

Patients with liver fibrosis/cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma were treated with sorafenib 400 mg b.d. HVPG measurement and transjugular liver biopsy were performed at baseline and at week 2. Changes in HVPG and intrahepatic mRNA expression of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), platelet-derived growth factor (PDGF), RhoA, tumour necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α) and placental growth factor (PlGF) were evaluated.

RESULTS

Thirteen patients (m/f = 12/1; Child-Pugh class A/B = 10/3) were included. The most common aetiology of liver disease was alcohol consumption (n = 7). Eleven patients had an elevated portal pressure, including eight patients with clinically significant portal hypertension. A significant decrease of HVPG (≥ 20% from baseline) was observed in four subjects. In HVPG responders, we observed mRNA downregulation of VEGF, PDGF, PlGF, RhoA kinase and TNF-α, while no substantial mRNA decrease was found in nonresponders in any of the five genes. In two of the four HVPG responders we observed a dramatic (43-85%) mRNA decrease of all five investigated genes.

CONCLUSION

Larger controlled clinical trials are needed to demonstrate any potential beneficial effect of sorafenib on portal hypertension in patients with cirrhosis.

Sorafenib-induced liver failure: a case report and review of the literature

In patients with hepatocellular carcinoma characterized by vascular invasion and/or extrahepatic disease, Sorafenib is considered treatment of choice. Although mild liver test abnormalities were reported in less than 1% of the patients in the two large randomized, controlled phase III trials, four cases of severe acute Sorafenib-induced hepatitis have been described. One of these four cases died from liver failure. In this paper, a patient with HCC with lung metastases developed high fever and a severe hepatitis that rapidly evolved into liver coma and death, two weeks after the initiation of Sorafenib. Biochemical parameters pointed to a hepatocellular type of injury. Clinical and biochemical presentations were compatible with a drug-induced hypersensitivity syndrome such as it has mainly been described for aromatic anticonvulsants, sulphonamides, and allopurinol. We hypothesize that an underlying cytochrome P450 dysfunction with the presence of reactive drug metabolites might lead to this potentially fatal Sorafenib-induced severe liver dysfunction.

Cryotherapy is associated with improved clinical outcomes of sorafenib for the treatment of advanced hepatocellular carcinoma

Sorafenib may prolong survival in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), but with limited efficacy. The present study aimed to assess the safety and efficacy of sorafenib combined with cryotherapy (cryoRx) for the treatment of advanced HCC. A total of 104 patients met the following criteria: advanced HCC without distant metastasis, presence of portal vein thrombosis, Child-Pugh class A or B and life expectancy of at least 12 weeks. All patients were randomly assigned to sorafenib and cryoRx (n=52) or sorafenib-alone (n=52) treatment groups. The primary end-point of the study was overall survival (OS). The secondary end-points included time to progression (TTP) and tolerability. Microvessel density (MVD) was assessed following immunostaining for CD34. In a median of 10.5 (4-26) months follow-up, the median OS was 12.5 months (95% CI 10.6-16.4) in the combination therapy vs. 8.6 months (7.3-10.4) in the sorafenib-alone (P=0.01) group. The median TTP was 9.5 months (8.4-13.5) in the combination therapy vs. 5.3 months (3.8-6.9) in the sorafenib alone (P=0.02) group. CryoRx was an independent factor associated with improved clinical outcomes of sorafenib for the treatment of advanced HCC. Patients with low intratumoral MVD receiving the combination therapy exhibited a significantly longer median TTP and OS compared to those receiving sorafenib. High intratumoral MVD was an independent predictor of poor responses to sorafenib for advanced HCC. Compared with previous reports of sorafenib-related adverse drug reactions (ADRs), cryoRx did not further increase the frequency and degree of sorafenib-related ADRs. In conclusion, compared to sorafenib alone, the addition of cryoRx to sorafenib significantly improves the clinical outcomes of sorafenib for the treatment of advanced HCC with acceptable tolerance and similar safety profiles as previously reported. High intratumoral MVD is predictive of poor responses to sorafenib in advanced HCC patients.

Hepatic and HSC-specific sorafenib effects in rats with established secondary biliary cirrhosis

Portal hypertension in cirrhosis depends on increased intrahepatic vascular resistance, which is explained by fibrosis and intrahepatic hyperresponsiveness to vasoconstrictors. Both are caused by activation and proliferation of hepatic stellate cells (HSCs). Portal hypertension of cirrhotic rats can be reduced by the multikinase inhibitor sorafenib, due to a reduction of intrahepatic vascular resistance. Therefore, the hepatic effects of sorafenib require further understanding. Here, we investigated hepatic and HSC-specific sorafenib effects in cirrhotic rats. Animal models of bile duct ligation-induced secondary biliary cirrhosis in rats were studied. The rats were treated with sorafenib (60 mg/kg/day) for 1 week, starting after established cirrhosis. Histological evaluation was carried out using hemalaun and eosin (HE) staining. Apoptosis was studied by PARP cleavage, colorimetric caspase-3 assay, and electrophoretic DNA detection. HSC activation was studied by hepatic Sirius red and immunohistochemical αSMA (α-smooth muscle actin) staining, and by in vitro experiments with culture-activated primary HSCs. Biochemical serum parameters suggested the occurrence of sorafenib-induced liver damage. HE staining revealed histological changes in livers of sham-operated and bile duct-ligated (BDL) rats in response to sorafenib, which were different in both groups. In BDL rats and isolated HSCs, the treatment with sorafenib reduced hepatic αSMA and procollagen-1α mRNA expression. As shown by immunohistochemical staining, perisinusoidal αSMA expression was reduced by sorafenib in BDL rats. This was associated with reduced perisinusoidal deposition of extracellular matrix, as revealed by Sirius red staining. Although no change in PARP cleavage and only a minor increase in hepatic caspase-3 activity were detected in BDL rats in response to sorafenib, livers of sorafenib-treated BDL rats contained small DNA fragments, which were not observed in untreated BDL rats. In conclusion, sorafenib treatment reduces the number of activated HSCs in cirrhotic livers. This leads to the decrease in intrahepatic vascular resistance, but also to liver damage in the dosage we used. Therefore, any translation to portal hypertensive patients who may profit from sorafenib should be done with particular care.

[Management of side-effects of targeted therapies in renal cancer: gastrointestinal side-effects]

Several types of gastrointestinal complications can occur during treatment with targeted therapies: diarrhoea, nausea and vomiting, abnormalities in hepatic and pancreatic profiles, etc. Gastrointestinal problems in targeted therapy can have a significant impact on the general status of patients, their weight and their adherence to the treatment. The prevention, screening and rapid treatment of these side-effects are essential elements of patient care and can limit the associated dose reductions and loss of therapeutic benefit. In the case of diarrhoea, treatment must be started at the onset of grade 1 or 2 diarrhoea (four to six stools per day), with loperamide or racecadotril. Treatment with targeted therapy must be stopped if there is diarrhoea of grade 3 or 4 (more than six stools per day). In the case of nausea/vomiting or burning pain in the oesophagus, symptomatic treatment without stopping the targeted therapy is recommended. Biological assessment including transaminases, total and conjugated bilirubin should be prescribed before treatment initiation with targeted therapy. An elevation in alkaline phosphatases without elevation of transaminases suggests primarily the existence of hepatic metastases. In the event of worsening of the hepatic profile, if ALT greater than 5N, treatment must be stopped and specialist advice sought.

Preoperative induction with sorafenib pathologically downstaged advanced renal cell carcinoma: a case report

We present the case of a patient with renal cell carcinoma treated preoperatively with sorafenib. Complete resection of the left renal mass measuring 7.2 x 6.6 cm seemed to be difficult at diagnosis because of large renal hilar lymph nodes. With a short period of sorafenib administration, marked shrinkage of the renal mass and lymphadenopathy was observed after the patient experienced fulminant hepatic failure and a severe hand-foot skin reaction. Two-dimensional computed tomography revealed 60%, 78% and 84% reduction in the primary renal tumor, lung metastatic nodules and lymph nodes, respectively. Tumor shrinkage allowed for complete resection of the left kidney and the lymphadenopathy. Pathological findings revealed that over 90% of the renal tumor was substituted by necrotic fibrotic tissue and that the residual neoplastic component was diagnosed as clear cell carcinoma. The lymph nodes that were resected were negative for malignancy. At 6 months after radical nephrectomy, a new computed tomography scan revealed no evidence of disease with the disappearance of lung nodules.

Drug-induced liver injury: what was new in 2008?

BACKGROUND

Given the number of publications appearing annually regarding drug-induced liver injury (DILI), there remains a need to concisely summarize each year's new crop of case series and reports as well as the advances in mechanisms of liver injury and in the field of pharmacogenomics relating to DILI.

OBJECTIVE

To present an up-to-date review of the past year's most important clinical studies and reports of DILI, placing them into context of previous publications.

METHODS

A Medline search was conducted of all manuscripts appearing in the fields "hepatotoxicity" and "drug-induced liver injury" during the calendar year 2008. The most clinically relevant English language case reports and studies exploring mechanisms and risk factors for DILI were then chosen for review, and supplemented with older literature where appropriate.

CONCLUSIONS

As in past years, 2008 was replete with publications dealing with virtually all facets of DILI, including updated incidence and prevalence data, as well as the latest information regarding mechanisms of liver injury. Data from the first 300 patients in the National Institute of Health-sponsored DILI Network registry of > 100 non-acetaminophen causes were presented. Antimicrobials and CNS drugs were responsible for > 60% of cases, with herbals and dietary supplements being increasingly reported. Identification of genetic predispositions to DILI is coming of age with the FDA calling for the testing of human leukocyte antigen B(*)5701 before the use of abacavir to reduce the risk of hypersensitivity reactions. Several groups emphasized the pitfalls in utilizing Roussel Uclaf Causality Assessment Method and other causality assessment methodologies, and an updated review appeared on the use of potentially hepatotoxic medications in patients with underlying liver disease.