Isolation and characterization of an aceticlastic methanogen from a biogas digester

Characterization of feedback-resistant mevalonate kinases from the methanogenic archaeons Methanosaeta concilii and Methanocella paludicola

The inhibition of mevalonate kinase (MVK) by downstream metabolites is an important mechanism in the regulation of isoprenoid production in a broad range of organisms. The first feedback-resistant MVK was previously discovered in the methanogenic archaeon Methanosarcinamazei. Here, we report the cloning, expression, purification, kinetic characterization and inhibition analysis of MVKs from two other methanogens, Methanosaetaconcilii and Methanocellapaludicola. Similar to the M. mazei MVK, these enzymes were not inhibited by diphosphomevalonate (DPM), dimethylallyl diphosphate (DMAPP), isopentenyldiphosphate (IPP), geranylpyrophosphate (GPP) or farnesylpyrophosphate (FPP). However, they exhibited significantly higher affinity to mevalonate and higher catalytic efficiency than the previously characterized enzyme.

Anaerobic degradation of toluene and o-xylene by a methanogenic consortium

Toluene and o-xylene were completely mineralized to stoichiometric amounts of carbon dioxide, methane, and biomass by aquifer-derived microorganisms under strictly anaerobic conditions. The source of the inoculum was creosote-contaminated sediment from Pensacola, Fla. The adaptation periods before the onset of degradation were long (100 to 120 days for toluene degradation and 200 to 255 days for o-xylene). Successive transfers of the toluene- and o-xylene-degrading cultures remained active. Cell density in the cultures progressively increased over 2 to 3 years to stabilize at approximately 10(9) cells per ml. Degradation of toluene and o-xylene in stable mixed methanogenic cultures followed Monod kinetics, with inhibition noted at substrate concentrations above about 700 microM for o-xylene and 1,800 microM for toluene. The cultures degraded toluene or o-xylene but did not degrade m-xylene, p-xylene, benzene, ethylbenzene, or naphthalene. The degradative activity was retained after pasteurization or after starvation for 1 year. Degradation of toluene and o-xylene was inhibited by the alternate electron acceptors oxygen, nitrate, and sulfate. Degradation was also inhibited by the addition of preferred substrates such as acetate, H2, propionate, methanol, acetone, glucose, amino acids, fatty acids, peptone, and yeast extract. These data suggest that the presence of natural organic substrates or contaminants may inhibit anaerobic degradation of pollutants such as toluene and o-xylene at contaminated sites.

Control/promotion of the refuse methanogenic fermentation

Although practiced for more than 7 millennia, the landfill disposal of refuse has, as yet, with few exceptions, been merely regarded as a low-cost disposal option and its exploitation potential has been largely ignored. Today, however, a number of possibilities are under consideration including the production of energy, chemical feedstock, value-added chemicals, carbon dioxide and protein; the use of refuse as an anaerobic filter for the co-disposal of industrial wastewater and sludge; and the restoration of impoverished soils by fresh or composted refuse addition. Development of these technologies, however, necessitates a comprehensive understanding of the fundamental microbiology and biochemistry of refuse catabolism. Existing fundamental knowledge underpinning these technologies will be considered in a series of review articles. In the first, control/exploitation of the solid-state refuse methanogenic fermentation is examined with specific reference to the effects of first-tier variable manipulations.

Methanogenic degradation of acetone by an enrichment culture

An anaerobic enrichment culture degraded 1 mol of acetone to 2 mol of methane and 1 mol of carbon dioxide. Two microorganisms were involved in this process, a filament-forming rod similar to Methanothrix sp. and an unknown rod with round to slightly pointed ends. Both organisms formed aggregates up to 300 micron in diameter. No fluorescing bacteria were observed indicating that hydrogen or formate-utilizing methanogens are not involved in this process. Acetate was utilized in this culture by the Methanothrix sp. Inhibition of methanogenesis by bromoethanesulfonic acid or acetylene decreased the acetone degradation rate drastically and led to the formation of 2 mol acetate per mol of acetone. Streptomycin completely inhibited acetone degradation, and neither acetate nor methane was formed. 14CO2 was incorporated exclusively into the C-1 atom of acetate indicating that acetone is degraded via carboxylation to an acetoacetate residue. It is concluded that acetone is degraded by a coculture of an eubacterium and an acetate-utilizing methanogen and that acetate is the only intermediate transferred between both. The energetical problems of the eubacterium converting acetone to acetate are discussed.

Factors Affecting the Methanogenic Activity of Methanothrix soehngenii VNBF

Methane production by Methanothrix soehngenii VNBF grown on acetate (50 mM) as the sole carbon and energy source was influenced by the addition of Fe, trace elements, and pesticides. The addition of Fe and trace elements significantly enhanced the rate of CH 4 production. The addition of pesticides in the early growth phase caused complete inhibition. However, less inhibition was noted when pesticides were added during early exponential growth phase. Addition to culture tubes of Co, Ni, or Mo at 2 μM produced 64, 41, or 17%, respectively, more CH 4 than that produced in tubes lacking the corresponding trace element. A concentration of more than 5 μM of these trace elements in the medium resulted in decreased CH 4 production, presumably because of toxic effects.

Acetate and CO2 assimilation by Methanothrix concilii

Biosynthetic pathways in Methanothrix concilii, a recently isolated aceticlastic methanogen, were studied by 13C-nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy. Labeling patterns of amino acids, lipids, and carbohydrates were determined. Similar to other methanogens, acetate was carboxylated to pyruvate, which was further converted to amino acids by various biosynthetic pathways. The origin of carbon atoms in glutamate, proline, and arginine clearly showed that an incomplete tricarboxylic acid cycle operating in the oxidative direction was used for their biosynthesis. Isoleucine was synthesized via citramalate, which is a typical route for methanogens. As with Methanosarcina barkeri, an extensive exchange of the label between the carboxyl group of acetate and CO2 was observed. Lipids predominantly contained diphytanyl chains, the labeling of which indicated that biosynthesis proceeded through mevalonic acid. Labeling of the C-1,6 of glucose from [2-13C]acetate is consistent with a glucogenic route for carbohydrate biosynthesis. Except for the different origins of the methyl group of methionine, the metabolic properties of Methanothrix concilii are closely related to those of Methanosarcina barkeri.

The bioenergetics of methanogenesis

The reduction of CO2 or any other methanogenic substrate to methane serves the same function as the reduction of oxygen, nitrate or sulfate to more reduced products. These exergonic reactions are coupled to the production of usable energy generated through a charge separation and a protonmotive-force-driven ATPase. For the understanding of how methanogens derive energy from C-1 unit reduction one must study the biochemistry of the chemical reactions involved and how these are coupled to the production of a charge separation and subsequent electron transport phosphorylation. Data on methanogenesis by a variety of organisms indicates ubiquitous use of CH3-S-CoM as the final electron acceptor in the production of methane through the methyl CoM reductase and of 5-deazaflavin as a primary source of reducing equivalents. Three known enzymes serve as catalysts in the production of reduced 5-deazaflavin: hydrogenase, formate dehydrogenase and CO dehydrogenase. All three are potential candidates for proton pumps. In the organisms that must oxidize some of their substrate to obtain electrons for the reduction of another portion of the substrate to methane (e.g., those using formate, methanol or acetate), the latter two enzymes may operate in the oxidizing direction. CO2 is the most frequent substrate for methanogenesis but is the only substrate that obligately requires the presence of H2 and hydrogenase. Growth on methanol requires a B12-containing methanol-CoM methyl transferase and does not necessarily need any other methanogenic enzymes besides the methyl-CoM reductase system when hydrogenase is present. When bacteria grow on methanol alone it is not yet clear if they get their reducing equivalents from a reversal of methanogenic enzymes, thus oxidizing methyl groups to CO2. An alternative (since these and acetate-catabolizing methanogens possess cytochrome b) is electron transport and possible proton pumping via a cytochrome-containing electron transport chain. Several of the actual components of the methanogenic pathway from CO2 have been characterized. Methanofuran is apparently the first carbon-carrying cofactor in the pathway, forming carboxy-methanofuran. Formyl-FAF or formyl-methanopterin (YFC, a very rapidly labelled compound during 14C pulse labeling) has been implicated as an obligate intermediate in methanogenesis, since methanopterin or FAF is an essential component of the carbon dioxide reducing factor in dialyzed extract methanogenesis. FAF also carries the carbon at the methylene and methyl oxidation levels.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)