The conformational specificity of viral epitopes

On the irrationality of rational design of an HIV vaccine in light of protein intrinsic disorder

The lack of progress in finding an efficient vaccine for a human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) is daunting. In fact, this search has spanned nearly four decades without much success. There are several objective reasons for such a failure, which include the highly glycosylated nature of HIV-1, the presence of neotopes, and high mutation rates. This article argues that the presence of highly flexible and intrinsically disordered regions in both human anti-HIV-1 antibodies and the major HIV-1immunogen, its surface glycoprotein gp120, represent one of the major causes for the lack of success in utilization of structure-based reverse vaccinology.

What does it mean to develop an HIV vaccine by rational design?

This review argues that the three popular concepts of design, rationality and reductionism, which guided vaccine research for many years, actually contributed to the inability of vaccinologists to develop an effective HIV vaccine. The strong goal-directed intentionality inherent in the concept of design together with excessive confidence in the power of rational thinking convinced investigators that the accumulated structural knowledge on HIV epitopes, derived from crystallographic studies of complexes of neutralizing antibodies bound to HIV Env epitopes, would allow them to rationally design complementary immunogens capable of inducing anti-HIV protective antibodies. This strategy failed because it was not appreciated that the structures observed in epitope-paratope crystallographic complexes result from mutually induced fit between the two partners and do not represent structures present in the free disordered molecules before they had interacted. In addition, reductionist thinking led investigators to accept that biology could be reduced to chemistry, and this made them neglect the fundamental difference between chemical antigenicity and biological immunogenicity. As a result, they did not investigate which inherent constituents of immune systems controlled the induction of protective antibodies and focused instead only on the steric complementarity that exists between bound epitopes and paratopes.

Development of a Preventive HIV Vaccine Requires Solving Inverse Problems Which Is Unattainable by Rational Vaccine Design

Hypotheses and theories are essential constituents of the scientific method. Many vaccinologists are unaware that the problems they try to solve are mostly inverse problems that consist in imagining what could bring about a desired outcome. An inverse problem starts with the result and tries to guess what are the multiple causes that could have produced it. Compared to the usual direct scientific problems that start with the causes and derive or calculate the results using deductive reasoning and known mechanisms, solving an inverse problem uses a less reliable inductive approach and requires the development of a theoretical model that may have different solutions or none at all. Unsuccessful attempts to solve inverse problems in HIV vaccinology by reductionist methods, systems biology and structure-based reverse vaccinology are described. The popular strategy known as rational vaccine design is unable to solve the multiple inverse problems faced by HIV vaccine developers. The term “rational” is derived from “rational drug design” which uses the 3D structure of a biological target for designing molecules that will selectively bind to it and inhibit its biological activity. In vaccine design, however, the word “rational” simply means that the investigator is concentrating on parts of the system for which molecular information is available. The economist and Nobel laureate Herbert Simon introduced the concept of “bounded rationality” to explain why the complexity of the world economic system makes it impossible, for instance, to predict an event like the financial crash of 2007–2008. Humans always operate under unavoidable constraints such as insufficient information, a limited capacity to process huge amounts of data and a limited amount of time available to reach a decision. Such limitations always prevent us from achieving the complete understanding and optimization of a complex system that would be needed to achieve a truly rational design process. This is why the complexity of the human immune system prevents us from rationally designing an HIV vaccine by solving inverse problems.

Structure-Based Reverse Vaccinology Failed in the Case of HIV Because it Disregarded Accepted Immunological Theory

Two types of reverse vaccinology (RV) should be distinguished: genome-based RV for bacterial vaccines and structure-based RV for viral vaccines. Structure-based RV consists in trying to generate a vaccine by first determining the crystallographic structure of a complex between a viral epitope and a neutralizing monoclonal antibody (nMab) and then reconstructing the epitope by reverse molecular engineering outside the context of the native viral protein. It is based on the unwarranted assumption that the epitope designed to fit the nMab will have acquired the immunogenic capacity to elicit a polyclonal antibody response with the same protective capacity as the nMab. After more than a decade of intensive research using this type of RV, this approach has failed to deliver an effective, preventive HIV-1 vaccine. The structure and dynamics of different types of HIV-1 epitopes and of paratopes are described. The rational design of an anti-HIV-1 vaccine is shown to be a misnomer since investigators who claim that they design a vaccine are actually only improving the antigenic binding capacity of one epitope with respect to only one paratope and not the immunogenic capacity of an epitope to elicit neutralizing antibodies. Because of the degeneracy of the immune system and the polyspecificity of antibodies, each epitope studied by the structure-based RV procedure is only one of the many epitopes that the particular nMab is able to recognize and there is no reason to assume that this nMab must have been elicited by this one epitope of known structure. Recent evidence is presented that the trimeric Env spikes of the virus possess such an enormous plasticity and intrinsic structural flexibility that it is it extremely difficult to determine which Env regions are the best candidate vaccine immunogens most likely to elicit protective antibodies.

Why Does the Molecular Structure of Broadly Neutralizing Monoclonal Antibodies Isolated from Individuals Infected with HIV-1 not Inform the Rational Design of an HIV-1 Vaccine?

It is commonly assumed that neutralizing Mabs that bind to the HIV-1 Env glycoprotein are more specific reagents than anti-HIV-1 polyclonal antisera and that knowledge of the structure of these Mabs facilitates the rational design of effective HIV-1 vaccine immunogens. However, after more than ten years of unsuccessful experimentation using the structure-based reverse vaccinology approach, it is now evident that it is not possible to infer from the structure of neutralizing Mabs which HIV immunogens induced their formation nor which vaccine immunogens will elicit similar Abs in an immunized host. The use of Mabs for developing an HIV-1 vaccine was counterproductive because it overlooked the fact that the apparent specificity of a Mab very much depends on the selection procedure used to obtain it and also did not take into account that an antibody is never monospecific for a single epitope but is always polyspecific for many epitopes. When the rationale of the proponents of the unsuccessful rational design strategy is analyzed, it appears that investigators who claim they are designing a vaccine immunogen are only improving the binding reactivity of a single epitope-paratope pair and are not actually designing an immunogen able to generate protective antibodies. The task of a designer consists in imagining what type of immunogen is likely to elicit a protective immune response but in the absence of knowledge regarding which features of the immune system are responsible for producing a functional neutralizing activity in antibodies, it is not feasible to intentionally optimize a potential immunogen candidate in order to obtain the desired outcome. The only available option is actually to test possible solutions by trial-and-error experiments until the preset goal is perhaps attained. Rational design and empirical approaches in HIV vaccine research should thus not be opposed as alternative options since empirical testing is an integral part of a so-called design strategy.

Requirements for empirical immunogenicity trials, rather than structure-based design, for developing an effective HIV vaccine

The claim that it is possible to rationally design a structure-based HIV-1 vaccine is based on misconceptions regarding the nature of protein epitopes and of immunological specificity. Attempts to use reverse vaccinology to generate an HIV-1 vaccine on the basis of the structure of viral epitopes bound to monoclonal neutralizing antibodies have failed so far because it was not possible to extrapolate from an observed antigenic structure to the immunogenic structure required in a vaccine. Vaccine immunogenicity depends on numerous extrinsic factors such as the host immunoglobulin gene repertoire, the presence of various cellular and regulatory mechanisms in the immunized host and the process of antibody affinity maturation. All these factors played a role in the appearance of the neutralizing antibody used to select the epitope to be investigated as potential vaccine immunogen, but they cannot be expected to be present in identical form in the host to be vaccinated. It is possible to rationally design and optimize an epitope to fit one particular antibody molecule or to improve the paratope binding efficacy of a monoclonal antibody intended for passive immunotherapy. What is not possible is to rationally design an HIV-1 vaccine immunogen that will elicit a protective polyclonal antibody response of predetermined efficacy. An effective vaccine immunogen can only be discovered by investigating experimentally the immunogenicity of a candidate molecule and demonstrating its ability to induce a protective immune response. It cannot be discovered by determining which epitopes of an engineered antigen molecule are recognized by a neutralizing monoclonal antibody. This means that empirical immunogenicity trials rather than structural analyses of antigens offer the best hope of discovering an HIV-1 vaccine.

Increased antibodies against unfolded viral antigens in the elderly after influenza vaccination

Objective  Our studies aimed to measure the quality of antibody response to influenza vaccines in the elderly. The frequency of significant rise in hemagglutination inhibition (HAI) titer in the elderly is low and although annual vaccination reduces morbidity and mortality, better correlates of vaccine efficacy in the elderly are needed.

Methods  We measured the amount and avidity of serum antibodies against native H3N2 influenza glycoproteins or denatured virus (unfoldons) in pre‐ and post‐vaccinated sera of 36 elderly subjects.

Results  Eighty percent of subjects had high pre‐immunization antibody levels and only 13% showed ≥2fold increase after vaccination, but 33% showed ≥2fold increase in avidity. With increasing dosage there was a significant increase in avidity against unfoldons with 50% of subjects showing ≥2fold increase at the highest dose. Elderly subjects given subunit vaccine showed higher reactivity with unfoldons (78% of native) than younger subjects studied earlier who were given inactivated whole virus vaccine (19% of native).

Conclusion  The clear inverse relationship between pre‐immunization antibody levels and antibody increase after vaccination implies that a major reason for the low frequency of antibody responses in elderly subjects is simply because they have high pre‐immunization antibody levels. Only low reactivity was observed with earlier viruses. The increased proportion and avidity of antibodies against unfoldons is of concern, as these are not protective, and vaccine developers need to be aware of the role of age or vaccine formulation in inducing anti‐unfoldon antibodies.

Anti-peptide aptamers recognize amino acid sequence and bind a protein epitope

In vitro selection of nucleic acid binding species (aptamers) is superficially similar to the immune response. Both processes produce biopolymers that can recognize targets with high affinity and specificity. While antibodies are known to recognize the sequence and conformation of protein surface features (epitopes), very little is known about the precise interactions between aptamers and their epitopes. Therefore, aptamers that could recognize a particular epitope, a peptide fragment of human immunodeficiency virus type I Rev, were selected from a random sequence RNA pool. Several of the selected RNAs could bind the free peptide more tightly than a natural RNA ligand, the Rev-binding element. In accord with the hypothesis that protein and nucleic acid binding cusps are functionally similar, interactions between aptamers and the peptide target could be disrupted by sequence substitutions. Moreover, the aptamers appeared to be able to bind peptides with different solution conformations, implying an induced fit mechanism for binding. Just as anti-peptide antibodies can sometimes recognize the corresponding epitope when presented in a protein, the anti-peptide aptamers were found to specifically bind to Rev.

Precise location of sequential dengue virus subcomplex and complex B cell epitopes on the nonstructural-1 glycoprotein

The reactions of a panel of 34 mouse monoclonal antibodies (MAbs) specific for the dengue-2 virus nonstructural-1 glycoprotein (NS1), were analysed using 174 overlapping synthetic nonameric peptides covering the entire sequence. Using this methodology, four epitopes were identified. One pair of MAbs, which defined a dengue-2/4 virus subcomplex epitope (24C: amino acids 299-309) using native NS1 proteins, showed the same reaction pattern with synthetic peptides containing the corresponding NS1 sequences of each virus serotype. One amino acid substitution, present in the sequences from the dengue-1/3 virus subcomplex abrogated almost all reaction by these MAbs. A dengue complex epitope (LX1: amino acids 111-121) was also located and peptides containing the sequences of each serotype were shown to contain only antigenically silent amino-acid substitutions. In contrast, MAbs which defined a dengue type-specific epitope (LD2: amino acids 25-33) and another dengue subcomplex epitope (24A: amino acids 61-69) failed to show the same reaction profiles using peptides of each serotype, suggesting that these determinants were partially dependent upon conformation. The LX1 epitope is a good candidate for further trials aimed at generating cross-protective immune responses to these viruses without the risk of antibody-dependent enhancement.