Overproduction, purification and characterization of GroES and GroEL from thermophilic Bacillus stearothermophilus

Cloning and characterization of thermostable GroEL/GroES homologues from Geobacillus thermopakistaniensis and their applications in protein folding

The chaperonin genes encoding GroEL_Gt (ESU72018) and GroES_Gt (ESU72017), homologues of bacterial GroEL and GroES, from Geobacillus thermopakistaniensis were cloned and expressed in Escherichia coli. The purified gene products possessed the ATPase activity similar to other bacterial and eukaryal counterparts. Recombinant GroEL_Gt and GroES_Gt were able to refold the denatured insoluble aggregates of α-amylase from Bacillus licheniformis into soluble and active form. Furthermore, GroEL_Gt and GroES_Gt successfully enhanced the thermostability of porcine heart malate dehydrogenase. Expression of GroEL_Gt gene in E. coli cells enhanced the thermotolerance of the host. Furthermore, soluble production of recombinant alcohol dehydrogenase from Bacillus subtilis strain R5 in E. coli, initially produced as insoluble aggregates, was achieved by co-expressing the gene with GroEL_Gt. Our results implied that GroEL_Gt could assist folding of nascent protein in E. coli with the help of host co-chaperonin without requiring additional ATP. This system can be used for soluble production of recombinant proteins which otherwise are produced in insoluble form in E. coli. To the best of our knowledge this is the first report on functional characterization and applications of chaperonins from genus Geobacillus.

Three GroEL homologues from Rhizobium leguminosarum have distinct in vitro properties

The GroEL molecular chaperone of Escherichia coli and its cofactor GroES are highly conserved, and are required for the folding of many proteins. Most but not all bacteria express single GroEL and GroES proteins. Rhizobium leguminosarum strain A34 encodes three complete operons encoding homologues to GroEL and GroES. We have used circular dichroism and measurement of ATPase activity to compare the stabilities of these chaperonins after expression in and purification from E. coli. Significant differences in the stabilities of the proteins with respect to denaturant and temperature were found. The proteins also differed in their ability to refold denatured lactate dehydrogenase. This study, the first to compare the properties of three different GroEL homologues from the same organism, shows that despite the high degree of similarity between different homologues, they can display distinct properties in vitro.

Microbial molecular chaperones

Protein folding in the cell, long thought to be a spontaneous process, in fact often requires the assistance of molecular chaperones. This is thought to be largely because of the danger of incorrect folding and aggregation of proteins, which is a particular problem in the crowded environment of the cell. Molecular chaperones are involved in numerous processes in bacterial cells, including assisting the folding of newly synthesized proteins, both during and after translation; assisting in protein secretion, preventing aggregation of proteins on heat shock, and repairing proteins that have been damaged or misfolded by stresses such as a heat shock. Within the cell, a balance has to be found between refolding of proteins and their proteolytic degradation, and molecular chaperones play a key role in this. In this review, the evidence for the existence and role of the major cytoplasmic molecular chaperones will be discussed, mainly from the physiological point of view but also in relationship to their known structure, function and mechanism of action. The two major chaperone systems in bacterial cells (as typified by Escherichia coli) are the GroE and DnaK chaperones, and the contrasting roles and mechanisms of these chaperones will be presented. The GroE chaperone machine acts by providing a protected environment in which protein folding of individual protein molecules can proceed, whereas the DnaK chaperones act by binding and protecting exposed regions on unfolded or partially folded protein chains. DnaK chaperones interact with trigger factor in protein translation and with ClpB in reactivating proteins which have become aggregated after heat shock. The nature of the other cytoplasmic chaperones in the cell will also be reviewed, including those for which a clear function has not yet been determined, and those where an in vivo chaperone function has still to be proven, such as the small heat shock proteins IbpA and IbpB. The regulation of expression of the genes of the heat shock response will also be discussed, particularly in the light of the signals that are needed to induce the response. The major signals for induction of the heat shock response are elevated temperature and the presence of unfolded protein within the cell, but these are sensed and transduced differently by different bacteria. The best characterized example is the sigma 32 subunit of RNA polymerase from E. coli, which is both more efficiently translated and also transiently stabilized following heat shock. The DnaK chaperones modulate this effect. However, a more widely conserved system appears to be typified by the HrcA repressor in Bacillus subtilis, the activity of which is modulated by the GroE chaperone machine. Other examples of regulation of molecular chaperones will also be discussed. Finally, the likely future research directions for molecular chaperone biology in the post-genomic era will be briefly evaluated.

Nonnative proteins induce expression of the Bacillus subtilis CIRCE regulon

The chaperone-encoding groESL and dnaK operons constitute the CIRCE regulon of Bacillus subtilis. Both operons are under negative control of the repressor protein HrcA, which interacts with the CIRCE operator and whose activity is modulated by the GroESL chaperone machine. In this report, we demonstrate that induction of the CIRCE regulon can also be accomplished by ethanol stress and puromycin. Introduction of the hrcA gene and a transcriptional fusion under the control of the CIRCE operator into Escherichia coli allowed induction of this fusion by heat shock, ethanol stress, and overproduction of GroESL substrates. The expression level of this hrcA-bgaB fusion inversely correlated with the amount of GroE machinery present in the cells. Therefore, all inducing conditions seem to lead to induction via titration of the GroE chaperonins by the increased level of nonnative proteins formed. Puromycin treatment failed to induce the sigmaB-dependent general stress regulon, indicating that nonnative proteins in general do not trigger this response. Reconstitution of HrcA-dependent heat shock regulation of B. subtilis in E. coli and complementation of E. coli groESL mutants by B. subtilis groESL indicate that the GroE chaperonin systems of the two bacterial species are functionally exchangeable.

Comparison of the conformational state and in vitro refolding of yeast chaperonin protein cpn10 with bacterial GroES

Gel filtration studies demonstrate that the heptameric complex of yeast cpn10 (pI around 8.8) reversibly disassembles into monomers when lowering the pH to 4.5, whereas its secondary structure is retained as demonstrated by circular dichroism. Monomeric yeast cpn10 does not bind to GroEL in the presence of nucleotides, whereas under identical conditions E. coli cpn10 (GroES), having a strong sequence homology to the yeast form but a pI of 5.2, shows no pH-dependent dissociation and is able to complex with GroEL at both pH 7.5 and 4.5. Using circular dichroism it is shown that, unlike E. coli cpn10, yeast cpn10 is not able to refold spontaneously after first being fully unfolded in 8 M urea. However, refolding of yeast cpn10 to a complex that can be recognised by GroEL depends on the presence of a lipid-water interface with a specificity for negatively charged lipids. We suggest that the requirements for refolding of yeast cpn10 are related to its post-translational transport and subcellular localization.

Specificity of an Escherichia coli RNA polymerase-associated NTPase

Standard preparations of Escherichia coli RNA polymerase harbor a 70 kDa protein with NTPase (beta-gamma cleavage) activity that is not a recognized polymerase subunit. The NTPase activity of this component, before and after separation from the polymerase, is strongly dependent on the presence of DNA; single-stranded polydeoxynucleotides are more effective than double-stranded. ATP and GTP are cleaved, the latter much less readily. The NTPase as it occurs with the polymerase displays cleavage preference for NTPs that are not complementary to the DNA, a fact that has led to proposals for involvement of the NTPase in transcriptional error prevention [Volloch, V. Z., Rits, L. & Tumerman, L. (1979) Nucleic Acids Res. 6, 1535-1546; Libby, R. T., Nelson, J. L., Calvo, J. M., & Gallant, J. A. (1989) EMBO J. 8, 3253-3158]. We find, however, that the lesser cleavage in the presence of complementary DNA results from competition for the NTP between the processes of incorporation by the polymerase and of cleavage by the NTPase, operating on the same substrate pool. The greater cleavage with noncomplementary DNA occurs because of the lack of incorporation by the polymerase, which then does not compete with the NTPase for the substrate pool. Thus, these findings indicate that the cleavage preference of the NTPase for noncomplementary NTPs is not part of a mechanism for error prevention during transcription.