New approaches in the use of selegiline for the treatment of Parkinson's disease

Deprenyl in Parkinson’s Disease: Mechanisms, Neuroprotective Effect, Indications and Adverse Effects

Deprenyl is a synthetic, selective inhibitor of the monoamine oxidase-B enzyme system. The mechanism of its beneficial effect in early and advanced Parkinson’s disease is not settled. Increased striatal dopamine accumulation, sensitization of surviving dopamine neurons with increased dopamine production and reduced nigro-striatal toxicity may all contribute. The standard daily dose of deprenyl is 10 mg. Selectivity may be lost at higher doses. Deprenyl is especially indicated in untreated patients, improving up to 50 percent of patients with mild motor fluctuations. Major symptomatic benefit also occurs in occasional levodopa treated patients. Adverse effects are common, however. Increase dyskinesias, confusion and hallucinations, nausea and postural hypotension may necessitate drug withdrawal or the use of low dose regimens. Caution should be exercised with older patients, those with ulcer disease, which may be worsened by deprenyl, and individuals with active ischemic heart disease where the safety of this drug is not yet clear.

Bromocriptine versus levodopa in early Parkinson's disease

BACKGROUND

Drugs that mimic dopamine as bromocriptine were introduced as monotherapy or in combination with LD in the hope that this approach would prevent or delay the onset of motor complications in patients with Parkinson's disease (PD). However, hitherto, the role of bromocriptine (BR) in this issue has remained controversial.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the efficacy and safety of bromocriptine (BR) monotherapy for delaying the onset of motor complications associated with levodopa (LD) therapy in patients with PD.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched the Movement Disorders Group trials register which includes MEDLINE and EMBASE; the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (The Cochrane Library); handsearched appropriate neurology journals and reference lists of reviews found by the search-strategy. We also contacted Sandoz -now Novartis- (manufacturer of BR) and contacted colleagues who had co-ordinated trials on BR.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised trials evaluating the efficacy of BR monotherapy for delaying the onset of motor complications compared to LD therapy alone in PD patients.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently evaluated the methodological quality of identified trials and extracted the data from the trials.

MAIN RESULTS

Six trials with 850 participants were included. The trials were of low methodological quality and were heterogeneous so we were unable to perform a meta-analysis. The occurrence of dyskinesias in three short trials was too low to draw any conclusion. The results of the longer trials indicate a lower occurrence of dyskinesias in the BR tier. In five trials that evaluated dystonia, this motor complication occurred less frequently in the BR tier. However, for both dyskinesias and dystonia a statistically significant difference in favour of BR emerged only in the largest trial. There was a trend for wearing-off and on-off fluctuations to occur less frequently in the BR group. Although all trials evaluated participants at the impairment level, only the largest trial reported a significantly larger improvement for the LD tier during the first year of therapy. Concerning disability, which was evaluated by five trials no statistically significant differences were found. Overall, a statistically larger number of dropouts occurred in the BR group because of an inadequate therapeutic response or intolerable side effects.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Based on a qualitative review of the available data we conclude that in the treatment of early Parkinson's disease, bromocriptine may be beneficial in delaying motor complications and dyskinesias with comparable effects on impairment and disability in those patients that tolerate the drug.

Bromocriptine versus levodopa in early Parkinson's disease

BACKGROUND

Drugs that mimic dopamine as bromocriptine were introduced as monotherapy or in a combination with LD in the hope that this approach would prevent or delay the onset of motor complications in patients with Parkinson's disease (PD). However, hitherto, the role of bromocriptine (BR) in this issue has remained controversial. The present study is a systematic review of all randomized controlled trials of bromocriptine monotherapy compared with levodopa (LD) monotherapy in PD.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the efficacy and safety of bromocriptine (BR) monotherapy for delaying the onset of motor complications associated with levodopa (LD) therapy in patients with Parkinson's disease (PD).

SEARCH STRATEGY

Sources including the Cochrane Library, the search strategy of the Movement Disorders Group (includes computerised searches of MEDLINE and EMBASE and hand searching of appropriate neurology journals), reference lists of the reviews found by the MEDLINE and EMBASE search-strategy, Sandoz -now Novartis- (manufacturer of BR), symposia reports, PD handbooks, contacts with colleagues who had co-ordinated trials on BR and reference lists of all included studies were used to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of interest.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomized trials were eligible for inclusion if they evaluated the efficacy of BR monotherapy for delaying the onset of motor complications compared to LD therapy in PD patients. Outcome measures that were evaluated included occurrence and severity of motor complications, changes in impairment and disability, and the occurrence of side effects.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

To determine the feasibility of a quantitative systematic review two independent reviewers evaluated the methodological quality of identified trials.

MAIN RESULTS

Over the period of 1974 to January 1999 we identified six studies randomizing more than 850 patients to a BR or a LD regimen. The majority of the studies lacked sample size calculations and randomization procedure remained unclear in three trials. Only two trials were performed according to a double-blind design. Important differences between studies concerning the duration of trials, the BR titration phase, the achieved mean dose of LD or BR, and the applied outcomes were found. Because of these differences, we could not pool the data from the different trials in an attempt to perform a meta-analysis. Therefore, the available data of the individual trials was re-analysed. Subsequently, the results were interpreted against the background of the sources of heterogeneity between the studies. The occurrence of dyskinesias in three short trials was too low to allow any conclusion. The results of the longer trials indicate a lower occurrence of dyskinesias in the BR tier. In five trials that evaluated dystonia, this motor complication occurred less frequent in the BR tier. However, for both dyskinesias and dystonia a statistically significant difference in favour of BR emerged only in the largest trial. There was a trend for wearing-off and on-off fluctuations to occur less frequently in the BR group. Although all trials evaluated patients at the impairment level, only the largest trial reported a significantly larger improvement for the LD tier during the first year of therapy. Concerning disability, which was evaluated by five trials no statistically significant differences were found. Overall, a statistically larger number of dropouts occurred in the BR group because of an inadequate therapeutic response or intolerable side effects.

REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS

This systematic review identified important sources of heterogeneity between trials. Inadequate powering of the studies and clinically relevant differences in trial duration, applied outcomes, and trial design may explain the different results and why many findings failed to reach a statistically significant level. Nevertheless, based on qualitative review of available data we conclude that in the treatment of early Parkinson's disease, bromocriptine may be beneficial in delaying motor complications and dyskinesias with comparable effects on impairment and disability in those patients that tolerate the drug.

The treatment of Parkinson's disease in older people

Parkinson's disease is characterised by a variable combination of tremor, rigidity, bradykinesia and impaired righting reflexes. The cumulative life-time risk is one in 40. Levodopa remains the single most effective treatment in older patients, and the minimum dose to achieve maximum functional benefit should be employed. When fluctuations occur, controlled release preparations and selegiline can improve function. Oral dopamine agonists have a role but the combined side effect profile with levodopa should be monitored. COMT inhibitors have recently become available. Subcutaneous apomorphine can be helpful when "on-off" phenomena are marked. The concept of neuroprotection continues to be debated. Surgery is an option for fitter older people but neurotransplantation remains essentially a research tool.

Monoamine oxidase inhibitors, cognitive functions and neurodegenerative diseases

Recent data obtained in animals and in humans suggest that both MAO-A and MAO-B inhibitors present cognitive enhancing properties of possible interest in the treatment of cognitive disorders. In addition, the rational for using selegiline as a neuroprotector in Parkinson's disease may also be applicable in Alzheimer's disease in which a dramatic increase in the MAO-B activity has been reported. It seems then worthwhile to investigate the neuroprotective effect of MAOIs in humans and to assess, furthermore, the real therapeutical benefit of their cognitive enhancing properties.

Neuropsychological correlates of L-deprenyl therapy in idiopathic parkinsonism

1. Monoaminergic neurotransmitter systems are known to play an important role in neuropsychological functions and they are impaired in dementia of DAT and PD. 2. L-deprenyl is a monoamine-enhancing drug which at low doses selectively inhibits MAO-B, an enzyme whose brain activity has been reported to increase in normal aging and neurodegenerative dementing disorders. 3. The authors studied the effects of L-deprenyl, 10 mg/day, on several cognitive domains in idiopathic parkinsonians without dementia. Ten out-patients, treated with levodopa plus DDI, were tested before receiving L-deprenyl and retested six months after they had been treated with the drug. A control group of ten parkinsonian out-patients treated with only levodopa plus DDI, matched for age, educational level, severity and duration of extrapyramidal disease, was tested by the same neuropsychological battery and retested after a comparable time interval. 4. Statistically significant changes were noted in the verbal and visuospatial learning performances of PD patients treated with the combination of L-deprenyl and levodopa.

The new generation of monoamine oxidase inhibitors

Irreversible and unspecific inhibitors of MAO were the first modern antidepressants, but after an initial success they fell into discredit due to adverse side effects. In the past two decades interest in MAO inhibitors has been renewed because of progress in basic research, a milestone being the finding that there are two subtypes of MAO, MAO-A and MAO-B. These are distinct proteins with high amino acid homology, coded by separate genes both located on the short arm of the human chromosome X. The enzyme subforms show different substrate specificities in vitro and different distributions within the central nervous system and in peripheral organs. In the central nervous system of man MAO-A seems to be mainly involved in the metabolism of 5 HT and noradrenaline, whereas 2-phenylethylamine and probably dopamine are predominantly deaminated by MAO-B. In the intestinal tract tyramine is mainly metabolized by MAO-A. These characteristics indicate distinct physiological functions of the two MAO-subforms. Several irreversible and reversible non-hydrazine inhibitors with relative selectivities for one of the MAO-subforms have been developed. They belong to various chemical classes with different modes of enzyme inhibition. These range from covalent mechanism based interaction (e.g. by propargyl- and allylamine derivatives) to pseudosubstrate inhibition (e.g. by 2-aminoethyl-carboxamides) and non-covalent interaction (e.g. by brofaromine, toloxatone and possibly moclobemide). The most important pharmacological effects of the new types of MAO inhibitors are those observed in neuropsychiatric disorders. The inhibitors of MAO-A show a favorable action in various forms of mental depression. The drugs seem to have about the same activity as other types of antidepressants, including tricyclic and related compounds as well as classical MAO inhibitors. The onset of action of the MAO-A inhibitors is claimed to be relatively fast. Other possible indications of these drugs include disorders with cognitive impairment, e.g. dementia of the Alzheimer type. In subjects with Parkinson's disease the MAO-B inhibitor L-deprenyl exerts a L-dopa-sparing effect, prolongs L-dopa action and seems to have a favorable influence regarding on-off disabilities. The action is in general transitory (months to several years). In addition L-deprenyl has been shown to delay the necessity for L-dopa treatment in patients with early parkinsonism. Whether the drug influence the progression of the disease is still a matter of debate. L-deprenyl also appears to have some antidepressant effect (especially in higher doses) and to exert a beneficial influence in other disorders, e.g. dementia of the Alzheimer type.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Selegiline and cognitive function in Parkinson's disease

Eighteen patients with Parkinson's disease were treated with placebo for 4 weeks and with the MAO-B inhibitor selegiline for 8 weeks without levodopa in a randomized double-blind clinical study. The maximum dose of selegiline was 30 mg/day and the patients' cognitive functions were evaluated before treatment and at week 12 when they were either on 30 mg selegiline or placebo. A series of neuropsychological tests were used to study general cognitive reasoning, memory, visuospatial abilities, attention, cognitive flexibility, motor functions and depression. Specific cognitive effects were not observed. Slight improvement occurred mainly in learning (easy word associations) which may reflect a limited, nonspecific arousal effect.

Selegiline hydrochloride and cognition

Selegiline HCl, 10 mg per day has been reported to improve attention and episodic memory in Parkinson's disease and early Alzheimer's disease. Selegiline also improves motor reaction times in Parkinson's and subjective feelings of increased vitality, euphoria and energy. At doses of between 10 and 40 mg a day it has also been shown to improve depression particularly when psychomotor retardation is prominent and anxiety minimal.

Selegiline in de novo parkinsonian patients: the French selegiline multicenter trial (FSMT)

The French selegiline multicenter trial was conducted in 1990 to test the possibility to improve disability of de novo parkinsonian patients (P.P.) during the first three months of treatment with selegiline (S) (10 mg/day) monotherapy. 93 P.P. were included in this double-blind, randomized, placebo controlled, clinical trial, in which 13 centers participated. Both parallel groups were followed up from inclusion (D0) to D30, D60 and D90. Drug efficacy was judged with Hoehn and Yahr (HY), Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS), Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS), Schwab and England scores, decision to introduce levodopa and selfassessment. Biological and clinical parameters (cardio- vascular, weight, side-effects reports) were assessed for tolerability. 84 P.P. (38 P, 46 S) were evaluable for efficacy at D90. When considering the main parameters, S appears superior to placebo: HY scores (p less than 0.001), global UPDRS scores (p less than 0.001) and UPDRS subscores: mental (p less than 0.001), daily living activities (p less than 0.01), motor activities (p less than 0.01). Depressive scores (HDRS) are significantly improved only at D90 (p = 0.005). Levodopa therapy was introduced in 45% of the cases in S groups versus 18.4% in P group. Global impression of efficacy was largely in favor of S; failure was noted in half of the cases in P group and only in 1/5th of the cases in S group. Side-effects were rare and minor. S 10 mg/day monotherapy is statistically superior to placebo in improving de novo P.P. during the first three months treatment. Motor symptoms rapidly improve; mood is only modified after 3 months. S appears to be well tolerated. S may be considered as a good candidate for the initial treatment of P.P.

Selegiline in the treatment of Parkinson's disease

Selegiline is a selective, irreversible inhibitor of monoamine oxidase type B (MAO-B). It also inhibits the reuptake of catecholamines into the presynaptic nerve and enhances the synthesis of dopamine by blocking the presynaptic dopamine autoreceptors. Thanks to these properties it potentiates and prolongs the duration of action of levodopa. Several clinical trials have shown its efficacy as an adjuvant to levodopa therapy. Improvement in parkinsonian disability and reduction of fluctuations in disability can be achieved by adding selegiline to the prevailing levodopa therapy. End-of-dose type fluctuations, in particular, react favourably to selegiline. Side-effects of the therapy can be managed by reducing the dose of levodopa. According to preliminary studies selegiline may also have some benefit as monotherapy in de novo parkinsonian patients. High doses of selegiline have been found to have some antidepressant efficacy, especially in patients with nonendogenous depression. It may also have an effect on bradyphrenia and some symptoms of cognitive dysfunction and dementia. In animal models selegiline has been shown to prevent parkinsonism caused by MPTP and also to increase the life span of rats. Whether selegiline slows down the progression of Parkinson's disease needs further examination.