Plasma exchange in Guillain-Barré syndrome: effect on anti-peripheral nerve myelin antibodies

Can antiglycolipid antibodies present in HIV-infected individuals induce immune demyelination?

Of the eight clinically defined neuropathies associated with HIV infection, there is compelling evidence that acute and chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (IDPN) have an autoimmune pathogenesis. Many non-HIV infected individuals who suffer from sensory-motor nerve dysfunction have autoimmune indicators. The immunopathogenesis of demyelination must involve neuritogenic components in myelin. The various antigens suspected to play a role in HIV-seronegative IDPN include (i) P2 protein; (ii) sulfatide (GalS); (iii) various gangliosides (especially GM1); (iv) galactocerebroside (GalC); and (v) glycoproteins or glycolipids with the carbohydrate epitope glucuronyl-3-sulfate. These glycoproteins or glycolipids may be individually targeted, or an immune attack may be raised against a combination of any of these epitopes. The glycolipids, however, especially GalS, have recently evoked much interest as mediators of immune events underlying both non-HIV and HIV-associated demyelinating neuropathies. The present review outlines the recent research findings of antiglycolipid antibodies present in HIV-infected patients with and without peripheral nerve dysfunction, in an attempt to arrive at some consensus as to whether these antibodies may play a role in the immunopathogenesis of HIV-associated inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy.

Pathogenesis of Guillain-Barré syndrome

Recent neurophysiological and pathological studies have led to a reclassification of the diseases that underlie Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS) into acute inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (AIDP), acute motor and sensory axonal neuropathy (AMSAN) and acute motor axonal neuropathy (AMAN). The Fisher syndrome of ophthalmoplegia, ataxia and areflexia is the most striking of several related conditions. Significant antecedent events include Campylobacter jejuni (4-66%), cytomegalovirus (5-15%), Epstein-Barr virus (2-10%), and Mycoplasma pneumoniae (1-5%) infections. These infections are not uniquely associated with any clinical subtype but severe axonal degeneration is more common following C. jejuni and severe sensory impairment following cytomegalovirus. Strong evidence supports an important role for antibodies to gangliosides in pathogenesis. In particular antibodies to ganglioside GM1 are present in 14-50% of patients with GBS, and are more common in cases with severe axonal degeneration associated with any subtype. Antibodies to ganglioside GQ1b are very closely associated with Fisher syndrome, its formes frustes and related syndromes. Ganglioside-like epitopes exist in the bacterial wall of C. jejuni. Infection by this and other organisms triggers an antibody response in patients with GBS but not in those with uncomplicated enteritis. The development of GBS is likely to be a consequence of special properties of the infecting organism, since some strains such as Penner 0:19 and 0:41 are particularly associated with GBS but not with enteritis. It is also likely to be a consequence of the immunogenetic background of the patient since few patients develop GBS after infection even with one of these strains. Attempts to match the subtypes of GBS to the fine specificity of anti-ganglioside antibodies and to functional effects in experimental models continue but have not yet fully explained the pathogenesis. T cells are also involved in the pathogenesis of most or perhaps all forms of GBS. T cell responses to any of three myelin proteins, P2, PO and PMP22, are sufficient to induce experimental autoimmune neuritis. Activated T cells are present in the circulation in the acute stage, up-regulate matrix metalloproteinases, cross the blood-nerve barrier and encounter their cognate antigens. Identification of the specificity of these T cell responses is still at a preliminary stage. The invasion of intact myelin sheaths by activated macrophages is difficult to explain according to a purely T cell mediated mechanism. The different patterns of GBS are probably due to the diverse interplay between antibodies and T cells of differing specificities.

Immunopathogenesis and treatment of the Guillain-Barré syndrome--Part I

The etiology of the Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS) still remains elusive. Recent years have witnessed important advances in the delineation of the mechanisms that may operate to produce nerve damage. Evidence gathered from cell biology, immunology, and immunopathology studies in patients with GBS and animals with experimental autoimmune neuritis (EAN) indicate that GBS results from aberrant immune responses against components of peripheral nerve. Autoreactive T lymphocytes specific for the myelin antigens P0 and P2 and circulating antibodies to these antigens and various glycoproteins and glycolipids have been identified but their pathogenic role remains unclear. The multiplicity of these factors and the involvement of several antigen nonspecific proinflammatory mechanisms suggest that a complex interaction of immune pathways results in nerve damage. Data on disturbed humoral immunity with particular emphasis on glycolipid antibodies and on activation of autoreactive T lymphocytes and macrophages will be reviewed. Possible mechanisms underlying initiation of peripheral nerve-directed immune responses will be discussed with particular emphasis on the recently highlighted association with Campylobacter jejuni infection.

Cerebrospinal fluid pheresis in Guillain Barré syndrome

While plasmapheresis is established in the treatment of acute polyneuroradiculitis, disabling pareses may last long, persisting neurological deficits remain frequent, and costs and side-effects are considerable. Repeated filtration of cerebrospinal fluid may remove pathogenetically relevant cells and polypeptides. Observations in 12 severe Guillain-Barré patients treated with CSF pheresis indicate that it is a safe and effective procedure. We hypothesize mechanisms of action of and potential indications for CSF pheresis as a more general concept. In inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy, CSF filtration could be combined with 'dynamic' cerebrospinal fluid pheresis, intravenous immunoglobulin therapy, cryoprecipitation, and/or immuno-adsorption to increase its effectiveness.