Quality of life and cognitive performance after carotid endarterectomy during long-term follow-up

A Delphi Consensus Study on Undergoing Carotid Endarterectomy: Patient Reported Outcome Measures

OBJECTIVE

Currently, evidence is lacking for disease specific patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) for use in atherosclerotic carotid artery stenosis (either symptomatic or asymptomatic) submitted to carotid endarterectomy (CEA). This study aimed to obtain expert consensus on the most important items to include in a PROM designed to capture the impact of atherosclerotic carotid artery stenosis and its treatment on health related quality of life.

METHODS

A three round modified Delphi consensus study was performed. A mixed expert Delphi panel of doctors (international panel of dedicated vascular surgeons and neurologists) and patients (either symptomatic or asymptomatic patients meeting criteria for carotid artery revascularisation) was implemented. The aim was to obtain pre-defined consensus on items in four pre-defined domains: generic, quality of life, symptom related, and treatment related. Consensus was reached in rounds two and three with > 70% overall expert agreement.

RESULTS

The experts agreed on 23 items (out of 49) which were distributed as follows: five in the generic, six in the quality of life, six in the symptom, and six in the treatment related domain. Interestingly, comparing the items that reached consensus in this study, with the generic and disease specific PROMs previously used in carotid artery disease investigation, the only constant items were "difficulty with walking" and "ability to perform daily activities" included in the symptom domain. Considering the items that reached expert consensus in the additional domains, emphasis was given to the impact of the diagnosis, treatment and follow up, and to fear or concern "about the future" and "about severe stroke". In the treatment domain emphasis was also attained on the side effects, long term patient satisfaction, and on the information provided regarding treatment options.

DISCUSSION

As hard clinical outcomes become increasingly rare, assessment of the impact of CEA becomes increasingly difficult. The consensus reached provides a newly defined disease specific PROM that warrants independent validation in specific populations in the future.

Comorbidities and Health-Related Quality of Life Following Revascularization for Asymptomatic Critical Internal Carotid Artery Stenosis Treated with Carotid Endarterectomy or Angioplasty with Stenting

Background

This study aimed to evaluate the relationship between existing comorbidities and the effectiveness of revascularization of asymptomatic critical internal carotid artery (ICA) stenosis treated with carotid endarterectomy (CEA) or carotid artery stenting (CAS) and short-term and long-term outcome in terms of health-related quality of life (HRQoL).

Material/Methods

Patients with asymptomatic critical ICA stenosis (n=62) included a group treated with CEA (n=31) and a group treated with CAS (n=31). A Health Assessment Questionnaire designed for this study was used to assess ten comorbidities, and the Short Form 36 Health Survey Questionnaire (SF-36) was used to evaluate HRQoL following CEA and CAS.

Results

Three comorbidities significantly influenced the effectiveness of revascularization in all patients studied who underwent CEA and CAS, which included symptomatic atherosclerosis in other vascular areas (p=0.048), coronary artery disease (CAD) (p=0.004), and previous myocardial infarction (MI) (p=0.004). In the CEA group, CAD and previous MI were significant comorbidities (p=0.002), when compared with the CAS group (p=0.635). In the CAS group, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) was a significant comorbidity in terms of outcome (p=0.025).

Conclusions

The comorbidities of atherosclerotic vascular disease, CAD, and previous MI had a significant influence of the effectiveness of the revascularization and postoperative HRQoL in all patients studied with asymptomatic critical ICA stenosis who were treated with CEA and CAS. When the two groups were compared, CAD and previous MI were significant comorbidities in the CEA group, and COPD was a significant comorbidity in the CAS group.

Quality of life after carotid endarterectomy: a review of the literature

Strokes are one of the leading causes of death, morbidity, and disability worldwide, mainly among elderly people. It is also the third most common cause of years of life being lost, indicating a high risk of premature mortality. Revascularisation with endarterectomy (CEA) is effective in reducing the risk of death and strokes in patients with carotid artery stenosis, but the effect of invasive treatment on quality of life (QoL) still needs attention. To shed more light on the patients’ perspective on this health condition, we carried out a review of the literature which aimed to analyze the level of health-related QoL among stroke survivors, with special attention to patients who had been treated with CEA. Strokes significantly reduce the level of QoL, which may subsequently be improved in the course of treatment with CEA. Patients experience a reduced level of QoL in the early postoperative period, but at 1 year following CEA, the level of QoL remains stable and is similar to that of chronically ill patients. The domains of QoL which are most affected are physical and emotional functioning, which also serve as markers for decreased QoL in the long term. Older age and comorbidities are predictors of worse QoL. Stroke survivors require proper care both immediately after a stroke happens and during the long-term rehabilitation. Measurement of QoL and of the determining factors that contribute to a reduced level of QoL, as well as focusing on determinants of QoL in stroke survivors may help to reduce patients’ disability and improve their daily functioning in society as well as reducing the cost of health care.

Severe carotid artery stenosis evaluated by ultrasound is associated with post stroke vascular cognitive impairment

BACKGROUND

Acute ischemic stroke has been recognized as one key cause of vascular cognitive impairment (VCI). The purpose of this study was to evaluate the correlation between carotid artery stenosis and post VCI in acute ischemic stroke patients.

METHODS

In this study, B-mode ultrasound was applied to measure the degree of carotid artery stenosis. After 1 year, the stroke patients' cognitive function was assessed by the mini-mental state examination (MMSE) score. The relationship between the VCI and degree of carotid artery stenosis was evaluated by multivariate regression analysis.

RESULTS

VCI was observed in 136 (37.2%) of the 365 participants. High degree of carotid artery stenosis was significantly correlated with VCI (p < .01), and this correlation remained unchanged even adjustment for age, gender, education level, stroke features, and vascular risk factors.

CONCLUSIONS

These findings indicate that high-grade stenosis of carotid artery is positively correlated with post stroke VCI in patients with acute ischemic stroke. The evaluation of 1 year post stroke cognitive function may be a potential tool for screening stroke patients at risk of VCI.

Association between Carotid Artery Stenosis and Cognitive Impairment in Stroke Patients: A Cross-Sectional Study

To investigate potential associations between carotid artery stenosis and cognitive impairment among patients with acute ischemic stroke and to provide important clinical implications. We measured the degree of carotid artery stenosis and recorded the Mini-Mental State Examination score (MMSE) at admission in 3116 acute ischemic stroke patients. The association between carotid stenosis and cognitive impairment assessed by MMSE was tested using multivariate regression analysis. Other clinical variables of interest were also studied. After adjusting for age, gender, education level, marriage, alcohol use, tobacco use, physical activity, hypertension, diabetes, hypercholesterolemia, atrial fibrillation, myocardial infarction and NIHSS (National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale) score, we found that participants with high-grade stenosis of the carotid artery had a higher likelihood of cognitive impairment compared to those without carotid artery stenosis (OR = 1.49, 95%CI: 1.05–2.11, p<0.001). Left common carotid artery stenosis was associated with cognitive impairment in the univariate analysis, although this effect did not persist after adjustment for the NIHSS score. Cognitive impairment was associated with high-grade stenosis of the right carotid artery.

Incidence, outcomes, and effect on quality of life of cranial nerve injury in the Carotid Revascularization Endarterectomy versus Stenting Trial

OBJECTIVE

Cranial nerve injury (CNI) is the most common neurologic complication of carotid endarterectomy (CEA) and can cause significant chronic disability. Data from prior randomized trials are limited and provide no health-related quality of life (HRQOL) outcomes specific to CNI. Incidence of CNIs and their outcomes for patients in the Carotid Revascularization Endarterectomy vs Stenting Trial (CREST) were examined to identify factors predictive of CNI and their impact on HRQOL.

METHODS

Incidence of CNIs, baseline and procedural characteristics, outcomes, and HRQOL scores were evaluated in the 1151 patients randomized to CEA and undergoing surgery ≤30 days. Patients with CNI were identified and classified using case report forms, adverse event data, and clinical notes. Baseline and procedural characteristics were compared using descriptive statistics. Clinical outcomes at 1 and 12 months were analyzed. All data were adjudicated by two neurologists and a vascular surgeon. HRQOL was evaluated using the Medical Outcomes Short-Form 36 (SF-36) Health Survey to assess general health and Likert scales for disease-specific outcomes at 2 weeks, 4 weeks, and 12 months after CEA. The effect of CNI on SF-36 subscales was evaluated using random effects growth curve models, and Likert scale data were compared by ordinal logistic regression.

RESULTS

CNI was identified in 53 patients (4.6%). Cranial nerves injured were VII (30.2%), XII (24.5%), and IX/X (41.5%), and 3.8% had Horner syndrome. CNI occurred in 52 of 1040 patients (5.0%) receiving general anesthesia and in one of 111 patients (0.9%) operated on under local anesthesia (P = .05). No other predictive baseline or procedural factors were identified. Deficits resolved in 18 patients (34%) at 1 month and in 42 of 52 patients (80.8%) by 1 year. One patient died before the 1-year follow-up visit. The HRQOL evaluation showed no statistical difference between groups with and without CNI at any interval. By Likert scale analysis, the group with CNI showed a significant difference in the difficulty eating/swallowing parameter at 2 and 4 weeks (P < .001) but not at 1 year.

CONCLUSIONS

In CREST, CNI occurred in 4.6% of patients undergoing CEA, with 34% resolution at 30 days and 80.8% at 1 year. The incidence of CNI was significantly higher in patients undergoing general anesthesia. CNI had a small and transient effect on HRQOL, negatively affecting only difficulty eating/swallowing at 2 and 4 weeks but not at 1 year. On the basis of these findings, we conclude that CNI is not a trivial consequence of CEA but rarely results in significant long-term disability.

Cognitive performance after carotid angioplasty and stenting with brain protection devices

OBJECTIVE

Neuropsychological outcomes after carotid endarterectomy (CEA) have been investigated extensively. However, cognitive impacts of carotid angioplasty and stenting (CAS), an emerging alternative to CEA, have not been studied. This study is aimed at investigating pattern and degree of cognitive changes after CAS among patients with high-grade carotid stenosis.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Fifty-four patients with high-grade carotid artery stenosis and received elective CAS were followed. Sixty-six patients with similar medical conditions requiring carotid angiography (CAG) were enrolled as controls. Cognitive functions among patients in both groups were evaluated at baseline and follow-ups utilizing a battery of neuropsychometric tests. Results were analysed by inter-group and within-group comparisons.

RESULTS

There were no statistically significant differences between CAS and CAG patients regarding demographic characteristics, risk factors for stroke and baseline cognitive performance (p>0.05). CAS patients performed significantly better than CAG patients in Rey auditory verbal learning tests (RAVLT) at week 1 (41.2 +/- 5.2 versus 37.4 +/- 4.0, p<0.001) and week 12 follow-ups (43.3 +/- 7.7 versus 37.3 +/- 4.5, p<0.001). Comparison of z score also indicated CAS patients improved significantly more than CAG patients in RAVLT at both weeks 1 (1.08 +/- 1.29 versus 0.25 +/- 0.99, p<0.001) and 12 follow-ups (1.62 +/- 1.95 versus 0.05 +/- 1.02, p<0.001).

CONCLUSION

CAS patients demonstrated improvement in verbal memory after procedures. Correction of cerebral hypoperfusion and reduction of artery-to-artery embolization after CAS are postulated responsible for the cognitive improvement.

Cognitive function after carotid endarterectomy: greater risk of decline in symptomatic patients with left internal carotid artery disease

BACKGROUND

The risk of cognitive decline in patients undergoing carotid endarterectomy (CE) for left internal carotid artery (ICA) (LICA) disease before or after the occurrence of ischemic symptoms has not been fully elucidated. We evaluated whether patients undergoing CE for symptomatic LICA stenosis have greater risk of cognitive decline than patients with asymptomatic LICA disease or right ICA disease.

METHODS

In a series of patients aged 65 years and older, consecutively undergoing CE and free from cognitive impairment, cognitive function was evaluated through the age- and education-adjusted Mini Mental State Examination and the Clock Drawing Task at baseline and at the end of the study period (average follow-up: 44.4 +/- 14.3 months).

RESULTS

The analysis included 103 patients (mean age 72.6 +/- 7.0 years; 73 men), of whom 50 had LICA disease (29 symptomatic). At the end of the study period, Mini Mental State Examination score was reduced in patients with symptomatic LICA disease (P < .001) but not in other patients, whereas the Clock Drawing Task score was reduced in both patients with LICA and right ICA. Patients with symptomatic LICA disease had greater risk of cognitive decline than other individuals, either measured by the Mini Mental State Examination score (F = 5.18, P = .002) or by the Clock Drawing Task score (F = 9.42, P = .001).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients undergoing CE for symptomatic LICA disease appear to be at increased risk of cognitive decline than other individuals. Further studies are needed to confirm these findings and to evaluate whether LICA endarterectomy before occurrence of cerebrovascular ischemic symptoms may provide additive benefit in the prevention of cognitive decline.

Neuropsychological Changes in Patients with Carotid Stenosis after Carotid Endarterectomy

We investigated changes in neuropsychological function in patients with carotid stenosis following carotid endarterectomy (CEA) in relation to cerebral hemodynamics. The subjects were 24 patients who underwent CEA and 17 healthy controls matched by age, educational level, gender and handedness. Cerebral angiography, single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) and neuropsychological tests were performed approximately 1 week before and 3 weeks after CEA in all patients. In the patient group, the categories achieved in the new modified Wisconsin Card Sorting Test (WCST) improved significantly after CEA (4.0 +/- 2.0; before CEA: 2.3 +/- 2.1, p < 0.01). The perseverative errors of Nelson in the WCST improved significantly (before CEA: 9.1 +/- 6.9, after CEA: 3.3 +/- 3.4, p < 0.01). The difficulty maintaining set in the WCST improved significantly (before CEA: 2.3 +/- 1.9, after CEA: 1.3 +/- 1.7, p < 0.05). In the control group, none of the test scores showed significant improvement between the first and second tests. Moreover, frontal lobe function improved significantly in those patients with baseline carotid artery diameter of more than 70% of normal, or whose preoperative cerebral perfusion reserve was reduced by less than 15% of a response to acetazolamide. Our results suggest that CEA improves frontal lobe function in patients with severe carotid stenosis or reduced cerebral perfusion reserve.

Cognitive functions in patients with cerebrovascular disease: potential impact of revascularization

The purpose of this review is to assess the impact of luminal restoring of carotid artery stenosis on cognitive functions. Therefore, papers dealing with the neuropsychological influence of carotid artery stenosis and studies comparing the neuropsychological course after respective recanalization have been included.

Effects of carotid endarterectomy on cerebral blood flow and neuropsychological test performance in patients with high-grade carotid stenosis

We examined the changes in cognitive function following carotid endarterectomy (CEA) in relation to the cerebral blood flow (CBF) in patients with high-grade carotid stenosis. The subjects consisted of 23 patients who underwent CEA and 17 controls matched by age and education. Single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) and neuropsychological tests were performed 2 weeks before and 4 weeks after CEA in all patients. The preoperative CBF tests revealed a decreased vasodilatory reserve in the ipsilateral cerebral hemisphere in nine patients, which was increased after CEA. In these patients, the grade of carotid stenosis was significantly higher than in those with a normal perfusion reserve (90.2+/-8.1% vs. 78.6+/-11.3%, respectively, p<0.05). In the patient group, the postoperative scores (27.2+/-2.9) of the mini-mental state examination (MMSE) improved significantly over the preoperative ones (26.1+/-3.2, p<0.05). Moreover, the scores in the block-design test after CEA (86.8+/-19.8) were significantly higher than those before the operation (81.8+/-22.3, p<0.01). The error score in immediate retention improved from 9.0+/-3.1 to 7.7+/-4.0 following CEA (p<0.05). In the control group, none of the test scores showed significant improvement between the first and second tests. In the patients with an impaired vasodilatory reserve, the mean score of the block-design test significantly improved from 65.6+/-22.1 to 74.0+/-19.2 after CEA compared with those in patients without impairment (p<0.05). High-grade carotid stenosis was thus concluded to cause cognitive impairment due to cerebral hemodynamic failure, which is presumably reversed by CEA.

Improved quality of life among patients with symptomatic carotid artery disease undergoing carotid endarterectomy

BACKGROUND

Few studies have examined how carotid endarterectomy affects patients' view of their quality of life.

METHODS

Patients undergoing carotid endarterectomy from January 1996 to March 1997 at the John Radcliffe Hospital completed the United Kingdom Short Form 36 (SF-36) Health Survey Questionnaire before undergoing the procedure and again at 3 months afterward. Scores were compared with population normal values.

RESULTS

In 50 patients with symptomatic carotid artery disease, there was significant improvement in the SF-36 overall "change in health" score after the procedure compared with beforehand (61.0 +/- 3.7 vs 44.5 +/- 3.4, P =.003, Wilcoxon signed rank test). There were, however, no statistically significant differences in the group's mean SF-36 subscores after operation compared with before the procedure. The physical subscores were below age-adjusted healthy population means but similar to those for chronically ill patients (physical function subscore P =.015 vs normal, P =.89 vs ill; role limitation-physical subscore P =.007 vs normal, P =.89 vs ill). Patients with postoperative complications did not have an improved change in health score (-12.5 vs 22.0, P =.03, Mann-Whitney U test). There was no effect on change in health score because of other risk factors or in patients with contralateral carotid artery occlusion or a history of preoperative stroke.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with symptomatic carotid artery disease undergoing an uncomplicated carotid endarterectomy perceive improved quality of life and overall health. There is no perception of worsened pain, energy, or physical or mental function after the procedure. These results confirm that patients believe that performance of carotid endarterectomy improves their overall health, supporting the surgical approach to carotid artery disease.

Increase in alpha rhythm frequency after carotid endarterectomy

OBJECTIVES

Besides preventing stroke, carotid endarterectomy (CEA) is reported to improve cerebral circulation and brain function. We tested whether this improvement is reflected by changes in the qEEG.

METHODS

qEEG changes in 166 patients with a >70% stenosis of the internal carotid artery (ICA) were assessed after subtraction of the preoperative and postoperative spectra (eyes closed condition) before and 3 months after CEA. The mean frequency of the alpha band (MFA), the peak frequency of the alpha band (F alpha), and bands with limits relative to each patient's F alpha were studied in relation to neurological symptoms, patency or occlusion of the contralateral ICA, shunt requirement, and side of surgery.

RESULTS

MFA and F alpha significantly increased over both hemispheres. After alignment on F alpha, a decrease of spectral band power was seen below F alpha, and a band power increase above F alpha. The group of patients with a contralateral ICA occlusion showed significantly more improvement than the group without. The group of patients with neurological deficits showed a tendency for improvement. No differences were found concerning shunt requirement or the side of surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

After CEA the alpha rhythm frequency increases. In general, patients with a contralateral ICA occlusion improve more than other patients, in agreement with data from the literature on cerebral circulation and brain function.

Changes in health-related quality of life after carotid endarterectomy

OBJECTIVES

Carotid endarterectomy (CEA) is intended to prevent stroke and therefore to extend lifespan. Whether CEA also influences health-related quality of life (HRQOL) is largely unknown. This study aimed to assess HRQOL-changes after CEA.

DESIGN

Prospective study, data assessment within 1 week before and 3 months after CEA.

MATERIALS

Patient classification (n = 70) was based on presenting neurological symptoms (none (24), transient (26), or permanent (20)), patency or occlusion (27%) of the contralateral internal carotid artery and intraoperative shunt requirement (28%).

METHODS

HRQOL was investigated with the Sickness Impact Profile (SIP). Analysis of variance was used to adjust for the influence of preoperative differences in functional impairment and comorbidity on the changes found.

RESULTS

Preoperative findings showed that the SIP scores of stroke patients and shunted patients were significantly higher (indicating poorer HRQOL) than those of the other patients. No adverse effect of CEA was observed. Analysis of variance revealed that neurological classification was not reflected to HRQOL changes. However, patients with contralateral occlusion showed a significant postoperative improvement (f = 4.99, p < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

HRQOL improvement after CEA is restricted to patients with occlusion of the contralateral carotid artery. Assessment of outcome of CEA should be related not only to neurological classification, but also to haemodynamic factors such as contralateral occlusion.

Entering the ninth decade is not a contraindication for carotid endarterectomy

The role of carotid endarterectomy (CEA) in stroke prevention is now better defined. However, its role in patients older than 79 years of age is controversial. This group of patients has been excluded in most clinical trials. In this study the authors reviewed their experience with CEA patients >79 years old. The records of all patients older than 79 years of age who underwent a CEA in a recent time period from January 1988 to December 1996 were retrospectively reviewed. Forty-one patients (31 men, 10 women) were identified by computer search. The indication for operation included transient ischemic attack in 12 (29.3%), amaurosis fugax in nine (22%), stroke in two (4.9%), and nonhemispheric symptoms in three (7.3%). Fifteen patients (36.6%) were asymptomatic. Medical risk factors included coronary artery disease in 26 (63.4%), hypertension in 22 (53.7%), and smoking in 12 (29.3%). The procedure was performed under EEG monitoring in all patients. General anesthesia was administered in 37 (90%) and regional anesthesia in four (10%). Shunts were used in four (10%) patients. The internal carotid artery was patched in 16 patients (39%). One patient (2.4%) developed a perioperative stroke and only one patient developed perioperative myocardial infarction (MI). None of the patients died within 30 days of surgery. In addition to the one MI case, five patients developed minor complications. The average length of time for stay after CEA was 3.4 days. Patients were followed up for an average of 20.7 months. Six patients died during follow-up. Four of those died from an MI and two from a stroke. The authors conclude that with proper selection of patients, CEA is safe in the octogenarian. Age alone should not be a contraindication for CEA.

Health-related quality of life after transient ischemic attack and minor stroke: Is medical or surgical treatment influential?

Although randomized trials have proven the benefit of carotid endarterectomy (CEA) for appropriate patients, health care purchasers increasingly look beyond clinical outcome toward measures of cost effectiveness and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in apportioning limited resources. We used a generic HRQoL outcome scale, the Short Form 36 (SF-36), to assess the differences in patient-perceived HRQoL in two cohorts of patients who had suffered minor cerebral ischemic events. One group (n=100) had undergone CEA, whereas members of the second cohort (n=100) were not appropriate candidates for surgery and were therefore treated with best medical therapy. The overall response rate was 83%. No significant difference in health profile between the CEA and medical cohorts was detected for the eight SF-36 domains. However, the CEA cohort rated a significantly improved change in general health over the previous year compared with the group managed medically (P<.01). A greater proportion of the former group than of the medical group thought their treatment had been successful and that their health had been improved by treatment (P<.01). Both groups shared the same anxieties over future cerebral ischemic events (P=.3). Patients' perception of HRQoL measured by the SF-36 domains was almost identical between the CEA and medical cohorts apart from a small but significant improvement in self-reported overall health in the CEA cohort. HRQoL outcome measures may be of value in future clinical trials of cerebral revascularization.

Carotid artery surgery in the octogenarian

BACKGROUND

The value of carotid surgery is largely dependent on the safety of the procedure. With changes in population life expectancy, increasing numbers of elderly patients are being considered for surgery.

METHODS

In the present paper, the results of 113 patients (octogenarians: > 80 years of age) who underwent carotid endarterectomy in the 17 years prior to 1994 are reported. This group composed 6.2% of the 1818 patients treated in the period, 665 (36.6%) operations were performed on patients 50-65 years inclusive and 1040 (57.2%) on patients aged 66-80 years inclusive.

RESULTS

The overall peri-operative stroke rate was 2.5% and the postoperative mortality was 1.9% with no statistical difference apparent between the age groups despite hemispheric strokes being the most common indication for operation in the octogenarian group (29.5%) and the least common indication in the youngest age group (16.2%, P <0.01). Long-term follow up (2-7 years) of octogenarian patients undergoing carotid surgery suggested maintenance of pre-operative levels of living independence.

CONCLUSIONS

The results of the study indicated that octogenarian patients should not be denied carotid endarterectomy on the basis of age alone and that results comparable to those of younger patients can be anticipated.